• Police seek suspects in deadly birthday party shooting
  • Lawmakers launch inquires into U.S. boat strike
  • Nov. 29, 2025, 10:07 PM EST / Updated Nov. 30, 2025,…
  • Mark Kelly says troops ‘can tell’ what orders…

Be that!

contact@bethat.ne.com

 

Be That ! Menu   ≡ ╳
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics Politics
☰

Be that!

Trump signs bill to release DOJ's Epstein files

admin - Latest News - November 20, 2025
admin
15 views 12 secs 0 Comments



President Trump signs a bill compelling the Justice Department to release its records on Jeffrey Epstein after months of pushback.



Source link

TAGS:
PREVIOUS
Step therapy requires patients try alternate medication
NEXT
Savewith a NBCUniversal ProfileCreate your free profile or log in to save this articleNov. 19, 2025, 9:32 PM ESTBy Gordon Lubold, Courtney Kube and Dan De LuceWASHINGTON — The senior military lawyer for the combatant command overseeing lethal strikes on alleged drug-smuggling boats near Venezuela disagreed with the Trump administration’s position that the operations are lawful — and his views were sidelined, according to six sources with knowledge of the legal advice.The lawyer, who serves as the senior judge advocate general, or JAG in military parlance, at U.S. Southern Command in Miami, raised his legal concerns in August before the strikes began in September, according to two senior U.S. officials, two senior congressional aides and two former senior U.S. officials.His opinion was ultimately overruled by more senior government officials, including officials at the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel, the six sources said. Other JAGs and military lawyers at various levels of seniority weighed in on the boat strikes, as well. It’s unclear what each of their opinions were, but some of the military lawyers, including civilians and those in uniform, also expressed concerns to senior officials in their commands and at the Defense Department about the legality of the strikes, the two senior congressional aides and one of the senior former U.S. officials said.The JAG at Southern Command specifically expressed concern that strikes against people on boats in the Caribbean Sea and the eastern Pacific Ocean, whom administration officials call “narco-terrorists,” could amount to extrajudicial killings, the six sources said, and therefore legally expose service members involved in the operations.The opinion of the top lawyer for the command overseeing a military operation is typically critical to whether or not the operation moves forward. While higher officials can overrule such lawyers, it is rare for operations to move forward without incorporating their advice. Chief Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell said in a statement: “The War Department categorically denies that any Pentagon lawyers, including SOUTHCOM lawyers, with knowledge of these operations have raised concerns to any attorneys in the chain of command regarding the legality of the strikes conducted thus far because they are aware we are on firm legal ground. Our current operations in the Caribbean are lawful under both U.S. and international law, with all actions in complete compliance with the law of armed conflict.”A spokesperson for Southern Command referred questions to the Defense Department, which the Trump administration calls the War Department. A spokesperson for the White House did not respond to a request for comment.The JAG is Marine Col. Paul Meagher, according to three people familiar with the matter. Attempts to reach Meagher for comment were unsuccessful. The strikes on alleged drug boats have drawn support from Republicans, as well as criticism from members of both parties, NBC News has reported. The opinion of the Southern Command JAG, which has not been previously reported, adds a new dimension to concerns that lawmakers, retired military officers and legal experts have raised about the administration’s legal justification for striking alleged drug boats. Those concerns have centered on questions about whether the strikes violate international and U.S. law.Since Sept. 2, it says, the administration has killed 82 people in 21 strikes on small vessels it says were transporting drugs bound for the United States.Administration officials have not put forward any specific evidence backing up their claims.The administration has told members of Congress that President Donald Trump determined the United States is in “armed conflict” with drug cartel members, NBC News has reported. The administration designated some drug cartels in Latin America as foreign terrorist organizations this year.Trump has argued that drugs from the region pose a significant threat to American citizens. He has linked the boats to fentanyl to argue that the military strikes have saved tens of thousands of American lives, although fentanyl is typically smuggled into the United States by land across the Mexican border. Cocaine, which is most often moved via sea, is considered far less lethal than fentanyl.JAGs’ opinions on possible military operations are usually shared with higher authorities, including the Defense Department’s general counsel, Justice Department officials and ultimately the White House, according to current and former U.S. officials familiar with the process. JAGs typically play an integral role in defining the legal parameters of any military operation, and often their collective advice would be the primary guiding principle as political leaders decide whether to take such action, according to the current and former U.S. officials familiar with the process. In the Trump administration’s campaign against alleged drug boats, politically appointed lawyers at senior levels have often defined the legalities