• Police seek suspects in deadly birthday party shooting
  • Lawmakers launch inquires into U.S. boat strike
  • Nov. 29, 2025, 10:07 PM EST / Updated Nov. 30, 2025,…
  • Mark Kelly says troops ‘can tell’ what orders…

Be that!

contact@bethat.ne.com

 

Be That ! Menu   ≡ ╳
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics Politics
☰

Be that!

Man behind viral Jonas Brothers resume speaks out

admin - Latest News - November 14, 2025
admin
16 views 6 secs 0 Comments



Man behind viral Jonas Brothers resume speaks out



Source link

TAGS:
PREVIOUS
Police chase runaway pig on I-40 in New Mexico
NEXT
Nov. 14, 2025, 5:00 AM ESTBy Allan SmithA new study found the total value of blocked or delayed data center projects during a three-month stretch earlier this year exceeded the total in the prior two years, signaling accelerating opposition to a foundational piece of artificial intelligence development in the U.S.The study — conducted by Data Center Watch, a project of AI intelligence firm 10a Labs that tracks local data center activity — found that an estimated $98 billion in data center projects were blocked or delayed from late March through June. That compares to $64 billion worth of projects that were blocked or delayed between 2023 and late March 2025.“Opposition to data centers is accelerating,” the authors wrote in the report, shared exclusively with NBC News. “As political resistance builds and local organizing becomes more coordinated, this is now a sustained and intensifying trend.”Leaders in both parties are locked in competition to encourage tech giants to put sprawling data centers in their states, looking for an economic leg up and an innovation edge in the early days of the artificial intelligence boom. But resident backlash has intensified in recent months as the projects have contributed to rising electricity bills, among other concerns.This month in Virginia, data centers were at the center of the campaign in one of the state legislative districts Democrats flipped, with Democratic challenger John McAuliff accusing Republican incumbent Geary Higgins of allowing the “unchecked growth” of data centers, while Higgins said in one of his own ads, “We need to ensure that data centers aren’t built near homes or in our open spaces.”Meanwhile, Meta is running a TV ad in markets around the country in which a longtime resident of Altoona, Iowa, praises the company for opening a data center in the town, saying it brought different kinds of jobs there, according to AdImpact, an ad-tracking firm.In a statement to NBC News last month, Dan Diorio, vice president of state policy for the Data Center Coalition, a group that advocates on behalf of the industry, highlighted the jobs, tax revenue and economic development connected to data center growth, adding the industry “is committed to paying its full cost of service for the energy it uses, including transmission costs.”The new study from Data Center Watch found that key projects were blocked or delayed in Indiana, Kentucky, Georgia and South Dakota, among other states. The researchers tracked “active opposition efforts” in 17 states, with 53 different groups taking action against 30 projects. Those opposition groups were successful in blocking or delaying two out of every three projects they protested, the report said, “underscoring the growing impact of organized local resistance.”“Opposition is cross-partisan and geographically mixed,” the researchers wrote. “Blue and red states alike are tightening rules or rethinking incentives; legislators in places like Virginia, Minnesota, and South Dakota are scrutinizing subsidies, grid impacts, and local authority, often cutting across traditional party lines.”“As development expands and media attention intensifies, local groups are learning from one another,” the researchers added. “Petitions, public hearings, and grassroots organizing are reshaping approval processes — especially in Indiana and Georgia.”The report’s authors cautioned, though, that such organized opposition can’t exclusively explain project delays, noting that multiple dynamics have played roles. That said, the authors wrote: “Political, regulatory, and community opposition is accelerating in both scale and frequency.”And the authors noted that data center tax incentives are starting to be rolled back as well.“Lawmakers are increasingly questioning the value of data center subsidies, citing concerns around energy use, fairness, and infrastructure impact,” the authors wrote.Political leaders are only recently gaining awareness of the opposition. One Pennsylvania official, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss the issue candidly, said they have seen opposition to data center projects sprout in Cumberland and York counties.“I am conflicted on the data centers because I don’t believe in holding back technology. I don’t support degrowth. We should be building great things,” this person said, adding: “I think the economic promise of data centers is muddy at best for the places that put them in.”This person said the opposition to the projects “is all grassroots-driven.”“People are really pissed off,” this person said. “They’re like, ‘I’m sick of this s—. I don’t get anything out of this.’ And I think people are a little freaked out by AI. I worry that people are a little blind to the public animosity.”Allan SmithAllan Smith is a political reporter for NBC News.
Related Post
November 20, 2025
White House responds to Trump's 'quiet piggy' remark
October 22, 2025
Oct. 22, 2025, 11:05 AM EDTBy Mirna Alsharif and Selina GuevaraLawyers gave their opening statements to a jury at the Peoria County Courthouse on Wednesday morning, officially kicking off the trial of a former Illinois deputy accused of fatally shooting Sonya Massey.Sean Grayson, 31, shot Massey, a 36-year-old Black mother of two, in June 2024 after she called authorities to her Springfield home about a possible prowler. The former Sangamon County sheriff’s deputy, who is white, said in a report written after the incident that he feared bodily harm because Massey was holding a pot of boiling water and said, “I rebuke you in the name of Jesus.”Nearly two weeks later, Grayson was fired and charged with first-degree murder, one count of aggravated battery and one count of official misconduct. He pleaded not guilty and was held in jail pending trial.On Tuesday, the aggravated battery and official misconduct charges were dropped at the request of the prosecutors with no objection from the defense, according to the court docket.Jury selection began Monday when a jury of 10 women and five men was selected. No cameras are allowed in the courtroom.John Milhiser, the state’s attorney for Sangamon County, said in his opening statement that Grayson did not turn on his body camera that night, which is part of a pattern of not following policies or training. He said Grayson