Police seek suspects in deadly birthday party shooting
Lawmakers launch inquires into U.S. boat strike
Nov. 29, 2025, 10:07 PM EST / Updated Nov. 30, 2025,…
Mark Kelly says troops ‘can tell’ what orders…

Be that!

contact@bethat.ne.com

Menu ≡ ╳

Home
Travel
Culture
Lifestyle
Sport
Contact Us
Politics Politics

Be that!

Wolf appears to use tool for the first time

admin - Latest News - November 18, 2025

admin

14 views 6 secs 0 Comments

Wolf appears to use tool for the first time

Source link

TAGS:

PREVIOUS

Border Patrol Arrests Expand to Raleigh Amid Protests

NEXT

Nov. 18, 2025, 9:28 AM ESTBy Alexander SmithTo hear President Donald Trump tell it, this was “one of the biggest approvals in the history of the United Nations,” a “moment of true historic proportion” that would ” lead to further peace all over the world.” But the gravity of the U.N. Security Council’s endorsement of the U.S. Gaza plan raised renewed questions Tuesday over how it will actually work. Most pressingly, it is not clear whether those at the heart of this conflict — the Palestinians and the Israelis themselves — actually support its end goals.Hamas, which still controls around half of the strip, outright rejected the resolution and said it robs Palestinians of their own agency, effectively allowing Trump free reign over the Gaza Strip for the next two years. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu welcomed its passage, but previously said he rejects its talk of “Palestinian self-determination and statehood” — which his far-right allies disavow.On a practical level, the proposal says it will require the creation of several as-yet-non-existent bodies, including the “Board of Peace” headed by Trump, and the International Stabilization Force, or ISF, whose troops could be drawn from Turkey, the United Arab Emirates and as far away as Indonesia. Displaced Palestinians try to protect their belongings from damage after heavy rain in the Austrian Quarter of Khan Younis, Gaza on Sunday.Abed Rahim Khatib / Anadolu via Getty ImagesThat said, this was a rare moment of geopolitical unity.Trump’s team won the support of Arab states by inserting language hinting at a future Palestinian state, and Russia and China abstained from the vote rather than using their vetoes to torpedo the proposal outright.In the event, it passed 13-0.Summarizing the mood Tuesday, U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres welcomed the vote as an “an important step,” but cautioned that it was “essential now to translate the diplomatic momentum into concrete and urgently needed steps on the ground,” his office said in a statement.It’s a sentiment shared by many observers.Frank Lowenstein, former special envoy for Israeli-Palestinian negotiations under President Barack Obama, told NBC News that passing the resolution was “essential” for Trump’s proposal.”There was no way this Trump plan could possibly work without a U.N. Security Council resolution,” he said. Not only will it impart “the credibility and the legitimacy and the clear support of the international community,” but it “provides an opportunity to begin creating a new reality, to begin moving forward with the process in a way that will give people hope.”He cautioned however that the resolution’s passage was “nowhere near sufficient,” principally because the U.N. has no enforcement mechanism, and that the ISF was immediately rejected by Hamas.The rubble of destroyed buildings in northern Gaza’s Jabalia Camp, on Sunday.Saeed M. M. T. Jaras / Anadolu via Getty ImagesThe resolution claims that “the parties” to the conflict “have accepted it.” But it’s not clear that is the case.The main Palestinian governmental body, the Palestinian Authority, said in a statement Tuesday that it welcomed the resolution and expressed its “full readiness to cooperate” with the United States and its backers.But Hamas, the perpetrators of the Oct. 7, 2023, attack, said the agreement did not meet the “political and humanitarian demands and rights” of the Palestinian people.The Palestinian militant-political group, which is designated a terrorist organization by the U.S. and would be disarmed under the deal, said in a statement that the mandate it grants to the ISF to use force “strips it of its neutrality, and turns it into a party to the conflict in favor of the occupation.”NBC News has contacted the White House for a response to these criticisms.Netanyahu praised Trump and “his tireless and devoted team,” saying he believed the plan “will lead to peace and prosperity because it insists upon full demilitarization, disarmament and the deradicalization of Gaza.”But just a day earlier the Israeli prime minister had firmly rejected the resolution’s call for “a pathway towards Palestinian self-determination and eventual statehood,” under pressure from his far-right coalition partners.Even putting these differences to one side, there are big question marks about how the basics of this plan will work in practice.“There is a genuine sense of relief that we are moving forward to diplomacy,” said Nimrod Goren, the president of the Mitvim Institute, a progressive Israeli think tank.“On the other hand, it’s not really clear where all this is headed,” he added. “What is the commitment of the leaders, the motivations of those behind it? And can it actually lead us away from the status quo in which Hamas still controls part of Gaza and Israel controls other parts around it?”On his Truth Social platform, Trump said members of the Board of Peace would be named in the coming weeks — having previously said British Prime Minister Tony Blair would be involved — and to expect “many more exciting announcements.””There are all kinds of new terminology and mechanisms that do not yet exist,” said Goren. “So there are a lot of question marks on the basic premises: What is their mandate? How will they be set up?”Indonesia, one of the backers of the U.S. proposal, says it is readying 20,000 troops to deploy to the ISF. But they are unlikely to head into Gaza so long as Hamas opposes the deal, according to Lowenstein.”Nobody’s going to send troops to be a part of the stabilization force that’s going to be fighting Hamas,” he said.Alexander SmithAlexander Smith is a senior reporter for NBC News Digital based in London.

