• Police seek suspects in deadly birthday party shooting
  • Lawmakers launch inquires into U.S. boat strike
  • Nov. 29, 2025, 10:07 PM EST / Updated Nov. 30, 2025,…
  • Mark Kelly says troops ‘can tell’ what orders…

Be that!

contact@bethat.ne.com

 

Be That ! Menu   ≡ ╳
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics Politics
☰

Be that!

Army gynecologist accused of secretly filming patients at Fort Hood

admin - Latest News - November 11, 2025
admin
14 views 18 secs 0 Comments



A new lawsuit accuses Army gynecologist Dr. Blaine McGraw of preying on female patients at Fort Hood and alleges the military ignored years of complaints. NBC’s Courtney Kube has the exclusive report. 



Source link

TAGS:
PREVIOUS
Senator defends tentative deal to end shutdown
NEXT
From 1975: Edmund Fitzgerald sinks on Lake Superior
Related Post
September 23, 2025
Sept. 23, 2025, 5:16 PM EDTBy Curtis Bunn and Tyler KingkadeIn 2016, Charlie Kirk wasn’t yet a household name. The young activist had co-founded Turning Point USA four years earlier to help spread conservative ideas on college campuses. But shortly after President Donald Trump’s first election, the group launched an ambitious new project — the Professor Watchlist — aimed at highlighting what it saw as left-leaning bias in higher education. The list, easily available online, now has more than 300 professor names, listed under categories like “Terror Supporter,” “LGBTQ,” “Antifa” and “Socialism.” Once dismissed by critics as a fringe culture war stunt, education experts say the list helped kick off a movement that continues today to monitor and expose perceived ideological opponents. Since Kirk’s assassination earlier this month, that movement has accelerated, with conservative activists systematically outing people in what critics have decried as a right-wing version of “cancel culture.” The backlash has led to the removal or resignation of dozens of teachers and professors who allegedly disparaged Kirk or celebrated his death online.“If you make statements that right-wing politicians don’t like, then you can lose your job. Period. That is chilling,” said Isaac Kamola, director of the American Association of University Professors’ Center for the Defense of Academic Freedom, who runs a project called Faculty First Responders that helps professors who have been targeted by Turning Point or other groups. “The Professor Watchlist planted that seed.”NBC News interviewed six professors on the watchlist, added between 2016 and 2023. Some are on it for work they published and others for outspoken social media posts. Once added, they received negative messages and comments; two said it escalated to death threats.This atmosphere, which intensified as social media culture evolved, changed how students and professors interact, said Peter Lake, director of the Center for Excellence in Higher Education Law and Policy at Stetson University College of Law. The watchlist was part of a shift that made “what had been a semi-private space — the classroom — into a place where statements or discussions could get national attention,” Lake said. Knowing a stray comment could go viral stifles free speech, he added.“When you step in the classroom, you might as well be in the studio,” he said. “People are going to record what you’re saying, they may publish it, they may take it out of context, they may share it with your enemies — anything can happen now and it frequently does.”Charlie Kirk near the campus of Georgia State University in Atlanta in 2024.Yasuyoshi Chiba / AFP via Getty Images fileThose forces were at work earlier this month, for instance, when conservatives circulated a video of a Texas A&M student confronting a senior lecturer in the English department for teaching about gender identity, citing Trump’s executive order recognizing only two genders. The lecturer, who was not on the Professor Watchlist, was fired and two administrators were removed from their posts. Last week, university president Mark Welsh also resigned amid the controversy.Some conservatives argue the watchlist was a necessary antidote to left-wing bias on campus and helped counter-balance the criticism of right-wing professors. It was “part of changing the way the right engaged with higher ed,” said Rick Hess, director of education policy studies at the American Enterprise Institute, a right-leaning think tank. “The problem is not with the list,” he said. “The problem is that the list was ever necessary.”Turning Point USA did not respond to multiple requests for comment.Charlie Kirk himself defended the project as “an awareness tool” in a 2018 interview with “The Opposition,” a Comedy Central TV show.