• 20 million under winter weather alerts as heavy…
  • Hegseth vows more U.S. boat strikes as Pentagon…
  • Dec. 6, 2025, 6:47 PM ESTBy Courtney Kube,…
  • Dec. 6, 2025, 6:00 AM ESTBy Mithil AggarwalHONG…

Be that!

contact@bethat.ne.com

 

Be That ! Menu   ≡ ╳
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics Politics
☰

Be that!

Dec. 2, 2025, 10:12 PM ESTBy Tim StellohProsecutors trying a Massachusetts man in the murder and dismemberment of his wife traced his gruesome online tracks in court Tuesday through dozens of internet searches conducted after Ana Walshe disappeared three years ago.The searches, which authorities extracted from Brian Walshe’s laptop, are key pieces of evidence in a case with no body. Ana Walshe has never been found.The searches began just before 5 a.m. Jan. 1, 2023, hours after the couple celebrated the holiday with a friend at their home south of Boston.According to testimony presented by a state trooper who examined the data, at 4:52 a.m. this term was typed into Google on Brian Walshe’s computer: “best ways to dispose of a body.”What followed was a litany of queries that lasted three days and sought information about dead bodies and dismemberment, crime scene cleanup and computer disposal. Brian Walshe, 50, pleaded guilty last month to misleading a police investigation and improper conveyance of a body. He is charged with first-degree murder.In his opening statement Monday, Brian Walshe’s attorney said that Ana Walshe died a sudden, unexpected death. He described his client’s internet search for grim information as a frantic and tragic response as he “wrestled with the fact that Ana was dead.”The lawyer, Larry Tipton, acknowledged that Brian Walshe lied to authorities about what happened to Ana Walshe — he told police that she’d disappeared after she traveled to Washington, D.C., for a work emergency on the morning of Jan. 1 — but he said Brian Walshe “never thought about killing Ana.” He said his client concluded that no one would believe that his wife was “alive one minute and dead the next.”Prosecutors contend that the murder was motivated by money — Brian Walshe was the sole beneficiary of his wife’s $2.7 million life insurance policy — and that he believed she was having an affair.According to the testimony of Massachusetts State Police Trooper Nicholas Guarino, most of the internet searches extracted from Brian Walshe’s computer were done via Google and Yahoo. Among them:4:55 a.m. Jan. 1: “How long before body starts to smell.”9:35 a.m. Jan. 1: “Can identification be made on partial human remains.” 11:50 a.m. Jan. 1: “Can I use bleach to clean my wood floors from blood stains.” 12:10 p.m. Jan. 1: “What does bleach to do dead bodies.”1:43 p.m. Jan. 1: “Can the FBI tell when you accessed your phone.”12:27 p.m. Jan. 2: “How to saw a body.”1:12 p.m. Jan. 2: “Can you identify a body with broken teeth.”1:12 p.m. Jan. 3: “Can a body decompose in a plastic bag.”7:30 p.m. Jan. 3: “Can police get your search history without your computer.”Two videos on the same topic were viewed on YouTube, Guarino said. A webpage viewed on Jan. 1 called “6 ways to dispose of a body” came from a website called “murdermurdermurder.com,” Guarino said.Tim StellohTim Stelloh is a breaking news reporter for NBC News Digital.

admin - Latest News - December 3, 2025
admin
6 views 19 secs 0 Comments




Prosecutors trying a Massachusetts man in the murder and dismemberment of his wife traced his gruesome online tracks in court Tuesday through dozens of internet searches conducted after Ana Walshe disappeared three years ago



