• Crowd goes wild at 'Silent Night' basketball game
  • Lava spills as Hawaii's Kilauea resumes eruptions
  • Protesters smear food on the case of the…
  • National Guard member 'slowly healing' after shooting

Be that!

contact@bethat.ne.com

 

Be That ! Menu   ≡ ╳
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics Politics
☰

Be that!

Arrests made over Hong Kong fire as death toll rises

admin - Latest News - December 1, 2025
admin
9 views 7 secs 0 Comments



Arrests made over Hong Kong fire as death toll rises



Source link

TAGS:
PREVIOUS
Megan Thee Stallion wins defamation civil suit against blogger
NEXT
Dec. 1, 2025, 4:09 PM ESTBy Rebecca Shabad and Gabe GutierrezWASHINGTON — The White House confirmed Monday that the U.S. did launch a second strike on an alleged drug boat from Venezuela in early September and that it was ordered by Adm. Frank M. Bradley, who at the time headed the Joint Special Operations Command.The follow-up strike killed the survivors of an initial U.S. strike on the vessel, which the Trump administration has said originated from Venezuela. Some lawmakers and legal experts say that second attack could constitute a war crime.“With respect to the strikes in question on Sept. 2, Secretary Hegseth authorized Adm. Bradley to conduct these kinetic strikes,” White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement during Monday’s briefing.“Adm. Bradley worked well within his authority and the law directing the engagement to ensure the boat was destroyed and the threat to the United States of America was eliminated,” she added.U.S. Special Operations Command, which Bradley now leads as commander, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.The Washington Post reported that Bradley had ordered the second strike, and that he was complying with an order from Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to “kill everybody.” NBC News has not confirmed the detail about Hegseth.One U.S. official and a source familiar with the Pentagon’s actions on Sept. 2 told NBC News recently that the first of the two strikes conducted that day left at least two survivors, with the subsequent strike killing them.On Sunday, President Donald Trump told reporters that Hegseth didn’t order the second strike.”He said he didn’t do it,” said Trump, who also said he didn’t know if the second strike even happened. The president said he “wouldn’t have wanted” it, adding that “Pete said he did not want them.” Asked again if there was no second strike, Trump said: “I don’t know. I’m going to find out about it, but Pete said he did not order the death of those two men.”Asked Monday what law the U.S. military relied on to justify the second strike, Leavitt said: “The strike conducted on Sept. 2 was conducted in self-defense to protect Americans in vital United States interests. The strike was conducted in international waters and in accordance with the law of armed conflict.”She also confirmed that Trump will be meeting with his national security team — which includes Hegseth, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, White House chief of staff Susie Wiles and deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller — in the Oval Office later Monday.Leavitt’s comments come amid widespread criticism and bipartisan investigations in the House and Senate into the second boat strike. The leaders of the Senate Armed Services Committee — chairman Roger Wicker, R-Miss., and ranking member Jack Reed, D-R.I. — said in a statement Friday that they will be “conducting vigorous oversight to determine the facts related to these circumstances.” Similarly, the leaders of the House Armed Services Committee — chairman Mike Rogers, R-Ala., and ranking member Adam Smith, D-Wash. — said they were taking “seriously the reports of follow-on strikes on boats alleged to be ferrying narcotics in the SOUTHCOM region and are taking bipartisan action to gather a full accounting of the operation in question.”Hegseth has defended the numerous U.S. strikes in the Caribbean, saying in a post on X Friday after The Washington Post article was published that “these highly effective strikes are specifically intended to be ‘lethal, kinetic strikes.'””Our current operations in the Caribbean are lawful under both U.S. and international law, with all actions in compliance with the law of armed conflict — and approved by the best military and civilian lawyers, up and down the chain of command,” he wrote.Hegseth received backlash on social media after he posted on his personal X account what appeared to be an AI-generated image of the children’s book character Franklin, with the title, “Franklin targets Narco Terrorists.” It shows Franklin, a turtle, standing on the edge of a helicopter aiming a machine gun at boats allegedly carrying drugs.The strikes in the Caribbean are part of an escalating pressure campaign the Trump administration is waging against Venezuela. Trump declared in a Truth Social post Saturday that Venezuela’s airspace should be considered “closed,” which came as the U.S. is considering military action against the South American nation.Rebecca ShabadRebecca Shabad is a politics reporter for NBC News based in Washington.Gabe GutierrezGabe Gutierrez is a senior White House correspondent for NBC News.
