• Police seek suspects in deadly birthday party shooting
  • Lawmakers launch inquires into U.S. boat strike
  • Nov. 29, 2025, 10:07 PM EST / Updated Nov. 30, 2025,…
  • Mark Kelly says troops ‘can tell’ what orders…

Be that!

contact@bethat.ne.com

 

Be That ! Menu   ≡ ╳
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics Politics
☰

Be that!

Nicole Kidman and Keith Urban separate after 19 years

admin - Latest News - September 30, 2025
admin
43 views 6 secs 0 Comments



Nicole Kidman and Keith Urban separate after 19 years



Source link

TAGS:
PREVIOUS
Sept. 30, 2025, 5:00 AM EDTBy Fred Schulte, KFF Health NewsNot long after California surgeon Andrew S. Hsu landed a job with a cosmetic surgery chain in Georgia, several of his patients alleged they suffered disfiguring injuries, and even his new employer allegedly had doubts about his competence, court records show.Hsu, a board-certified general surgeon, was one of six out-of-state doctors who joined the Atlanta Goals Aesthetics & Plastic Surgery center during the pandemic. The surgeons received temporary licenses to practice in Georgia, which state officials granted in response to the sudden need for more medical personnel to address the Covid outbreak — even though the center specialized in elective cosmetic surgeries, such as Brazilian butt lifts, or BBLs, and liposuction, paid for in cash or on credit.The Atlanta center announced its opening in March 2021 as an expansion of New York-based Goals Aesthetics & Plastic Surgery, which markets “precision body contouring” for about a dozen surgery clinics in eight states, promising patients a “dream body in just one visit.” But the Atlanta center’s early days were marred by allegations of substandard patient care. Court records show that at least 20 women filed medical malpractice lawsuits, several of which were later dismissed, against the facility, or its owner and surgeons. Hsu was named as a defendant in seven suits filed against the Atlanta center, more than any other physician there. An eighth patient sued Hsu alleging negligence in an operation he performed at a Goals office in New York.Hsu did not respond to requests for comment. Goals declined to comment. Both have denied any negligence in response to the lawsuits.Cosmetic surgery chains across the country are attracting patients by promising “minimally invasive” operations to reshape their bodies or get rid of stubborn fat — even helping arrange outside financing for people who can’t pay upfront. Hundreds of thousands of patients are undergoing such procedures each year, and plastic surgeons can earn more than $500,000 each year in one of the highest-paid specialties in American medicine. An investigation by KFF Health News found that lawsuits filed by injured patients have trailed the industry’s growth, in some cases alleging that surgeons lacked adequate training, had histories of malpractice lawsuits or had faced disciplinary action by state medical licensing boards — yet crossed into another state and kept practicing.With cosmetic surgery chains growing, lawsuits reveal allegations of injuries and deaths04:08In the Atlanta lawsuits, Goals has denied any negligence and won dismissal of several of them because patients had signed papers agreeing to outside arbitration — which requires them to resolve disputes privately and outside the court system.Yet, Goals argued in a separate contract dispute with a medical staffing firm that several of its Atlanta surgeons, including Hsu, were indeed prone to problems — either because they lacked adequate training or had troubled pasts, including investigations by state medical licensing boards into misconduct, court records show. One of Hsu’s Atlanta patients alleged in a separate lawsuit that she suffered in pain for more than a year because a piece of a scalpel was left inside her body after a BBL and liposuction. In a June 2023 court filing in that contract dispute, Goals blamed the problems on a medical staffing firm — Barton Associates, a private equity-owned firm in Massachusetts — it said failed to do adequate background checks on the doctors it supplied. Barton denied the allegations and said it met all terms of the contract.No public database exists to help patients learn the full practice histories of physicians, including cosmetic surgeons. And patients are largely left on their own to decipher which certificates hanging on a surgeon’s office wall, or ballyhooed in web advertising, signify appropriate training and which do not. Disputes among medical specialty groups over whose members are the best qualified to perform cosmetic operations — and deliver the best results — add