of the operations with minimal lower-level legal input, according to the two senior congressional aides and one of the former senior U.S. officials. There have been other signs of disagreement within the administration over the strikes. The head of Southern Command, Adm. Alvin Holsey, plans to step down after less than a year in a job that typically lasts about three years.Holsey announced in October that he will depart next month. In addition to concerns about the legality of the strikes, Democrats and Republicans on Capitol Hill have complained that the administration has not provided them enough information about the legal rationale or the intelligence used to target the vessels and people the administration purports are bringing drugs into the United States. “There is no world where this is legal,” said a current JAG, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they are not authorized to speak publicly.Congress has not declared war or authorized the use of military force against the drug traffickers, and U.S. law allows the president to take military action without lawmakers’ approval only if there is a national emergency due to an attack on the country or American forces.Dan Maurer, an associate professor of law at Ohio Northern University and a former Army JAG, argued that the drug cartels’ narcotics smuggling and other actions are crimes but do not qualify as an armed attack on the United States as defined by U.S. and international law.“These drug cartels may be violent, they may be aggressive, they may be transnational,” Maurer said in an interview. “They may be doing terrible things within their own countries; they may be importing terrible things into our country that have bad consequences. But all of those are crimes, and none of which meets the traditional meanings of an attack or invasion.”Maurer and other former military lawyers and experts believe the Trump administration’s legal rationale for the strikes is so tenuous it could put commanders and troops in legal peril after Trump leaves office in 2029.Trump administration officials have defended the legality of the strikes and argued that they have shared ample information about them with members of Congress.The legal debate about the strikes is likely to intensify if Trump decides to hit targets inside Venezuela, as he has threatened to do. The current legal rationale for strikes on vessels does not apply to any strikes on land, a senior administration official told lawmakers in a closed-door briefing last week, according to two additional congressional aides.Some of the military’s strikes on boats have killed people who critics of the operations say may be noncombatants or even immigrants who are hitching rides on the vessels and have nothing to do with the drug trade. Two survivors of a strike were captured and repatriated to Colombia and Ecuador rather than taken into U.S. custody, a decision that one of the congressional aides said raises questions about whether there is sufficient evidence to prosecute them for a crime.The internal differences over the legality of the boat strikes echo a similar debate more than 20 years ago. During President George W. Bush’s administration, senior military lawyers for the Army, the Air Force and the Marines raised objections over proposed “enhanced” interrogation techniques in 2003 and later testified to Congress about their concerns. They warned that U.S. courts could find those techniques amounted to torture and were illegal. John Yoo, the controversial legal architect of Bush’s “war on terror” after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, now argues the Trump administration’s boat strikes risk crossing the line between “crime fighting and war.”“Americans have died in car wrecks at an annual rate of about 40,000 in recent years; the nation does not wage war on auto companies,” he wrote recently in an op-ed in The Washington Post. “American law instead relies upon the criminal justice or civil tort systems to respond to broad, persistent social harms.” Gordon LuboldGordon Lubold is a national security reporter for NBC News.Courtney KubeCourtney Kube is a correspondent covering national security and the military for the NBC News Investigative Unit.Dan De LuceDan De Luce is a reporter for the NBC News Investigative Unit. 
Related Post
September 23, 2025
Trump talks about old bid to renovate U.N. in speech
November 17, 2025
Trump’s tariff rollbacks the ‘most substantial’ since trade policy was announced
November 18, 2025
Nov. 17, 2025, 8:03 PM ESTBy Nicole Acevedo, Ryan Chandler, Suzanne Gamboa and Julia AinsleyCHARLOTTE, N.C. — Jonathan Ocampo has called this Southern city home for six years but, after immigration enforcement descended here over the weekend, the American citizen of Colombian descent said he doesn’t leave the house without his U.S. passport.“I’m carrying it here right now, which is sad,” he told NBC News. Ocampo said that he worries that his father, a citizen who has been in the country for 40 years, could be targeted because of being Hispanic-looking and speaking what he described as very broken English. “It’s just scary,” he said.According to the Department of Homeland Security, more than 130 people have been arrested since Border Patrol began an immigration enforcement push it calls “Operation Charlotte’s Web” on Saturday, putting many residents and business owners of the state’s largest city on edge. A popular Latino bakery was closed on Monday over fears of Border Patrol activity. Several small businesses in a shopping center also shut their doors Monday after immigration authorities were seen smashing the car window of a Honduran-born U.S. citizen, Willy Aceituno, over the weekend. Aceituno told WCNC he was getting breakfast when he noticed