Source link

TAGS:
PREVIOUS
Dec. 2, 2025, 10:50 PM ESTBy Zoë RichardsThe Trump administration on Tuesday halted immigration applications submitted by nationals from 19 countries that already faced restrictions on travel to the United States, according to a U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services memo.”USCIS has considered that this direction may result in delay to the adjudication of some pending applications and has weighed that consequence against the urgent need for the agency to ensure that applicants are vetted and screened to the maximum degree possible,” the agency said in a four-page policy memo.”Ultimately, USCIS has determined that the burden of processing delays that will fall on some applicants is necessary and appropriate in this instance, when weighed against the agency’s obligation to protect and preserve national security,” it added.The New York Times first reported the immigration pause, which applies to both green card and citizenship applicants.A spokesperson for the USCIS office did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the new policy Tuesday night.Trump talks strikes on alleged drug boats and immigration at Cabinet meeting06:22The move comes less than week after two National Guard members were shot on patrol in Washington, D.C., leaving one dead and the other critically wounded. The suspect, who pleaded not guilty to murder Tuesday, is an Afghan national who entered the United States legally during the Biden administration and was granted asylum after President Donald Trump took office for a second time.According to USCIS, more than 1.4 million people have pending asylum applications that could be affected by the new pause.The application hold pertains to people from 19 countries the Trump administration designated as high risk who are trying to get their immigration statuses processed by the agency. The list primarily targets African and Asian countries.Trump signed a proclamation in June fully banning nationals from 12 countries — among them Afghanistan, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen — from entering the United States and partially restricting the entry of nationals from seven others: Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela.USCIS Director Joseph Edlow said in a Newsmax interview Monday that following the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021, he does not believe the Afghan nationals who came to the United States “were properly vetted.”His office said Monday on X, “Nothing is off the table until every alien is vetted and screened to the maximum degree possible.”Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said Monday on X that she met with Trump and recommended “a full travel ban on every damn country that’s been flooding our nation with killers, leeches, and entitlement junkies.”Zoë RichardsZoë Richards is a politics reporter for NBC News.
NEXT
Van Epps thanks Trump after Tennessee House win
Related Post
October 10, 2025
Deadly explosion rocks Tennessee manufacturing plant
November 17, 2025
Nov. 17, 2025, 2:19 PM ESTBy Rob WileTrump administration officials are racing to reframe the president’s tariff rollbacks, as critics say the White House is capitulating on its signature economic policy.Late Friday, the White House announced the president had signed an executive order exempting more than 200 food products, including bananas, beef and coffee, from the so-called reciprocal tariffs he has imposed on U.S. trading partners. The move comes as the trade duties have begun to face economic, legal and political resistance that cast doubt on their efficacy. Some two-thirds of voters who helped sweep Democrats into power in a host of races earlier this month said President Donald Trump hasn’t lived up to his promises to curb inflation and improve the economy, according to NBC News polling. Meanwhile, the Supreme Court could issue an opinion in the coming months striking down the central argument Trump has made as to why he has the power to apply seemingly arbitrary tariff rates on dozens of countries. Grocery prices set to fall as Trump repeals some tariffs02:26White House officials are insisting the rollbacks do not amount to a retreat from the president’s staunch defense of tariffs as an economic driver. “This is nothing new,” National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett said on CNBC’s “Squawk Box” on Monday in response to a question of whether the reversals represent an acknowledgement that the policies have contributed to rising costs. Hassett cited previous moves by the administration to exempt certain products from duties following trade-framework agreements. One day earlier, Hassett told ABC News’ “This Week” that price increases for some goods weren’t being solely caused by tariffs — but acknowledged that prices could start coming down as imports into the U.S. climb. He also sought to blame former President Joe Biden, whose administration oversaw a post-pandemic inflation surge.“We understand that people still feel the pain of the high prices, but we’re closing the gap fast,” Hassett said. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent likewise sought to cast blame for rising beef prices backward.”The beef market is a very specialized market,” Bessent began. “It goes in long cycles. And this is the perfect storm, again, something we inherited.”In addition to Friday’s broad rollback of food-related tariffs, Trump also announced Friday that he was significantly reducing tariffs on goods from Switzerland, which had faced some of the highest duties yet announced during Trump’s second term.A day earlier, the White House said many food products from four Central and South American countries would be exempted from levies after they agreed to trade frameworks with the U.S.The U.S. economy continues to contend with stubborn inflation — especially for many everyday grocery items. Orange juice prices have increased approximately 29% year on year, while beef costs are up 13.5%, according to the latest NBC News grocery price tracker data.While some of the factors influencing the cost increases are not directly tied to tariffs, economists have estimated that consumers have been shouldering more than 50% of the overall price increases seen from Trump’s import duties.Businesses and analysts alike continue to sound the alarm on the impact of tariffs, saying they are compounding the stubborn inflation that has taken root since the pandemic and holding back investment decisions. The U.S. manufacturing sector — consisting of industries the administration had hoped would benefit most directly from the trade duties — has been particularly hard-hit, with many indicators suggesting it is in recession. Between February and August, manufacturing employment fell by some 41,000 jobs. Small businesses, whose owners tend to lean more conservative, have also seen an outsize impact from tariffs. Key elements of Trump’s tariff regime now also face legal jeopardy, however, as the Supreme Court weighs whether Trump illegally bypassed Congress when he imposed reciprocal duties and fentanyl-related tariffs using emergency powers authorization.Oral arguments before the court earlier this month indicated that multiple justices believed there were constitutional limits built into the emergency tariff powers the administration has claimed during Trump’s second term. A decision is expected before the end of the year. In a statement Monday, a White House spokesman said the administration remains “committed to the tariff policies that have secured trillions in investments to make and hire in America along with unprecedented trade deals for American workers, industries, and farmers.”“President Trump’s September 5th executive order specifically laid out various natural resources and agricultural products not produced in the United States that could be eligible for tariff-free treatment in the context of trade deals — the President’s recent tariff announcement reflects how the Administration has now secured a critical mass of trade deals with countries in the Western Hemisphere, Europe, and Asia,” spokesman Kush Desai said. But whether all the products that were most recently exempted from tariffs fall into the category of “not produced in the United States” is doubtful. Beef and oranges are produced in the United States, for example, and yet they were included on Friday’s list of broad exemptions from all reciprocal tariffs — not just from duties on imports from countries where the U.S. has secured trade deals. In the Friday executive order that rolled back all reciprocal tariffs on certain food products, Trump cited “current domestic demand for certain products, and current domestic capacity to produce certain products.” That definition goes beyond the strict categories of products the United States does not produce and products from countries with which the U.S. has trade agreements. It signals that a desire to cool off price increases is increasingly being seen as a justification for tariff exemptions on some products, like beef.Last week’s announcements are not the first time Trump has signaled a willingness to reconsider his trade stances. Throughout the spring and summer, the president frequently floated higher duties on a trade partner, usually amid ongoing negotiations, only to backtrack on them later. Some on Wall Street eventually dubbed the inevitable reversals “TACO” — “Trump Always Chickens Out.” The back-and-forth announcements served to whipsaw markets, with the president often standing down after major stock indexes experienced declines in response to his threats. It is unlikely tariffs are going away entirely: The White House has signaled it would likely seek to reimpose some duties via other statutes if the Supreme Court rules against Trump’s emergency authority. Just last month, the president announced a slew of new duties on imports including furniture, heavy trucks and pharmaceuticals. The tariffs have also raised billions in revenues — though even with those increased funds, the nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget has said U.S. lawmakers will “need to identify substantially more deficit reduction to put debt on a sustainable path.” Any ruling that calls for refunds of the collected funds could have unforeseen consequences on the economy. Still, some analysts say the recent tariff rollbacks may have only just begun. “What matters more for the outlook … is the signal that this move sends about the directional shift of future tariff adjustments,” Bernard Yaros, economist with Oxford Economics research group, wrote in a note published Saturday.“As we near the (2026 midterm) election, the administration may broaden these tariff exemptions to a wider swathe of food products.”Rob WileRob Wile is a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist covering breaking business stories for NBCNews.com.
November 16, 2025
Rep. Khanna: Releasing Epstein files is not about Trump
October 10, 2025
