• Police seek suspects in deadly birthday party shooting
  • Lawmakers launch inquires into U.S. boat strike
  • Nov. 29, 2025, 10:07 PM EST / Updated Nov. 30, 2025,…
  • Mark Kelly says troops ‘can tell’ what orders…

Be that!

contact@bethat.ne.com

 

Be That ! Menu   ≡ ╳
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics Politics
☰

Be that!

Black boxes from UPS cargo plane reveal alarm bell went off in cockpit before crash

admin - Latest News - November 8, 2025
admin
17 views 24 secs 0 Comments



The NTSB today revealed black box recordings captured an alarm bell beginning to go off in the cockpit of UPS Flight 2976 after the plane began its takeoff roll. At least 13 people were killed in the crash, including three UPS pilots. NBC News’ Tom Costello reports.



Source link

TAGS:
PREVIOUS
Nov. 8, 2025, 5:15 AM ESTBy Jeremy Mikula and Melinda YaoThe World Series ends in a thriller, a Democratic Party stalwart says goodbye, and Japan deploys troops to take on a wild species. Test your knowledge of this week’s news, and take last week’s quiz here. Jeremy MikulaJeremy Mikula is the weekend director of platforms for NBC News.Melinda YaoI am an intern for NBC News’ Data / Graphics team.David Hickey, Lara Horwitz and Kayla Hayempour contributed.
NEXT
Nov. 8, 2025, 6:00 AM EST / Updated Nov. 8, 2025, 6:07 AM ESTBy Erik OrtizWithin days of her arrival at a Texas prison camp in early August, Ghislaine Maxwell gushed in emails to her friends and family over the cleanliness and safety of her new surroundings.“The institution is run in an orderly fashion which makes for a safer more comfortable environment for all people concerned, inmates and guards alike,” wrote Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year prison sentence for recruiting minors to be sexually abused by her longtime confidant, the wealthy financier Jeffrey Epstein.Maxwell’s unexpected move to the all-women’s Federal Prison Camp Bryan, which houses inmates convicted of nonviolent offenses and white-collar crimes in dormitory-style quarters, drew immediate condemnation from current and former federal Bureau of Prisons employees. They said it was very unusual for prisoners with sex offenses on their records to be incarcerated in such an unconstrained setting, indicating Maxwell was receiving preferential treatment.For more on this story, watch NBC’s “Nightly News” tonight at 6:30 p.m. ET/5:30 p.m. CTMaxwell, 63, had been in a low-security federal correctional institution in Tallahassee, Florida, following her conviction in December 2021 on federal sex trafficking charges. FCI Tallahassee is more restrictive than a camp like FPC Bryan, where inmates have access to work programs, recreation and other activities and are often serving shorter sentences. Maxwell was moved days after meeting with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche in July.Federal Prison Camp Bryan in Bryan, Texas, houses about 635 prisoners.Brandon Bell / Getty ImagesNBC News has reviewed emails Maxwell sent during her first few months at FPC Bryan, which were obtained by the House Judiciary Committee. The emails describe Maxwell’s relief at being in a calmer facility without violence, where staff was polite and the food was better. “My situation is improved by being at Bryan,” she wrote in one email. “The kitchen looks clean too — no possums falling from the celling to fry unfortunately on ovens, and become mingled with the food being served,” she wrote in another, complaining about her previous prison.Maxwell also praised prison camp warden Tanisha Hall, whom Maxwell called a “true professional.”“I feel like I have dropped through Alice in Wonderlands looking glass,” Maxwell wrote to a relative, adding, “I am much much happier here and more importantly safe.”#embed-20251107-maxwell-email-1 iframe {width: 1px;min-width: 100%}The emails were shared with the House Judiciary Committee after the top Democrat on the committee, Rep. Jamie Raskin of Maryland, wrote a letter to Hall on Oct. 30 asking about Maxwell’s perceived “VIP treatment.” The letter cited a Wall Street Journal report last month describing special accommodations for Maxwell’s visitors and other perks, such as meals sent to her dormitory room, late-night workouts and her ability to shower after other inmates were already in bed for the night.Raskin’s inquiry raised other accusations made by inmates to the Journal that they have been threatened with retaliation if they speak about Maxwell to the media. At least one inmate who spoke with the Journal was transferred out of FPC Bryan after speaking about Maxwell, the newspaper reported.