Lava spills as Hawaii's Kilauea resumes eruptions
Protesters smear food on the case of the…
National Guard member 'slowly healing' after shooting
Dec. 6, 2025, 12:18 PM ESTBy Mirna Alsharif…

Be that!

contact@bethat.ne.com

Menu ≡ ╳

Home
Travel
Culture
Lifestyle
Sport
Contact Us
Politics Politics

Be that!

Police release 911 calls from Texas floods

admin - Latest News - December 5, 2025

admin

4 views 5 secs 0 Comments

Police release 911 calls from Texas floods

Source link

TAGS:

PREVIOUS

FIFA World Cup draw puts Team USA against Australia at group stage

NEXT

Dec. 5, 2025, 4:00 PM ESTBy Ben Kamisar and Bridget BowmanVoters who backed Democratic governors in New Jersey and Virginia this year after voting for President Donald Trump in 2024 have a message for both parties: reject your party’s extremes and run campaigns about more than just Trump.In new focus groups, 14 swing voters from New Jersey and Virginia revealed sharply negative views of both parties — and of politicians broadly. They explained that they were drawn in last month’s elections in their states to Govs.-elect Mikie Sherrill and Abigail Spanberger, who cast themselves as moderates and transcended the damaged Democratic Party brand. And while 10 of these voters disapproved of Trump’s job performance so far and voiced concerns about high prices, a majority said they did not view their votes for governor as a protest vote against Trump. An anti-Trump message alone may not be enough to sway them and voters like them next year in the midterm elections. Kornacki: Polls don’t show ‘huge gap’ in favorability between Democrats & Republicans03:51Instead, their consistent refrain serves as an important message to Republicans and Democrats as they look to sway swing voters in key races across the country next year: Candidate quality matters, ranging from positions on issues to personality to professional background.“I mean, look, I’m a Republican, but let me tell you, if somebody is checking all the boxes for me, if they’re a Democrat, I’m going to go with my gut and what I feel,” Cynthia G., a 52-year-old from New Jersey, said of Sherrill, who served in Congress before she won the governorship.“And Mikie is just proven to me. Naval officer, formal federal prosecutor, mother of four. She’s tough, but she’s like the quiet storm. She’ll get things done,” said Cynthia, who participated in the recent focus groups, which were produced by Syracuse University and the research firms Engagious and Sago and observed by NBC News as part of the 2025 “Deciders” series.Exit polling from the New Jersey and Virginia gubernatorial races show Sherrill and Spanberger, another former House member, both had some crossover appeal as they sailed to double-digit victories, each winning 7% of voters who cast ballots for Trump in 2024. Unlike a poll, which uses statistical methods to demonstrate the views of a larger population, focus groups dig deeper into how individual panelists view key questions facing the country and make decisions. These focus groups shed light on why some voters backed Democrats despite sharply negative views of the Democratic Party and illustrated nuanced views of Trump and how he now factors into their political thinking. “The most important lesson for both parties in 2026 is to not run flawed candidates,” said Rich Thau, president of Engagious. “While affordability, political moderation, and President Trump’s job performance all mattered in Virginia’s and New Jersey’s gubernatorial races, what mattered most to swing voters was candidate quality.”Candidates matterThese voters — including 12 self-described independents, one Republican and one Democrat — said they supported Trump in 2024 because they were optimistic he could better handle the economy. They also viewed then-Vice President Kamala Harris as unqualified and out of touch. And while these voters view both parties negatively, they were especially critical of the Democratic Party, describing Democrats when asked to offer a brief assessment as “dishonest,” “weak,” “unfocused,” “self-serving,” “wishy-washy, and “ineffective.”But Sherrill and Spanberger, a former CIA officer, were still able to win them over by casting themselves as pragmatic moderates and stressing their national security backgrounds.Spanberger “was the closest thing to what you can call a moderate nowadays. She worked across the aisle. She wasn’t an extremist,” said Bruce L., 40, of Richmond, who noted that her congressional office also helped resolve issues for him and his family. Michael C., 60, of Brick, N.J., said he backed Sherrill “because of her veteran status. Because being in the military, when you have a job that needs to get done, you get it done, you make sure you find a way to do it.”Other voters described Sherrill and Spanberger as “sensible,” “pragmatic” and “down-to-earth.” None said they backed the Democrats solely because they would oppose Trump’s policies. “It’s easy to see these Democratic wins in Virginia and New Jersey as a referendum on President Trump, but what these swing voters told us is not quite that simple,” said Margaret Talev, director of Syracuse University’s Institute for Democracy, Journalism & Citizenship. “Moderation, competency and personal appeal is the combination they crave.”Some voters were turned off by the GOP candidates’ embrace of Trump, even though these voters supported him last year.The president endorsed Jack Ciattarelli, a former state legislator, against Sherrill in New Jersey. And while Trump did not back Virginia Lt. Gov. Winsome Earle-Sears, she broadly embraced his policies. “Winsome Earle-Sears just seemed to be an extremist who actually just kept defining herself in comparison to others than rather what she stood for, and would propagate