Related Post
October 6, 2025
Savewith a NBCUniversal ProfileCreate your free profile or log in to save this articleOct. 6, 2025, 6:07 PM EDTBy Erika EdwardsThe booming IV hydration spa industry operates with virtually no oversight or data backing up its claims, according to the first comprehensive national analysis of hydration clinics. At clinics nationwide, people pay hundreds of dollars to have vitamins and minerals dripped directly into their veins as a detox, to ease headaches or boost immunity, “almost completely without evidence,” said Dr. Peter Lurie, president of the Center for Science in the Public Interest and co-author of the study, published Monday in JAMA Internal Medicine. “As a result, there’s a real danger to consumers.”Hydration clinics, combined with the growing number of med spas offering intravenous vitamin drips, skin care and cosmetic procedures, have ballooned into a $15 billion wellness industry in recent years, according to the American Med Spa Association. The group represents med spas, which often offer IV treatments, nationwide. Alex Thiersch, chief executive officer of the American Med Spa Association, said some IV hydration clinic providers don’t realize that they’re actually practicing medicine and may lack proper training.“We have had folks who are surprised by that,” Thiersch said. “They thought, ‘I’m just doing an IV. It’s different. It’s vitamins.’”“If you’re putting a needle in someone’s vein,” he said, “that’s 100% medical practice.”There are no federal health regulations or national standards for procedures for med spas. Instead, the facilities fall under the authority of each state.As of June 2024, no state or jurisdiction had enacted legislation specifically to regulate IV hydration spas, according to the new study.Thirty-two states did have some kind of policy addressing IV hydration spas, including rules either for prescribing or compounding drugs or how clinics should dispense medications.Four states — Alabama, North Carolina, South Carolina and Vermont — had the most comprehensive oversight. “This is a medical system that exists largely outside of conventional medicine,” Lurie said. “We’re worried that people will spend their money on these without reason to expect benefits. We’re also worried that there will be adverse effects related to this.”The potential for injury is real: Products or equipment could be contaminated, or a provider might not have appropriate training to give an IV safely.There’s no official count of the number of people injured at med spas. Infections and allergic reactions aren’t often reported to health departments. The new research cited NBC News’ previous reporting on med spas as evidence of “rising concerns of their safety, with reports of infections and contaminated products.” Of 255 clinic websites analyzed, more than half offered IV hydration therapy touting therapies like magnesium for headaches and muscle cramps, glutathione as a potential immune system booster, or other substances advertised to increase energy.Just two of those sites listed tangible sources for those health claims. None mentioned potential risks, like infection or allergic reactions. One aspect of the research involved a secret shopper investigation, in which researchers placed calls to 87 randomly chosen spas.Only about 1 in 4 required a medical consultation beforehand. More than 85% recommended specific IV cocktails when callers mentioned symptoms like a headache or cold, often without verifying a patient’s medical history.Fewer than 1 in 4 warned about potential side effects, like bruising or infections. The Food and Drug Administration previously warned consumers about the potential for severe infections and skin deformities from unauthorized shots touted to dissolve fat at med spas.Erika EdwardsErika Edwards is a health and medical news writer and reporter for NBC News and “TODAY.”
September 22, 2025
Nvidia will invest up to $100 billion in OpenAI
October 15, 2025
Italy’s oldest bartender still serving drinks at 100
October 30, 2025
Dr. Phil ordered to liquidate media company
Comments are closed.
Scroll To Top
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics
© Copyright 2025 - Be That ! . All Rights Reserved