• Police seek suspects in deadly birthday party shooting
  • Lawmakers launch inquires into U.S. boat strike
  • Nov. 29, 2025, 10:07 PM EST / Updated Nov. 30, 2025,…
  • Mark Kelly says troops ‘can tell’ what orders…

Be that!

contact@bethat.ne.com

 

Be That ! Menu   ≡ ╳
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics Politics
☰

Be that!

Campaign to move penguins 'trapped' in basement

admin - Latest News - November 14, 2025
admin
17 views 18 secs 0 Comments



British lawmakers have joined a campaign calling for 15 penguins “trapped in a basement without sunlight or fresh air” in central London to be released. NBC News’ Yuliya Talmazan reports from outside the aquarium.



Source link

TAGS:
PREVIOUS
Savewith a NBCUniversal ProfileCreate your free profile or log in to save this articleNov. 14, 2025, 9:04 AM ESTBy Frank Thorp V and Julie TsirkinMost of the senators whose data was requested as part of the investigation that led to special counsel Jack Smith’s Jan. 6 probe have now distanced themselves from a provision included in the shutdown-ending bill, signed into law by President Donald Trump, that would let them sue the government for potentially millions of dollars for not notifying them when accessing their records.“I have no plans at this time” to sue, Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wisc., said in a statement shared with NBC News. “If I did sue, it would only be for the purpose of using the courts to expose the corrupt weaponization of federal law enforcement by the Biden and Obama administrations. With the full cooperation in our congressional investigations from the Trump DOJ and FBI, that shouldn’t be necessary.”Trump’s Justice Department gave Senate Republicans a document naming eight GOP Senators and one member of the House whose data was accessed as part of the Jan. 6 investigation. And under this new retroactive statute, which does not explicitly name Smith, the senators would be afforded a unique ability to sue the government and potentially rake in up to $500,000 for each “instance” of data collection. (The provision only applies to senators and would not apply if a senator were the target of a criminal investigation.)Several senators have already indicated that they won’t seek a payout.Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., says he will not sue the government by using the provision included in the government funding bill, even though his data was requested as part of the investigation that led to Smith’s investigation.“I am for accountability for Jack Smith and everyone complicit in this abuse of power,” Hagerty said in a post on X on Thursday. “I do not want and I am not seeking damages for myself paid for with taxpayer dollars.”Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., issued a statement calling the measure, which both Republican and Democratic leaders in the Senate signed off on, “a bad idea.”“I think the Senate provision is a bad idea,” Hawley said, adding, “There needs to be accountability for the Biden DOJ’s outrageous abuse of the separation of powers, but the right way to do that is through public hearings, tough oversight, including of the complicit telecom companies, and prosecution where warranted.”A spokesperson for Sen. Dan Sullivan, R-Alaska, told NBC News, “Senator Sullivan first learned about this provision when he and his staff were reading the bill to reopen the government. He does not plan on suing and is supportive of the House bill to repeal the provision.”Sen. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., who earlier supported the provision, said in a new statement, “If the Senate votes on the bill to undo the Arctic Frost provision in the government funding bill, I will support the effort to reverse it.”“This fight is not about the money; it is about holding the left accountable for the worst weaponization of government in our nation’s history. If leftist politicians can go after President Trump and sitting members of Congress, they will not hesitate to go after American citizens,” she added.But Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., said he would “definitely” sue the government, telling reporters on Thursday, “It bothers the hell out of me and I’m going to sue, and I’m going to create opportunities for others to sue that weren’t in the Senate.”Earlier in the week, he said, “If you think I’m gonna settle this thing for a million dollars, no, I want to make it so painful no one ever does this again.”In a post on X on Thursday, Sen. Tommy Tuberville, R-Ala., called for Jack Smith to be “DISBARRED and THROWN IN JAIL” — and if he isn’t, Tuberville said he will “sue the living hell out of every Biden official involved in this to make sure this NEVER happens to a conservative again.”A spokesperson for Sen. Cynthia Lummis, R-Wyo., said the senator did not author the provision and “hasn’t really considered” whether she would sue for damages.The senators’ comments came after House Speaker Mike Johnson said he would hold a vote on the House floor to repeal the provision inserted by his Senate counterparts. Johnson told reporters this week that he was “shocked” and “angry” about the statute being “dropped in at the last minute” and that most House Republicans wanted to reverse it, as he communicated to Senate Majority Leader John Thune.It’s not yet clear what will happen in the Senate, where a GOP aide said the language was a “member-driven provision”. Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, said it was Thune who “inserted that in the bill to provide real teeth to the prohibition on the Department of Justice targeting Senators.” A Democratic aide told NBC News that Schumer “fought to make the provision prospective to protect his members from a corrupt and out-of-control DOJ” under Attorney General Pam Bondi.Thune’s office declined to comment.The eight Republican senators whose phone “tolling records” were accessed were: Ron Johnson of Wisconsin; Lindsey Graham of South Carolina; Bill Hagerty of Tennessee; Josh Hawley of Missouri; Dan Sullivan of Alaska; Tommy Tuberville of Alabama; Cynthia Lummis of Wyoming; and Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee.Frank Thorp VFrank Thorp V is a producer and off-air reporter covering Congress for NBC News, managing coverage of the Senate.Julie TsirkinJulie Tsirkin is a correspondent covering Capitol Hill.
NEXT