the worst of the Trump policies,” said Robert L., a 54-year-old from Springfield, Virginia. Christian G., 25, of Clifton, New Jersey, described Ciattarelli as a “phony” who was “piggybacking off of Trump a lot, or just utilizing Trump’s name in general.”All but one of the New Jersey voters said their state has been going in the “wrong direction,” but they still voted for a Democrat after two terms of Democratic Gov. Phil Murphy. Some saw Ciattarelli as part of the same “good old boys’ network” as Murphy. They viewed Sherrill as the candidate more likely to bring a change and were drawn to her proposals to lower the state’s rising utility bills. Meanwhile, nine of the 14 focus group participants said their votes for Sherrill and Spanberger were not about protesting Trump. But the five voters who did view their votes as a protest against Trump voiced a wide range of concerns with his administration so far. “Trump made a lot of promises, but most of them could not be delivered,” said Rebecca H., 52, of Falls Church, Virginia. “For me, it’s kind of a testament to how I guess trust was lost over the year,” said Christian, the Clifton, New Jersey, resident. “Whereas I voted for him back in ‘24, now, a year later I’m feeling let down.”Down on TrumpThe former Trump voters have some significant disagreements with the president — including over health care, his immigration policies, the Defense Department’s attacks on suspected drug boats from South America, and the handling of documents related to the federal investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. But the economy loomed especially large. Trump weighs in on election wins by Democrats02:34Some, like Cynthia G., the 52-year-old New Jersey Republican, believe that the economy is moving “in the right direction, to a degree.” She’s been heartened by seeing prices for goods like eggs going down, even though most of the groups said they’ve seen significant price increases broadly. Others who feel the country is now more stable economically cited their view of Trump as a businessman with a plan or the strength of the stock market. And some see Trump’s aggressive tariff policy as an important way to eventually bring jobs back from overseas. “I agree with the tariffs. I think, honestly, I wish it would force all manufacturing to come back to the United States,” said Ashley E., a 40-year-old Virginia independent. But other participants were fiercely critical of Trump’s handling of the economy, particularly tariffs.“People tried warning him before the elections that the foreign companies don’t pay them [tariffs], it’s reflected in the price. And he said, ‘Oh, that’s not true,’” said Robert L., a 54-year-old Virginia independent. “If he’s such a great dealmaker, he should have used them [tariffs] as a potential stick,” Robert continued. “Instead, he’s a bull in a china shop and greatly impacted the economy and inflation. Presidents can affect inflation and the economy for the worse much more easily than for the better. And he’s done it for the worse.” Some grounded their frustration with Trump’s policies in what they saw as a general abdication of his campaign promise to lift up everyday Americans. “It’s a bait and switch with him where he said he was for the average person but he actually favors big business, and then just does whatever he wants and there’s no consequences,” said Justin K., a 39-year-old independent from Arlington, Virginia, who added that he thinks the “big tech companies” have Trump’s “ear.” In total, the group was largely down on Trump’s actions on immigration, with just two of the 14 respondents saying they approved, on the whole, of the administration’s policies. Some who had positive things to say about the administration clamping down on illegal border crossings were still deeply critical of its mass deportation policies and the widespread arrests being carried out by Immigration and Customs Enforcement. “He’s tightening the border control — I approve of that and I approve of restricting the refugees. But I don’t like how ICE is kidnapping people,” said Rebecca H., a 52-year-old independent from Virginia. On the U.S. military strikes ordered by Trump on alleged drug boats from Venezuela, or Trump accusing Democrats of “seditious behavior” for making a video calling on members of the military to refuse illegal orders, those who had heard about the episodes largely disagreed with the president. Only one participant backed using the military to strike suspected drug traffickers overseas, arguing America has a “right to defend ourselves from any country, or any person, who’s trying to bring in illicit substances that kill people.”The others criticized the administration for exceeding its authority. Meanwhile, fewer had heard about Trump’s clash with Democratic lawmakers over their social media video about illegal military orders. Some were skeptical about the Democrats’ move in the first place. One voter called it a “great political stunt,” another said it was “insulting” to troops who already knew the rules, and another hesitated because “it’s going to make people start to question everything that’s going on.” But there was near unanimity in their belief that Trump’s response — posting social media messages labeling the lawmakers’ actions as “SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR, punishable by DEATH” — was not appropriate. “The last comment, punishable by death — I don’t think you should even go there, calling them traitors and everything like that,” Cynthia G., the 52-year-old New Jersey Republican, said. “He just has to word things a bit better.” Ben KamisarBen Kamisar is a national political reporter for NBC NewsBridget BowmanBridget Bowman is a national political reporter for NBC News.

