• Police seek suspects in deadly birthday party shooting
  • Lawmakers launch inquires into U.S. boat strike
  • Nov. 29, 2025, 10:07 PM EST / Updated Nov. 30, 2025,…
  • Mark Kelly says troops ‘can tell’ what orders…

Be that!

contact@bethat.ne.com

 

Be That ! Menu   ≡ ╳
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics Politics
☰

Be that!

Oct. 30, 2025, 11:54 AM EDT / Updated Oct. 30, 2025, 12:24 PM EDTBy Gary Grumbach and David K. LiA former Virginia teacher told civil jurors on Thursday she thought she was dead or about to die in the moments after she was shot by a 6-year-old boy at school two years ago.Abigail Zwerner spoke slowly and at times struggled with her emotions, explaining how she was severely injured on Jan. 6, 2023, at Richneck Elementary in Newport News.“I thought I was dying, I thought I had died,” she told the jury of three men and six women. “I thought I was on my way to heaven or in heaven. But then it all got black.”The plaintiff’s testimony is at the heart of her $40 million civil lawsuit against former assistant principal Ebony Parker, who allegedly ignored several warnings about the boy who shot Zwerner.The attack was totally preventable had Parker acted on clear signs the boy posed a threat, Zwerner said in her civil complaint.The bullet, fired by the child, tore through Zwerner’s hand before it struck her in the chest, where it remains today. A doctor testified earlier in this trial that it’d be far more dangerous to remove that round than to leave it alone.To this day, Zwerner said she struggles with basic physical tasks. The plaintiff recalled having lunch recently with her lawyer and failing to open a bag of potato chips, after trying to rip it at different angles.“And I eventually asked you to open it, the same thing with water bottles,” Zwerner said.The psychological scars of the shooting are still fresh and painful, the plaintiff said.She recalled how loved ones had planned to see the movie “Hamilton” before breaking down the morning of, realizing there’d be scenes of dueling in the famous musical.“I felt like everything just came over my body,” the educator said. “I remember crying a lot, and I remember that afterwards.” Her family asked what she’d like to do in place of going to that movie. “I remember saying or telling them ‘nowhere,’ like I can’t go anywhere,” Zwerner said. “I just want to stay home. I’m not going anywhere today.” A Richneck teacher testified earlier this week that she told the assistant principal about the weapon three times after students had tipped her off about the boy having a gun in his backpack.Another teacher testified that she also shared similar information with Parker after a different student alerted her about the boy having a gun.Under cross-examination on Thursday, Parker’s attorney inferred that Zwerner, herself, could or should have taken more decisive action against the gun-wielding youngster.Zwerner testified that another teacher had told her she was going to report the child to Parker. At that point, Zwerner said she felt safe knowing that a superior was aware of the threat.“I didn’t (take any other action), honestly didn’t think twice,” she said. “ It was my understanding that the administration wouldn’t think twice as well when alerted about a potential gun in school.” The educator told NBC’s “TODAY” show, three months after the shooting that the attack left her with permanent emotional wounds.“I’m not sure when the shock will ever go away because of just how surreal it was and, you know, the vivid memories that I have of that day,” Zwerner said at the time. “I think about it daily. Sometimes I have nightmares.”When Zwerner originally filed her civil complaint, Parker, the school district and several other administrators were named as defendants. The case was eventually whittled down to Parker as the lone defendant.On paper, any civil verdict against Parker would be paid by the Virginia Risk Sharing Association (VRSA), an insurance pool made up of many public bodies statewide, including the Newport News School Board.This is a developing story. Please check back for updates.Gary GrumbachGary Grumbach is an NBC News legal affairs reporter, based in Washington, D.C.David K. LiSenior Breaking News Reporter

admin - Latest News - October 30, 2025
admin
18 views 19 secs 0 Comments




A former Virginia teacher told civil jurors on Thursday she thought she was dead or about to die in the moments after she was shot by a 6-year-old boy at school two years ago