“While prison officials may limit inmates’ First Amendment rights to preserve security and order, you have provided no such justification for why prison security requires a ‘Ghislaine Maxwell’ gag order,” Raskin wrote, asking Hall to respond to his inquiry by Nov. 13, provide documentation and coordinate a visit for his staff to speak with inmates about their experiences.The warden faces a similar inquiry and deadline from Rep. Robert Garcia of California, the top Democrat on the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.The emails provided to NBC News and the House Judiciary Committee included messages from several inmates who expressed fear that they would be moved to higher-security facilities for mentioning Maxwell in phone calls or emails and said they believe she is receiving more care and attention than the typical prisoner. “They are even delivering her meals to her and NO inmates is allowed to prepare her meals,” one said.Hall, who began her career as a correctional officer at FPC Bryan in 1994 and has been its warden since 2023, did not respond to requests for comment. The Justice Department, which oversees the BOP, declined to comment.David Oscar Markus, a lawyer for Maxwell, said in response to NBC News’ request for comment about the congressional inquiries and the contents of her emails that “there’s nothing journalistic about publishing a prisoner’s private emails, including ones with her lawyers.”“That’s tabloid behavior, not responsible reporting,” Markus said in a statement. “Anyone still interested in that kind of gossip reveals far more about themselves than about Ghislaine. It’s time to get over the fact that she is in a safer facility. We should want that for everyone.”Ian Maxwell, Maxwell’s brother, said in an email to NBC News that messages between him and his sister are “personal and private by their very nature.”If those emails were sent to Congress and a reporter, he added, “then they were stolen and leaked without authorisation and represent a breach of intellectual property rights and the fundamental right of all citizens to privacy.”Maxwell’s emails indicate she’s able to access the warden for help, including arranging visits and communicating with her lawyers. In an email Maxwell sent to one of her attorneys in September, she noted that she spoke with the warden when she had a problem receiving documents by a deadline in her appeal before the Supreme Court.“Her creative solution was that you EM/scan it to her and she will scan back my changes!” Maxwell wrote, referring to her lawyer emailing the warden. “Of course that is fantastic as it saves days and days.”#embed-20251107-maxwell-email-0 iframe {width: 1px;min-width: 100%}Patrick McLain, a Dallas criminal defense attorney who has represented women at FPC Bryan, said it would be unusual for any warden to get involved with inmates’ cases and that “no way” would he expect Hall to give his clients at FPC Bryan the same personal attention as Maxwell described in the emails.“That’s a rare occurrence,” McLain said. “It would be like the head of a large corporation of a manufacturing plant regularly having contact with people on the assembly line.”FPC Bryan, located in a residential neighborhood and ringed with razor wire, houses about 635 prisoners.In other emails, Maxwell, a socialite and the daughter of a British media mogul, voiced her continued frustration with the media and “people selling rubbish stories and making money from their lies.”In October, when Sean “Diddy” Combs was sentenced to 50 months in federal prison on two counts of transporting former girlfriends for prostitution, Maxwell was paying attention, writing in an email: “What an intersting sentence for Diddy! Hmm.”Maxwell has been a central figure in the Epstein saga that has morphed into a major and ongoing political dispute.The guilty verdict in Maxwell’s sex abuse trial is read in a New York City courtroom on Dec. 29, 2021.Jane Rosenberg / ReutersEpstein died by suicide in a New York City jail in 2019 as he awaited trial on sex trafficking charges. While President Donald Trump initially said he supports full disclosure of investigative files in Epstein’s case, his administration has said it would not release all of the documents, prompting outcry from Democrats, some Republicans and parts of the president’s own base who have fueled conspiracy theories and pushed unfounded narratives surrounding Epstein’s death.The intrigue around Epstein only grew when Blanche met with Maxwell in July for nine hours over two days in a federal courthouse in Tallahassee. The details of their discussion were not immediately made public, but in the days that followed, Maxwell was moved from her Florida prison to FPC Bryan.The Justice Department in late August released transcripts from Maxwell’s meeting with Blanche, in which she said she never witnessed any inappropriate conduct by Trump or any other prominent figures in Epstein’s orbit. Trump, whose name appeared in the unsealed records as a friend of Epstein’s before they had a falling out, has not been accused by authorities of any