• Police seek suspects in deadly birthday party shooting
  • Lawmakers launch inquires into U.S. boat strike
  • Nov. 29, 2025, 10:07 PM EST / Updated Nov. 30, 2025,…
  • Mark Kelly says troops ‘can tell’ what orders…

Be that!

contact@bethat.ne.com

 

Be That ! Menu   ≡ ╳
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics Politics
☰

Be that!

Oct. 19, 2025, 11:34 PM EDTBy Dennis RomeroSAN DIEGO — The Marines Corps has launched an investigation after the California Highway Patrol said shrapnel from an artillery shell, fired during a live-fire demonstration touted by the White House, struck a law enforcement vehicle.No injuries were reported when an artillery round “detonated overhead prematurely” during Saturday’s 250th anniversary celebration for the Marines Corps at Camp Pendleton, the highway patrol said.But at least one of its patrol vehicles, on hand to help stop and divert traffic on Interstate 5 through the base during the demonstration, was damaged, the highway patrol said in a statement Sunday.“This was an unusual and concerning situation,” CHP Border Division Chief Tony Coronado, who also identified himself as a Marine, said in the statement. “It is highly uncommon for any live-fire or explosive training activity to occur over an active freeway.”Capt. Gregory Dreibelbis, spokesperson for I Marine Expeditionary Force, said in a statement Sunday that officials “are aware of the report of a possible airborne detonation of a 155mm artillery round outside the designated impact area” during Saturday’s Marine Corps amphibious capabilities demonstration.Pictures from a CHP incident report show a black-and-white unit with a hood apparently pierced by shrapnel, as well as multiple munition fragments. The report indicated that the fragment on the hood measured around 2 inches by 2 inches. According to a CHP map, the vehicle was at Interstate 5 and Las Pulgas Road, nearly a mile north of the Red Beach demonstration along the northernmost coast of San Diego County, when it was hit. The highway patrol said shrapnel from live artillery, fired over Interstate 5 as part of the anniversary demonstration, struck a patrol vehicle.California Highway PatrolThe report said a motorcycle officer also found a fragment measuring about 1 inch by a half-inch near his own vehicle. The CHP said the strike happened as officers were temporarily halting traffic on the freeway so motorists would be out of harm’s way during the demonstration.California Gov. Gavin Newsom had been critical of the plan to fire live munitions over the interstate in the days leading up to Saturday’s celebrations, which were attended by Vice President JD Vance and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who both gave spoke at the event. Newsom, a Democrat who has repeatedly sparred with the Trump administration, had criticized the potential impact of a temporary closure of the 80,000-vehicles-per-day Interstate 5, and he said state authorities were denied sufficient notice of a dangerous and “absurd show of force.”“This could have killed someone,” Newsom said Sunday on X.Asked for a response to the CHP’s report of a shrapnel strike, Newsom spokesperson Diana Crofts-Pelayo also pointed to a post on the X account for the governor’s office: “We love our Marines and owe a debt of gratitude to Camp Pendleton, but next time, the Vice President and the White House shouldn’t be so reckless with people’s lives for their vanity projects.”The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment Sunday. In the lead-up to Saturday’s celebrations, officials within the Trump administration had characterized complaints about the live-fire demonstrations and consequent freeway shutdown as an overreaction. “Gavin Newsom wants people to think this exercise is dangerous,” William Martin, Vance’s communications director, said in a statement to The New York Times. “The Marine Corps says it’s an established and safe practice. Newsom wants people to think this is an absurd show of force. The Marine Corps says it’s part of routine training at Camp Pendleton.”Dreibelbis, the Marine spokesman, said safety protocols were observed.“The demonstration went through a rigorous safety evaluation, and deliberate layers of redundancy, to ensure the safety of fellow citizens,” he said, adding that live fire was suspended Saturday in accordance with safety protocols. The CHP said it wants to conduct a review and create better communication with federal officials. Dreibelbis said the Marine Corps has launched an investigation and wants to learn from the incident, as well.”We are committed to determining the incident’s root cause and applying findings to future missions,” he said.Dennis RomeroDennis Romero is a breaking news reporter for NBC News Digital.Elyse Perlmutter-Gumbiner, Bill Feather and Madeline Morrison contributed.

admin - Latest News - October 20, 2025
admin
21 views 19 secs 0 Comments




The U.S. Marines Corps has launched an investigation after the California Highway Patrol said shrapnel from an artillery shell, fired during a live-fire demonstration touted by the White House, struck a law enforcement vehicle.



