• Police seek suspects in deadly birthday party shooting
  • Lawmakers launch inquires into U.S. boat strike
  • Nov. 29, 2025, 10:07 PM EST / Updated Nov. 30, 2025,…
  • Mark Kelly says troops ‘can tell’ what orders…

Be that!

contact@bethat.ne.com

 

Be That ! Menu   ≡ ╳
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics Politics
☰

Be that!

Many federal employees miss first full paycheck on Day 24 of shutdown

admin - Latest News - October 25, 2025
admin
25 views 18 secs 0 Comments



A bipartisan policy center reports that 1.4 million civilian federal employees missed their first full paycheck today as the government shutdown continues with no clear end in sight. NBC News’ Tom Costello reports. 



Source link

TAGS:
PREVIOUS
Border Patrol commander appears to throw tear gas at protestors
NEXT
Oct. 24, 2025, 10:43 PM EDTBy Phil HelselNBA Commissioner Adam Silver said Friday that he was “deeply disturbed” about allegations of criminal gambling fraud that resulted in the indictments of Portland Trail Blazers head coach Chauncey Billups and Miami Heat star Terry Rozier a day earlier.“There’s nothing more important to the league and its fans than the integrity of the competition,” Silver said in a halftime interview during Friday’s Boston Celtics-New York Knicks game. “And so I had a pit in my stomach, it was very upsetting.”The federal indictments announced Thursday alleged two schemes of fraud, one involving cheating at illegal poker games and another that involved NBA games and online sports betting.In the NBA fraud, Rozier and five others are accused of exploiting confidential information about players and teams so that others could make bets — which FBI Director Kash Patel likened to insider trading. In one instance, Rozier allegedly tipped off a friend about plans to prematurely leave a game in 2023, and then bets were placed with that nonpublic knowledge.FBI: Mafia involved in NBA gambling scandal02:52Billups is accused in the alleged poker scheme. Prosecutors said he was a “Face Card,” a high-profile figure used to attract gamblers, in rigged games.Lawyers for Billups and Rozier have denied the allegation and said the men will fight the charges.The indictments have cast a spotlight on online sports betting that is now legal in many states — although those sportsbooks have been accused of no wrongdoing, and U.S. Attorney Joseph Nocella Jr. said the sportsbooks were victims.Rozier had been investigated by the league in 2023 involving betting. Silver said Friday that league investigation was prompted after legal sportsbooks picked up unusual behavior around a game in March of 2023. Ultimately, that league investigation found there was insufficient evidence to move forward, Silver said.”While there was that aberrational betting, we frankly couldn’t find anything,” Silver said. “Terry at the time cooperated, he gave the league office his phone, he sat down for an interview.”Silver said the NBA has been cooperating with law enforcement.”The federal government has subpoena power, it can threaten to put people in jail, it can do all kinds of things that a league office can’t do. So we’ve been working with them since then,” Silver said.In all, 34 people were indicted in the two cases. The poker game scheme involves 31 people being indicted, and six are indicted in the NBA information scheme. But three charged in the NBA scheme are also charged in the poker case.Phil HelselPhil Helsel is a reporter for NBC News.
Related Post
October 8, 2025
Oct. 8, 2025, 5:00 AM EDTBy Aria BendixA Covid vaccine rollout unlike any other has given rise to confusion over who’s eligible and concerns that the shots might be harder to obtain this fall — especially for young children. Unlike in past years, when the vaccines were approved and recommended for everyone 6 months and older, the Food and Drug Administration this summer approved updated Covid shots only for people 65 and older and those with medical conditions that put them at risk of severe illness. On Monday, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention announced that it recommends Covid shots for the same groups, based on people’s own decision-making or conversations with their doctors. The change has created hurdles for people who want the shots but don’t obviously fit into either category — especially parents who want their infants or toddlers vaccinated. But for the most part, it hasn’t prevented adults from getting vaccinated.Younger adults must now attest either online or in person at pharmacies that they have health conditions that qualify them for the vaccine. The CDC’s list of conditions is broad — it includes pregnancy, physical inactivity, being overweight, mental health conditions and a history of smoking. So many adults seeking shots say it’s easy to find something that describes them or to stretch the truth without pushback. CVS’ and Walgreens’ websites simply prompt people to confirm that they’re eligible before they book appointments and offer an option to learn more about the CDC’s list of risk factors. A prescription isn’t required.Bobby McClanahan, 37, of Columbus, Ohio, said he signed up for a vaccination appointment on the CVS website about two weeks ago even though he didn’t think he had any underlying conditions