Related Post

November 4, 2025

6 deaths tied to listeria outbreak in precooked pasta

October 27, 2025

Hurricane Hunters film inside Hurricane Melissa's eye

November 26, 2025

Italian man dresses as dead mom to collect her pension

October 12, 2025

Oct. 12, 2025, 6:00 AM EDTBy Jon-David RegisNatalie Silva, a high school senior in Massachusetts, wants to play soccer in college, but she is still recovering from a right knee injury during a game over a year ago.Silva remembers colliding with an opposing player. As she fell, she heard her knee “pop” when her cleats got stuck in the turf on a field where her Uxbridge High School team was playing an away game.“I was playing on an indoor field where the turf is on top of concrete. If it was grass, there would’ve been more cushion,” claims Silva, 18, who goes to school about 50 miles southwest of Boston. She said she met with her doctor, who was concerned that her cleats were made for playing on grass, not turf. “The turf 100% played a role in my injury,” Silva said.The multibillion-dollar artificial turf industry has convinced local governments and school boards that turf fields are a way to save money and increase playing time for young people. As hundreds of synthetic fields and playgrounds are installed at schools, colleges, and public parks in the U.S. every year, stakeholders from lawmakers to school boards and soccer moms are debating claims like Silva’s about the safety of playing on such surfaces.Boston and Westport, Connecticut, have effectively banned turf that contains rubber from recycled tires due to concerns about exposure to chemicals. Vermont has passed restrictions, and in California, a reversal of a previous decision now allows local communities to impose bans. Groups like the NFL Players Association, and physical therapists and other clinicians believe playing on turf increases the risk of torn ligaments, sprained ankles, and other injuries.A study of NFL data released in 2024 found higher incidences of lower-extremity injuries on artificial turf than on natural grass. The odds of a serious injury requiring season-ending surgery were significantly higher, the study said. “ACL and ankle sprains are the main injuries we see from turf,” said HIDEF Physical Therapy founder Zach Smith, who works with athletes in Seattle as they recover from turf-related injuries.“The turf provides better grip and more friction,” he said. “Great for performance, but bad for joints.”Safety debate mountsArtificial turf — first widely introduced in the 1960s at the former domed stadium of Major League Baseball’s Houston Astros — is made from plastics to mimic the look of grass. It typically contains tiny black pellets called “crumb rubber,” processed using shredded tires.By 2020, there were 13,000 synthetic turf sports fields in the U.S., with about 1,500 installed annually, according to the National Recreation and Park Association. Nowadays, young people who participate in sports, from football to field hockey and lacrosse to soccer, are less likely to play on natural grass than on artificial turf, also called synthetic grass, synthetic turf, or astroturf.Python Park, a 12-acre playing field in Avondale Estates, Georgia, belongs to the Paideia School. Paideia is changing its fields from grass to turf. Sam Whitehead / KFF Health NewsThe Synthetic Turf Council, a leading industry trade group, did not return calls and emails to answer questions about chemical hazards and injuries. But the industry has pointed to research showing no definitive link between artificial turf and health problems, including sports injuries.Manufacturers support their product.“Artificial turf lets kids play safely on a lush, mud-free surface all year long,” said Adam Grossman, chief executive of Southern Turf Co., headquartered in Austin, Texas.“No fertilizers, pesticides, or watering required,” said Grossman, adding that his company’s products are “nontoxic.”Brad Blastick, president of Lazy Grass Co. in Alpharetta, Georgia, said his company’s products feature “built-in cushioning, helping to reduce injuries and keep kids active and safe.”In a January letter to protest a Santa Clara County, California, proposal to ban artificial turf, the president and CEO of the Synthetic Turf Council, Melanie Taylor, said “forever chemicals are ubiquitous in today’s environment, including water, air, soil, and a variety of food products.”Synthetic turf does not contain more than what’s in other parts of the environment, and it helps communities across the country save money, Taylor said in the letter. “Motions to ban synthetic turf hinder communities’ ability to access these benefits [and] should be reconsidered,” she wrote.Long-term consequencesCritics of turf dispute the industry’s claims, including those about safety.The pellets of crumb rubber in turf contain toxic chemicals like petroleum compounds, metals, and lead, according to Stuart Shalat, former director of the Division of Environmental Health at Georgia State University.