13 views

Sept. 30, 2025, 5:00 AM EDTBy Fred Schulte, KFF Health NewsNot long after California surgeon Andrew S. Hsu landed a job with a cosmetic surgery chain in Georgia, several of his patients alleged they suffered disfiguring injuries, and even his new employer allegedly had doubts about his competence, court records show.Hsu, a board-certified general surgeon, was one of six out-of-state doctors who joined the Atlanta Goals Aesthetics & Plastic Surgery center during the pandemic. The surgeons received temporary licenses to practice in Georgia, which state officials granted in response to the sudden need for more medical personnel to address the Covid outbreak — even though the center specialized in elective cosmetic surgeries, such as Brazilian butt lifts, or BBLs, and liposuction, paid for in cash or on credit.The Atlanta center announced its opening in March 2021 as an expansion of New York-based Goals Aesthetics & Plastic Surgery, which markets “precision body contouring” for about a dozen surgery clinics in eight states, promising patients a “dream body in just one visit.” But the Atlanta center’s early days were marred by allegations of substandard patient care. Court records show that at least 20 women filed medical malpractice lawsuits, several of which were later dismissed, against the facility, or its owner and surgeons. Hsu was named as a defendant in seven suits filed against the Atlanta center, more than any other physician there. An eighth patient sued Hsu alleging negligence in an operation he performed at a Goals office in New York.Hsu did not respond to requests for comment. Goals declined to comment. Both have denied any negligence in response to the lawsuits.Cosmetic surgery chains across the country are attracting patients by promising “minimally invasive” operations to reshape their bodies or get rid of stubborn fat — even helping arrange outside financing for people who can’t pay upfront. Hundreds of thousands of patients are undergoing such procedures each year, and plastic surgeons can earn more than $500,000 each year in one of the highest-paid specialties in American medicine. An investigation by KFF Health News found that lawsuits filed by injured patients have trailed the industry’s growth, in some cases alleging that surgeons lacked adequate training, had histories of malpractice lawsuits or had faced disciplinary action by state medical licensing boards — yet crossed into another state and kept practicing.With cosmetic surgery chains growing, lawsuits reveal allegations of injuries and deaths04:08In the Atlanta lawsuits, Goals has denied any negligence and won dismissal of several of them because patients had signed papers agreeing to outside arbitration — which requires them to resolve disputes privately and outside the court system.Yet, Goals argued in a separate contract dispute with a medical staffing firm that several of its Atlanta surgeons, including Hsu, were indeed prone to problems — either because they lacked adequate training or had troubled pasts, including investigations by state medical licensing boards into misconduct, court records show. One of Hsu’s Atlanta patients alleged in a separate lawsuit that she suffered in pain for more than a year because a piece of a scalpel was left inside her body after a BBL and liposuction. In a June 2023 court filing in that contract dispute, Goals blamed the problems on a medical staffing firm — Barton Associates, a private equity-owned firm in Massachusetts — it said failed to do adequate background checks on the doctors it supplied. Barton denied the allegations and said it met all terms of the contract.No public database exists to help patients learn the full practice histories of physicians, including cosmetic surgeons. And patients are largely left on their own to decipher which certificates hanging on a surgeon’s office wall, or ballyhooed in web advertising, signify appropriate training and which do not. Disputes among medical specialty groups over whose members are the best qualified to perform cosmetic operations — and deliver the best results — add to the confusion. No government agency tracks injuries or other complication rates at clinics offering cosmetic surgery or any other type of operations. And in many jurisdictions, including Georgia, gaining access to court records — a possible red flag for spotting problems — is laborious and costly.Charleetra Hornes, 52, who lives in the Atlanta suburbs and is suing the Goals center for medical malpractice, said she knew nothing of its alleged early troubles and chose the company because its advertising promised “minimal downtime” for recovery and that she would remain awake during the operation.She said she paid $6,650 for a “double BBL” in which fat is suctioned from the stomach, purified and injected into the buttocks and hips to create what Goals calls a “natural-looking enhancement.” Goals went ahead with her surgery July 2, 2022, even though she had tested positive for Covid that day, according to the suit. Hornes alleged that two days before the surgery, Goals assigned her to surgeon Thomas Shannon, who has worked for Goals in Georgia and Texas. Though staff gave her pills to manage the discomfort, Hornes said, she suffered “excruciating pain” during the procedure, according to the suit.That night, she spiked a fever that sent her to the emergency room. She spent two weeks in the hospital recovering from injuries, including a “severe burn on her side,” according to the suit.“I’ve been disfigured and burned up, and it’s not fair,” she said in an interview.In June 2024, Hornes sued Shannon, the Goals center and Barton Associates, alleging malpractice. On Sept. 2, a Georgia judge dismissed Shannon from the case, ruling that Hornes failed to serve him with the complaint in Texas before the statute of limitations ran out. He did not respond to requests for comment. In a separate order issued on the same day, the judge also dismissed the other defendants, citing the statute of limitations issue and that Hornes had previously signed an arbitration agreement. Some cosmetic surgery chains and other medical practices ask patients to sign such agreements. Hornes wishes she had learned more about the Atlanta surgery center, instead of accepting what she calls its “flashy” come-ons. “I wish I would have taken it more seriously,” she said in an interview, “because it was life-altering.”Malpractice cases and settlements are useful toolsKFF Health News identified more than 200 lawsuits filed against multistate cosmetic surgery companies, mostly over the past seven years, including cases involving a dozen deaths, using databases of court records. Lawsuits by themselves don’t prove wrongdoing. Many cases are settled