immigration authorities chasing two people. Three vehicles then surrounded his car and agents began asking about his immigration status. “I was scared,” he said. Aceituno, who recorded the incident, is seen on video staying inside his car and telling agents that if they broke the window they’d have to pay for it. An agent ultimately shattered the window and opened Aceituno’s car door and pulled him to the ground. In a social media post, DHS accused Aceituno of “trying to distract officers so others could evade the law.”DHS assistant secretary Tricia McLaughlin said in a statement that those arrested in North Carolina “have all broken the immigration laws of our country.” The deployments in Charlotte are the latest in a string of high-profile immigration enforcement actions targeting specific cities across the nation such as Los Angeles, Portland and most recently Chicago, where hundreds of the people arrested did not have prior criminal history, according to the Chicago Tribune. Ocampo said he doesn’t think Charlotte is unique in being the focus of federal immigration enforcement. “I think they’re targeting wherever there is a strong Hispanic presence, whether it’s Charlotte, whether it’s Chicago, California, I’m seeing on the news, they’re everywhere,” he said.In Charlotte, residents have reported dozens of sightings of Border Patrol agents, including one on Monday outside the community center for ourBRIDGE for Kids, a non-profit that provides afterschool programs for refugee and immigrant students.Several trucks carrying more than 20 Border Patrol agents showed up to the center Monday morning, according to a witness who shared a video of the scene with NBC News. The witness asked not to be named out of fear it would cause retaliation against the business. It is not known whether anyone was arrested. No children were present at the time since programs run in the afternoons, which were canceled for this afternoon as a precaution, the person said.In detailing immigration arrests in Charlotte, McLaughlin said some of the detainees have criminal records including “known gang membership, aggravated assault, possession of a dangerous weapon, felony larceny, simple assault, hit and run, possession of stolen goods, shoplifting, DUI, DWI, and illegal re-entry after prior deportation, a felony.” Staff at the Carolina Migrant Network said they are working on confirming these by tracking down all of those arrested.So far, some of the people detained by Border Patrol agents in Charlotte include workers at a Home Depot parking lot putting up Christmas decorations, a young man who worked at a grocery store and others in the surrounding areas of churches, apartment complexes and stores, according to Siembra NC, another advocacy group that manages an immigration hotline.“This is not about public safety,” said Stefania Arteaga, co-executive director and co-founder of the Carolina Migrant Network, a legal services group for those facing deportation. “We are seeing clear racial profiling on our streets and absolute militarization…This is about causing fear and destroying, really destroying our community.”Among the incidents confirmed by the group was an arrest reported to their hotline by a pastor at the Central United Methodist Church. Another incident outside the Weeping Willow AME Zion Church involved the detention of a “man who was participating in a church cleanup day,” according to Siembra NC. That man was hospitalized after having “a panic attack” following his immigration arrest, according to McLaughlin, who added that the man unsuccessfully tried to escape from the hospital and said he has a prior arrest for assault. Protesters gather at First Ward Park for the “No Border Patrol In Charlotte” rally before marching through uptown, in Charlotte, N.C., on Nov. 15.Grant Baldwin / Getty ImagesOn Sunday morning, a Spanish-language service at Casa Viva Church was half empty as hundreds of people in the congregation chose to stay home because they are “scared about going out because of the situation right now,” Pastor Alejandro Montez said.Jeremy McKinney, a North Carolina attorney who served as American Immigration Lawyers Association president from 2022-23, said an attorney confirmed that some of those arrested had been sent three states away to Stewart Detention Center in Lumpkin, Georgia.The privately run immigration center, about two and half hours south of Atlanta in a rural and isolated area, is often used because North and South Carolina have no detention centers. Because of overcrowding in Stewart, McKinney said attorneys were anticipating some of those arrested could be transferred to Louisiana. The distance and isolation makes getting legal counsel difficult for detainees who can face waiting up to a week to schedule an attorney meeting, McKinney said. Manolo Betancur, who owns Manolo’s Bakery in Charlotte, decided not to open his business Monday after he said he witnessed people being stopped by Border Patrol agents outside.“I’m not going to risk my customers,” Betancur told WCNC, NBC’s affiliate in Charlotte. “Safety is more important than any money.” Nicole Acevedo reported from New York, Ryan Chandler from Charlotte, Suzanne Gamboa from San Antonio and Julia Ainsley from Washington, D.C. Nicole AcevedoNicole Acevedo is a news reporter for NBC News.Ryan ChandlerRyan Chandler is a correspondent for NBC News.Suzanne GamboaSuzanne Gamboa is a national reporter for NBC News and NBC Latino. Julia AinsleyI am NBC News’ Senior Homeland Security Correspondent.Tangni Noriega contributed.
September 21, 2025
CDC panel votes to limit who is eligible Covid vaccine
Comments are closed.
Scroll To Top
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics
© Copyright 2025 - Be That ! . All Rights Reserved