• Dec. 6, 2025, 5:00 AM ESTBy Matt DixonTALLAHASSEE,…
  • Border Patrol agent chases woman in Louisiana
  • 20 million under winter weather alerts as heavy…
  • Hegseth vows more U.S. boat strikes as Pentagon…

Be that!

contact@bethat.ne.com

 

Be That ! Menu   ≡ ╳
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics Politics
☰

Be that!

Dec. 3, 2025, 5:00 AM ESTBy Henry J. GomezDuring the final, chaotic days of the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan in August 2021, Rep. Andy Barr, R-Ky., stood as an unwavering champion for resettling the Afghan nationals who had aided America and its allies.“We have failed in our obligation to help many of these Afghans who risked their lives, and in many cases died, for the cause of their own country in assistance to the United States, and we owe them to help them get into our country with these visas,” Barr said then in an interview with Kentucky Educational Television.Now a Senate candidate, Barr saw his remarks resurface and quickly go viral last week after the shooting of two National Guard members — one of whom died — in Washington, D.C. Law enforcement officials identified the suspect as Rahmanullah Lakanwal, an Afghan national who served alongside U.S. troops in Afghanistan. Lakanwal pleaded not guilty Tuesday to charges including first-degree murder. “I don’t believe we owe anything to foreigners from Afghanistan, but I do believe our politicians owe it to the American citizens that they’re supposed to represent, to not flood our country with thousands of people from the 3rd world who don’t share our values and never will,” businessman Nate Morris, one of Barr’s rivals in the GOP primary, wrote in a social media post sharing a clip from the interview.The clash offered a preview of how the topic could jam other Republicans running in competitive primaries next year, from the already hostile Kentucky race to Sen. John Cornyn’s re-election battle in Texas and campaigns for governor in Florida and South Carolina. It’s also a fight that reflects shifting goalposts for a GOP in which even legal immigration has become a source of debate. The attack on Guard members — which officials have said was targeted — validated warnings from several leading figures on the right, including Vice President JD Vance, who had argued that resettling Afghan refugees could yield tragic consequences.“This has become a flaming hot issue with MAGA,” said a top Republican strategist involved in several statewide races who was granted anonymity to share candid observations about intraparty tensions.“Any Republican running in a competitive primary who has a history of supporting bringing in Afghan refugees following [then-President Joe] Biden’s withdrawal is probably not sleeping well right now,” the strategist added. “The base is out for blood and they’re not just blaming Democrats for what happened to those two National Guardsmen, they’re blaming the Republicans who they view as betraying the country on these immigration issues.”The motive for last week’s shooting remains unknown. Lakanwal, who had worked under CIA direction and, according to former intelligence and military officials, would have undergone extensive vetting for that role, came to the U.S. under Operation Allies Welcome. The Biden-era program aimed to support “vulnerable Afghans” and those who worked alongside U.S. forces in Afghanistan by helping them resettle in the United States. Many Afghan nationals applied for asylum — another process that typically includes a vigorous vetting — while waiting for special immigrant visa applications to be processed. Lakanwal was granted asylum this year, under President Donald Trump, sources told NBC News. Trump administration officials have not disclosed whether Lakanwal ever received a special immigrant visa. Since the shooting, Trump has called for a re-examination of all Afghan nationals who came to the U.S. during the Biden administration while vowing to “permanently pause“ all immigration from what he called “Third World countries.”Like most other members of Congress, Rep. Andy Barr voted in July 2021 to help Afghan evacuees receive special immigrant visas. Christian Kantosky / Lexington Herald-Leader/Tribune News Service via Getty ImagesBarr, like every House Democrat and all but 16 other House Republicans, voted in July 2021 to expand and expedite special immigrant visas for Afghan evacuees. The bill never became law, and within weeks the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan — set in motion by Trump in his first term and executed by Biden — descended into chaos. An overwhelmingly bipartisan effort soon gave way to more tribal politics.While Morris has been calling attention to the visa issue since the shooting, another