to the confusion. No government agency tracks injuries or other complication rates at clinics offering cosmetic surgery or any other type of operations. And in many jurisdictions, including Georgia, gaining access to court records — a possible red flag for spotting problems — is laborious and costly.Charleetra Hornes, 52, who lives in the Atlanta suburbs and is suing the Goals center for medical malpractice, said she knew nothing of its alleged early troubles and chose the company because its advertising promised “minimal downtime” for recovery and that she would remain awake during the operation.She said she paid $6,650 for a “double BBL” in which fat is suctioned from the stomach, purified and injected into the buttocks and hips to create what Goals calls a “natural-looking enhancement.” Goals went ahead with her surgery July 2, 2022, even though she had tested positive for Covid that day, according to the suit. Hornes alleged that two days before the surgery, Goals assigned her to surgeon Thomas Shannon, who has worked for Goals in Georgia and Texas. Though staff gave her pills to manage the discomfort, Hornes said, she suffered “excruciating pain” during the procedure, according to the suit.That night, she spiked a fever that sent her to the emergency room. She spent two weeks in the hospital recovering from injuries, including a “severe burn on her side,” according to the suit.“I’ve been disfigured and burned up, and it’s not fair,” she said in an interview.In June 2024, Hornes sued Shannon, the Goals center and Barton Associates, alleging malpractice. On Sept. 2, a Georgia judge dismissed Shannon from the case, ruling that Hornes failed to serve him with the complaint in Texas before the statute of limitations ran out. He did not respond to requests for comment. In a separate order issued on the same day, the judge also dismissed the other defendants, citing the statute of limitations issue and that Hornes had previously signed an arbitration agreement. Some cosmetic surgery chains and other medical practices ask patients to sign such agreements. Hornes wishes she had learned more about the Atlanta surgery center, instead of accepting what she calls its “flashy” come-ons. “I wish I would have taken it more seriously,” she said in an interview, “because it was life-altering.”Malpractice cases and settlements are useful toolsKFF Health News identified more than 200 lawsuits filed against multistate cosmetic surgery companies, mostly over the past seven years, including cases involving a dozen deaths, using databases of court records. Lawsuits by themselves don’t prove wrongdoing. Many cases are settled under confidential terms that keep critical details under wraps. Yet, medical authorities and most physician licensing boards regard malpractice cases and settlements as a useful tool for detecting possible patterns of substandard health care that may harm patients. Court files show that surgeons who were sued numerous times for malpractice — and in some cases disciplined by state medical boards for misconduct — have managed to get hired by cosmetic surgery chains. Goals, owned by physician Sergey Voskin, has contracted with eight surgeons with three or more malpractice cases filed against them, including in the Atlanta area, court records allege. Gerald Hickson, founding director of the Vanderbilt Center for Patient and Professional Advocacy and an expert on medical malpractice issues, called that number of suits a “warning” of possible problems, despite their outcome.Earlier this year, a Pennsylvania woman identified in court filings as “P.C.” sued Goals, Voskin and surgeon Peter Driscoll, alleging Driscoll came on board despite an “extensive history of malpractice allegations, licensing suspensions and discipline” in Texas and California, according to medical board records cited in the suit. Companies hiring doctors have ready access to the nonpublic National Practitioner Data Bank, which details disciplinary problems in a doctor’s past. But it’s not clear from court records whether anybody made these standard background checks. Goals did not respond to a request for comment. The suit also accuses Goals of consumer fraud for touting its surgeons as “double if not triple board certified plastic surgeons.” According to the complaint, Driscoll was board-certified by the American Board of Otolaryngology, a specialty that focuses on treatment and surgery of head and neck areas. Driscoll is no longer certified in the specialty, according to the American Board of Medical Specialties website. The woman alleges that Driscoll sexually harassed her and made “unwanted and unwelcome sexual contact” during