• Police seek suspects in deadly birthday party shooting
  • Lawmakers launch inquires into U.S. boat strike
  • Nov. 29, 2025, 10:07 PM EST / Updated Nov. 30, 2025,…
  • Mark Kelly says troops ‘can tell’ what orders…

Be that!

contact@bethat.ne.com

 

Be That ! Menu   ≡ ╳
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics Politics
☰

Be that!

Debris starts to fly as Hurricane Melissa fast approaches Jamaica

admin - Latest News - October 28, 2025
admin
18 views 16 secs 0 Comments



NBC News’ George Solis reports on Hurricane Melissa’s fast approach to the island of Jamaica where debris has started to fly and low lying roads are starting to flood. 



Source link

TAGS:
PREVIOUS
Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu orders immediate 'powerful' strikes on Gaza
NEXT
States sue Agriculture Department over looming suspension of SNAP food assistance
Related Post
October 20, 2025
A U.S. ally hopes to get Trump's attention with a major bargaining chip against China
November 23, 2025
Nov. 23, 2025, 5:07 PM ESTBy Alexandra Marquez, Courtney Kube, Fiona Glisson, Megan Shannon and Julie TsirkinPresident Donald Trump inserted fresh tensions into the high-stakes Ukraine-Russia peace talks on Sunday, publicly accusing Kyiv’s leaders of showing “zero gratitude” for U.S. support just as U.S. officials in Geneva were working to show a united front.Trump’s Truth Social comments landed at a delicate moment: his administration is pressing Ukraine to accept a 28-point peace proposal by Thanksgiving, even as confusion over the plan’s authorship and concerns from European allies and U.S. lawmakers have raised questions about whose interests it serves.Senior U.S. officials, including Secretary of State Marco Rubio and special envoy Steve Witkoff, met with Ukrainian officials in Geneva, Switzerland, this weekend to move peace talks forward with a goal of ending the war.Ukraine’s Andriy Yermak, left, and U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio hold a press conference at the U.S. Mission in Geneva, Switzerland, on Sunday.Fabrice Coffrini / AFP – Getty Images fileOn Sunday, after a full day of talks, Rubio told reporters “a tremendous amount of progress,” had been made. He added “there’s still some work to be done, but we are much further ahead today at this time than we were when we began this morning and where we were a week ago for certain.”“So it is in my personal view that we’ve had probably the most productive and meaningful meeting so far in this entire process since we’ve been involved in from the beginning,” he said. “We have a very good work product that was already built on a foundation of input from all the relative parties involved here, and we were able to go through some of those items now, point by point. And I think we’ve made good progress.”Another U.S. official told NBC News that Rubio, Witkoff and Army Secretary Dan Driscoll met with a Ukrainian delegation at the U.S. Mission in Geneva. The U.S. officials said the discussions were “positive and constructive.”In a post later Sunday on Telegram, Zelenskyy thanked the U.S. and European allies.“Ukraine is grateful to the United States, to every American heart, and personally to President Trump for the help that, starting with the Javelins, is saving the lives of Ukrainians. We thank everyone in Europe, in the Group of Seven and the Group of Twenty, who is helping us protect lives,” he wrote.Ukrainian and European leaders have expressed concerns about the peace proposal, with some European leaders and U.S. lawmakers close to Trump have also expressed concerned that it benefits Russia.“While there are many good ideas in the proposed Russia-Ukraine peace plan, there are several areas that are very problematic and can be made better. The goal of any peace deal is to end the war honorably and justly — and not create new conflict,” Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., wrote in a post on X Saturday.Another top Trump ally in the Senate, Sen. Roger Wicker, R-Miss., also expressed concerns on Friday. “This so-called ‘peace plan’ has real problems, and I am highly skeptical it will achieve peace,” he wrote in a post on X.Trump says 28-point Ukraine peace plan isn’t his ‘final offer’00:32On Saturday, Trump told reporters that this particular proposal is “not my final offer.” He added that if Zelenskyy didn’t accept the peace proposal, “then he can continue to fight his little heart out.”In a video after the proposal was made public, Zelenskyy said, “Currently, the pressure on Ukraine is one of the hardest.”He added, “Ukraine may now face a very difficult choice, either losing its dignity or the risk of losing a key partner, either the difficult 28 points, or a very difficult winter.”Olha Stefanishyna, Ukraine’s ambassador to the United States, told Fox News’ “The Sunday Briefing” that the 28 points are a starting point for negotiations.“This is only the first proposal, unattainable, and indeed, it’s a wish list. It’s not a document or an agreement. It’s just a list of the points it’s been discussed right now, and it is an agreed line with Ukraine and the United States that it will be a constructive reconciling process,” she said.On Saturday night, several U.S. lawmakers questioned whether the peace proposal was drafted by the U.S. or Russia.Sen. Mike Rounds, R-S.D., on Saturday said “none of the information that was released on this particular proposal came back from the administration,” following his call Saturday afternoon with Rubio.