• U.S. seizes oil tanker off Venezuela coast
  • Dec. 10, 2025, 6:52 PM ESTBy Yasmin Vossoughian…
  • Dec. 10, 2025, 4:03 PM ESTBy Allan Smith…
  • Family uses external review to overturn insurance denial

Be that!

contact@bethat.ne.com

 

Be That ! Menu   ≡ ╳
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics Politics
☰

Be that!

Dec. 9, 2025, 11:25 AM ESTBy Courtney KubeA coalition of advocacy groups filed a lawsuit Tuesday against the Trump administration seeking the immediate release of the memo that provides the legal justification for U.S. military strikes on alleged drug boats.The complaint, filed in federal court in Manhattan, argues that the deadly strikes, which have killed at least 87 people since early September, are illegal and that Americans deserve to see the justification for them. The filing requests for the court to order the Justice, State and Defense Departments to immediately search for all records regarding the legal reasoning behind the U.S. military campaign against alleged drug boats, and to release them to the American Civil Liberties Union, or ACLU, and other plaintiffs, including the New York Civil Liberties Union and the Center for Constitutional Rights. “We think that the public deserves to know how our government is justifying the cold-blooded murder of civilians is lawful,” Jeffrey Stein, attorney for the ACLU, said in an interview. “We think that the Trump administration needs to stop these illegal and immoral strikes immediately, and that the officials who have carried them out must be held accountable, not gifted a ‘Get Out of Jail Free card.'”The U.S. military has conducted at least 22 strikes against boats that the Trump administration says are carrying drugs destined for the U.S. The administration has described the crew members targeted in the strikes as smugglers working on behalf of cartels. The first strike on Sept. 2 has become the subject of intense scrutiny after it was reported that two people survived the initial strike on the boat, and were later killed by a second one ordered by Adm. Frank “Mitch” Bradley, the commander overseeing the attacks. Some legal experts and Democratic politicians have argued that the follow-up strike, often known as a “double tap,” violated international law because it targeted two people who were in an incapacitated craft in open waters.Video footage shows a vessel being hit by a U.S. strike on Sept. 2 in the southern Caribbean.@realDonaldTrump via Truth SocialBradley and Gen. Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, briefed lawmakers on Capitol Hill last week. Reaction to the briefings was split down party lines, with Republicans defending the follow-up strikes and Democrats expressing continued concern.The advocacy groups said they filed their lawsuit after the government failed to respond to a Freedom of Information Act request for the documents filed on Oct. 15. “By claiming that these attacks are legal while refusing to provide any evidence or rationale, Trump shows once again his disdain for basic transparency, human rights, and the rule of law,” Ify Chikezie, staff attorney at the New York Civil Liberties Union, wrote in a statement. “The courts must step in and order the administration to release these documents immediately.” Stein, of the ACLU, said administrations have routinely released legal justification memos in the past, including regarding sensitive military operations, because they discuss the principles of constitutional law, and classified details can be redacted.In 2011, the Obama administration released a memo explaining why the Justice Department believed U.S. military operations in Libya were in the national interest and that then-President Obama could initiate them without prior authorization from Congress.And during Trump’s first administration, the Justice Department released its legal memo justifying U.S. military strikes on three Syrian chemical weapons facilities.Stein said he disagrees with some who have argued that the strikes amount to war crimes. “We are not in a war, and so any discussion of these illegal strikes as war crimes is inaccurate,” he said. “The law of armed conflict does not apply to these strikes. They are premeditated killings outside of the context of armed conflict, and we have a legal concept for that conduct. It’s murder.”Courtney KubeCourtney Kube is a correspondent covering national security and the military for the NBC News Investigative Unit.

admin - Latest News - December 9, 2025
admin
2 views 14 secs 0 Comments




Advocacy groups filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration seeking the release of the memo justifiying U.S. military strikes on alleged drug boats.



Source link

TAGS:
PREVIOUS
Duffy and RFK Jr. square off in airport pull-ups
NEXT
Video captures a train colliding with a vehicle
Related Post
October 3, 2025
Karoline Leavitt talks about potential layoffs
November 9, 2025
Nov. 9, 2025, 2:55 PM ESTBy Alexandra MarquezThe U.S. Department of Agriculture said that states that issued full November SNAP benefits to recipients after a lower court decision allowed them to should “immediately undo” the distributions and that failure to comply could result in cancellation of future disbursement of federal funds. “To the extent States sent full SNAP payment files for November 2025, this was unauthorized. Accordingly, States must immediately undo any steps taken to issue full SNAP benefits for November 2025,” Patrick A. Penn, the Deputy Under Secretary Food, Nutrition, and Consumer Services, wrote on Saturday regarding the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP.“Failure to comply with this memorandum may result in USDA taking various actions, including cancellation of the Federal share of State administrative costs and holding States liable for any overissuances that result from the noncompliance,” he wrote.The latest memo was a reversal of earlier guidance the USDA had issued before the Supreme Court again paused the distribution of full SNAP benefits on Friday, sending the case back to the appeals court.The Friday memo said that the relevant agencies in the Trump administration would “complete the processes necessary to make funds available to support your subsequent transmittal of full issuance files to your EBT processor.”Saturday’s memo comes amid a fast-moving legal battle over whether the federal government should continue to disburse SNAP benefits — also known as food stamps — to over 40 million Americans who usually receive them during the ongoing federal government shutdown.SNAP benefits were funded for October, the first month of the shutdown, but at the end of the month, the USDA posted a message on its website informing Americans that SNAP benefits wouldn’t be dispersed in November, telling them that “the well has run dry” and blaming Democrats for the lapse.Two separate lawsuits were filed in Rhode Island and Massachusetts ahead of Nov. 1 seeking to force the federal government to release the funds.In response to one of the lawsuits, the USDA allowed SNAP benefits to be partially released. Then, last week, a federal judge ordered the Trump administration to pay SNAP benefits in full for November. States began to disburse the funds as quickly as possible last week. But on Friday, the Supreme Court allowed the Trump administration to temporarily halt SNAP payments for November.The USDA guidance on Saturday did not explain to states how they should claw back funding that may have already gone out to SNAP recipients.On Sunday, Gov. Maura Healey, D-Mass., said that SNAP recipients in her state should continue to spend their funds and threatened to sue the Trump administration.”If President Trump wants to penalize states for preventing Americans from going hungry, we will see him in court. Massachusetts residents with funds on their cards should continue to spend it on food. These funds were processed in accordance with guidance we received from the Trump Administration and a lower court order, and they were processed before the Supreme Court order on Friday night,” Healey said in a statement.Gov. Tony Evers, D-Wis., in response to the USDA’s request to undo SNAP disbursements, simply said in a statement, “No.”“Our administration is actively in court fighting against the Trump Administration’s efforts to yank food assistance away from Wisconsin’s kids, families, and seniors, and we are eager for the court to resolve this issue,” he added.Alexandra MarquezAlexandra Marquez is a politics reporter for NBC News.Gary Grumbach contributed.
October 1, 2025
Kimmel and Colbert join each other's shows
October 16, 2025
Trump expands access to make IVF more affordable
Comments are closed.
Scroll To Top
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics
© Copyright 2025 - Be That ! . All Rights Reserved