wrongdoing.Markus, Maxwell’s attorney, has previously said that she is “innocent and never should have been tried, much less convicted, in this case.”In October, the Supreme Court declined to hear Maxwell’s appeal of her criminal conviction, leaving presidential clemency as her best shot at being freed before her projected 2037 release date.Following the Supreme Court’s decision, Trump told reporters that he would speak with the Justice Department and “would have to take a look” at whether he would consider a pardon.Maxwell’s arrival at FPC Bryan — a camp described by employees as being lax with security — led prison officials to ramp up protective measures, including patrol cars and surveillance cameras along the perimeter. Members of the BOP’s Special Operations Response Team, who are highly trained on disturbances and security breaches at federal prisons, arrived to check IDs at the front entrance.A BOP official attributed the enhanced security to Maxwell’s presence, but could not say whether there had been any direct threats to her, other inmates or FPC Bryan itself.Maxwell’s transfer also rankled some community members, who questioned why she was selected to come to Bryan, given her conviction on a sex offense.“We want a better prison system for all, but why is she being shown privilege when there are other people who are trying and putting in the work, and they don’t get to be moved here?” asked Raequel Rogers, a co-organizer of the Brazos Valley Community Coalition, a grassroots group that demonstrated in front of FPC Bryan in August. “It’s brought a lot of attention to our town that we haven’t consented for. We don’t want a child sex trafficker here.”The BOP’s policy indicates Maxwell should be ineligible for incarceration at a minimum-security prison camp because she is a convicted sex offender. Sex offenders must be in at least a low-security prison, as Maxwell was in Tallahassee, unless a waiver is granted by the administrator of the BOP’s Designation and Sentence Computation Center.McLain, the Dallas defense attorney, said one of his clients, Julie Howell, was transferred out of FPC Bryan after she was quoted in a news article saying inmates were angry about Maxwell’s placement among them. McLain said Howell was vocal because she has helped law enforcement find sex traffickers. Maxwell’s arrival also disrupted the other inmates’ routines, McLain said.“It’s made their lives all topsy-turvy,” he said.Howell was initially transferred from FPC Bryan to a detention center in Houston. But on Friday, McLain said, he learned Howell had finally been moved to a halfway house to complete her sentence.It was a silver lining after what happened to her in Bryan, McLain added: “Fortunately, the system is not totally rife with corruption.”Erik OrtizErik Ortiz is a senior reporter for NBC News Digital focusing on racial injustice and social inequality.
Related Post
October 18, 2025
'No Kings' human banner formed in San Francisco
November 9, 2025
Nov. 9, 2025, 2:55 PM ESTBy Alexandra MarquezThe U.S. Department of Agriculture said that states that issued full November SNAP benefits to recipients after a lower court decision allowed them to should “immediately undo” the distributions and that failure to comply could result in cancellation of future disbursement of federal funds. “To the extent States sent full SNAP payment files for November 2025, this was unauthorized. Accordingly, States must immediately undo any steps taken to issue full SNAP benefits for November 2025,” Patrick A. Penn, the Deputy Under Secretary Food, Nutrition, and Consumer Services, wrote on Saturday regarding the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP.“Failure to comply with this memorandum may result in USDA taking various actions, including cancellation of the Federal share of State administrative costs and holding States liable for any overissuances that result from the noncompliance,” he wrote.The latest memo was a reversal of earlier guidance the USDA had issued before the Supreme Court again paused the distribution of full SNAP benefits on Friday, sending the case back to the appeals court.The Friday memo said that the relevant agencies in the Trump administration would “complete the processes necessary to make funds available to support your subsequent transmittal of full issuance files to your EBT processor.”Saturday’s memo comes amid a fast-moving legal battle over whether the federal government should continue to disburse SNAP benefits — also known as food stamps — to over 40 million Americans who usually receive them during the ongoing federal government shutdown.SNAP benefits were funded for October, the first month of the shutdown, but at the end of the month, the USDA posted a message on its website informing Americans that SNAP benefits wouldn’t be dispersed in November, telling them that “the well has run dry” and