Source link

TAGS:
PREVIOUS
Oct. 30, 2025, 12:02 PM EDTBy Bridget Bowman and Adam EdelmanFor Democrats like Leslie Frucht, President Donald Trump’s victory in 2024 was downright demoralizing. But she still felt compelled to rally in Paramus, New Jersey, on a recent Saturday for her party’s nominee for governor, Rep. Mikie Sherrill. “We have to do something, and you have to feel like you’re part of the fight,” Frucht said. Democrats are hoping this year’s gubernatorial contests in New Jersey and Virginia fire up their supporters not just in those states, but also across the country as they look to move on from a brutal 2024 campaign cycle in which they lost the White House and the Senate, and as polls show the party remains broadly unpopular.“Winning cures a lot of the ills, right? It shows people we’re back on track,” Democratic National Committee Chairman Ken Martin told NBC News as he knocked on doors earlier this month in Medford, New Jersey. “But we’ve been winning,” Martin added, pointing to the party’s overperformance in special legislative elections this year, noting that each victory is “another shot in the arm for Democrats to give them a sense that we have a plan, we know what we’re doing, we’re back, and that we’re going to win in ‘26 and then again in ‘28.”National Democrats have viewed the contests in New Jersey and Virginia as a key test of their message on economic issues — a point of emphasis voters said was sorely lacking from the party last year.Sherrill and Spanberger have done just that, building out campaigns focused on lowering the cost of living.But they’ve both faced a delicate balancing act on a host of other hot-button issues that have given the Democratic Party fits in recent election cycles, including transgender rights and immigration. With just days to go before the election, polls show Spanberger with a consistent lead in Virginia over GOP Lt. Gov. Winsome Earle-Sears, while surveys show the race in New Jersey between Sherrill and Republican Jack Ciattarelli remains close.But if Spanberger and Sherrill emerge victorious in the blue-leaning states, it’s certain Democratic operatives will look to emulate the approach both candidates took in crafting a message for many of the party’s candidates in the 2026 midterm elections.“If we come out with wins in both states, that’s going to springboard us into ‘26 and hopefully create a wave impact where we could win back both the House and the Senate,” Martin said. Laser-focused on costsIn more than two dozen interviews with NBC News, Democratic officials, officeholders, candidates, operatives and voters said that one major lesson from this year’s campaigns is how Spanberger and Sherill have zeroed in on the issue of affordability. Sherrill herself said that is a major takeaway from her campaign. “I’m obviously focused on what we can do here in New Jersey as far as costs, as far as affordability, utility costs, health care costs, housing costs,” Sherrill said after the Paramus rally of her message to other Democrats watching her race. “But what I’m hearing from my colleagues in the House of Representatives is their constituents are asking the same thing: How do we drive down costs?”Sherrill pledged in her closing TV ad to “drive your costs down.” She also stressed her “day one” plan to address rising electricity costs by declaring a state of emergency on utility prices.In Virginia, Spanberger has remained focused on a message that has emphasized plans to lower costs for health care and prescription drugs, housing and energy, while criticizing Trump for causing chaos in the state’s economy. Much of that angle had been tied to Trump’s efforts to shrink the federal workforce early in his second term — many federal employees reside in Virginia — and she has used the ongoing government shutdown to reinforce the approach.In an interview with NBC News following a recent campaign event at a peanut farm in Franklin, Virginia, Spanberger said her message on the economy was a product of what she was hearing from voters.“It’s a question of what people are bringing to me, which is concerns about affordability, the ability to know that your kids can have the opportunity that you might want for them,” she said. “It’s rising energy, health care costs, it’s housing costs.”Democratic strategists said the overarching emphasis on economic issues has offered a stark contrast to the party’s messaging up and down the ballot last year.“After 2024, we know we need to be laser focused on kitchen-table [issues]. Spanberger and Sherrill have shown voters respond when we do that,” said Jesse Ferguson, a Democratic strategist and veteran of Virginia campaigns.In an interview following a recent Spanberger campaign event, Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro, a prospective 2028 Democratic presidential candidate, praised Sherrill and Spanberger for “running their races on issues like affordability and freedom,” and suggested that anything that contributes to a winning message must be a part of future campaigns.