that would put him at risk of severe Covid. If necessary, he was prepared to say he had asthma, even though he doesn’t.But the website didn’t ask for specifics — he merely agreed to the terms and conditions and was able to get vaccinated.The pharmacist was enthusiastic that he was there, McClanahan said: “She just told me to encourage people to come in and get a vaccine booster.”Dr. Michelle Fiscus, a pediatrician and the chief medical officer at the Association of Immunization Managers, said that per the CDC criteria, “the majority of Americans would actually qualify to get a Covid-19 vaccine.”Insurance plans — including private plans, Medicare and Medicaid — still largely cover Covid shots. McClanahan said he had no trouble getting his provider, Blue Cross Blue Shield, to do so. “I’m walking out of CVS and I opened my Blue Cross Blue Shield app on my phone and the claim was already there, showing that I owed nothing,” he said.However, vaccinating infants and toddlers is proving more challenging, since their shots are typically administered in doctors’ offices, which have less consistent supplies than pharmacies. Walgreens offers Covid vaccinations only for kids ages 3 and up, and CVS’ minimum age is 5 years. (Some states, such as Kansas and Illinois, have even higher age requirements.)Several pediatricians told NBC News that they are still vaccinating healthy children because of the CDC language that allows for shared decision-making between doctors and patients. In addition, the American Academy of Pediatrics continues to recommend Covid vaccinations for all babies ages 6 to 23 months, along with older kids who are at high risk of severe disease or haven’t had Covid shots before. (Parents can choose to get healthy children boosters this year if they desire, according to the AAP.)“I really agree with the AAP language, saying that anybody that wants a Covid vaccine for their child should be able to get one,” said Dr. Alexandra Yonts, an attending physician at Children’s National Hospital in Washington, D.C.Samantha Cramer, the mother of a 2-year-old in Kissimmee, Florida, said she went on a wild goose chase to find a vaccination for her daughter, Alice.Pharmacies weren’t an option, and the family’s pediatrician didn’t have the specialized refrigeration to store the shots, Cramer said. Calls to her local health clinic and a major hospital system in the area revealed neither were offering Covid shots to toddlers. Cramer and her husband considered traveling to Georgia to get Alice vaccinated.“We were just like, ‘Do you want to take a trip up to a state that’s chill about this? Do we need to go out of state to get her vaccinated?’” she said.In a last-ditch effort, Cramer asked for advice on Reddit. A user recommended MinuteClinics — health clinics inside CVS pharmacies that vaccinate kids ages 18 months and up. Cramer tried three locations: One wasn’t accepting walk-ins, and another said the pediatric vaccine was out of stock, but Alice was finally vaccinated at the third.“The choice to not vaccinate is infinitesimally easier now than it is to vaccinate,” Cramer said. The reason some pediatric hospitals don’t have updated Covid vaccines available yet is that they waited for the CDC’s final recommendations before they ordered them. The agency took two weeks to formally adopt the guidance determined by its vaccine advisory committee. (Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. fired the panel’s previous 17 members in June and subsequently appointed 12 new members, many of whom have expressed skepticism about Covid vaccines.) The final CDC guidance paved the way for shots to be distributed through the Vaccines for Children Program, which provides free shots for uninsured or underinsured kids.Nemours Children’s Health — a pediatric hospital network with locations in Delaware, New Jersey, Pennsylvania and Florida — was one of the health systems that delayed its Covid vaccine rollout until the CDC recommendation came out. Dr. Matthew Davis, Nemours’ enterprise physician-in-chief, said the network should receive doses soon.“I’m confident that parents and guardians who want to vaccinate their kids against Covid-19 will be able to do so,” he said. “There are some additional steps in terms of counseling around shared decision-making and documentation, but those steps shouldn’t be a full barrier to kids getting vaccinated when their parents and guardians make the choice to do so.”Aria BendixAria Bendix is the breaking health reporter for NBC News Digital.
September 21, 2025
Patel defends post about Charlie Kirk ‘subject’
November 18, 2025
Nov. 18, 2025, 9:28 AM ESTBy Alexander SmithTo hear President Donald Trump tell it, this was “one of the biggest approvals in the history of the United Nations,” a “moment of true historic proportion” that would ” lead to further peace all over the world.” But the gravity of the U.N. Security Council’s endorsement of the U.S. Gaza plan raised renewed questions Tuesday over how it will actually work. Most pressingly, it is not clear whether those at the heart of this conflict — the Palestinians and the Israelis themselves — actually support its end goals.Hamas, which still controls around half of the strip, outright rejected the resolution and said it robs Palestinians of their own agency, effectively allowing Trump free reign over the Gaza Strip for the next two years. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu welcomed its passage, but previously said he rejects its talk of “Palestinian self-determination and statehood” — which his far-right allies disavow.On a practical level, the proposal says it will require the creation of several as-yet-non-existent bodies, including the “Board of Peace” headed by Trump, and the International Stabilization Force, or ISF, whose troops could be drawn from Turkey, the United Arab Emirates and as far away as Indonesia. Displaced Palestinians try to protect their belongings from damage after heavy rain in the Austrian Quarter of Khan Younis, Gaza on Sunday.Abed Rahim Khatib / Anadolu via Getty ImagesThat said, this was a rare moment of geopolitical unity.Trump’s team won the support of Arab states by inserting language hinting at a future Palestinian state, and Russia and China abstained from the vote rather than using their vetoes to torpedo the proposal outright.In the event, it passed 13-0.Summarizing the mood Tuesday, U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres welcomed the vote as an “an important step,” but cautioned that it was “essential now to translate the diplomatic momentum into concrete and urgently needed steps on the ground,” his office said in a statement.It’s a sentiment shared by many observers.Frank Lowenstein, former special envoy for Israeli-Palestinian negotiations under President Barack Obama, told NBC News that passing the resolution was “essential” for Trump’s proposal.”There was no way this Trump plan could possibly work without a U.N. Security Council resolution,” he said. Not only will it impart “the credibility and the legitimacy and the clear support of the international community,” but it “provides an opportunity to begin creating a new reality, to begin moving forward with the process in a way that will give people hope.”He cautioned however that the resolution’s passage was “nowhere near sufficient,” principally because the U.N. has no enforcement mechanism, and that the ISF was immediately rejected by Hamas.The rubble of destroyed buildings in northern Gaza’s Jabalia Camp, on Sunday.Saeed M. M. T. Jaras / Anadolu via Getty ImagesThe resolution claims that “the parties” to the conflict “have accepted it.” But it’s not clear that is the case.The main Palestinian governmental body, the Palestinian Authority, said in a statement Tuesday that it welcomed the resolution and expressed its “full readiness to cooperate” with the United States and its backers.But Hamas, the perpetrators of the Oct. 7, 2023, attack, said the agreement did not meet the “political and humanitarian demands and rights” of the Palestinian people.The Palestinian militant-political group, which is designated a terrorist organization by the U.S. and would be disarmed under the deal, said in a statement that the mandate it grants to the ISF to use force “strips it of its neutrality, and turns it into a party to the conflict in favor of the occupation.”NBC News has contacted the White House for a response to these criticisms.Netanyahu praised Trump and “his tireless and devoted team,” saying he believed the plan “will lead to peace and prosperity because it insists upon full demilitarization, disarmament and the deradicalization of Gaza.”But just a day earlier the Israeli prime minister had firmly rejected the resolution’s call for “a pathway towards Palestinian self-determination and eventual statehood,” under pressure from his far-right coalition partners.Even putting these differences to one side, there are big question marks about how the basics of this plan will work in practice.“There is a genuine sense of relief that we are moving forward to diplomacy,” said Nimrod Goren, the president of the Mitvim Institute, a progressive Israeli think tank.“On the other hand, it’s not really clear where all this is headed,” he added. “What is the commitment of the leaders, the motivations of those behind it? And can it actually lead us away from the status quo in which Hamas still controls part of Gaza and Israel controls other parts around it?”On his Truth Social platform, Trump said members of the Board of Peace would be named in the coming weeks — having previously said British Prime Minister Tony Blair would be involved — and to expect “many more exciting announcements.””There are all kinds of new terminology and mechanisms that do not yet exist,” said Goren. “So there are a lot of question marks on the basic premises: What is their mandate? How will they be set up?”Indonesia, one of the backers of the U.S. proposal, says it is readying 20,000 troops to deploy to the ISF. But they are unlikely to head into Gaza so long as Hamas opposes the deal, according to Lowenstein.”Nobody’s going to send troops to be a part of the stabilization force that’s going to be fighting Hamas,” he said.Alexander SmithAlexander Smith is a senior reporter for NBC News Digital based in London.
October 29, 2025
GM to cut thousands of jobs in Michigan, Tennessee and Ohio
Comments are closed.
Scroll To Top
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics
© Copyright 2025 - Be That ! . All Rights Reserved