• Dec. 6, 2025, 8:00 AM ESTBy Jing Feng…
  • Russia Launches Drone Strike on Ukraine as Talks…
  • Dec. 6, 2025, 4:45 AM ESTBy Alexander SmithLONDON…
  • Dec. 6, 2025, 5:00 AM ESTBy Melanie Zanona,…

Be that!

contact@bethat.ne.com

 

Be That ! Menu   ≡ ╳
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics Politics
☰

Be that!

Dec. 5, 2025, 5:16 PM ESTBy Aria BendixAn anti-vaccine lawyer who has regularly sued federal and state health agencies spoke Friday at a meeting of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s vaccine advisory panel — an unheard-of departure for the committee, which for decades was a trusted source for vaccine recommendations.The lawyer, Aaron Siri, has also served as the personal attorney for Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a longtime anti-vaccine activist. Siri delivered a lengthy presentation about the childhood immunization schedule, chronicling what he said were concerning adverse events from routine vaccines and calling particular attention to vaccines for hepatitis B, pneumococcal disease and a combination shot for diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis (whooping cough). Previously, Siri has advocated for the Food and Drug Administration to revoke its approval of the polio vaccine.Art Caplan, head of the division of medical ethics at NYU Langone Medical Center, said Siri’s presence at the meeting suggests that the panel, known formally as the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, is “trying to use a pre-committed ideology to get where they want to go, which is to get rid of childhood vaccination.” “This is a science issue, and he’s the wrong guy, with the wrong conflicts, with the wrong style, with the wrong information,” Caplan said.Siri also pointed to a supposed link between autism and vaccines given in the first six months of life — a claim that has been widely debunked — arguing that there are no studies to disprove the link. “If you’re going to say vaccines don’t cause autism, have the data to say it,” Siri said.Decades of research, including extensive probes into the safety of the measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine, has found no link between vaccines and autism. A large Danish study from July found no association between aluminum exposure from vaccines during the first two years of life and increased rates of neurodevelopmental disorders. And a massive review in 2021, which evaluated 138 studies, determined that MMR vaccines don’t cause autism.Siri suggested at the meeting that a shortcoming of several childhood vaccines is their failure to prevent transmission, pointing to research on a type of whooping cough vaccine in infant baboons. Public health experts argue that the goal of those shots is to prevent symptomatic disease and death. He further suggested that childhood vaccines weren’t properly evaluated for safety — despite decades of continuous monitoring for side effects.“The concern is that not one of them was licensed based on an inert, a placebo-controlled clinical trial,” Siri said.People who question the safety of vaccines often suggest that trials should be conducted with an inert placebo — meaning some trial participants would receive the new vaccine while others would receive an inactive substance like saline, to compare results.However, public health experts say there’s a legitimate reason not to use a placebo in some cases: It would be unethical to withhold the benefit of a vaccine from study participants, so trials often test new vaccines against older versions.“Siri’s claim that childhood vaccines were ‘never tested against placebo’ is a talking point, not a fact,” Dr. Jake Scott, an infectious diseases specialist at Stanford Medicine, said via text message. “Inert placebo-controlled trials exist for most of the routine childhood vaccines, including large studies using saline or sterile water controls published in major journals.” Scott testified before Congress in September that his research team had documented 398 randomized control trials that evaluate the active ingredients in childhood vaccines and use inert placebos such as saline or sterile water.Dr. Cody Meissner, a pediatrician and the only ACIP member who has previously served on the committee, said Siri’s presentation was “a terrible, terrible distortion of all the facts.”“For you to come here and make these absolutely outrageous statements about safety, it’s a big disappointment to me and I don’t think you should have been invited, I will be completely honest,” Meissner said during the meeting.Siri’s unorthodox presentation followed a day and a half of chaotic proceedings, in which advisory members and presenters made false claims about the safety and efficacy of hepatitis B vaccines and cherry-picked data. The committee voted Friday morning to roll back a long-standing recommendation for all newborns to get a first dose of the hepatitis B vaccine. Instead, the advisers said women who test negative for hepatitis B can consult with a health care provider about whether their baby should get the birth dose.Kennedy fired the previous members of the advisory panel in June over what he claimed were “persistent conflicts of interest,” and replaced them with a group that has largely expressed skepticism of vaccines.Siri disclosed a litany of conflicts at Friday’s meeting, including numerous ongoing lawsuits against the Department of Health and Human Services and its subsidiary agencies. Those include lawsuits over purported Covid vaccine injuries and exemptions to vaccine mandates, he said. Siri previously sued the CDC to compel it to turn over studies demonstrating that vaccines don’t cause autism.Siri said he was asked to speak Friday alongside Dr. Paul Offit, director of the Vaccine Education Center at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, and Dr. Peter Hotez, co-director of the Texas Children’s Hospital Center for Vaccine Development. Hotez said he declined the request because “ACIP appears to have shifted its mission away from science and evidence-based medicine.” Offit, who has similarly accused the committee of becoming political, said he could not recall receiving an invitation, but would not have attended the meeting regardless.Caplan, the medical ethicist, said such a debate would not have been productive. “We don’t really need to debate evolution again, probably don’t need to debate settled opinion about whether we went to the moon — and we don’t need to debate this,” he said.Aria BendixAria Bendix is the breaking health reporter for NBC News Digital.