“The party needs to move in the direction of winning races again after losing the presidential race and many races associated with that last cycle,” Shapiro said. “The direction our party needs to go in — it’s winning again and focusing on finding answers and solutions to people’s pressing problems from the states.”Thorny issuesSpanberger and Sherrill have also been navigating issues that have tripped up other Democrats: transgender rights and immigration. Spanberger has faced criticism from Republicans for not taking clear positions on transgender people’s participation in youth sports and use of school locker rooms and public bathrooms. The issues were part of a broader education-focused message Virginia GOP Gov. Glenn Youngkin used on his way to victory four years ago, and were again employed by Trump’s successful 2024 campaign.Earle-Sears attempted to revive that strategy, running ads that mimicked a spot from Trump’s campaign last year, in which a narrator says “Spanberger is for they/them, not us.” Spanberger struggled to find a consistent and concise response throughout the campaign, but eventually began explaining her position by saying she felt it was important that such issues be left up to parents, teachers and administrators, not the governor. It’s a reply that has largely avoided the emerging debate within the Democratic Party on the issue.But Democratic voters and strategists said Spanberger has been able to get away with not taking the topic on more directly because she’s established a clear message on the economy, which polls have shown is a more important issue that trans rights this cycle. “It doesn’t have the same resonance as it once did because the argument was ultimately about priorities,” Ferguson said of the GOP’s trans-related attacks. “Voters are seeing the GOP obsessed with the topic of ‘they/them’ this time while Democrats are the ones focused on the kitchen table, aka ‘you.’” Gene Granger, a 43-year-old self-described independent from Portsmouth who is supporting Spanberger, said that the Democrat’s approaches on trans issues “have been fine.”“Who the hell cares? We should be talking about the economy, jobs, prosperity, how we’re going to make Virginia better, not whether or not someone is a guy or a girl,” Granger said following a recent Spanberger campaign event.Spanberger has also danced around the issue of past violent text messages from Democratic attorney general nominee Jay Jones that were unearthed earlier this month. She has condemned the texts but has not pulled her support or called on him to leave the race.Her stance prompted many Democratic voters interviewed by NBC News to question how she communicated on the issue. Shelvin Vaughn, a 70-year-old retired government worker from Chesapeake, called Spanberger’s responses on issues such as trans rights and Jones a “salad,” but that he voted for her and Jones anyway. Democrats, broadly, he said, “should be more direct” with voters.Transgender rights have not been as potent an issue in New Jersey. But Sherrill has been navigating the thorny topic of immigration, a significant issue in a state where around 1 in 4 residents are foreign-born. Republicans have built up an advantage on handling immigration in recent years, and Trump has credited his border policy with propelling him back to the White House.Ending New Jersey’s “sanctuary state” status is one of Ciattarelli’s central campaign promises, along with making the state more affordable. New Jersey’s current policy, known as the Immigrant Trust Directive, limits state and local law enforcement officers’ cooperation with federal immigration officials. Sherrill has called for “comprehensive immigration reform” at the federal level but initially declined to say during a debate if she’d keep the Immigrant Trust Directive in place. She subsequently said about the directive, “There are areas of it that I’m very supportive of, and areas that I think need to be addressed.” Rep. Rob Menendez, D-N.J., said Sherrill has “made clear New Jersey is an inclusive place and we look out after each other. And I think that will guide her administration. But we can’t ignore the fact that the work is at the federal level.”Asked if Democrats still have work to do when it comes to winning over voters on the immigration issue, Menendez said: “It’s incumbent on all of us to always do the work. On immigration, we need to continue to lead, continue to show that this administration’s approach is not the answer.”Bridget Bowman reported from Medford and Paramus, New Jersey. Adam Edelman reported from Chesapeake, Portsmouth, Norfolk and Franklin, Virginia.Bridget BowmanBridget Bowman is a national political reporter for NBC News.Adam EdelmanAdam Edelman is a politics reporter for NBC News.
NEXT
Virginia teacher shot by first grade student takes the stand in civil trial
Related Post
October 7, 2025
