• Police seek suspects in deadly birthday party shooting
  • Lawmakers launch inquires into U.S. boat strike
  • Nov. 29, 2025, 10:07 PM EST / Updated Nov. 30, 2025,…
  • Mark Kelly says troops ‘can tell’ what orders…

Be that!

contact@bethat.ne.com

 

Be That ! Menu   ≡ ╳
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics Politics
☰

Be that!

A liver transplant might save him — if he can get the drug he needs to stay alive long enough

admin - Latest News - October 23, 2025
admin
22 views 12 secs 0 Comments




A health insurance dispute is preventing a North Carolina man from getting a cancer drug his doctors say is necessary.



Source link

TAGS:
PREVIOUS
Lou Gehrig's Yankee jersey sold for $2.7 million
NEXT
Eric Adams endorses Andrew Cuomo for NYC mayor
Related Post
November 21, 2025
Mamdani and Trump discussed working on affordability
October 2, 2025
Christ the Redeemer pink for breast cancer awareness
October 10, 2025
Oct. 10, 2025, 10:00 AM EDTBy Kristen Welker and Rebecca ShabadWASHINGTON — President Donald Trump intended his recent Truth Social post imploring Attorney General Pam Bondi to take legal action against his opponents as a direct message, according to a Trump administration official.Trump was surprised to learn he had actually posted the message to his Truth Social account, the source said, adding that the president reacted by saying “Oh,” and then tried to shrug it off. The Wall Street Journal first reported that Trump meant the post as a direct message. The lengthy post on Sept. 20 addressed Bondi as “Pam” and expressed frustration that “nothing is being done” to his foes. “What about Comey, Adam ‘Shifty’ Schiff, Leticia???” he wrote, referring to former FBI Director James Comey, Sen. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., and New York Attorney General Letitia James. “They’re all guilty as hell, but nothing is going to be done,” he claimed, adding, “We can’t delay any longer, it’s killing our reputation and credibility.” “They impeached me twice, and indicted me (5 times!), OVER NOTHING. JUSTICE MUST BE SERVED, NOW!!!” his post concluded.N.Y. AG Letitia James is indicted on heels of James Comey charges02:44Two of the three people mentioned in the post — Comey and James — have now been indicted by the Justice Department. Two administration officials told NBC News in August that Bondi had appointed a “special attorney” to investigate mortgage fraud allegations against James and Schiff.James was indicted on Thursday by a federal grand jury, charged with one count of bank fraud and one count of making false statements to a financial institution.The prosecutions and investigations of Trump’s rivals have raised concerns from legal experts and critics about his use of the Justice Department for potential retribution and the damage that could cause to the rule of law.James secured a nearly half-billion-dollar civil fraud judgment against Trump and his companies last year, which was recently overturned and is on appeal. She denied the charges against her, saying they were “baseless” and driven by “political retribution.”Her attorney, Abbe Lowell, said Thursday that the case is “driven by President Trump’s desire for revenge,” adding, “When a president can publicly direct charges to be filed against someone — when it was reported that career attorneys concluded none were warranted — it marks a serious attack on the rule of law.”Trump’s pressure on Bondi contradicts his previous claims that he has not become involved in investigations against his rivals or Justice Department charging decisions. After Comey was charged, for example, Trump told reporters at the White House that he had “nothing to do with the case.” “I don’t call anybody. You know what? I’m allowed to do that if I wanted to do that,” Trump said, going on to repeat the allegation that Comey had “lied” and “got caught.” Trump was referring to congressional testimony that the then-FBI director gave in 2017 denying he had authorized a leak to the news media about an FBI investigation into the Clinton Foundation.Comey pleaded not guilty this week to charges that he had made a false statement to Congress and obstructed a congressional proceeding. He said after the charges were filed that there are “costs to standing up to Donald Trump,” adding that he has “great confidence in the federal judicial system.”Referring to Comey’s indictment, Schiff said in an interview on NBC News’ “Meet the Press”: “If Republicans allow this to go on for four years, there will be nothing left of our democracy.””He’s described me as the enemy within,” Schiff said, referring to Trump. “He’s described other Democratic elected officials as the enemy within. He is using the Justice Department to go after his political enemies, and he’s using the Justice Department to protect his political friends. … This should concern every American, not just those he’s tweeting about like myself.”Schiff served as the lead impeachment manager in the House during Trump’s first impeachment trial nearly six years ago. He has denied any wrongdoing in response to the Trump administration’s investigation into mortgage fraud allegations.Asked if he is concerned that he could be charged next, Schiff said: “Those of us on the president’s enemies list — and it is a long and growing list — will not be intimidated, we will not be deterred. We will do our jobs, we will stand up to this president.”In addition to bringing charges against the president’s rivals, the Trump administration has purged officials at the Justice Department and FBI, including recently firing special agents who worked with special counsel Jack Smith’s office in investigations into Trump, sources told NBC this week.The administration’s moves have drawn fire from Justice Department officials and others. In a recent letter obtained by NBC, 42 retired judges warned that the case against Comey shows the “rights and liberties of every American are in grave danger.”Trump was “corruptly” abusing the power of his office “by directing the United States Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation to target his critics and his perceived political enemies for investigation and criminal prosecution,” they argued.Kristen WelkerKristen Welker is the moderator of “Meet the Press.”Rebecca ShabadRebecca Shabad is a politics reporter for NBC News based in Washington.Ryan J. Reilly, Adam Reiss and Matt Korade contributed.
