• Israel prepares for final hostage release as Gazans…
  • Oscar-winning actor Diane Keaton dies at 79
  • Diane Keaton, Oscar-winning actress, dies at 79
  • Diane Keaton, Oscar-winning actor who rose to fame…

Be that!

contact@bethat.ne.com

 

Be That ! Menu   ≡ ╳
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics Politics
☰

Be that!

Oct. 4, 2025, 5:00 AM EDTBy Sahil KapurWASHINGTON — The federal government remains shut down, with the Senate struggling to find the 60 votes needed to reopen it and no negotiations taking place between the leaders of the two parties.Republicans control the Senate but need at least eight Democratic caucus members to vote with them to overcome a filibuster and end the shutdown. So far, they have just three: Sens. John Fetterman, D-Pa.; Catherine Cortez Masto, D-Nev.; and Angus King, I-Maine. The rest are holding firm, so far, as the party demands concessions in the form of health care funding in order to win their votes.Federal government shutdown set to stretch into next week02:19With no serious discussions occurring between Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., and Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., the spotlight turns to rank-and-file senators who could be key to finding a way to break the impasse.The House, meanwhile, has canceled its session for next week, keeping the focus on the Senate.Here are three key Democratic senators to watch.We’d like to hear from you about how you’re experiencing the government shutdown, whether you’re a federal employee who can’t work right now or someone who is feeling the effects of shuttered services in your everyday life. Please contact us at tips@nbcuni.com or reach out to us here.Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H.Shaheen is in a unique position for a variety of reasons. She’s a senior member of the Appropriations Committee, which is tasked with writing government funding bills, and she loathes shutdowns. Shaheen was just one of two Democratic caucus members (along with Sen. Angus King, I-Maine) who voted for the last Republican bill to avoid a government shutdown, which passed in March.She’s also the lead author of the Democratic bill to make permanent the Obamacare subsidies that will expire at the end of this year, the party’s central demand in the current standoff. And she’s retiring at the end of this term, freeing her from political pressure.“There are a lot of people on both sides of the aisle who think we need to address this,” Shaheen said, of the Obamacare subsidies, citing recent polls that show substantial support for extending them to avoid premium hikes. “I think it’s important, and it’s a message to not only our Republican colleagues, but to the White House.”A source who has spoken to Shaheen said she recognizes the headwinds Democrats face as the minority party and has spoken to colleagues in search of the best possible outcomes on a health care solution. The source spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss private conversations among senators. Shaheen is seen by Republicans as someone they can deal with; she’s nobody’s idea of a partisan flamethrower. If there’s a deal to break the logjam, it probably runs through her.Sen. Jon Ossoff, D-Ga.Ossoff is the only Democrat running for re-election next year in a state won by President Donald Trump in 2024. The first-term Georgia senator has held his cards close to the vest during the shutdown and has been strategic in his occasional breaks with his party during his Senate career. But in each of the four recent votes on bills to fund the government, he has supported the Democratic plan — which extends Obamacare funding and undoes Medicaid cuts — and opposed the Republican one.Ossoff said his vote is “to keep the government open and to prevent massive increases to Georgians’ health insurance premiums next year.”He faulted Trump for telling Republicans not to negotiate with Democrats, while urging the GOP to “work with us to find a bipartisan path forward and to prevent a massive increase in health insurance premiums for Georgia families.”For now, Trump and Republicans are shouldering more of the blame for the shutdown than Democrats, according to four recent polls. That gives Ossoff some breathing room. But he won’t want to alienate swing voters who may prove crucial to his quest for a second term in an ultra-competitive state.If the public turns on Democrats in the shutdown fight, Ossoff will face immense pressure to flip. If not, it could mean that the GOP strategy of holding out until Democrats feel the heat and cave is failing.Sen. Brian Schatz, D-HawaiiSchatz was one of the 10 key Democrats who voted to drop the filibuster and allow Republicans to pass a six-month government funding bill that prevented a shutdown at the most recent deadline in March. Schatz didn’t vote for the underlying funding bill like Shaheen and King did, but his and other Democrats’ votes to allow Republicans to get around the filibuster provoked a furious response from the liberal base.Schatz is in a unique position as a Schumer deputy who has his finger on the pulse of both the Democratic conference and the party base (including its younger and more online activists). He’s among the limited group of senators who are adept at social media, where much of the debate is taking place. And he’s in pole position to be the next Senate Democratic whip and replace the retiring Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill.In the run-up to the current shutdown, Schatz offered “free advice” to Republicans, vowing that “another jam job is not going to work” and that the GOP needs to negotiate with Democrats to achieve a successful product. He made good on that warning.Schatz could be a bellwether for the direction of the caucus and whether a sufficient number of Democrats can accept a bill to reopen the government. If he’s on board, other fence-sitters in the conference may feel more comfortable supporting it.Sahil KapurSahil Kapur is a senior national political reporter for NBC News.