under confidential terms that keep critical details under wraps. Yet, medical authorities and most physician licensing boards regard malpractice cases and settlements as a useful tool for detecting possible patterns of substandard health care that may harm patients. Court files show that surgeons who were sued numerous times for malpractice — and in some cases disciplined by state medical boards for misconduct — have managed to get hired by cosmetic surgery chains. Goals, owned by physician Sergey Voskin, has contracted with eight surgeons with three or more malpractice cases filed against them, including in the Atlanta area, court records allege. Gerald Hickson, founding director of the Vanderbilt Center for Patient and Professional Advocacy and an expert on medical malpractice issues, called that number of suits a “warning” of possible problems, despite their outcome.Earlier this year, a Pennsylvania woman identified in court filings as “P.C.” sued Goals, Voskin and surgeon Peter Driscoll, alleging Driscoll came on board despite an “extensive history of malpractice allegations, licensing suspensions and discipline” in Texas and California, according to medical board records cited in the suit. Companies hiring doctors have ready access to the nonpublic National Practitioner Data Bank, which details disciplinary problems in a doctor’s past. But it’s not clear from court records whether anybody made these standard background checks. Goals did not respond to a request for comment. The suit also accuses Goals of consumer fraud for touting its surgeons as “double if not triple board certified plastic surgeons.” According to the complaint, Driscoll was board-certified by the American Board of Otolaryngology, a specialty that focuses on treatment and surgery of head and neck areas. Driscoll is no longer certified in the specialty, according to the American Board of Medical Specialties website. The woman alleges that Driscoll sexually harassed her and made “unwanted and unwelcome sexual contact” during a BBL procedure in June 2022 at a Goals office in New Jersey. According to the suit, staff members overheard Driscoll watching pornography in an office bathroom multiple times, but Goals did not terminate him at the time. New Jersey’s State Board of Medical Examiners temporarily suspended Driscoll’s license in February 2023 related to the incident, and the woman’s lawsuit is pending in federal court in New Jersey. Goals and Voskin have denied the allegations in the suit and filed a motion to dismiss or compel arbitration of the case. Driscoll, who has not filed a response with the court, could not be reached for comment.Performance issues not ‘disqualifying’Other cosmetic surgery chains have faced multiple malpractice actions targeting surgeons or other health care providers who staff their clinics, court records show. The surgeon roster at Mia Aesthetics, a Miami-based chain that operates 13 cosmetic surgery offices nationwide, lists four doctors with three or more malpractice actions since 2020, court records show.Nearly a dozen injured patients have filed lawsuits criticizing the credentials of doctors and nurse practitioners affiliated with Belle Medical, including the family of a 70-year-old Utah woman with five children who died in the car two days after liposuction as her husband rushed her from home to a hospital, according to court records.Her husband alleges he called Belle Medical’s office the day after the procedure to say his wife was having difficulty breathing and heart palpitations and couldn’t walk more than a short distance, which the lawsuit argued were “textbook symptoms of pulmonary embolism, or blood clot in the lung.” According to the suit, nobody at Belle Medical advised the family to seek immediate medical care. An autopsy found she died from “bilateral pulmonary emboli,” according to the suit.Backed by Peterson Partners, a Utah private equity and investment firm, Belle Medical operates in Utah, Idaho and Oklahoma, offering liposuction and other cosmetic surgery. Neither Belle Medical nor Peterson Partners responded to requests for comment. In court filings, Belle Medical has argued that its medical providers are independent contractors who are solely responsible for any procedures they perform.Private equity-backed Sono Bello, the largest of the cosmetic surgery chains with more than 100 locations nationwide, has defended more than a dozen lawsuits alleging the company contracted with inadequately trained doctors or practitioners previously disciplined by medical licensing boards. In May 2023, Ohio’s medical board revoked the license of a Sono Bello contract surgeon after three of her patients died, two of them following procedures at a Sono Bello office in the Cleveland area, according to medical board records.Robert Centeno, Sono Bello’s medical director for the East region, told KFF Health News that many surgeons have past performance issues, which he called “not, in fact, disqualifying.” Surgeon Robert Centeno is Sono Bello’s medical director for the East region.NBC News“The vast majority of our colleagues are extremely professional and committed to their profession,” he said in an interview. “And while there may be a momentary lapse or issue with their practice, most of our surgeons take those sanctions, take that counseling, that advice, and improve their practices and go on to be very, very productive members of the medical community.” Asked about malpractice lawsuits filed against the company, Centeno said that Sono Bello has “performed over 300,000 procedures to date,” which he described as “more procedures for more patients completed safely than anyone else in the industry. It would be natural and understandable to know that at some point during that process, that a patient has actually sued us,” Centeno said.‘Unable to perform’In early 2020, as the pandemic slowed business in New York City, Goals sought to expand to Atlanta — a hot market for its BBLs. In a PR Newswire release, Goals promised patients “amazing contours” and boasted of having “some of the most experienced, and aesthetically forward surgeons in the industry.” BBLs and liposuction make up 95% of its business, marketed to mostly Black and Hispanic women, Goals owner Voskin testified in a deposition filed this year in the Driscoll case. Many Atlanta patients suing the company paid roughly $6,000 to $8,000 for their surgeries, court records show. Goals initially staffed the Atlanta center through Barton Associates. Many hospitals and medical offices rely on such firms to find temporary doctors and other staff. Under the deal, Barton charged Goals $1,400 for each procedure and paid about $600 of that to the surgeon, according to Goals’ court filings.