Oct. 10, 2025, 10:00 AM EDTBy Kristen Welker and Rebecca ShabadWASHINGTON — President Donald Trump intended his recent Truth Social post imploring Attorney General Pam Bondi to take legal action against his opponents as a direct message, according to a Trump administration official.Trump was surprised to learn he had actually posted the message to his Truth Social account, the source said, adding that the president reacted by saying “Oh,” and then tried to shrug it off. The Wall Street Journal first reported that Trump meant the post as a direct message. The lengthy post on Sept. 20 addressed Bondi as “Pam” and expressed frustration that “nothing is being done” to his foes. “What about Comey, Adam ‘Shifty’ Schiff, Leticia???” he wrote, referring to former FBI Director James Comey, Sen. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., and New York Attorney General Letitia James. “They’re all guilty as hell, but nothing is going to be done,” he claimed, adding, “We can’t delay any longer, it’s killing our reputation and credibility.” “They impeached me twice, and indicted me (5 times!), OVER NOTHING. JUSTICE MUST BE SERVED, NOW!!!” his post concluded.N.Y. AG Letitia James is indicted on heels of James Comey charges02:44Two of the three people mentioned in the post — Comey and James — have now been indicted by the Justice Department. Two administration officials told NBC News in August that Bondi had appointed a “special attorney” to investigate mortgage fraud allegations against James and Schiff.James was indicted on Thursday by a federal grand jury, charged with one count of bank fraud and one count of making false statements to a financial institution.The prosecutions and investigations of Trump’s rivals have raised concerns from legal experts and critics about his use of the Justice Department for potential retribution and the damage that could cause to the rule of law.James secured a nearly half-billion-dollar civil fraud judgment against Trump and his companies last year, which was recently overturned and is on appeal. She denied the charges against her, saying they were “baseless” and driven by “political retribution.”Her attorney, Abbe Lowell, said Thursday that the case is “driven by President Trump’s desire for revenge,” adding, “When a president can publicly direct charges to be filed against someone — when it was reported that career attorneys concluded none were warranted — it marks a serious attack on the rule of law.”Trump’s pressure on Bondi contradicts his previous claims that he has not become involved in investigations against his rivals or Justice Department charging decisions. After Comey was charged, for example, Trump told reporters at the White House that he had “nothing to do with the case.” “I don’t call anybody. You know what? I’m allowed to do that if I wanted to do that,” Trump said, going on to repeat the allegation that Comey had “lied” and “got caught.” Trump was referring to congressional testimony that the then-FBI director gave in 2017 denying he had authorized a leak to the news media about an FBI investigation into the Clinton Foundation.Comey pleaded not guilty this week to charges that he had made a false statement to Congress and obstructed a congressional proceeding. He said after the charges were filed that there are “costs to standing up to Donald Trump,” adding that he has “great confidence in the federal judicial system.”Referring to Comey’s indictment, Schiff said in an interview on NBC News’ “Meet the Press”: “If Republicans allow this to go on for four years, there will be nothing left of our democracy.””He’s described me as the enemy within,” Schiff said, referring to Trump. “He’s described other Democratic elected officials as the enemy within. He is using the Justice Department to go after his political enemies, and he’s using the Justice Department to protect his political friends. … This should concern every American, not just those he’s tweeting about like myself.”Schiff served as the lead impeachment manager in the House during Trump’s first impeachment trial nearly six years ago. He has denied any wrongdoing in response to the Trump administration’s investigation into mortgage fraud allegations.Asked if he is concerned that he could be charged next, Schiff said: “Those of us on the president’s enemies list — and it is a long and growing list — will not be intimidated, we will not be deterred. We will do our jobs, we will stand up to this president.”In addition to bringing charges against the president’s rivals, the Trump administration has purged officials at the Justice Department and FBI, including recently firing special agents who worked with special counsel Jack Smith’s office in investigations into Trump, sources told NBC this week.The administration’s moves have drawn fire from Justice Department officials and others. In a recent letter obtained by NBC, 42 retired judges warned that the case against Comey shows the “rights and liberties of every American are in grave danger.”Trump was “corruptly” abusing the power of his office “by directing the United States Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation to target his critics and his perceived political enemies for investigation and criminal prosecution,” they argued.Kristen WelkerKristen Welker is the moderator of “Meet the Press.”Rebecca ShabadRebecca Shabad is a politics reporter for NBC News based in Washington.Ryan J. Reilly, Adam Reiss and Matt Korade contributed.
Comments are closed.
Scroll To Top
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics
© Copyright 2025 - Be That ! . All Rights Reserved