Source link

TAGS:
PREVIOUS
Louvre robbers swipe jewels once worn by French royalty
NEXT
This Chicago union boss endlessly provokes the right. She's about to expand her power.
Related Post
November 18, 2025
Zohran Mamdani reaches out to WH for Trump meeting
October 15, 2025
Oct. 15, 2025, 5:00 AM EDTBy Dan De Luce, Gordon Lubold and Courtney KubeWASHINGTON — Members of Congress are growing concerned over a lack of information from the Trump administration about the intelligence and strategy underlying its strikes on alleged drug smuggling boats in the Caribbean, six sources told NBC News. Republicans and Democrats on Capitol Hill have left briefings about the strikes frustrated with the lack of information, said these people: five congressional sources and an additional source with knowledge of the matter. Some have asked for unedited video of the strikes, reflecting the kind of basic information they seek, but the administration has so far refused to provide it. At a briefing a few weeks ago, Republican lawmakers were clearly upset with the answers they received, one of the congressional sources said. “The Republicans were mad that the briefers were unable to answer questions about the legal basis for the operations,” the source said. Some members of Congress — including Republicans who broadly support the attacks and the administration generally — are also concerned about the level of precision of the intelligence used to determine targets and the possibility that an American citizen could be killed in the operations, several of the sources said. A Defense Department spokesperson said members are being fully informed, and last week most GOP senators voted to defeat a measure that would have required congressional approval before more attacks were launched.Lawmakers are also asking the administration to explain who was killed in the strikes, how they were positively identified as legitimate targets for lethal force, what intelligence indicated that they had possible links to drug trafficking gangs and what information showed that they were heading to the United States with drugs, the sources said. President Donald Trump said on social media that the U.S. military had conducted another strike against a Venezuelan boat.@realDonaldTrump via Truth SocialThey have also asked whether the administration has weighed the potential response from trafficking groups, including the possibility of retaliation inside the United States.Since Sept. 2, President Donald Trump has ordered at least five military strikes in the Caribbean on boats his administration says were moving illicit drugs from Venezuela to the United States. Officials say 27 people have been killed in the attacks, the most recent of which Trump announced Tuesday. Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth posted short, grainy video clips of the strikes on social media. The clips include multiple edits, contributing to questions in Congress about whether the targets are definitely the drug smuggling boats the administration has said they are and about the circumstances and locations of the operations. Raw, unedited video could help reassure lawmakers about the origins of the vessels being targeted, as well as provide more context for them to better understand the circumstances under which the vessels are targeted or even where the strikes are occurring. After the first strike, Trump said the boat the United States destroyed was linked to the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua, but the White House has yet to provide evidence to back up that claim. Drugs were found in the water after one strike, an official from the Dominican Republic said at a news conference last month. The United States has not revealed evidence that drugs were on all the boats. Asked about the lawmakers’ request for more information and video, chief Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell said administration officials have kept Congress fully informed about the strikes and the legal authorities involved with frequent briefings.“The Department of War has given numerous briefs and notifications to Congress that have extensive details of the policy, operations, tactical intelligence, and authorities invoked,” Parnell said in an email.Parnell and the White House did not directly address why the administration so far has not provided lawmakers with access to unedited video of the attacks.A White House official told NBC News, “The Department of War is working through additional requests for information from the Hill.”The administration has provided six classified briefings to relevant congressional committees and lawmakers over the past month, Pentagon and White House officials said.Although no one on the congressional side disputes that there have been briefings by Pentagon officials, members from both parties have come away from them dissatisfied and frustrated at the vague nature of the information that was shared, the