Related Post

October 6, 2025

Judge blocks deployment of National Guard to Portland

October 5, 2025

Several people canoe in flooded Utah streets

October 3, 2025

Father of soldier killed in Oct. 7 attacks thanks U.S.

September 23, 2025

Sept. 23, 2025, 4:00 PM EDTBy Daniella Silva, Rob Wile and Nicole AcevedoAfter announcing a new $100,000 fee on H-1B visas, the Trump administration on Tuesday proposed overhauling the visa’s lottery selection process to prioritize higher-paid and higher-skilled foreign employees.The proposed policy changes could reignite the debate over the use of foreign labor by U.S. employers. The move comes as President Donald Trump has taken aim at H-1B visas, a program used widely by Big Tech and outsourcing companies to hire foreign workers, announcing Friday that companies would be required to pay a $100,000 fee with new applications submitted after Sept. 21. The administration on Tuesday targeted H-1B visa allocation, proposing a “weighted selection process” for when annual demand for the visas tops the 85,000 limit set by Congress, which it says has happened every year for more than a decade. The new process would replace the current lottery system that determines who gets to apply for those limited visa spots in favor of putting more weight on higher skilled and higher paid foreign workers, according to a proposed rule set to be published in the Federal Register on Wednesday. Under the current lottery rules, offers to apply for an H-1B visa are assigned at random. The Trump administration’s proposal would assign prospective employees to four different wage bands, with workers in the highest wage category being entered into the selection pool four times and those in the lowest wage category being entered into the selection pool once. The Department of Homeland Security stated in the proposal that the weighted system would better serve the visa program’s original intent and “incentivize employers to offer higher wages or higher skilled positions to H-1B workers and disincentivize the existing widespread use of the H-1B program to fill lower paid or lower skilled positions.”It said the proposed selection process would still maintain opportunities for employers to hire H-1B workers at “all wage levels.” ‘A strong signal’The H-1B visa program allows U.S. employers to temporarily hire skilled foreign workers in “specialty occupations” across health care, tech and finance industries, and other STEM-related fields.The two new proposed policies together send “a strong signal of the direction that the administration wants to go,” said Xiao Wang, CEO of Boundless Immigration, a company that offers services to people navigating the immigration process in the U.S.If adopted, the policies would benefit companies seeking to keep foreigners with specialized skills who studied at American universities in the U.S., as well as ensuring H-1B visas “disproportionately go to people who are deemed higher skilled, represented by higher wages and higher salary,” he said.Trump stated Friday that changes were needed in the visa system, saying it was designed to bring in temporary workers with “additive, high-skilled functions, but it has been deliberately exploited to replace, rather than supplement, American workers with lower-paid, lower-skilled labor.”For the last H-1B lottery round, which closed its registration in March, about 339,000 people applied. Of those, 120,141 applications were selected for the lottery, according to USCIS data.The proposal faces a 30-day public comment period before it is considered by the administration for a final rule, a process that could take months.If the changes are adopted, companies seeking to hire lower-wage workers from India and China for computer-related jobs appear likely to be among the most affected. For more than a decade, about 60% of H-1B workers approved every year have held computer-related jobs, according to Pew Research.Start-ups and smaller companies who cannot afford to pay their workers in the higher pay categories compared to major tech companies would also be impacted, Wang said.Deedy Das, a partner at Menlo Ventures venture capital group, said in a social media post that the latest proposal would hurt many tech companies.“Overall, it’s really bad for startups, early employees, helps IT consulting shops and can be easily gamed,“ Das wrote.Trump’s announcement of a new $100,000 fee on H-1B visas touched off a frenzy among current visa holders, the companies that employ them and countries around the world as they worked to understand the edict.Eventually, the White House clarified that it would be a one-time fee and apply only to new visa applicants. Trump said companies would have to pay the fee for new H-1B visa applications submitted after Sept. 21. That’s a steep rise from current fees, which are usually $2,000 to about $5,000.Both the fee and Tuesday’s proposal are likely to face challenges in court. A growing chorus on both the left and the right say an over-reliance on the visa by U.S. firms has put U.S.-born workers at a disadvantage. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick has called the H-1B visa program a “scam,” while the left-leaning Economic Policy Institute has claimed that some of the companies most reliant on H-1B visas, such as Amazon and Facebook’s parent, Meta, have also had sizable layoffs, though it did not cite evidence that the use of the visa and the layoffs are related.In the first half of 2025, Amazon received approval for more than 12,000 H-1B visas, while Meta received more than 5,000. Representatives for both companies did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Daniella SilvaDaniella Silva is a national reporter for NBC News, focusing on immigration and education.Rob WileRob Wile is a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist covering breaking business stories for NBCNews.com.Nicole AcevedoNicole Acevedo is a national reporter for NBC News and NBC Latino.

Comments are closed.

Home
Travel
Culture
Lifestyle
Sport
Contact Us
Politics

© Copyright 2025 - Be That ! . All Rights Reserved