- Latest News - September 30, 2025

Doctors with troubled pasts are performing complicated cosmetic surgery procedures tied to crippling pain and injury, patients allege.

Source link

TAGS:
14 views

Sept. 30, 2025, 2:29 AM EDTBy Kate ReillyJK Rowling has responded after Emma Watson made conciliatory comments in a podcast posted Wednesday about their relationship which has been marked for years by conflicting views on transgender rights.On Monday, JK Rowling posted to her 14.4 million X followers a nearly 700-word response to Emma Watson’s latest remarks about their ongoing conflict. “Emma Watson and her co-stars have every right to embrace gender identity ideology,” Rowling wrote. “Such beliefs are legally protected, and I wouldn’t want to see any of them threatened with loss of work, or violence, or death, because of them.”She then targeted Watson and her “Harry Potter” co-star Daniel Radcliff for their public critiques of the author’s views.”However, Emma and Dan in particular have both made it clear over the last few years that they think our former professional association gives them a particular right — nay, obligation — to critique me and my views in public.”Rowling said that until recently she felt a “certain protectiveness” over Watson and her co-stars who she has known since they were ten-years-old, stating that she has “repeatedly declined invitations from journalists to comment on Emma specifically.”The author said the actor “has so little experience of real life she’s ignorant of how ignorant she is.”Rowling later compared her own background of poverty to Watson’s “privileges.””I wasn’t a multimillionaire at 14. I lived in poverty while writing the book that made Emma famous,” Rowling wrote. “I therefore understand from my own life experience what the trashing of women’s rights in which Emma has so enthusiastically participated means to women and girls without her privileges.”Rowling’s remarks on X came after Watson discussed her feelings toward Rowling in a sit-down interview for the “On Purpose with Jay Shetty” podcast posted Wednesday. When asked by Shetty how she’s dealing with Rowling’s “extremely hurtful” comments following their public break over transgender issues, Watson said that she still treasures their relationship.“I really don’t believe that by having had that experience, and holding the love and support and views that I have, mean that I can’t and don’t treasure Jo and the person that I had personal experiences with.”She continued, saying that she hopes “people who don’t agree with my opinion will love me, and I hope I can keep loving people who I don’t necessarily share the same opinion with.”Watson’s manager did not immediately reply to an NBC News request for comment.Kate ReillyKate Reilly is a news associate with NBC News.

- Latest News - September 30, 2025

JK Rowling has responded after Emma Watson made conciliatory comments in a podcast posted Wednesday about their relationship which has been marked for years by conflicting views on transgender rights

TAGS: