• Police seek suspects in deadly birthday party shooting
  • Lawmakers launch inquires into U.S. boat strike
  • Nov. 29, 2025, 10:07 PM EST / Updated Nov. 30, 2025,…
  • Mark Kelly says troops ‘can tell’ what orders…

Be that!

contact@bethat.ne.com

 

Be That ! Menu   ≡ ╳
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics Politics
☰

Be that!

Acting FEMA head resigns

admin - Latest News - November 17, 2025
admin
13 views 12 secs 0 Comments




David Richardson, the acting administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, resigned Monday, two administration officials confirmed to NBC News.



Source link

TAGS:
PREVIOUS
Nov. 17, 2025, 2:09 PM ESTBy David K. LiAn Indiana homeowner was charged in connection to the fatal shooting of a house cleaner who arrived at the wrong address before she was gunned down outside that front door, officials said Monday.Curt Anderson, 62, will face one count of voluntary manslaughter, Boone County Prosecutor Kent Eastwood announced.The prosecutor acknowledged that Indiana has strong protections for self-defense, but said those protections did not apply in this instance.”It is vitally important for the citizens of Boone County to understand that our decision today in no way should be interpreted as a challenge to Indiana’s stand your ground law, a person’s right to self-defense,” Eastwood told reporters.Rios Perez, a 32-year-old Guatemalan immigrant, was killed on Nov. 5 after she and her husband mistakenly went to the wrong home in anticipation of a day’s work as house cleaners in the Indianapolis suburb of Whitestown.She was shot in the head and died in the arms of husband Mauricio Velásquez, family members said.Perez had four children, ranging in age from 11 months to 17. The prosecutor will have to overcome Indiana code that grants wide latitude to Hoosier state residents to use “reasonable” force “to prevent serious bodily injury to the person.” “It is vague (what is reasonable),” said Indianapolis defense attorney Courtney Benson-Kooy, who serves on the executive committee of the Indiana Bar’s Criminal Justice Section. “It’s going to be completely up to the jury to determine whether the person actually believed that they were in fear or that (lethal) force was necessary.” This is a developing story. Please check back for updates.David K. LiSenior Breaking News ReporterDaniella Silva contributed.
NEXT
Judge: Comey case 'missteps' could lead to dismissed charges
Related Post
November 3, 2025
Nov. 3, 2025, 10:38 AM ESTBy Corky SiemaszkoIt is, in many ways, a quintessentially American unsolved murder mystery.The victim was a rich and beautiful teenage girl found beaten to death with a golf club in a ritzy and supposedly safe Connecticut suburb. There was national news media frenzy followed by a stymied police investigation. And at the center of it all, there was murder suspect Michael Skakel, who also happens to be related to the fabled Kennedy family. Eventually, there would be celebrity cameos from another high-profile murder investigation in this unfolding drama.But 50 years after the 15-year-old was found dead beneath a tree in the backyard of her family home, there still is no definitive answer to the question: Who killed Martha Moxley?Undated photo of Martha Moxley released as evidence during the trial of Michael Skakel.Getty Images fileNow, for the first time since his conviction in the killing of Moxley was overturned in 2013, Skakel is speaking at length about the death in Greenwich that sent him to prison for more than 11 years.“Um, my name is Michael Skakel and why am I being interviewed?” he asks veteran journalist Andrew Goldman in “Dead Certain: The Martha Moxley Murder,” NBC News Studios’ new podcast that makes its debut Tuesday. “I mean, that’s kind of a big question, isn’t it?”On several occasions, Skakel and his brother Stephen Skakel were interviewed at the modest rental home they share in Norwalk, Connecticut, which is a far cry from the mansion in which they grew up.“For the first half of the 20th century, the Skakels were incalculably rich robber baron rich, a kind of wealth we now associate with the Koch brothers. Certainly richer than the Kennedys,” Goldman said. “Not so anymore.”The first five episodes of the podcast delve into the history of the murder case that transfixed the country after Moxley was found dead Oct. 31, 1975, setting off a hunt for her killer that continues to this day.Goldman is not new to the Moxley case; he ghostwrote “Framed: Why Michael Skakel Spent Over a Decade in Prison for a Murder He Didn’t Commit,” a 2016 bestseller by Skakel’s cousin, now-Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. After finishing his work on the book, Goldman continued to reinvestigate the case on his own for nearly a decade.But Goldman, in the podcast, admits he wasn’t initially sold on the idea of Skakel being innocent.“When I first met him back in 2015, to be honest, being in the same room with him made me physically uncomfortable,” Goldman says. “The media coverage of the case had convinced me I was shaking a murderer’s hand.”Skakel is the fifth of seven children born to Rushton and Anne Skakel, who were fabulously wealthy and ultraconservative Catholics. They were the nieces and nephews of Ethel Skakel Kennedy, the widow of Robert F. Kennedy. The Skakel children lost their mother to cancer in 1972 and their father struggled with alcoholism.The family lived across the street from the Moxleys in a Tudor-style mansion.Moxley was last seen alive Oct. 30, 1975, when she was hanging out with a group of friends that included then 15-year-old Skakel and his older brother Thomas Skakel on Mischief Night, which is the night before Halloween when children roam the neighborhood and pull pranks such as ringing doorbells and toilet-papering trees and yards.Described by friends as “joy on legs,” the vivacious teen was found dead the next day in the brush on her family’s property with her pants and underwear pulled down.An autopsy revealed Moxley had not been sexually assaulted, but had been bludgeoned and stabbed in the neck with a broken six-iron golf club that was traced back to the Skakel home.Skakel wasn’t the first person police suspected of killing Moxley. Thomas Skakel landed on investigators’ radar well before him because he was seen flirting with her before she died. Later, police focused on the Skakel children’s live-in tutor, Kenneth Littleton. Neither were charged with a crime.Skakel said in the podcast that his life was a horror show before Moxley died.Skakel said his father beat him at age 9 when he found him with some Playboy magazines and often beat him for no reason at all.“He was about as Orthodox Catholic as it got,” Skakel said of his father. “I just never knew when it was going to happen. I didn’t know why it happened.”During Skakel’s sentencing hearing in 2002, his lawyer submitted 90 letters from people close to him that included details of abuse he allegedly suffered at the hands of his father.Skakel said his mother was cold and left most of the child-rearing to the household help. When he broke his neck at age 4, he said, his mother barely visited him during his two-month stay in the hospital.“She wasn’t really touchy-feely,” he said.When his mother got sick, Skakel said his father blamed him.“If you only did better in school, your mother wouldn’t have to be in the hospital,” Skakel recalled his father telling him. “And I remember just going, ‘Oh, my God, I wanted to die. I just wanted to die’.”Skakel said he was around 12 years old when his mother died. And like his father, he sought solace in drinking. He was sent away to a private school in Maine after he was caught driving under the influence at age 17. He said he was subjected to beatings from his classmates at Elan School. The school, which aimed to help troubled teens, closed down in 2011.“They literally picked me up over their head and carried me downstairs like I was a crash test dummy,” Skakel said of one beating. “And when I was probably 10 feet from the stage, they threw me. And I thought I broke my, my back on the stage.”Skakel made it through reform school and rebuilt his life. He stopped drinking in 1982, got married in 1991 and later had a son. He earned a college degree in 1993 and competed on the international speed skiing circuit.Meanwhile, the long-stalled Moxley investigation was revived after another Skakel relative, William Kennedy Smith, was tried and acquitted in 1991 for an unrelated rape. Amid the tabloid frenzy of that case, an unfounded rumor emerged that he had been at the Skakel home on the night that Moxley died.The speculation around Smith went nowhere, but the media attention breathed new life into the stalled Moxley case. And that prompted Skakel’s father to fund a private investigation aimed at clearing the family name.That move backfired. The end result was a report that was leaked to the media, casting doubt on the alibis of Thomas and Michael Skakel.Among the revelations was Michael Skakel’s admission that on the night of the murder, he climbed a tree by Moxley’s house and tossed pebbles at