sources said. NBC News has reported that the United States has been preparing options for strikes inside Venezuela’s borders. Many lawmakers fear that extending the bombing to targets on land would pose a significant risk of civilian casualties, two of the congressional sources and the source with knowledge of the matter said. Targeting a vessel on the open seas is one thing, they believe, but striking a location on land brings more perils, including the possibility of inadvertent civilian deaths.A member of the national militia holds a Venezuelan flag at a rally in support of President Nicolás Maduro in Caracas on Oct. 6 amid rising tensions with the United States.Leonardo Fernandez Viloria / Reuters fileSome members of Congress also believe the strikes are illegal; others have concerns about their legality. The administration provided a letter to Congress in which it said Trump has determined that the United States is now engaged in an “armed conflict” with drug trafficking organizations and that it views members of those groups as “armed combatants,” using the same legal rationale the government has previously used to go after Al Qaeda, the Islamic State and other terrorist groups.After the first classified briefing by Pentagon officials, which they felt was lacking, multiple lawmakers asked the administration to give access to unedited video of the strikes to members of Congress, who would view the video only behind closed doors, the sources said. Members believe the raw video could help answer some of their questions. So far, though, the administration has not agreed to the request, the sources said. During previous administrations, Pentagon and intelligence officials in some cases provided lawmakers with classified, nonpublic video or photos of specific counterterrorism operations. Although Republicans have privately voiced concerns about the lack of information and clarity about the strikes, last week all but two GOP senators joined in voting down a resolution that would have required the Trump administration to seek congressional approval before it launched more attacks.The resolution went down to defeat in a 51-48 vote. Two Republicans, Rand Paul of Kentucky and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, joined almost all Democrats in voting in favor. (John Fetterman of Pennsylvania crossed the aisle and joined the rest of the Republicans in voting no.) Paul said that he believes the strikes have no legal foundation and that the administration needs to provide evidence to justify the lethal bombing raids. “Is it too much to ask to know the names of those we kill before we kill them, to know what evidence exists of their guilt?” Paul said in a speech on the Senate floor. Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., at a committee hearing in Washington on Sept. 17.Kevin Dietsch / Getty Images fileSen. Todd Young, R-Ind., voted against the resolution but said afterward that he was still “highly concerned about the legality” of the strikes, as well as the deployment of U.S. warships and other resources to the Caribbean that could be needed to counter China in the Pacific.“The administration should adhere to the Constitution and keep the people’s representatives informed on this critical national security issue,” Young said in a statement.‘Secret list’More than 20 Democrats in Congress wrote a letter to the administration last month posing a list of questions about the recent strikes and asking for a copy of all legal assessments of the attacks by federal agencies. The administration has yet to respond to the letter, according to a spokesperson for Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va. Sen. Elissa Slotkin, D-Mich., last week accused the administration of failing to inform Congress and the American people about all the groups being targeted and all the groups Trump has designated as terrorist organizations. At a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing, Slotkin asked Charles Young, the principal deputy general counsel for the Defense Department, to identify the drug cartels that are viewed as adversaries in the campaign.“How many new terrorist organizations are we currently in armed conflict with, and could you name them?” Slotkin asked. Young, who has been nominated to be the Army’s next general counsel, told Slotkin: “Senator, it may be more appropriate to discuss that with you in a closed session.”Slotkin replied that “we couldn’t get it in a closed session” held with the Defense Department’s new general counsel. “I was a CIA officer and helped with targeting. I have no problem with going after these cartels,” she added. “I have no problem designating terrorist organizations in general. But we’ve never had an instance where there’s a secret list of what I understand to be dozens of new terrorist organizations that the American public and certainly the oversight committees don’t get to know.”In justifying labeling