“We asked, ‘Is this, you know? Where does this come from?’ And he said, ‘This was a product that had been presented to Mr. Witkoff, and that it was not our proposal, and that it was an opportunity, though, for the U.S. as an intermediary to bring it to the attention of the Ukrainians and I believe, the Europeans as well,’” Rounds added.In a post on X late Saturday night, Rubio said that the plan was endorsed by U.S. officials.“The peace proposal was authored by the U.S. It is offered as a strong framework for ongoing negotiations,” he wrote. “It is based on input from the Russian side. But it is also based on previous and ongoing input from Ukraine.”Alexandra MarquezAlexandra Marquez is a politics reporter for NBC News.Courtney KubeCourtney Kube is a correspondent covering national security and the military for the NBC News Investigative Unit.Fiona GlissonMegan ShannonMegan Shannon is a White House researcher for NBC NewsJulie TsirkinJulie Tsirkin is a correspondent covering Capitol Hill.Isabella Colletta contributed.
October 7, 2025
Oct. 6, 2025, 7:40 PM EDTBy Zoë RichardsPresident Donald Trump said Monday that he would consider invoking the Insurrection Act “if it was necessary,” particularly if the courts or state and local officials delay his plans to deploy the National Guard.”I’d do it if it was necessary. So far it hasn’t been necessary. But we have an Insurrection Act for a reason,” Trump told reporters in the Oval Office when he was asked under what conditions he would consider the rarely used 19th century law.”If I had to enact it, I’d do that. If people were being killed and courts were holding us up or governors or mayors were holding us up, sure, I’d do that. I mean, I want to make sure that people aren’t killed. We have to make sure that our cities are safe,” he added.The Insurrection Act of 1807 allows the president to mobilize the U.S. military to conduct civilian law enforcement activities under certain circumstances. It was last used during the 1992 Los Angeles riots.Trump was speaking about his efforts to federalize troops and crack down on crime in Democratic-run cities.A federal judge in Oregon on Sunday blocked the Trump administration from deploying federalized National Guard members from California or other states to Portland’s streets.U.S. District Judge Karin Immergut, a Trump appointee, had also blocked the administration from deploying Oregon National Guard troops in Portland.”Portland’s been on fire for years, and not so much saving it,” Trump told reporters Monday. “We have to save something else, because I think that’s all insurrection. I really think that’s really criminal insurrection.”Oregon AG: Trump shouldn’t deploy troops to cities unless under ‘extreme circumstances’02:44Trump and his allies similarly referred to protesters opposing Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids in Los Angeles as “insurrectionists,” and Trump offered a similar answer in June when he was asked about any plans to invoke the Insurrection Act. “Depends on whether or not there’s an insurrection,” he said at the time, without ruling out the possibility of using it in the future.A key Trump ally argued earlier Monday that such action is needed now.In a text message to NBC News before Trump’s Oval Office remarks, former White House strategist Steve Bannon said Trump “needs to invoke the Insurrection Act of 1807 immediately and deploy active duty U.S. Army personnel and assets to Portland and Chicago — he needs to put Pritzker and Newsom in their place.”California Gov. Gavin Newsom and Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker, both Democrats, have opposed Trump’s National Guard efforts in their states.At a news conference earlier Monday, Pritzker suggested that Trump is trying to sow unrest so he can invoke the Insurrection Act.”The Trump administration is following a playbook cause chaos, create fear and confusion, make it seem like peaceful protesters are a mob by firing gas pellets and tear gas canisters at them,” Pritzker said. “Why? To create the pretext for invoking the Insurrection Act so that he can send military troops to our city.”Illinois sued Monday to block the Trump administration from deploying federalized National Guard troops to Chicago. A judge declined to immediately block the administration’s move and instead scheduled a hearing for Thursday.White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson said in a statement that Pritzker had failed to address violence in his state.“Amidst ongoing violent riots and lawlessness, that local leaders like Pritzker have refused to step in to quell, President Trump has exercised his lawful authority to protect federal officers and assets,” Jackson said. “President Trump will not turn a blind eye to the lawlessness plaguing American cities.”During his first term, despite nudging from allies, Trump ultimately did not invoke the Insurrection Act, which the White House said was a possibility in response to demonstrations stemming from the death of George Floyd in Minneapolis in May 2020.Zoë RichardsZoë Richards is a politics reporter for NBC News.Katherine Doyle and Dareh Gregorian contributed.
September 21, 2025
Trump administration raises fee for H-1B visas to $100,000 
Comments are closed.
Scroll To Top
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics
© Copyright 2025 - Be That ! . All Rights Reserved