a BBL procedure in June 2022 at a Goals office in New Jersey. According to the suit, staff members overheard Driscoll watching pornography in an office bathroom multiple times, but Goals did not terminate him at the time. New Jersey’s State Board of Medical Examiners temporarily suspended Driscoll’s license in February 2023 related to the incident, and the woman’s lawsuit is pending in federal court in New Jersey. Goals and Voskin have denied the allegations in the suit and filed a motion to dismiss or compel arbitration of the case. Driscoll, who has not filed a response with the court, could not be reached for comment.Performance issues not ‘disqualifying’Other cosmetic surgery chains have faced multiple malpractice actions targeting surgeons or other health care providers who staff their clinics, court records show. The surgeon roster at Mia Aesthetics, a Miami-based chain that operates 13 cosmetic surgery offices nationwide, lists four doctors with three or more malpractice actions since 2020, court records show.Nearly a dozen injured patients have filed lawsuits criticizing the credentials of doctors and nurse practitioners affiliated with Belle Medical, including the family of a 70-year-old Utah woman with five children who died in the car two days after liposuction as her husband rushed her from home to a hospital, according to court records.Her husband alleges he called Belle Medical’s office the day after the procedure to say his wife was having difficulty breathing and heart palpitations and couldn’t walk more than a short distance, which the lawsuit argued were “textbook symptoms of pulmonary embolism, or blood clot in the lung.” According to the suit, nobody at Belle Medical advised the family to seek immediate medical care. An autopsy found she died from “bilateral pulmonary emboli,” according to the suit.Backed by Peterson Partners, a Utah private equity and investment firm, Belle Medical operates in Utah, Idaho and Oklahoma, offering liposuction and other cosmetic surgery. Neither Belle Medical nor Peterson Partners responded to requests for comment. In court filings, Belle Medical has argued that its medical providers are independent contractors who are solely responsible for any procedures they perform.Private equity-backed Sono Bello, the largest of the cosmetic surgery chains with more than 100 locations nationwide, has defended more than a dozen lawsuits alleging the company contracted with inadequately trained doctors or practitioners previously disciplined by medical licensing boards. In May 2023, Ohio’s medical board revoked the license of a Sono Bello contract surgeon after three of her patients died, two of them following procedures at a Sono Bello office in the Cleveland area, according to medical board records.Robert Centeno, Sono Bello’s medical director for the East region, told KFF Health News that many surgeons have past performance issues, which he called “not, in fact, disqualifying.” Surgeon Robert Centeno is Sono Bello’s medical director for the East region.NBC News“The vast majority of our colleagues are extremely professional and committed to their profession,” he said in an interview. “And while there may be a momentary lapse or issue with their practice, most of our surgeons take those sanctions, take that counseling, that advice, and improve their practices and go on to be very, very productive members of the medical community.” Asked about malpractice lawsuits filed against the company, Centeno said that Sono Bello has “performed over 300,000 procedures to date,” which he described as “more procedures for more patients completed safely than anyone else in the industry. It would be natural and understandable to know that at some point during that process, that a patient has actually sued us,” Centeno said.‘Unable to perform’In early 2020, as the pandemic slowed business in New York City, Goals sought to expand to Atlanta — a hot market for its BBLs. In a PR Newswire release, Goals promised patients “amazing contours” and boasted of having “some of the most experienced, and aesthetically forward surgeons in the industry.” BBLs and liposuction make up 95% of its business, marketed to mostly Black and Hispanic women, Goals owner Voskin testified in a deposition filed this year in the Driscoll case. Many Atlanta patients suing the company paid roughly $6,000 to $8,000 for their surgeries, court records show. Goals initially staffed the Atlanta center through Barton Associates. Many hospitals and medical offices rely on such firms to find temporary doctors and other staff. Under the deal, Barton charged Goals $1,400 for each procedure and paid about $600 of that to the surgeon, according to Goals’ court filings.
NEXT
Hurricane Humberto Pulls Tropical Storm Imelda Away From US
Related Post
November 5, 2025
Nov. 4, 2025, 8:41 PM ESTBy Alexandra MarquezVirginia state Sen. Ghazala Hashmi on Tuesday became the first Muslim American woman elected to statewide office in the U.S. with her victory in the state’s lieutenant governor’s race, NBC News projects.Her historic victory comes the same night that former Rep. Abigail Spanberger, whom NBC News projects as the winner in Virginia’s governor’s race, became the first woman elected governor in the state.This is the second time Hashmi has made history in an election; in 2019 she was the first Muslim American woman elected to Virginia’s state Legislature. Since then, Hashmi has served in the statehouse representing a district southwest of Washington, D.C.Last month, Hashmi told The Washington Post that she hoped voters would send a message showing that they’re “not divided” on “lines of bigotry.”“We’re really showing the rest of the country that Virginia is in a position where we embrace diversity,” she said.Spanberger and Hashmi, both Democrats, ran alongside other members of their party seeking statewide office in Virginia, but governors and lieutenant governors are elected separately in the state. Ghazala Hashmi won the election to be Virginia’s next lieutenant governor, NBC News projects.Caroline Gutman for The Washington Post via Getty ImagesVirginia’s lieutenant governor holds few official responsibilities, but the person can serve as a crucial tie-breaker in the state Senate and is first-in-line to succeed the governor in the case of death or resignation.Several lieutenant governors in the state have used the position as a launching pad for gubernatorial campaigns, including Lt. Gov. Winsome Earle-Sears, the Republican nominee for governor this year.“Lieutenant Governor-elect Hashmi ran a brilliantly focused campaign all about lowering costs, growing Virginia’s economy, and ensuring our kids have access to high-quality child care and education,” Democratic National Committee Chair Ken Martin said in a statement. Alexandra MarquezAlexandra Marquez is a politics reporter for NBC News.
November 21, 2025
Nov. 21, 2025, 11:50 AM EST / Updated Nov. 21, 2025, 12:14 PM ESTBy Erin McGarry and Kate ReillyA major cross-country storm next week threatens to cause travel delays for millions across the United States during the busy Thanksgiving holiday.Southern California is set to be the first hit, with heavy rainfall throughout Friday. Up to 1 inch of rain per hour is possible, with 1 to 2 inches of total rainfall in urban areas causing localized flash flooding. Rock- and mudslides are also possible.The storm will shift away from California on Saturday and move into the desert, where heavy rainfall is forecast to sweep across southern Arizona. It is then expected to move into the Southern Plains, where it poses the risk of excessive rainfall in areas that were just hit by a separate system over the past two days.By Monday, the rainstorm is expected to stretch from South Texas to the Upper Midwest, bringing pockets of heavy rain and potential flooding that could delay flights.The East Coast is forecast to be affected on Tuesday, with light rain and residual travel delays from the storm.This storm system comes ahead of the nation’s busiest travel period.At least 82 million Americans are expected to travel at least 50 miles from home over the Thanksgiving holiday period from Tuesday, Nov. 25, to Monday, Dec. 1, according to the American Automobile Association (AAA).People with Thanksgiving travel plans should check the weather forecast before traveling and plan accordingly, the National Weather Service said on Friday. Erin McGarryErin McGarry is the executive editor of NBC News’ climate unit. Kate ReillyKate Reilly is a news associate with NBC News.
November 6, 2025
Sudan paramilitary group agrees to U.S. ceasefire proposal
November 22, 2025
Savewith a NBCUniversal ProfileCreate your free profile or log in to save this articleNov. 22, 2025, 4:06 PM ESTBy Julie Tsirkin, Gordon Lubold, Megan Shannon and Alexandra MarquezPresident Donald Trump on Saturday said that his administration’s peace proposal for Ukraine and Russia is “not my final offer,” telling reporters after a question from NBC News, “One way or the other, we have to get it ended.”Trump added that if Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy doesn’t agree to the peace plan, “then he can continue to fight his little heart out.”Earlier this week, Trump said that he wants Zelenskyy — who has hesitations about the proposal — to accept the peace plan by Thanksgiving.Trump’s new Thanksgiving deadline for Ukraine peace plan01:35Key points of the proposal include allowing Russia to keep more Ukrainian territory than it currently holds, forcing Ukraine to limit the size of its army and agreeing that Ukraine will never join NATO.Ukrainian lawmakers have criticized the plan as conceding too much to Russia’s demands, though the Trump administration has said that the plan, which has 28 points, was drafted with input from both sides of the conflict.“Ukraine may now face a very difficult choice, either losing its dignity or the risk of losing a key partner, either the difficult 28 points, or a very difficult winter,” Zelenskyy said in a video about the plan earlier this week.Several U.S. lawmakers, including in Trump’s own party, have also expressed concerns about the plan.“While there are many good ideas in the proposed Russia-Ukraine peace plan, there are several areas that are very problematic and can be made better. The goal of any peace deal is to end the war honorably and justly — and not create new conflict,” Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., wrote in a post on X Saturday morning. Later, the South Carolina senator posted that he was confident Trump would garner a peace deal by pushing both countries and would ensure Ukraine remains free and able to defend itself from future aggression.Sen. Roger Wicker, R-Miss., wrote in his own X post on Friday that “this so-called ‘peace plan’ has real problems, and I am highly skeptical it will achieve peace.”He added, “Ukraine should not be forced to give up its lands to one of the world’s most flagrant war criminals in Vladimir Putin. The size and disposition of Ukraine’s armed forces is a sovereign choice for its government and people. And any assurances provided to Putin should not reward his malign behavior or undermine the security of the United States or allies.”The proposal includes a security guarantee with a commitment that U.S. and European allies to Ukraine would treat any future attack on Ukraine as an attack on the broader trans-Atlantic community, a U.S. official told NBC News, with few additional details about what the commitment would entail.Ukrainian leaders aren’t the only ones voicing concerns about the plan. On the sidelines of the G20 summit in South Africa, European leaders have said the proposal, if agreed to, could “leave Ukraine vulnerable to future attack.”That was a key point in a statement signed by the leaders of Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Finland, Ireland, the Netherlands, Spain and Norway.Secretary of State Marco Rubio and special envoy Steve Witkoff will travel to Geneva on Sunday to meet with a Ukrainian delegation to move peace talks forward with an eye to ending the war in Ukraine, according to two U.S. officials.A separate meeting with a Russian delegation in another location in coming days is under consideration, according to those officials.Rubio and Witkoff will join Army Secretary Dan Driscoll, who arrived earlier Saturday along with the top U.S. diplomat to Ukraine, Ambassador Julie Davis. Driscoll this past week traveled to Kyiv to meet with Zelenskyy.“Secretary Driscoll and team just landed in Geneva to work on the next steps toward achieving peace in Ukraine,” a U.S. official said.Zelenskyy confirmed the details of the meeting in a post on X, saying he’d spoken to U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer on Saturday.“Tomorrow, our advisers will work in Switzerland — representatives from Ukraine, the United States, and the E3 format, namely the UK, France, and Germany. The vast majority of European leaders are ready to assist and get involved. Consultations are ongoing at various levels, and the efforts of everyone who seeks a genuine and lasting peace matter,” Zelenskyy wrote.Trump made quickly ending the ongoing war in Ukraine a key promise of his 2024 campaign. So far this year, he’s met with Zelenskyy multiple times and hosted Russian President Vladimir Putin for a summit in Alaska.Russian leaders, including Putin, have praised the peace proposal, with Putin saying that if Ukraine doesn’t sign the agreement, Russia would end the war “through military means, through armed struggle.”Julie TsirkinJulie Tsirkin is a correspondent covering Capitol Hill.Gordon LuboldGordon Lubold is a national security reporter for NBC News.Megan ShannonMegan Shannon is a White House researcher for NBC NewsAlexandra MarquezAlexandra Marquez is a politics reporter for NBC News.
Comments are closed.
Scroll To Top
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics
© Copyright 2025 - Be That ! . All Rights Reserved