Republican in the Kentucky race, former state Attorney General Daniel Cameron, has not mentioned it in his social media posts.A spokesperson for Barr’s campaign declined to answer questions about his 2021 comments, instead referring to a statement Barr released after last week’s shooting. In the statement, Barr emphasized a September 2021 vote against a continuing resolution that avoided a government shutdown and included funding for Biden’s evacuee program. “As I’ve said repeatedly, ‘If we can’t vet them, they don’t belong here,’” Barr said. “President Trump is cleaning up Biden’s mess and I fully support him.”Cornyn, who faces primary challenges in Texas next year from Rep. Wesley Hunt and state Attorney General Ken Paxton, could also find himself vulnerable on the issue. In June 2021, Cornyn joined with Sen. Alex Padilla, D-Calif., to introduce a bill that would have expedited special immigrant visas for Afghan interpreters and translators who assisted the U.S. And unlike Barr, he voted in favor of subsequent continuing resolutions that helped fund the evacuee program.Natalie Yezbick, a spokesperson for Cornyn, emphasized in an email that Lakanwal initially came to the country under the Biden-era program, not under a special immigrant visa.“Senator Cornyn has repeatedly warned about the dangers of the Biden administration’s parole programs and wrote a letter last year specifically warning about the problems with Afghan vetting,” Yezbick wrote. “It is inaccurate to say that Sen. Cornyn was supportive of the program under which this individual entered the U.S.”Hunt, who when asked about visas in 2024 told NOTUS that “we should be loyal back” to those “who were loyal to us,” said Tuesday that he plans to introduce legislation to “revoke all available special Afghan immigrant visas.”“What unfolded last week in Washington, D.C., is a tragedy — one born from years of decisions made by entrenched elites who consistently prioritize foreigners over the American people,” said Hunt, who was not in Congress during the 2021 votes.Paxton, in an emailed statement, offered similar thoughts, accusing Cornyn of focusing more on “aiding foreign invaders than he is [on] protecting actual Americans and stopping terrorists from coming into our country.”In Florida, investment firm CEO James Fishback has raised the issue against Trump-endorsed Rep. Byron Donalds in the state’s Republican primary for governor. Donalds voted for the July 2021 special immigrant visa bill but against the later spending bills.“Why did he vote to let in thousands of unvetted Afghans?” Fishback, who is positioning himself as a loyalist to term-limited Gov. Ron DeSantis, a former Trump rival, wrote last week in a post on X that included a clip from a 2021 interview in which Donalds spoke supportively of resettling Afghan allies.Danielle Alvarez, a senior adviser to Donalds’ campaign, referenced the December 2021 continuing resolution, which passed the House without a single Republican vote.“Republicans didn’t vote for the CR that funded Operation Allies Welcome, Joe Biden’s reckless Afghan resettlement program,” Alvarez said. “Byron Donalds has been rock-solid from Day 1: If you’re in this country unvetted or illegally, get out.”In South Carolina, meanwhile, the crowded GOP primary field for governor includes two supporters of the initial visa bill from July 2021: Reps. Nancy Mace and Ralph Norman. The issue could also come into play in Iowa, where Rep. Ashley Hinson is seeking a promotion to the Senate and Rep. Randy Feenstra is running for governor, and in Wisconsin, where Rep. Tom Tiffany is a candidate for governor. All three Republicans voted for the July 2021 bill and stand as early front-runners in their primaries. “Like many Americans, I supported improving the Special Immigrant Visa process and strongly opposed President Biden’s legally dubious use of so-called ‘categorical parole’ during the disastrous Afghanistan withdrawal,” Tiffany said in a statement to NBC News. “Every Afghan brought in under the Biden administration must be reexamined.”A second Republican strategist granted anonymity to speak candidly about how Republicans might weaponize the issue against each other acknowledged the nuances of the issue — that House members supported visas before it was clear how messy the withdrawal would become. “That’s the problem with being an incumbent. You’ve maybe taken some s—– votes,” the strategist added. “It might have been something that most other Republicans voted for. But on game day, that doesn’t matter to voters.”“This will become, I think, a big thing,” they added. “Hey, if I’m Nate Morris, I’m using it.”Henry J. GomezHenry J. Gomez is a senior national political reporter for NBC NewsMatt Dixon contributed.