admin - Latest News - December 6, 2025
admin
2 views 13 secs 0 Comments




An anti-vaccine lawyer who has regularly sued federal and state health agencies spoke Friday at a meeting of the CDC’s vaccine advisory panel.



Source link

TAGS:
PREVIOUS
Waymo recalls cars for passing stopped school buses
NEXT
RoboCop stands watch over Detroit
Related Post
November 19, 2025
Nov. 17, 2025, 9:00 PM EST / Updated Nov. 19, 2025, 10:06 AM ESTBy Scott Wong, Melanie Zanona, Kyle Stewart and Brennan LeachWASHINGTON — Congress voted overwhelmingly Tuesday to pass legislation to compel the Justice Department to release its records related to the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein — a major victory for lawmakers in both parties who’ve been leading the push for months.As the final vote tally in the House, 427-1, was read, several Epstein survivors who were sitting in the gallery embraced one another and loud cheers went up through the chamber. Rep. Clay Higgins, R-La., was the only lawmaker to vote no.Just hours later, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., headed to the floor and requested unanimous consent that the measure be passed in the upper chamber once it was received from the House.Not a single senator objected. The bill was sent to President Donald Trump, who has vowed to sign it into law, on Wednesday morning.Epstein abuse survivor Danielle Bensky, left, and Lauren Hersh, National Director of World Without Exploitation, embrace after receiving word that the Senate unanimously approved passage of the measure Tuesday. Heather Diehl / Getty ImagesThe measure, which last week secured enough bipartisan support to head straight to the House floor, got a big boost over the weekend, when Trump reversed his position and urged Republicans to support it.Reps. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., and Ro Khanna, D-Calif. — the bipartisan duo who co-authored the legislation and successfully forced the vote on the House floor, despite leadership’s objections — had spent the past few days trying to drive up the vote tally to put pressure on the Senate. The votes in both chambers exceeded their expectations. At a candlelight vigil with Epstein survivors and lawmakers outside the Capitol on Tuesday night, survivor Annie Farmer invoked the memory of Virginia Giuffre, the Epstein survivor and sexual abuse advocate who died by suicide in April at age 41. Her memoir, “Nobody’s Girl,” was posthumously published last month.“She immediately rallied all of us together and had this vision for what could happen, what people could learn from this, what she wanted to do with this platform and push that forward in such a brave way,” Farmer said, breaking down in tears.“I feel like she’s here with us. I feel like she can see this. So thank you, Virginia, for all that you’ve done for us,” she continued.Epstein survivors speak out ahead of House vote on releasing Epstein files05:26The bill would require the attorney general to release in a searchable and downloadable format “all unclassified records, documents, communications, and investigative materials” related to Epstein and his co-conspirator Ghislaine Maxwell, flight logs or travel records, people and entities connected with Epstein and internal emails, notes and other internal Justice Department communications. Those records would need to be released “not later than 30 days” after the law is enacted.The legislation says the attorney general may withhold or redact any information that identifies victims or would jeopardize an active federal investigation.Ahead of the House vote, Massie, Khanna and Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., held an emotional news conference outside the Capitol with more than a dozen Epstein survivors, urging senators to quickly take up the bill.”You had Jeffrey Epstein, who literally set up an island of rape — a rape island — and you had rich and powerful men, some of the richest people in the world, who thought that they could hang out with bankers, buy off politicians and abuse and rape America’s girls with no consequence,” Khanna told reporters Tuesday.”Because survivors spoke up, because of their courage, the truth is finally going to come out,” he added. “And when it comes out, this country is really going to have a moral reckoning.”Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., and Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., outside the Capitol on Tuesday.Graeme Sloan / Bloomberg via Getty Images fileEarlier in the day, House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., had been working to persuade the Senate to amend language in the bill to better protect the identities of victims. Higgins, the lone no vote, wrote on X that the bill, as written, could reveal “thousands of innocent people — witnesses, people who provided alibis, family members, etc.”But Massie urged his fellow Republicans not to “muck it up in the Senate.” And in the end, with such a large vote in the House, no GOP senator dared stand in the way.”We fought the president, the attorney general, the FBI director, the speaker of the House and the vice president to get this win,” Massie said, adding that opponents deserved some “credit” because