“It’s not ‘Professor Blacklist’ and it’s not ‘Professor Hitlist,’” Kirk said at the time. “We’re not calling for the termination of these professors — let the schools make their own decisions.”Some professors targeted by the watchlist said it sparked a campaign of harassment against them.Shawn Schwaller, an assistant history professor at California State University, Chico, was added to the list in 2021. His profile includes a long list of allegations, including that he had disparaged conservatives. In one article Schwaller wrote, he offered a defense of protesters at a right-wing Christian event who used flash bombs and bear spray, arguing that they were responding to the “intensely violent rhetoric of a white Christian supremacist.”Schwaller said he was surprised by the response he received online once his name went public. “I hope the professor gets some lead,” one post read. Another said, “He better get a third eye behind his head because its gonna get serious for him.”Preston Mitchum, a former Georgetown Law adjunct professor, found himself on the list after writing on X, formerly Twitter, in 2017, “All white people are racists. All men are sexist. Yes, ALL cis people are transphobic. We have to unpack that. That’s the work!” Mitchum had also appeared on a Fox News panel alongside Charlie Kirk to discuss issues around race after President Trump met with Kanye West in 2018. He said he had been receiving backlash from his tweets but the vitriol increased after the segment aired.He received unwanted calls and emails, Mitchum said, including death threats. “I’m a Black, queer man. I don’t scare often,” he said. He said he finds it hypocritical that Kirk is hailed as a champion of free speech yet created a tool he believes has been used to silence people. “The entire goal is censorship, like fundamentally, the goal is to get you to stop talking,” he said.Preston Mitchum said he received death threats after appearing on the Professor Watchlist and on a panel with Charlie Kirk.Kollin BensonFor some professors, being put on the list was a badge of honor. Charles Roseman, an associate professor at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, was added after co-authoring an article on sex and gender in Scientific American in 2023. “I’m quite glad to draw their ire,” he said. “I’m glad that they disapprove of me. That’s quite the compliment.”Kirk, in a 2016 interview with Time magazine, said the list was not meant to intimidate or “make these professors feel any less secure.” “The inspiration was just to shine a light on what we feel has been an unfair balance toward left-leaning ideas and biases in our universities,” he said.In the years since its inception, the watchlist seems to have inspired other groups. Right-wing influencers like Libs of TikTok now regularly spotlight individual faculty they believe want to indoctrinate students, while conservative parent groups like Moms for Liberty have advocated for state laws limiting what can be discussed in classrooms or shared in libraries. These activists are close allies of the MAGA movement.Republican governors, such as Ron DeSantis in Florida and Greg Abbott in Texas, have also made fights over “wokeness” in colleges a core component of their legislative agendas. Death of Charlie Kirk raises questions about future of free speech in America02:00John Wesley Lowery, an expert in higher education law who advises universities on compliance with federal regulations, said it’s simpler to share details about professors today than when the watchlist was first launched. “It is so much easier to crowdsource information now,” he said. And that’s not the only change, he said, noting that past activism targeted individuals. “What we’ve seen over the last week instead is far more concerted efforts to immediately place pressure on institutions to take action.”Lake, of Stetson University, said the watchlist was a catalyst in changing the way professors work. Among professors writ large, he said, there is an “air of fatalism — do the job long enough, and you could step on a land mine and that could be it.” It’s not only professors who limit what they say in class now, he said. The same is true among students. Lake brought up Kirk’s assassination a couple times in class recently, and there was “no reaction,” he said. “They don’t want to get caught up in a whirlwind.”Curtis BunnCurtis Bunn is a reporter for NBC BLK.Tyler KingkadeTyler Kingkade is a national reporter for NBC News, based in Los Angeles.Melissa Chan and Jo Yurcaba contributed.
November 2, 2025
Authorities investigate explosion at Harvard
November 22, 2025
Nov. 22, 2025, 8:37 AM ESTBy Mithil AggarwalA U.S.-led peace plan that mirrors several key Russian demands has sent ripples across Europe, with leaders meeting on the sidelines of the G20 summit in South Africa this weekend in the hopes of making the plan more favorable to Kyiv.”We must all work together, with both the U.S. and Ukraine, to secure a just and lasting peace once and for all,” British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said Saturday ahead of the summit, which the U.S. is not attending.Allies will discuss the current proposal and look at how they can “strengthen this plan for the next phase of negotiations,” he said.President Donald Trump has set Thanksgiving as the deadline for Ukraine to agree to the 28-point framework, which suggests that Russia could be granted more territory than it holds, limits placed on Ukraine’s army, and Kyiv prevented from ever joining NATO — Moscow’s long-sought demands.The U.S. proposals do include a security guarantee modeled on NATO’s Article 5, which would commit the U.S. and European allies to treat a future attack on Ukraine as an attack on the entire trans-Atlantic community, according to a U.S. official, though there are few specifics on what that would entail.Top Ukrainian and U.S. officials will meet in Switzerland to discuss “possible parameters of a future peace,” Rustem Umerov, the secretary of Ukraine’s National Security and