September 24, 2025
Sept. 24, 2025, 3:47 PM EDTBy Tyler KingkadeAfter dozens of school districts and colleges fired employees or placed them on leave over social media posts about Charlie Kirk’s assassination, some of those employees are turning to federal courts to get their jobs back. A former Ball State University staff member is suing the Indiana school’s president after she was fired for posting on Facebook: “Charlie Kirk’s death is a reflection of the violence, fear and hatred he sowed. It does not excuse his death, AND it’s a sad truth.”An art teacher in central Iowa filed a suit last week after the Oskaloosa school board voted to fire him for posting “1 Nazi down” about Kirk’s assassination.An elementary school teacher assistant is suing her Spartanburg County, South Carolina, district over what her lawsuit calls an unconstitutional social media policy. According to the suit, she was fired for posting a quote from Kirk in which he said it’s worth having “some gun deaths every single year” to protect the Second Amendment, and then adding the phrase “thoughts and prayers.” And on Wednesday, an art professor will plead his case before a federal judge in Sioux Falls, hoping to stop the University of South Dakota from firing him for posting on Facebook: “Where was all this concern when the politicians in Minnesota were shot? And the school shootings? And capital police? I have no thoughts or prayers for this hate spreading nazi. A shrug, maybe.”The schools have not yet responded in court. The universities and two districts declined to comment on pending litigation.The lawsuits are among the first actions educators have taken to combat a campaign propelled by conservative influencers and Republican lawmakers who urged schools and other employers to fire people who they say made light of or celebrated Kirk’s death. Those pushing for the firings have argued that teachers and professors with abhorrent views shouldn’t be allowed to influence students. Liberal-leaning critics have accused conservatives of embracing so-called cancel culture, which they had long condemned. Death of Charlie Kirk raises questions about future of free speech in America02:00Civil liberties groups have warned that some of the firings could violate the First Amendment, regardless of whether they simply criticize Kirk or openly celebrate his death. The legal challenges filed over the past two weeks will be important test cases on whether public employees can post statements deemed offensive, said Adam Goldstein, vice president of strategic initiatives at the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression.“It’s an unfortunate necessity that the courts will have to weigh in here,” Goldstein said. “There’s no option here other than a number of cases where courts hopefully reinstruct us on how the First Amendment is supposed to work.”In the days after Kirk was shot earlier this month, Vice President JD Vance and other top Republicans urged citizens to report people who mock Kirk’s assassination to their employers. Secretary of Education Linda McMahon told Fox News last week that she’d “like to see more” college faculty who celebrate Kirk’s death fired or suspended.Some Democrats have shared similar sentiments. In Iowa, a leading Democratic gubernatorial candidate echoed calls to remove the Oskaloosa teacher. “I’d be pretty uncomfortable with my kids having teachers that celebrated someone’s murder,” Rob Sand, the candidate and current state auditor, told the Des Moines Register this week. Because the cases involve public employees, the employers have a higher bar to meet before firing them for speaking out, legal experts say. They will have to show the staff members’ posts created a disruption that interfered with classes, for instance, or the operation of a school. Goldstein said generating controversy or complaints is typically not enough to warrant a firing. Michael Hook, the University of South Dakota art professor, deleted his remarks after a few hours, and shared an apology that stated he regretted the original post. Through his lawyer, Hook declined to be interviewed.Hook filed a motion Tuesday to get an emergency order to block the university from moving forward with the next step in his termination process. He alleges his firing stems from angering “the wrong people,” noting that the governor and speaker of the state house had called for his termination. “When I read this post, I was shaking mad,” Gov. Larry Rhoden, a Republican, posted on X.An online petition to reinstate Hook has over 8,000 signatures.In many cases, Goldstein said, the teachers’ punishment seems disproportionate to their alleged offense, noting that an inappropriate post could be flagged without termination.“It’s very weird to live in a world where Charlie’s wife can forgive the shooter,” Goldstein said, “but we can’t forgive a teacher who quoted him.”Tyler KingkadeTyler Kingkade is a national reporter for NBC News, based in Los Angeles.
Comments are closed.
Scroll To Top
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics
© Copyright 2025 - Be That ! . All Rights Reserved