they ultimately came around to the legislation. “They are finally on the side of justice.”Even after having voted for the bill, Johnson was still fuming over the process hours later. Returning to the Capitol from a White House dinner honoring Saudi Arabia’s crown prince, Johnson said, “I’m deeply disappointed in this outcome,” and he lamented that “Chuck Schumer rushed it to the floor.” Senate Majority John Thune, R-S.D., didn’t object, despite being aware of Johnson’s concerns.Johnson said he was continuing to have conversations with Trump about those issues. “I’m frustrated with the process,” he said, “but I trust Leader Thune.”Why Trump reversed courseMomentum on the Epstein discharge petition had been building in the House, which allowed rank-and-file members to circumvent leadership and force a vote.All House Democrats were on board, and after half the House signed the discharge petition to force a vote, a deluge of Republicans began announcing they would vote for it.Trump and the White House had worked behind the scenes to stop the effort, trying to pressure a handful of GOP women to drop off the petition.But with the writing on the wall, Trump abruptly reversed course Sunday night, posting on Truth Social that House Republicans should vote for the bill. On Friday, Trump directed Attorney General Pam Bondi to investigate Epstein’s ties to prominent Democrats and financial institutions.Trump, who had supported releasing the Epstein files before his re-election last year, vowed Monday to sign the legislation should it reach his desk, which he said would allow the GOP to turn the page and focus on the economy.”Some of the people that we mentioned are being looked at very seriously for their relationship to Jeffrey Epstein, but they were with him all the time — I wasn’t. I wasn’t at all,” Trump said in the Oval Office.”What I just don’t want Epstein to do is detract from the great success of the Republican Party, including the fact that the Democrats are totally blamed for the shutdown,” he continued.Standing with fellow Epstein survivors Tuesday, Jena-Lisa Jones lashed out at Trump over the new Justice Department probe.“I beg you, President Trump: Please stop making this political,” Jones said. “It is not about you, President Trump. You are our president. Please start acting like it. Show some class, show some real leadership, show that you actually care about the people other than yourself.”Jones said she voted for Trump. “Your behavior on this issue has been a national embarrassment,” she said.Marjorie Taylor Greene speaks at news conference with Epstein victims03:55Asked about the criticism, White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson said: “Democrats and the media knew about Epstein and his victims for years and did nothing to help them while President Trump was calling for transparency, and is now delivering on it with thousands of pages of documents as part of the ongoing Oversight investigation.”A conservative Trump ally in the House told NBC News that Republicans have been widely frustrated with the White House’s dismissive handling of the Epstein saga and have privately encouraged it to shift strategy — which was communicated as recently as Friday, days before Trump flipped on the issue. The White House was also warned that there would be mass Republican defections on the House floor.Thousands of documents releasedThe Justice Department has already turned over tens of thousands of documents from the Epstein investigation to the House Oversight Committee, which is conducting its own probe and has made many of those records public. In addition, Democrats on the Oversight Committee released a series of emails last week from Epstein to Maxwell and journalist Michael Wolff that refer to Trump, which Epstein’s estate turned over in response to a subpoena. In one 2019 email, Epstein wrote of Trump, “Of course he knew about the girls as he asked ghislaine to stop,” but he didn’t accuse Trump of any wrongdoing.Trump has consistently denied involvement in any of Epstein’s crimes. The two men had socialized in the 1980s and the 1990s, including at a 1992 party at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida, where video shows them discussing women. But Trump and Epstein had a falling-out in the 2000s, when Trump accused Epstein of hiring away girls and young women from his resort’s spa. Trump said he banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago. In 2008, Epstein pleaded guilty to Florida state charges of soliciting prostitution with a minor. In July 2019, the Justice Department charged him with sex trafficking of minors. A month later, authorities said, Epstein killed himself in his jail cell while he was awaiting trial.Johnson has argued for months that the Epstein legislation isn’t needed because the Oversight Committee has been releasing documents to the public. He dodged questions Monday about Trump’s about-face and his conversations with the president.”He’s never had anything to hide. He and I had the same concern — that we wanted to ensure that victims of these heinous crimes are completely protected from disclosure, those who don’t want their names out there,” Johnson told reporters. “And I’m not sure the discharge petition does that, and that’s part of the problem.”Scott WongScott Wong is a senior congressional reporter for NBC News. Melanie ZanonaMelanie Zanona is a Capitol Hill correspondent for NBC News.Kyle StewartKyle Stewart is a producer and off-air reporter covering Congress for NBC News, managing coverage of the House.Brennan LeachBrennan Leach is an associate producer for NBC News covering the Senate.Megan Lebowitz, Tara Prindiville and Frank Thorp V contributed.