Defence Council, wrote on Telegram Saturday. Separately, Zelenskyy’s office said Saturday that the delegation has been confirmed for the talks, which “will take place in the coming days.” President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelenskyy.Nicolas Economou / NurPhoto via Getty ImagesThe White House has described the plan as “the best win-win scenario, where both parties gain more than they must give,” saying the proposals were crafted with input from Russia and Ukraine. However, analysts say the plan could amount to a dangerous capitulation for Ukraine, which has previously rejected plans that would require recognizing Russia’s illegal annexations of the entire eastern Donetsk region and Crimea.”Even if parts of this plan were to be shoved down Ukraine’s throat, it would be the end of Ukraine as we know it. It’s a real capitulation,” Michael Bociurkiw, a nonresident senior fellow at the Atlantic Council’s Eurasia Center, who was in Johannesburg, told NBC News by phone.The U.S. was facilitating a “potentially disastrous surrender for Ukraine,” Keir Giles, a senior consulting fellow at Chatham House, a London-based think tank, said.”And now we will see yet another panicked scramble by European leaders to head off an outcome that would be disastrous for their own security,” he said, adding that the European response towards “repeated disastrous peace plans has been in words, not action.””There should be nothing about Ukraine without Ukraine,” Ursula Von der Leyen, the European Commission President, said Friday in a post on X, adding European leaders will also meet in Angola next week.Ukraine must have a “decisive voice in peace talks,” Polish President Karol Nawrocki said late Friday on X. “The price of peace cannot in any way be the achievement of strategic goals by the aggressor, and the aggressor was and remains the Russian Federation,” he added.As European leaders mulled over the plan on the G20 summit’s sidelines, notably absent was Trump, who is boycotting the event over his unfounded claims that the country’s white minority is subject to hate crimes and land grabs.While Trump initially said Vice President JD Vance would attend, he later said there would be no U.S. delegation taking part. Russian President Vladimir Putin, who has an International Criminal Court warrant calling for his arrest, is also not attending.How much Europe will actually be able to influence the plan without U.S. involvement remains an open question, and one with implications for both Ukraine’s borders and peace for the broader continent.“They can’t influence this,” said Bociurkiw. “It makes NATO and Europe look weak, and Putin will go on and on to cause more disruptions,” he said.”It’s like a speed train and you have Putin and Trump on it, and then you have Zelenskyy on the departure platform and Europe stuck at the check-in counter,” he added.Giles said the military aspects of the peace plan leave Ukraine effectively defenseless against a future Russian attack.“And since Ukraine forms the front line of the defense of Europe, this is a potentially disastrous outcome for the continent as a whole,” Giles said.Britain’s Prime Minister Keir Starmer arrives to attend a trilateral with France and Germany on the sidelines of a G20 summit to discuss a joint response to a unilateral U.S. plan for Ukraine.Leon Neal / AFP – Getty ImagesLawmakers in Ukraine aren’t particularly happy with the plan either, with Victoria Podgorna from Ukrainian President Volodmyr Zelenskyy’s political party saying it was giving Russia “amnesty for launching a brutal war.”Zelenskyy said Friday he had spoken with Starmer and his counterparts in Germany and France, adding that he would also talk to Washington to ensure Kyiv’s “principled stances are taken into account.” “Ukraine may now face a very difficult choice, either losing its dignity or the risk of losing a key partner, either the difficult 28 points, or a very difficult winter,” Zelenskyy said, warning his country of a “very difficult, eventful” week ahead.Grand-parents of 7-years-old Polish citizen Amelia Grzesko, killed with her mother Oksana in a missile attack on November 19, mourn during their funeral ceremony in Ternopil, on Nov. 22, 2025.Yurko Dyachyshyn / AFP – Getty ImagesHis warning also came as Ukraine suffers setbacks on the battlefield and Zelenskyy tries to contain the fallout of a $100 million corruption scandal implicating his top officials.On Saturday, the Russian defense ministry said it had captured two additional villages in eastern Ukraine, one in the Donetsk and another in Zaporizhzhia. Russia’s gains, both on the battlefield and in the proposed plan, have drawn a positive response from the Kremlin, where Putin has said it could “form the basis of a final peace settlement,” though adding it was not “substantively” discussed with Russia.Meanwhile, two people were killed in Russia’s southern city of Syzran in a Ukrainian strike on energy facilities, the regional governor Vyacheslav Fedorishchev said Saturday on Russia’s state-backed Max messenger app.Mithil AggarwalMithil Aggarwal is a Hong Kong-based reporter/producer for NBC News.
September 25, 2025
Aboard U.S. aircraft carrier deployed under NATO
Comments are closed.
Scroll To Top
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics
© Copyright 2025 - Be That ! . All Rights Reserved