Oct. 7, 2025, 4:42 PM EDTBy Angela YangTaylor Swift’s fans are used to scouring her videos and social media posts for hidden messages about her albums.But after the release of “The Life of a Showgirl,” some Swifties have said their hunt for clues led them down a rabbit hole of speculation around whether artificial intelligence was used in a series of promotional videos for the album.The 12 videos were part of a promotional scavenger hunt released by Google, which sent fans on a search for 12 orange doors hidden across 12 cities (for her 12th album) around the world. On each of the doors was a QR code revealing video clues to the puzzle, which pieced together a phrase that fans needed to search through Google. The hunt ultimately led to the lyric video for the album’s opening track, “The Fate of Ophelia.”While deciphering the video clues, some fans online said they noticed wonky text, muddled details and objects that disappear, or shape-shift against the laws of physics. Using the hashtag #SwiftiesAgainstAI on X, they began accusing the videos of utilizing generative AI. Swift has not personally promoted the orange door campaign, and it’s unclear how involved she was in the production of the clips, which were also briefly posted to her YouTube account as Shorts. On Swift’s YouTube channel, the shorts now appear to be unavailable. Swift’s recently dropped music video for “The Fate of Ophelia,” and 12 lyric videos for the “Showgirl” album, are all still up on her channel. None use AI.A representative for Swift did not provide comment for the story. Google did not respond to a request for comment.Swift, a victim of AI deepfakes, has long expressed her support for artists’ rights to own their work, which some of her fans online said is what made them so disappointed when they saw the promotional videos, as AI systems are often trained on datasets containing copyrighted work.Some fans pointed out that Swift appeared to use hand-painted props on the set of the music video for “The Fate of Ophelia,” noting that the music icon has long been very thoughtful about the presentation of her work. “When so much effort has been put into the rest of the album rollout … I think it is very, very lazy and disappointing to use generative AI to create videos a human being very much could have done,” Rachel Lord, a self-described fan of Swift, said in a TikTok video. “I think it’s very important that we as fans talk about how much we disagree with this, because if we don’t talk about it, they’re just going to continue with it,” she said, emphasizing that she’s not “hating on Taylor.”The controversy arose amid some mixed reviews for Swift’s latest album, which topped Spotify charts and sold 2.7 million copies in its first day of release. While many have praised the upbeat bops on “The Life of a Showgirl,” others have said the tracks lack the kind of lyricism they have come to expect of Swift.Swift’s diehard fan base has traditionally come to her defense amid any backlash. The AI speculation and the subsequent criticism, however, appeared to come just as much from her fans as her detractors.In a Reddit post about the orange door promo clips in the popular r/TaylorSwift community, a moderator wrote: “The videos are most likely AI generated. We typically do not allow AI content, but given that this is somehow related to the album push we are clearly going to keep this thread going.”Several are calling on Swift — who has not commented on the AI speculation — to make a statement about the matter.“Dear @taylornation13, We expected a decent album promo but we noticed that the promotion on cities were made by A.I,” wrote one X user who describes themself as a “taywarrior” and Swiftie in their bio. The post had been viewed more than 1.3 million times as of Tuesday afternoon.“A.I has a large impact on the environment and wildlife because of its LARGE water consumption and more,” the user added. “Please learn better next time. #SwiftiesAgainstAI.”The use of AI in media production has been a polarizing subject in the entertainment industry. As generative AI tools become increasingly integrated into film, TV and music production, artists have railed against the technology due to concerns over labor displacement as well as AI companies’ scraping of human-made work without consent or compensation.Outside of vocal pushback from artists and studios, AI image, video and music generators have been hit with numerous copyright infringement lawsuits from authors, artists, news outlets, mass media companies and music labels.Some of Swift’s defenders have argued that the seemingly AI-generated quirks in the videos might be explained with computer-generated imagery. Others have insisted that CGI would not cause objects to morph, blur or disappear when the camera moves.Swift has not condemned the use of AI usage as a whole, but she has previously condemned its misuse. In a 2024 Instagram post endorsing Kamala Harris for president, Swift addressed President Donald Trump’s attempt to tout an AI image of her.“Recently I was made aware that AI of ‘me’ falsely endorsing Donald Trump’s presidential run was posted to his site,” Swift wrote. “It really conjured up my fears around AI, and the dangers of spreading misinformation.”Angela YangAngela Yang is a culture and trends reporter for NBC News.
October 23, 2025
Lou Gehrig's Yankee jersey sold for $2.7 million
November 13, 2025
Trump Signs Bill to Reopen Government After Record Shutdown
September 22, 2025
Elon Musk’s Twitter promised a purge of blue check marks. Instead he singled out one account
Comments are closed.
Scroll To Top
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics
© Copyright 2025 - Be That ! . All Rights Reserved