cartels as foreign terrorist organizations, officials often cite the high death toll from fentanyl use in the United States. But Venezuela is not considered a source for the illegal fentanyl in the United States, which is mainly smuggled over land routes in small, easily concealed amounts across the Mexico-U.S. border, not by boat through the Caribbean, experts say. A claim by Colombian President Gustavo Petro last week appeared to reflect the concern U.S. lawmakers have about the precision of the strikes and the intelligence behind them. Petro wrote on social media last week that a boat struck on Oct. 3, which the United States portrayed as Venezuelan, was actually from his country and carried Colombian citizens, and he also criticized what he said was a broader political campaign against Venezuela. In a statement, a White House spokesperson dismissed what Petro said, but it was unclear whether the spokesperson was rejecting his central claim, that the boat was Colombian with Colombian citizens on it, not Venezuelan. The spokesperson did not respond to an attempt to clarify the administration’s position.“The United States looks forward to President Petro publicly retracting his baseless and reprehensible statement so that we can return to a productive dialogue on building a strong, prosperous future for the people of the United States and Colombia,” the statement read. Dan De LuceDan De Luce is a reporter for the NBC News Investigative Unit. Gordon LuboldGordon Lubold is a national security reporter for NBC News.Courtney KubeCourtney Kube is a correspondent covering national security and the military for the NBC News Investigative Unit.
November 12, 2025
Nov. 12, 2025, 5:00 AM ESTBy Scott Wong, Ryan Nobles and Lillie BoudreauxWASHINGTON — Democrats shut down the federal government to secure a key demand: extending health care subsidies for millions of Americans.After a more than 40-day standoff, they threw in the towel — with no guarantee from Republicans that they would agree to renew the expiring Obamacare tax credits.Progressive activists and their Democratic allies in Congress, who had wanted the party to fight on longer, decried it as a monumental “cave” to an authoritarian in Donald Trump.But others in the party see a silver lining in the six-week standoff. The eight Senate Democrats who bucked their own leadership and negotiated an end to the longest shutdown in American history said the bipartisan deal protects federal workers who had been laid off during the shutdown — at least temporarily.Kornacki: Trump and Republicans ‘took a hit’ in approval ratings during government shutdown17:05More importantly, they said, the grueling shutdown that is expected to end in the coming days has “crystallized” the battle lines in the next major political fight over health care that is sure to spill into the 2026 midterm election year. It also underscored Trump’s cruelty, Democratic leaders argued, as the White House fought to halt food stamp payments to states during the shutdown.While emotions are raw and finger-pointing rampant in the wake of the deal, the Democratic Party was unified during most of the record 42-day shutdown, demonstrating for the first time it could take on Trump, rev up the progressive base and turn out voters at the polls, as it did in this month’s elections.“I think the Democrats did … some of the best messaging I think we’ve ever had in terms of talking about affordability and talking about health insurance,” said Sen. Ruben Gallego, D-Ariz., who voted against reopening the government. “And I think that was the reason why you saw the results coming in, in New Jersey and Virginia, and that you saw that the polling was going our way.”Small winsAmong the eight Senate Democrats who struck a deal with the White House and Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., four were former governors — pragmatists used to working across the aisle who argue you don’t always get what you want in legislation.The agreement includes a “minibus” of three appropriations bills, which will fund some parts of the government through next fall. The rest of the government will be funded through Jan. 30.The deal includes funding of the food assistance program known as SNAP for the rest of the fiscal year through September 2026, meaning families will be fed and food stamps can’t be used as leverage in any funding fight in the coming months.The group of eight also got some wins for federal workers, who have been under siege since Trump’s inauguration, facing aggressive Department of Government Efficiency cuts and the consolidation of some agencies, like the U.S. Agency for International Development.They got the Trump administration to agree to reinstate federal workers who were laid off during the shutdown through reductions in force, or RIFs. And they secured language barring future mass firings for the duration of the resolution that keeps the government open through January.It’s a win for “federal employees who are not going to be traumatized by RIFs going forward,” said Democratic Sen. Tim Kaine, the former governor of Virginia, a state home to nearly 150,000 civilian federal workers. “I’ve got some folks who didn’t like the vote, but I’m going to have a whole lot of federal employees who are going back to work and they’re getting their paychecks, and they can live through the holidays without worrying that they’re going to get a bad email at 5 a.m. tomorrow morning that they’re laid off.”