her window. When she didn’t come out, he masturbated while sitting in the tree.Pressure to reinvestigate the Moxley killing ratcheted up further in 1993 when author Dominick Dunne published a novel called “A Season in Purgatory” based on the Moxley murder. That was followed five years later by “Murder in Greenwich,” which was written by disgraced O.J. Simpson detective Mark Fuhrman and which named Michael Skakel as Moxley’s likely murderer.Two years later, on March 14, 2000, Skakel, 39, was arrested after investigators secured testimony from two former classmates at the Elan School who claimed he confessed to killing Moxley.Skakel was arraigned on a murder charge in juvenile court because he was 15 at the time of the crime. The case was later moved to regular court. He said his lawyer, Mickey Sherman, promised him that he’d never see the inside of a courtroom.But two years later, Skakel was convicted of killing Moxley and sentenced to 20 years to life in prison. He was released in 2013 after his conviction was overturned.The judge ruled that Skakel had been denied a fair trial because, among other things, Sherman had failed to contact a witness who could have provided his client with an alibi. And in 2020, the state dropped the case against Skakel saying it would not be able to prove the case against him beyond a reasonable doubt.“Mickey Sherman basically proved to be the anti-Nostradamus,” Goldman says in the podcast. “Every one of his predictions turned out to be dead wrong.”Corky SiemaszkoCorky Siemaszko is a senior reporter for NBC News Digital.
November 20, 2025
Trump approved 28-point plan for peace between Russia and Ukraine
November 23, 2025
Nov. 22, 2025, 5:00 AM ESTBy Aria BendixAt least four families have sued infant formula maker ByHeart saying their babies contracted botulism from contaminated formula, as the company faces ongoing scrutiny from federal investigators and a separate class action lawsuit filed last week.In the lawsuits, affected families described harrowing days or weeks in the hospital with their babies, who were placed on IVs and feeding tubes. Many said they had chosen ByHeart’s formula because it contained organic whole milk and minimal additives, making it seem like the healthiest option.The company said in a statement Wednesday that laboratory tests had identified Clostridium botulinum spores in samples of its formula. ByHeart told NBC News that it could not comment on pending litigation and that “the company is focused on the recall and root cause investigation at this time.”According to the Food and Drug Administration, 31 infants who consumed the formula have suspected or confirmed botulism. The cases span 15 states, and all have required hospitalization. No deaths have been reported.ByHeart recalls infant formula sold nationwide due to serious health risks02:03The bacteria that causes botulism can grow in foods that aren’t properly canned or preserved, and it produces a toxin that attacks the nerves. The resulting illness can cause difficulty breathing, muscle paralysis or death.ByHeart said on its website that it has not identified the root cause of the contamination but has shared its test results with the FDA.“We immediately notified the FDA of those findings, and we are working to investigate the facts, conduct ongoing testing to identify the source, and ensure this does not happen to families again,” it said.In an interview with NBC News, Hanna Everett said she started giving ByHeart formula to her daughter, Piper, at around 2 months old. By early this month, Piper was constipated and drooling excessively, and her left eye seemed droopy, Everett said. A friend sent her a link to the ByHeart recall.“Sure enough, the can she had just finished that day was the exact lot number that was affected,” said Everett, who lives in Richmond, Kentucky.Piper was admitted to a children’s hospital on Nov. 9, where she was diagnosed with botulism. Everett said the sight of doctors and nurses struggling to administer IVs and a feeding tube made her throw up.Hanna Everett’s daughter, Piper, in the hospital.Courtesy Hanna EverettTwo friends had to physically prop her up, she said, “because I was just bawling.”“They’re holding your child down that’s not even 4 months old technically at the time, and she’s just screaming bloody murder. And there’s nothing you can do,” Everett said.Piper was given a botulism antitoxin via an IV drip. The treatment isn’t readily stocked at hospitals, so it had to be flown in. Everett said Piper’s condition has improved; she was released from the hospital roughly a week ago.Hanna Everett with her daughter, Piper.Courtesy Hanna EverettBut Everett is still wracked with guilt.