admin - Latest News - December 3, 2025
admin
6 views 9 secs 0 Comments




During the final, chaotic days of the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan in August 2021, Rep.



Source link

TAGS:
PREVIOUS
Dec. 3, 2025, 5:00 AM ESTBy Erika EdwardsA group of advisers to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is preparing to vote on whether the agency should scrap its long-standing recommendation that every baby get a hepatitis B vaccination within 24 hours of birth.The shot — universally recommended for newborns in the U.S since the early 1990s — is credited with driving down cases of acute hepatitis B infections in kids by 99%. The virus, which can be passed from mother to baby during childbirth, can lead to liver disease and early death. There is no cure. Despite its success, the hepatitis B vaccine has become the latest target of skeptics who question whether the benefits of the shot outweigh potential risks.A vaccine given on “day one has a risk of neonatal fever, which causes more interventions” like blood work to determine the cause of the fever, said Dr. Kirk Milhoan, a pediatric cardiologist who practices at Driscoll Children’s Hospital in Corpus Christi, Texas. Milhoan has been a member of the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) since June, when Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. fired all of its members, replacing them with his own appointees. On Monday, Milhoan was named the new ACIP chair, replacing Martin Kuldorff, a biostatistician who previously cast doubt on childhood vaccines, including the one for hepatitis B. Dr. Sean O’Leary, a pediatric infectious disease expert and spokesman for the American Academy of Pediatrics, said he has never seen a serious reaction after “thousands of babies” have been given the hepatitis B vaccine.“I never once saw a fever actually associated with hepatitis B vaccine,” O’Leary said at a media briefing Tuesday. And a review of more than 400 studies found no evidence that the birth dose of the vaccines causes any short- or long-term health problems. On the contrary, the review of research, published Tuesday by the Vaccine Integrity Project, an independent group of experts led by the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy at the University of Minnesota, found that giving newborns the hepatitis B vaccine has prevented more than 6 million infections and nearly 1 million hospitalizations. The paper was not published in a peer-reviewed journal. ACIP is scheduled to meet Thursday and Friday. The committee makes recommendations to the CDC director, who can then choose whether to adopt them. While a vote against newborn vaccination does not prohibit doctors from administering the shot, the panel’s recommendations influence insurance coverage.It’s unclear whether the ACIP members would vote to eliminate or delay that first dose of a hepatitis B vaccine by a month or two. The agenda posted online as of Tuesday described the meeting in broad strokes, offering no details about who would be presenting data. A vote on the vaccine was supposed to take place at an ACIP meeting in September, but it was tabled because of confusion among committee members. Hepatitis B can spread through sexual contact and sharing drug paraphernalia, such as needles. It can also pass from person to person if they share common household items such as toothbrushes or razors. Milhoan said any decision to give newborns hepatitis B vaccines should be made based on clinicians’ individual assessments of the babies’ risk for infection — that is, whether a pregnant woman tests positive for the infection or has a “questionable infectious disease background.” At September’s ACIP meeting, the panel voted unanimously to recommend testing all pregnant women for hepatitis B.But not all pregnant women receive prenatal care, and if they do, not all feel comfortable speaking frankly with their doctors. Milhoan appeared to dismiss the argument that women may not divulge activities that could increase their risk for hepatitis B because of stigma.“I hope they love their baby more than they love their pride,” he said.A 2019 report showed that just 84% to 88% of pregnant women are tested for the virus. Without vaccination, 90% of babies exposed to the hepatitis B virus during birth develop chronic hepatitis, according to the American Academy of Pediatrics.The hepatitis B vaccine is not the only immunization Milhoan has cast doubt on. He is a senior fellow at the Independent Medical Alliance — formerly known as the Front Line Covid-19 Critical Care Alliance — a group that has advocated for unproven treatments for Covid. His biography on the IMA’s website says he “is dedicated to treating patients affected by acute SARS-CoV-2 infections, Long Covid, and vaccine-related cardiovascular toxicity due to the spike protein.” Last year, he participated in an event with Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., about alleged injuries associated with the shots. Milhoan has been especially critical of Covid vaccines for their link to a small but increased risk of a heart condition called myocarditis in young men. The link was not seen in clinical trials; it was detected in 2021, soon after the shots were made available.“The rates of myocarditis were much higher than anyone thought,” Milhoan said. He said he was labeled an “anti-vaxxer” for speaking out about the potential risk. “People were saying, ‘Are you against the vaccines?’ I’m just trying to show you what we’re seeing,” he said.Over the weekend, Dr. Vinay Prasad, the vaccine chief at the Food and Drug Administration, told staff members in a memo that an internal review found that at least 10 children died “after and because of” Covid vaccines and suggested the deaths were tied to myocarditis. Prasad did not provide any evidence to back up the claim.Studies have shown that myocarditis is more commonly associated with Covid infection than vaccination.This week’s ACIP meeting is also expected to include discussion of the use of aluminum adjuvants in vaccines. The ingredient is added to prompt the immune system to react better to vaccines. A study of more than 1 million people, published over the summer, found that aluminum adjuvants were not linked to an increased risk of 50 chronic conditions, including autoimmune diseases, allergies and autism. The meeting follows months of upheaval within the CDC, including mass firings and significant changes to its messaging. On Nov. 19, a CDC webpage that once stated unequivocally that vaccines do not cause autism was rewritten to suggest, without evidence, that health officials had “ignored” possible links between the shots and the disorder.Erika EdwardsErika Edwards is a health and medical news writer and reporter for NBC News and “TODAY.”