admin - Latest News - October 4, 2025
admin
10 views 17 secs 0 Comments




The federal government remains shut down, with the Senate struggling to find the 60 votes needed to reopen it and no negotiations taking place between the leaders of the two parties.



Source link

TAGS:
PREVIOUS
Oct. 4, 2025, 2:01 AM EDT / Updated Oct. 4, 2025, 2:06 AM EDTBy Arata Yamamoto and Jennifer JettTOKYO — Japan’s governing party elected Sanae Takaichi as its new leader on Saturday, setting her up to become the U.S. ally’s first female prime minister.Takaichi defeated Shinjiro Koizumi 185 to 156 in a second-round runoff vote to become leader of the conservative Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), which has governed Japan almost uninterrupted since the end of World War II.The leadership race was triggered last month when Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba said he would step down after a year in office. Though Takaichi is likely to succeed him as prime minister of Japan, the world’s fourth-largest economy, when parliament votes later this month, it is not guaranteed since the LDP-led coalition lost its majority in both houses in the past year. Takaichi, 64, a conservative nationalist who lists former British leader Margaret Thatcher as one of her role models, was an ally of assassinated former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, Japan’s longest-serving leader.But there are concerns that Takaichi’s nationalistic historical views could cause friction with China, Japan’s top trading partner.Koizumi, 44, the son of former Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi, would have been Japan’s youngest leader since Hirobumi Ito, who was just a few months younger than Koizumi when he became the country’s first prime minister in 1885.The party voted on five candidates in the first round, with Takaichi securing 183 votes to Koizumi’s 164. Yoshimasa Hayashi, 64, the top spokesperson for the current Japanese government, came third with 134 votes after a recent surge in polls.Votes in the first round were divided evenly between 294 LDP lawmakers and almost 1 million rank-and-file party members who were represented by 295 votes. Lawmakers favored the more moderate Koizumi, while party members preferred Takaichi, who has a passionate hard-line base. In the second round, lawmakers had the same number of votes while rank-and-file party members had 47, representing the 47 prefectures of Japan.Lawmakers in the second round voted 149 to 145 in favor of Takaichi, while party members gave her 36 votes compared with Koizumi’s 11.Arata Yamamoto reported from Tokyo, and Jennifer Jett from Hong Kong.Arata YamamotoArata Yamamoto has been an NBC News producer in Tokyo since 1993.Jennifer JettJennifer Jett is the Asia Digital Editor for NBC News, based in Hong Kong.
NEXT
Oct. 4, 2025, 5:15 AM EDTBy Jeremy Mikula and Melinda YaoThe government shuts down, a celebrity couple calls it quits, and Taylor Swift releases a new album. Test your knowledge of this week’s news, and take last week’s quiz here.#embed-20251003-news-quiz iframe {width: 1px;min-width: 100%}Jeremy MikulaJeremy Mikula is the weekend director of platforms for NBC News.Melinda YaoI am an intern for data graphics team.Nick Duffy, Josh Feldman, Lara Horwitz and Jana Kasperkevic contributed.
Related Post
October 8, 2025
Johnson and Senate Democrats argue about government shutdown and health care
September 22, 2025
Disney says 'Jimmy Kimmel Live' will return Tuesday
October 1, 2025