October 31, 2025
Oct. 31, 2025, 5:00 AM EDT / Updated Oct. 31, 2025, 8:16 AM EDTBy Peter Nicholas and Megan LebowitzWASHINGTON — Over the years, a genteel nonprofit organization called the Trust for the National Mall has raised money to help care for the cherry trees dotting the Tidal Basin. It upgraded the U.S. Park Police stables on the National Mall and hosted pickleball games on the grassy expanse between American monuments.Now it has a new assignment: handling the millions of dollars pouring in for President Donald Trump’s gilded White House ballroom. The nonpartisan group is serving as the steward for what Trump has said is more than $350 million in private donations from individuals, foundations and corporations to remake part of the old East Wing into a 90,000-square-foot ballroom. Donors have been instructed to direct their ballroom contributions to the trust, a tax-exempt nonprofit organization. Individual and corporate donors can typically deduct the amount they contributed from their federal income taxes. A person raising money for the ballroom told NBC News that they have been asking for donations of $2.5 million to $5 million and that the deduction is one reason people choose to give. The fundraiser, like others in this article, was granted anonymity to speak candidly. The White House said donors will be able to remain anonymous if they wish.The trust’s involvement in Trump’s project has plunged it into politically divisive terrain that it has avoided since its founding in 2007. Senators are demanding answers about what the trust knows about the ballroom and its donors and when it found out.“This nonpartisan, independent organization is about to be enmeshed in the very perilous quicksand of Donald Trump’s donation scheme for his ballroom,” Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., said in an interview.Devoted to “restoring, preserving and enriching the National Mall,” the trust is now part of a project that is transforming the symbol of American history and power. Construction crews flattened the East Wing of the White House this month to make way for a ballroom that can seat nearly 1,000 people; in July, Trump said the addition wouldn’t touch the White House.In interviews, trust officials stressed that they’re playing only the limited role of managing the donations and have no say over the design or construction of the ballroom itself. The group is an official partner of the National Park Service, the federal agency that maintains the White House grounds. Traditionally, the trust assists the Park Service by raising private money for projects, thus defraying the cost to taxpayers.Over the summer, the Park Service approached the trust and asked whether it would handle the private donations for the ballroom, a trust staff member said.The group’s 14-member board discussed the request and agreed to take part, board member Eric Hoplin, who is CEO of the National Association of Wholesaler-Distributors, said in an interview. Neither he nor the staff member would say whether the group could have declined to participate.Asked whether the trust knew in advance that the East Wing would be torn down, Hoplin said, “Because we weren’t involved in the design or construction, we were learning about the evolution of the project as others have.”He made no apologies for the ballroom, pointing to past White House renovations that also drew public ire back in the day. “If you look to history and you think about Andrew Jackson’s addition of the North Portico and you look at Teddy Roosevelt’s addition of the West Wing, when you look at the Truman restoration, including the Truman Balcony, each of those projects in their time was controversial,” Hoplin said. “Now they’re widely accepted and in fact celebrated parts of the White House. So it’s not for us to judge the project. We’re the partner of the National Park Service, and we are playing this limited role.”Born out of a philanthropic impulse, the trust seems a throwback to an era that predated Trump’s rise. The ballroom project is an arranged marriage of sorts between MAGA and civic magnanimity.Chip Akridge, head of a local commercial real estate firm, would regularly jog through Washington to look at his properties. A friend urged him to inspect the Mall’s condition, and when he did, he saw it was “a disgrace,” he told a House committee in 2008. Akridge said he helped create the trust to restore the Mall’s luster.The East Wing was demolished to make room for Trump’s new ballroom.Andrew Harnik / Getty ImagesOver the years, the trust has led a string of efforts to improve the Mall and surrounding spaces. During Trump’s first term, it managed $4 million in private donations for a pair of White House projects: a tennis pavilion and a renovation of the Rose Garden. Trump paved over the garden grass after he returned to office.The group brought in volunteers to help with White House garden tours, along with experts to “shape” White House educational tours in President Joe Biden’s administration, the staff member said.Donors have been invited to “adopt” a cherry tree as part of the trust’s effort to preserve the 3,700-some cherry trees on the Tidal Basin. A total of $42,000 was raised in 2023 to help protect 40 trees. The group also worked to upgrade horse stables on the Mall that were first built in the 1970s, among other projects. And it marshals volunteers for smaller tasks, such as painting benches and laying mulch.Current board members aren’t Trump’s traditional MAGA allies. Some are past or present executives at corporations like Humana and Wells Fargo, while others are philanthropists who have supported cultural and artistic endeavors. The group’s president and CEO is Catherine Townsend, who was appointed in 2016. That year, she donated $250 to the Democratic presidential campaign of Hillary Clinton, campaign finance records show. Townsend also made a pair of $250 donations to the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee in 2010. The trust didn’t make Townsend available for an interview and didn’t respond to questions about the donations.Since he took office, Trump has pushed hard to do away with diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives. The trust hosted “conversations” during Joe Biden’s presidency that amplified minority voices. One such event in 2021 focused on African Americans and the influential role they’ve played on the National Mall. Another one that year, “Herstory on America’s Civic Stage,” dealt with “important moments for America’s women.” A third celebrated Asian American and Pacific Island Heritage Month. This week, the White House fired all six members of the Commission of Fine Arts, an independent government agency that is expected to review Trump’s construction projects, including the ballroom. A White House official said it plans to replace them with people who are “more aligned with President Trump’s America First Policies.”Blumenthal and four other Democratic senators sent a letter to the trust and its governmental partner, the National Park Service, on Oct. 23 with a list of questions and a Nov. 7 deadline for answers. “Is the demolition consistent with the Trust’s mission to ‘preserve the National Mall as a symbol of our nation’s ideals and civic purpose?’” the senators asked.“What procedures are in place to pay for the project if costs exceed the amount raised via the Trust? Will taxpayers be liable for any potential costs of this project?” wrote Blumenthal and Sens. Elizabeth Warren and Edward Markey of Massachusetts, Ron Wyden of Oregon and Chris Van Hollen of Maryland.In a statement to NBC News, Warren said that “billionaires and giant corporations with business in front of the Trump administration are not coughing up millions of dollars to build Trump’s ballroom out of concern for the National Mall.”“The Trust for the National Mall appears to have become a vehicle for favor-seeking and possible corruption,” she said. “I’m pushing to find out if the Trust is facilitating wink-and-nod arrangements — and what these ballroom donors are getting in return.”The trust has not yet responded to the senators’ letter. In the past, the trust has raised comparatively modest amounts of money. In 2022, it received only about $2.2 million in contributions and grants, according to its IRS tax returns. Last year, it raised about $9.5 million.The ballroom project has attracted donations from major companies such as Google, Amazon, Apple, Microsoft and beyond. Comcast Corp., the parent company of NBCUniversal, was also on the White House list of donors. The trust staff member said that “financials can vary widely year over year based on projects being built or completed and where we are in a fundraising cycle.”The group has stepped up its fundraising efforts ahead of July 4, 2026, when the nation will celebrate its 250th anniversary. It has set out to raise $250 million, with the money going toward projects that include restoring the fountains of Lafayette Square, across the street from the White House.A former IRS official who reviewed the trust’s most recent tax return expressed doubts that the group is equipped to manage the ballroom donations.“The main thing is that this is not an organization that shows any indication of being able to have an inflow of hundreds of millions of dollars,” the person said, speaking on condition of anonymity.Hoplin voiced confidence the trust can do the job.“We have the capacity and the ability and the track record for a project of this magnitude,” he said.Peter NicholasPeter Nicholas is a senior White House reporter for NBC News.Megan LebowitzMegan Lebowitz is a politics reporter for NBC News.Christina Wilkie contributed.
October 6, 2025
Crowd sets Boston police car on fire with fireworks
November 13, 2025
Missing girl's mom charged in unrelated felony case
Comments are closed.
Scroll To Top
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics
© Copyright 2025 - Be That ! . All Rights Reserved