NEXT
Good Samaritan rescues two women from sinking truck
Related Post
October 5, 2025
Melania Trump gives Navy sailors a 'Hooyah!'
October 23, 2025
Mosquitoes discovered in Iceland for the first time
November 18, 2025
House to Move Ahead With Epstein Vote Following Trump Reversal
October 24, 2025
Oct. 24, 2025, 2:56 PM EDT / Updated Oct. 24, 2025, 3:00 PM EDTBy Alexandra MarquezOne day before early voting begins in the New York mayoral race, Democratic nominee Zohran Mamdani condemned the “racist, baseless” attacks he’s faced in recent days, saying the attacks exemplify the islamophobia Muslims all over New York face every day.”I have sought to be the candidate fighting for every single New Yorker, not simply the Muslim candidate,” Mamdani told reporters gathered outside of a mosque in the Bronx. “I thought that if I could build a campaign of universality, I could define myself as the leader I aspire to be, one representing every New Yorker, no matter their skin color or religion, no matter where they were born.””And I thought that if I behaved well enough or bit my tongue enough in the face of racist, baseless attacks, all while returning back to my central message, it would allow me to be more than just my faith,” Mamdani added, appearing to grow emotional. “I was wrong. No amount of redirection is ever enough.” Mamdani, who currently represents parts of Queens in the New York State Assembly, would be the city’s first Muslim mayor.His comments come one day after former Gov. Andrew Cuomo —who lost to Mamdani in the June Democratic primary and is now running as an independent — faced criticism for remarks he made about Mamdani on a radio program.On Thursday, Cuomo appeared to agree with a conservative radio host who said that Mamdani would cheer if a terror attack happened while he was mayor.A Cuomo campaign spokesperson later told NBC News that Cuomo did not agree with the radio host’s comment.Earlier this week, in the final debate ahead of the Nov. 4 mayoral election, Mamdani defended himself against attacks from Cuomo and Republican nominee Curtis Sliwa that he didn’t have a strong plan to combat antisemitism in New York City.The city needs “a leader who takes [antisemitism] seriously, who roots it out of these five boroughs, not one who weaponizes it as a means by which to score political points on a debate stage,” Mamdani told viewers.He also accused the other candidates of accusing him of antisemitism in part because he’s a Muslim.After Sliwa accused Mamdani of supporting a “global jihad,” Mamdani said, “I have never, not once, spoken in support of global jihad. That is not something that I have said, and that continues to be ascribed to me. And frankly, I think much of it has to do with the fact that I am the first Muslim candidate to be on the precipice of winning this election.”“They view you as the arsonist who fanned the flames of antisemitism,” Sliwa had told Mamdani earlier in the debate, referring to members of his own family. “They cannot suddenly accept the fact that you’re coming like a firefighter and you’re going to put out these flames.”His identity as a Muslim is something Mamdani also referenced during a podcast released this week.“I do think that Andrew Cuomo, there are a number of things that he has said or done that he would not have done if I was not a Muslim candidate,” Mamdani told the hosts of the “Flagrant” podcast.In his speech Friday, Mamdani also decried what he described as a post-9/11 rise in Islamaphobia in New York City.”For as long as we have lived, we have known that no matter what anyone says, there are still certain forms of hate that are acceptable in this city,” he said. “Islamophobia is not seen as inexcusable.””In an era of ever-diminishing bipartisanship, it seems that islamophobia has emerged as one of the few areas of agreement,” he added.Mamdani also thanked his supporters who have “rushed to my defense over these past few days,” but said he was thinking, “of those Muslims in this city who do not have the luxury of being the Democratic nominee.”Mamadani has faced allegations of antisemitism for months, even before he became the Democratic nominee for mayor.The allegations largely centered on his criticism of Israel’s conduct in its war in Gaza, where over 60,000 people have been killed since Hamas’ Oct. 7, 2023 attack on Israel, according to health authorities in Gaza.He has also faced criticism over his refusal earlier in the race to denounce the phrase “globalize the intifada.”Cuomo referenced this during Wednesday’s debate, telling Mamdani, “You’re the savior of the Jewish people? You won’t denounce ‘globalize the intifada,’ which means ‘kill Jews.'”Mamdani said in June that he didn’t use the phrase, but that mayors shouldn’t “police speech.” The New York Times reported in July that Mamdani said he would “discourage” use of the phrase moving forward.Mamdani has also sought to find commonality with the Jewish community, meeting with Jewish leaders, courting Hassidic voters in Yiddish and attending Rosh Hashanah celebrations.In his speech on Friday, Mamdani said that he has learned over the last few years that for Muslims in New York City, “safety could only be found in the shadows of our city [and] it is in those shadows alone where Muslims could embrace their full identities.””If we were to emerge from those shadows … it is in those shadows that we must leave our faith. These are lessons that so many Muslim New Yorkers have been taught again and again,” Mamdani said. “Over these last few days, these lessons have become the closing messages of Andrew Cuomo, Curtis Sliwa and Eric Adams.”Adams, the incumbent mayor of New York City, suspended his independent campaign for governor in September and endorsed Cuomo on Thursday.The mayoral election is on Nov. 4, with early voting starting in the five boroughs on Saturday.Alexandra MarquezAlexandra Marquez is a politics reporter for NBC News.
Comments are closed.
Scroll To Top
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics
© Copyright 2025 - Be That ! . All Rights Reserved