“It feels like I let her down when I know that’s not the case. It’s hard to tell yourself that as a mother, because you’re going to blame yourself,” she said.Everett and her husband, Michael, sued ByHeart last week, seeking damages for medical expenses, pain and suffering.“It makes me more angry and just sick to my stomach that it took them as long as it did to own up to this,” she said. “It’s almost like too little, too late.”Everett said she messaged ByHeart about the recall while Piper was in the hospital, and it offered to send her more formula cans.Darin Detwiler, a professor of food regulatory policy at Northeastern University, agreed that ByHeart should have taken comprehensive action more quickly.“They should have identified this on their own, and they should have been forthcoming immediately,” he said.After the FDA alerted ByHeart to the potential link between its formula and the botulism outbreak, the company initially recalled just two lots. The following day, ByHeart posted on its website that there was not enough evidence to link its product to the illnesses because a sample that had tested positive for botulism bacteria came from an opened can, which “can be contaminated in multiple ways.”In court filings, parents suing ByHeart have described states of terror.In the latest suit, filed on Wednesday, a Washington state couple said their daughter had chronic constipation, difficulty feeding and extreme fatigue while taking the formula. She was admitted to the emergency room at 2 months old, the filing says.The family left the hospital on Wednesday, according to the suit. The mother, Madison Wescott, said she doesn’t produce enough milk to satisfy her daughter’s needs without formula.“Knowing that I can’t fully feed my child, and I can’t trust formula companies has really taken a toll on our family,” Wescott said in the suit.In California, Anthony Barbera and Thalia Flores exclusively fed their son ByHeart formula after he was born, according to their lawsuit. By the time their son received the antitoxin for botulism at the hospital, he was no longer eating, connected to multiple IV lines and too weak to cry, their lawsuit says.Arizona parents Stephen and Yurany Dexter said in their lawsuit that their daughter stopped eating altogether in August, refusing the bottle of formula as soon as it touched her lips. She was transported by air ambulance to a children’s hospital. The couple said they feared she might die or never recover fully.Bill Marler, a lawyer representing the Dexters, Wescotts and Barbera and Flores, said ByHeart has “a lot to answer for.”“If there’s a product that should be safe, it should be infant formula,” he said.Before this, no botulism outbreaks had ever been linked to infant formula in the U.S. Formula makers aren’t required to regularly test for Clostridium botulinum, but they must follow sanitary control practices to prevent contamination and are subject to FDA inspections.Most of the major formula recalls in recent years — including the 2022 Abbott Nutrition recall, which contributed to a national formula shortage — were because of potential contamination with a different bacteria, Cronobacter sakazakii. ByHeart also recalled batches of its formula in December 2022 because of possible Cronobacter contamination.In 2023, the FDA sent a warning letter to ByHeart describing “significant violations” at its manufacturing facility in Pennsylvania. The FDA said that ByHeart attributed a batch of formula that tested positive for Cronobacter to a laboratory error, though the lab denied that that was the case. The agency also said there were two water leaks at the facility, and that ByHeart did not evaluate a potential link between the leaks and formula that later tested positive for Cronobacter.ByHeart’s website states that it “undertook action to address the issues and there are no open issues from that warning letter.” The Pennsylvania facility was not involved in the production of formula in the current recall, the company said.Abigail Snyder, an associate professor of microbial food safety at Cornell University, said an FDA warning letter like the one ByHeart got is “pretty unusual,” though there was increased regulatory activity around infant formula after the Abbott recall.“Fewer ingredients and whole milk is a different attribute than microbial safety, unfortunately,” she said.Aria BendixAria Bendix is the breaking health reporter for NBC News Digital.Kenzi Abou-Sabe contributed.