“They have been living under a cloud of anxiety since Jan. 20, and we’ve lifted that cloud to some degree,” Kaine added. Crystallizing the health fightThe deal fell far short when it comes to health care. Democrats failed to win an extension of Affordable Care Act tax credits that were boosted during the Covid-19 pandemic and are set to expire on Dec. 31. Instead, they secured only a promise from Thune that the Senate will vote on a bill to extend the health subsidies by the end of the second week of December. The House has made no such promise.“Obviously, the Democrats did not hold the line,” said a disappointed Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., who voted against the funding bill.“Look, I think it was a terrible, terrible vote at a time when we have a broken health care system,” added another progressive, Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., who caucuses with Democrats.Drawing out the high-stakes shutdown through October and into the November ACA open enrollment period served two purposes for Democrats, members on both sides of the deal said. It gave them time to educate the public about an issue few in the country were talking about — the expiring subsidies — and came as millions of Americans began feeling the sticker stock firsthand as they received notices of skyrocketing monthly premiums for 2026.“What happened over the last 40 days is we crystallized the fight about health care for the American people and made it clear who’s holding that up,” retiring Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H., a key negotiator and former governor who has authored a one-year extension of the subsidies, told NBC News.“It’s President Donald Trump, it’s Speaker Johnson and it’s the Republicans who have been unwilling to do anything to address the rising costs of health care,” Shaheen said.#embed-20251002-shutdown-milestones iframe {width: 1px;min-width: 100%}The GOP’s stunning, unsuccessful attempt to repeal Obamacare during Trump’s first term helped propel House Democrats to the majority in the 2018 midterms. Democrats believe it’s a good issue for their party, and one that will again help them take back control of the House next year.Amid this week’s circular Democratic firing squad, party leaders are desperately urging their members to keep the heat on Republicans, particularly vulnerable ones facing tough re-election bids.“It’s critical that we continue to highlight the health care crisis that the Republicans refuse to come to the table to try and solve, and call out by name our Republican colleagues in swing seats refusing to extend health care subsidies on the insurance marketplace,” Rep. Suzan DelBene, the head of the House Democrats’ campaign arm, wrote in a memo to her colleagues.“Please stay disciplined and focused in communicating that the House Republicans best positioned to stand up to President Trump and Republican leadership on behalf of their constituents to end this crisis, have refused,” she said.40-day fightLiberal activists and even mainstream Democratic voters had been clamoring for a fight with Trump as the president ran roughshod over the Democratic opposition and even the GOP-controlled Congress.Rep. Veronica Escobar, D-Texas, a member of the powerful House Appropriations Committee that oversees government spending, said she’s not happy with how the shutdown saga ended and has even called for new Democratic leadership in the Senate.But she doesn’t consider the past 40 days a “complete failure.”“We didn’t get what we wanted, but it certainly elevated the consequences of the health care crisis, which is about to be made significantly worse,” Escobar, a member of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, said in an interview. “And it has demonstrated that Republicans are unwilling to solve that and other crises confronting the American people.”“I’m very proud of the unity of purpose we demonstrated,” she continued. “The majority of the American people understood we are fighting for them.”Scott WongScott Wong is a senior congressional reporter for NBC News. Ryan NoblesRyan Nobles is chief Capitol Hill correspondent for NBC News.Lillie BoudreauxLillie Boudreaux is a desk assistant at NBC News.
October 27, 2025
New report details threats facing uncontacted peoples
Comments are closed.
Scroll To Top
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics
© Copyright 2025 - Be That ! . All Rights Reserved