Sept. 30, 2025, 12:04 PM EDTBy Kaan OzcanNew cases of cancer have been rising among younger people, worrying patients and doctors about causes. A new study suggests increasing numbers of cases of early onset cancer are largely due to improved and more routine screening, while mortality rates among younger people haven’t changed.The study, published Monday in JAMA Internal Medicine, compared rates of new diagnoses over the past three decades to mortality rates of the fastest-rising cancers in adults under 50. Of the eight cancers the research team studied, only two, colorectal and endometrial, showed increases in deaths. Other cancers included thyroid, anal, pancreatic, kidney, myeloma and small intestine. While breast and kidney cancers have increased in incidence, the mortality rates across all age groups have decreased in recent years.In fact, invasive breast cancer has been increasing faster in women under 50 than women over 50, at around a 1.4% increase per year from 2012 to 2021, according to the American Cancer Society. Similarly, colorectal cancer rates increased 2.4% per year in adults under 50 years and by 0.4% in adults 50-64 from 2012 to 2021. However, deaths have been halved for both because of earlier detection and improved treatment such as immunotherapies.Advances in screening technology and recommended screening at younger ages have allowed doctors to detect tumors at their earliest stages, including cases that may not ever negatively affect a person’s health.Dr. H. Gilbert Welch, senior investigator at the Center for Surgery and Public Health at Mass General Brigham hospital and a co-author of the study, said the harder doctors look for cancer, the more they are bound to find. “There really isn’t much more cancer out there,” Welch said. “We’re just finding stuff that’s always been there. That’s particularly true in things like the thyroid and the kidney.”The increase in “diagnostic scrutiny” for cancer adds to the uptick in some cancer case numbers. “Largely, what’s going on here is that people are getting tested more, and they’re getting more, if you will, powerful tests that can resolve smaller and smaller abnormalities,” he said. “This is largely simply unearthing things that have always been there.”Last year, the highly influential U.S. Preventive Services Task Force lowered the recommended age for first breast cancer screenings to 40, down from 50. And as deaths from colon cancer among people ages 45 to 49 ticked up, in 2021 the recommended age to start screening dropped from 50 to 45. Dr. Ahmed Jemal, senior vice president for surveillance, prevention and health services research at the American Cancer Society, said rising incidence rates can’t simply be chalked up to more and improved screening. Some of the causes are diet, obesity and physical inactivity.The study also pointed out that unnecessary treatments, such as surgery or radiation or chemotherapy, for cancers that aren’t “clinically meaningful” can cause multiple burdens for younger patients, Jemal said. A clinically meaningful cancer is considered dangerous and could spread if it is untreated. “You create not only cost burden, but you create anxiety,” Jemal said. Dr. Philippe E. Spiess, chief of surgery at Moffitt Cancer Center in Tampa, Florida, said the psychosocial aspect of cancer is another significant consequence. “Once a patient physically knows they have a mass, there is a significant burden that you have related to knowing that,” he said.Rather than intervene with every cancer doctors find, Spiess said, it’s important for doctors to assess whether patients’ cancers are dangerous and at risk of harming them. If tumors are small enough to be considered nonlethal, doctors should work with patients to monitor and continually assess their risk.“As long as the patient is committed to observation and surveillance, I think the consideration there is that you’re really not losing anything,” Spiess said.Kaan OzcanKaan Ozcan is an intern with NBC News’ Health and Medical Unit. 
October 6, 2025
Pritzker slams Trump's deployment of National Guard
Comments are closed.
Scroll To Top
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics
© Copyright 2025 - Be That ! . All Rights Reserved