October 21, 2025
Oct. 21, 2025, 10:36 AM EDTBy Elmira AliievaThe Kremlin denied Tuesday that it was holding up President Donald Trump’s latest push to end the war in Ukraine, and insisted it had not changed its demands ahead of possible talks.Trump had announced that Russia and the United States’ top diplomats would meet this week, with his own summit with Vladimir Putin to follow in Budapest, Hungary. Russian officials have now said there was no date set for either meeting. “We cannot postpone what has not been agreed upon,” Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov told Russia’s TASS state news agency early Tuesday. He was responding to a CNN report that the meeting between Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov had been put on hold indefinitely.Ryabkov said there had been no clear agreement on when or where such a meeting might take place.Trump and Putin met in Anchorage in August.Andrew Harnik / Getty Images”Everything is in progress, internal work is ongoing. As new information becomes available, we will keep you informed,” he told state media journalists.The White House did not immediately respond to NBC News’ request for comment. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov echoed Ryabkov’s comments when talking about the Trump-Putin summit in Budapest. “You can’t postpone something that hasn’t been agreed upon,” Peskov said in his daily briefing.“You heard statements from both the American side and our side that this may take time. Therefore, no precise timeframe was initially set,” he said. Rubio and Lavrov held a call Monday where they discussed the “next steps” in preparing a summit between the two presidents, according to the State Department.Lavrov and Rubio in Anchorage, Alaska, on Aug. 15.Andrew Caballero-Reynolds / AFP – Getty Images“Marco Rubio and I discussed the current situation and how we could prepare a mutually agreed framework for the next meeting between the presidents of Russia and the United States,” Lavrov said in a news conference on Tuesday. “The key point is not the venue or timing, but how we will proceed substantively on the tasks that were agreed upon and on which broad understanding was reached in Anchorage,” he said, referring to Trump and Putin’s meeting in Alaska in August. “We agreed to continue these telephone contacts to better assess where we currently stand and how to move forward in the right direction,” he added.Lavrov emphasized that the country’s position remains consistent with understandings reached between Putin and Trump during the Anchorage talks. “Those understandings are based on the agreement achieved at that time, which President Trump very succinctly formulated when he said that what is needed is a long-term, sustainable peace, not an immediate ceasefire that would lead nowhere,” he said. A damaged residential buildings after a Russian Geran-2 drone struck Sloviansk, Ukraine on Monday.Jose Colon / Anadolu via Getty ImagesOn Sunday, after both a call last week with Putin and then a meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in Washington, Trump said he supported the immediate halt to fighting as called for by Kyiv and its European allies.For now both sides should “stop at the battle line — go home, stop fighting, stop killing people,” he told reporters on board Air Force One. “They can negotiate something later on down the line,” he said.Leaders of European nations, including Britain, France, Germany, Ukraine, and the European Union issued a joint statement Tuesday supporting Trump’s efforts to end the fighting, and suggesting that Russia appeared unwilling to pursue a peace agreement at this stage.“We strongly support President Trump’s position that the fighting should stop immediately, and that the current line of contact should be the starting point of negotiations,” said the statement, published by the British government.“We must ramp up the pressure on Russia’s economy and its defense industry, until Putin is ready to make peace,” it said. In an interview with NBC News’ “Meet the Press” taped Friday, Zelenskyy urged Trump to get tougher with Putin and said he was ready to join their summit in Budapest.Hungary’s foreign minister, Peter Szijjarto, was in Washington on Tuesday. He posted on Facebook: “We have some serious days ahead.”Elmira AliievaElmira Aliieva is an NBC News intern based in London.
Comments are closed.
Scroll To Top
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics
© Copyright 2025 - Be That ! . All Rights Reserved