shot Massey because he was angry. “It will be clear that the defendant, without lawful justification, in the home of Sonya Massey, the defendant shot and killed Sonya Massey because he was mad at her,” Milhiser told the court. Grayson’s attorney, Daniel L Fultz, said in his opening statement that evidence will show that the former deputy lawfully discharged his weapon and acted to protect his life. “He believed he would suffer great bodily harm or death,” he said. He said that Grayson had warned Massey to put down the pot of water before firing his weapon. “What happened to Ms. Massey was a tragedy, but it was not a crime,” Fultz said. Grayson appeared in court wearing a black suit and glasses. He sometimes rocked back and forth in his chair and glanced at the courtroom gallery, where media and members of Massey’s family were seated. Massey’s killing triggered a national response, igniting protests across the country. Protesters gathered outside the courthouse Monday to call for justice for Massey, who had mental health issues, according to her family.Her death raised new questions about U.S. law enforcement shootings of Black people in their homes and it prompted a change in Illinois law requiring fuller transparency on the background of candidates for law enforcement jobs.The trial is expected to last a week and a half.Mirna AlsharifMirna Alsharif is a breaking news reporter for NBC News.Selina GuevaraSelina Guevara is an NBC News associate producer, based in Chicago.Minyvonne Burke contributed.
October 9, 2025
Oct. 9, 2025, 5:00 AM EDTBy Dareh GregorianPresident Donald Trump’s efforts to deploy National Guard troops in states that don’t want them will be tested in two different courts Thursday.Lawyers for Chicago and Illinois will go before a federal judge to try to block troops from being deployed in the country’s third most populous city, while attorneys for Portland and Oregon will urge a federal appeals court to leave in place a restraining order against troop deployments there.The hearings — in Chicago and San Francisco — are set to begin at noon ET in courthouses about 2,000 miles apart.“We’re looking for the courts to do the right thing,” Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker, a Democrat, told reporters Wednesday.Trump defended his actions in both states. “Everything we’re doing is very lawful. What they’re doing is not lawful,” he said at the White House later Wednesday.Illinois sued Monday seeking to block the administration from deploying federalized National Guard troops on the streets of Chicago, contending it’s illegal, unconstitutional and unnecessary.Trump ordered the deployment over the weekend. U.S. Northern Command said that 500 National Guard members have been mobilized — 300 from Illinois and 200 from Texas — and that some of the troops from Texas were on duty “in the greater Chicago area” as of Wednesday night.“These forces will protect U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and other U.S. Government personnel who are performing federal functions, including the enforcement of federal law, and to protect federal property,” Northern Command said in a statement.The lawsuit argues that there’s no emergency in Chicago and that the administration has been trying to provoke unrest by increasing the presence of federal law agents who are using “unprecedented, brute force tactics for civil immigration enforcement.”Those tactics include shooting “chemical munitions at groups that included media and legal observers” at an ICE facility outside Chicago and staging a dramatically produced raid at an apartment building in which agents rappelled down from Black Hawk helicopters.“The community’s horror at these tactics and their significant consequences have resulted in entirely foreseeable protests,” the suit said.“The deployment of federalized National Guard, including from another state, infringes on Illinois’s sovereignty and right to self-governance” and “will cause only more unrest,” it added.The White House has maintained that Trump is trying to keep American cities and federal personnel safe. Trump said this week that if the courts wind up derailing his efforts to use the National Guard, he could invoke the Insurrection Act, which would empower him to use the U.S. military domestically.Trump floats invoking Insurrection Act amid showdown with Democratic-led cities12:07″The Trump administration is committed to restoring law and order in American cities that are plagued by violence due to Democrat mismanagement. And President Trump will not stand by while violent rioters attack federal law enforcement officers,” White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson said in a statement Wednesday.The administration is expected to make similar arguments to a three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit of Appeals in San Francisco, which it’s asking to pause a federal judge’s order in Oregon over the weekend blocking the state’s National Guard from being federalized and deployed.The “extraordinary” order by U.S. District Judge Karen Immergut “improperly impinges on the Commander in Chief’s supervision of military operations, countermands a military directive to officers in the field, and endangers federal personnel and property,” Justice Department attorneys contended in their court filing.They also noted that the 9th Circuit blocked a similar restraining order this year involving National Guard troops in Los Angeles and held then that the president’s judgment about whether troops are needed should get “a great level of deference.”White House expects it will win lawsuit challenging deployment of National Guard to Portland12:06Immergut, a Trump appointee, said in her order that the Portland case is different from the California one, in part because it appears Trump was acting in bad faith with his exaggerated claims of violence in the city, including that it was “war ravaged” with “ICE Facilities under siege from attack by Antifa” and “crazy people” who “try to burn down buildings, including federal buildings” every night.While there had been some violent protests in June, demonstrations “were not significantly violent or disruptive in the days — or even weeks — leading up to the President’s directive on September 27,” Immergut wrote, describing the protests as mostly “small and uneventful.””On September 26, the eve of the President’s directive, law enforcement ‘observed approximately 8-15 people at any given time out front of ICE. Mostly sitting in lawn chairs and walking around. Energy was low, minimal activity,’” her order said.Dareh GregorianDareh Gregorian is a politics reporter for NBC News.
October 17, 2025
Trump asks Supreme Court to allow National Guard deployment in Illinois
Comments are closed.
Scroll To Top
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics
© Copyright 2025 - Be That ! . All Rights Reserved