blaming Democrats for the lapse.Two separate lawsuits were filed in Rhode Island and Massachusetts ahead of Nov. 1 seeking to force the federal government to release the funds.In response to one of the lawsuits, the USDA allowed SNAP benefits to be partially released. Then, last week, a federal judge ordered the Trump administration to pay SNAP benefits in full for November. States began to disburse the funds as quickly as possible last week. But on Friday, the Supreme Court allowed the Trump administration to temporarily halt SNAP payments for November.The USDA guidance on Saturday did not explain to states how they should claw back funding that may have already gone out to SNAP recipients.On Sunday, Gov. Maura Healey, D-Mass., said that SNAP recipients in her state should continue to spend their funds and threatened to sue the Trump administration.”If President Trump wants to penalize states for preventing Americans from going hungry, we will see him in court. Massachusetts residents with funds on their cards should continue to spend it on food. These funds were processed in accordance with guidance we received from the Trump Administration and a lower court order, and they were processed before the Supreme Court order on Friday night,” Healey said in a statement.Gov. Tony Evers, D-Wis., in response to the USDA’s request to undo SNAP disbursements, simply said in a statement, “No.”“Our administration is actively in court fighting against the Trump Administration’s efforts to yank food assistance away from Wisconsin’s kids, families, and seniors, and we are eager for the court to resolve this issue,” he added.Alexandra MarquezAlexandra Marquez is a politics reporter for NBC News.Gary Grumbach contributed.
October 26, 2025
2 arrests made in breakthrough for Louvre heist probe
November 5, 2025
Nov. 4, 2025, 8:36 PM EST / Updated Nov. 4, 2025, 9:07 PM ESTBy Jane C. TimmPennsylvania voters approved the retention of three state Supreme Court justices, NBC News projects, preserving Democrats’ 5-2 majority on the battleground state’s high court.Justices Christine Donohue, Kevin Dougherty and David Wecht all survived an up-or-down vote to keep their seats on the bench. Dougherty and Wecht each won another 10-year term, while Donohue will serve until 2027, when she’ll reach the mandatory retirement age of 75 for justices.Pennsylvania judges and justices must stand for retention every 10 years, when voters can vote “yes” or “no” to keep them on the bench. Very few Pennsylvania Supreme Court justices have lost their jobs this way, as retention elections are typically low-profile affairs. But with Democrats’ majority at stake in one of the country’s premier swing states ahead of the 2026 and 2028 elections, this year’s races drew outsize money and attention on both sides. Democrats and their allies spent aggressively in the final stretch of the race, pouring more than $13 million into TV ads since October 1st, compared to the $2.8 million spent on the Republican side. In one TV ad, the trio of judges appeared together to tell voters “we protected access to abortion. And your right to vote. Even when the powerful came after it.” Prominent Democrats backed the incumbent justices, who appeared on the ballot without any party designation. Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro, who faces re-election next year and is viewed as a potential 2028 Democratic presidential contender, appeared in an ad on the justices’ behalf. And former President Barack Obama posted on social media urging Pennsylvanians to vote “yes” on retention.President Donald Trump also weighed in at the last minute, urging Pennsylvanians to “Vote ‘NO, NO, NO’ on Liberal Justices Donohue, Dougherty, and Wecht” in a Truth Social post on Sunday night. Pennsylvania’s Supreme Court has decided several big cases in recent years, particularly related to elections. The Democratic-controlled court struck down a GOP-drawn congressional map in 2018 and upheld a mail voting law four years later. Last year, Democratic justices overturned a precedent upholding Medicaid’s ban on covering abortions.If all three justices had lost, Pennsylvania’s high court would have been deadlocked 2-2 through the end of 2027, threatening the high court’s ability to decide major cases and set legal precedents, which require agreement from four justices.“It would be disastrous,” Wecht warned of such an outcome in an interview with NBC News ahead of the election. “Precedent is the whole reason for our court. We’re not just deciding Smith versus Jones, we’re deciding a question of law that applies for now and in the future throughout Pennsylvania for everybody.”Jane C. TimmJane C. Timm is a senior reporter for NBC News.
Comments are closed.
Scroll To Top
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics
© Copyright 2025 - Be That ! . All Rights Reserved