“When fields heat up, they can release fumes or transfer chemicals to skin,” said Shalat, who is now retired. “And we don’t yet fully understand the long-term effects, especially for children.”The Paideia School, a K-12 private school in Atlanta, is switching from grass to turf at Python Park, its off-campus location in Avondale Estates that has two soccer fields and a diamond for baseball and softball.Janet Metzger, a self-described environmentalist who lives near Python Park, said she tried to persuade the school to cancel the project because she is worried about the impact on nature.“When there’s natural grass, you have insects and life in the soil that keep the area vibrant,” Metzger said. “Turf kills the environment and harms all the species that live there.”The Paideia School declined an interview request to answer questions about why it is installing turf.In instituting their restriction on turf fields, government officials in California and Vermont said they were worried about PFAS, which are known as “forever chemicals,” and other hazardous materials that can be inhaled or absorbed through the skin. A 2024 federal Environmental Protection Agency report on the crumb rubber in turf found that chemicals associated with tire crumb rubber were in the air, on surfaces, and on the skin of study participants but concluded there were no elevated levels in their bodies. EPA researchers, however, said their study was not designed to assess health risks associated with crumb rubber.Meanwhile, the U.S. Consumer Protection Agency has issued recommendations for limiting exposure to crumb rubber recycled tire materials used in playground surfaces, encouraging people to wash their hands and other exposed skin after leaving playgrounds with these surfaces, and to avoid eating and drinking while there.This year is shaping up to become one of the hottest on record. Turf absorbs heat from the sun and can become much hotter than natural grass, creating a health hazard, according to the Center for Environmental Health.“On turf, you get more blisters, turf toe, and turf burns. I’m playing recreational soccer now and dealing with blisters myself,” said Smith, the Seattle physical therapist who specializes in orthopedic injuries and rehabilitation. “Turf gets hot, and when you add sweat and heat, it becomes a dangerous combination.”Brian Feeley, an orthopedic surgeon at the University of California-San Francisco, said his studies show ACL and Achilles tendon injuries are more likely on turf and more likely to require surgery.“Artificial turf doesn’t release cleats as easily,” he said. “That puts more torque and strain on the knees and ankles.”And Feeley said the long-term consequences can be severe: “An ACL injury as a young athlete can keep you from playing at the next level and lead to arthritis in your 30s.”Natalie Silva is still recovering from a torn anterior cruciate ligament injury in her right knee that she says happened in February 2024 during a high school soccer game played on a turf field.Natalie SilvaSilva, the injured high school soccer player, said she wishes her games had been played on natural grass. The Uxbridge High School principal’s office and athletic department declined multiple requests to comment.She vividly recalls the match in February 2024 when she tore the anterior cruciate ligament in her right knee.“I went up to head the ball and landed awkwardly on my right leg,” she said. “The goalie ran into me at full speed, and my knee popped. I immediately fell to the floor in agony. Every bump in the car ride home made my leg jerk — it felt detached.”Before the injury, Silva said, she had hoped to play soccer in college. Now, she is struggling through rehabilitation three times a week and can’t play for a full year.Asked about her future in soccer, Silva said she doesn’t know what to expect. Right now, she’s just trying to enjoy senior year.“The mental side of it is the worst,” Silva said. “The feeling of one day being able to do everything and the next you can’t walk or even move your leg. The mental aspect of it lasts longer than the pain.”Jon-David RegisJon-David Regis is a contributor to KFF Health News. Fred Clasen-Kelly contributed.

Comments are closed.

Home
Travel
Culture
Lifestyle
Sport
Contact Us
Politics

© Copyright 2025 - Be That ! . All Rights Reserved