Nov. 14, 2025, 9:38 AM ESTBy Daryna Mayer and Yuliya TalmazanKYIV, Ukraine — As explosions boomed and smoke blanketed Ukraine’s capital early Friday, it was the same old fear for Nadiia Chakrygina. Like clockwork, she got her three children — Tymur, 13, Elina, 9, and 9-month-old Diana — out of bed and into a basement, where they waited, some asleep, some awake, for the strikes to be over.“Why do our children deserve this,” Chakrygina, 34, told NBC News in a telephone interview. “Why are they living under strikes? Why can’t they get proper sleep and go to school? There is anger about everything.”It’s a routine millions of Ukrainians have been begrudgingly following since Russian President Vladimir Putin launched his invasion almost four years ago, and the nearly nightly barrages of Ukrainian cities that have followed. A Russian drone shot down by Ukrainian air defense above Kyiv on Friday.Sergei Supinsky / AFP via Getty ImagesAs Chakrygina and her family emerged from their shelter, they learned at least four people were killed and another 29 injured in the massive attack, which authorities said had damaged residential buildings in the Ukrainian capital. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who has been pushing for an end to the war, took to X shortly afterward to call it a “wicked attack.”But with peace negotiations effectively stalled and Russian troops pushing deeper into eastern Ukraine, there is little end in sight. Chakrygina, who used to work as a pension fund clerk before she had her three children, said she moved to Kyiv from the town of Vuhledar in the eastern Donetsk region shortly after the war started in February 2022. Vuhledar, which has been obliterated by years of fighting, was captured by Russian forces last October as part of Putin’s wider push to recapture the entire Donbass region, which is made up of Donetsk and the neighboring region of Luhansk. While their progress has been slow, earlier this week Russian forces appeared to be advancing on the city of Pokrovsk, a key logistics hub seen as a gateway to the broader region, which sits around 35 miles north of Vuhledar. A destroyed apartment in a residential building that was hit Friday.Oleksii Filippov / AFP via Getty ImagesBack in Kyiv, business manager Maryna Davydovska said she could feel the air “shake” around her as powerful and loud explosions interrupted the night, forcing her family to go to an underground shelter.“I feel numb inside,” Davydovska, 36, said in an interview on WhatsApp messenger after the attack. “It’s too much pain we are carrying every day, and it feels like it will not be over, never. I am not angry or fed up, I am desperate.”Russia has been pummeling Ukraine with near-daily drone and missile strikes, killing and wounding civilians. The Russian Defense Ministry said Friday that forces targeted Ukraine’s “military-industrial complex and energy infrastructure” with “high-precision long-range weapons.” It made no mention of civilian sites hit.The Kremlin has repeatedly said its only targets are linked to Kyiv’s war effort, but it has relentlessly targeted Ukraine’s energy sector in a bid to plunge the country into the cold and dark ahead of winter.“We are used to everything. The strikes come, we get scared but life continues,” Chakrygina said, reciting the motto that gets her through the relentless attacks. But while civilians simply try to survive, there was public anger this week after Ukraine’s justice minister was suspended Wednesday in an investigation into an alleged $100 million kickback scheme in the country’s energy sector. German Galushchenko was removed from office after anti-corruption authorities said they exposed a scheme which allegedly saw current and former officials, and businesspeople receive benefits and launder money through the country’s state energy company, Energoatom, authorities said.Police stand next to a residential building damaged in Friday’s strikes, Oleksii Filippov / AFP via Getty ImagesFive people have been arrested and another seven were placed under suspicion, according to a statement Tuesday from Ukraine’s National Anticorruption Bureau, the NABU, and Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office, SAPO.Zelenskyy said in a statement on Telegram on Wednesday that those involved “cannot remain in their positions,” adding: “This is a matter of trust in particular. If there are accusations, they must be answered.”Davydovska called the scandal “demotivating,” although she said she was encouraged that the corruption was uncovered and investigated. “We have a joke — Ukraine is the richest country: no matter how much is stolen, there is still money here,” she said. But on a more serious note, she added that Ukrainians had been fundraising for the army for the last four years, “while some bastards are doing such things.” Chakrygina meanwhile, said she was hopeful that peace can be reached. “We don’t believe anymore in Vuhledar, in our [Donetsk] region, because Vuhledar has been erased from the face of the Earth. But we want to at least live here [in Kyiv],” she said. It’s her three children that keep her going every day, she said. “They need their future. They need to live without war,” she added. Daryna Mayer reported from Kyiv. Yuliya Talmazan from London. Daryna MayerDaryna Mayer is an NBC News producer and reporter based in Kyiv, Ukraine.Yuliya TalmazanYuliya Talmazan is a reporter for NBC News Digital, based in London.
Related Post
October 7, 2025
3 critically hurt after California helicopter crash
October 17, 2025
Oct. 17, 2025, 5:00 AM EDTBy Rob WileThe torrent of billion-dollar investment announcements related to artificial intelligence has raised fears that the economy is sitting on a bubble that, if popped, could send it into a tailspin. Some on Wall Street aren’t buying it. In a note to clients published Thursday titled “AI Spending Is Not Too Big,” Goldman Sachs economist Joseph Briggs made the case that the billions being spent on building out data centers — known as capital expenditures, or “capex” — remains sustainable.In short: Briggs believes AI applications are leading to real productivity gains that will help boost companies’ bottom lines. Meanwhile, the cost of the computing processing needed to power those applications justifies the billions in spending, assuming the sophistication of the applications continues to improve. In total, Briggs expects U.S. companies to generate as much as $8 trillion in new revenue thanks to AI. “The key takeaway from our analysis is that the enormous economic value promised by generative AI justifies the current investment in AI infrastructure and that overall levels of AI investment appear sustainable as long as companies expect that investment today will generate outsized returns over the long run,” Briggs wrote. Other key Wall Street players have echoed his assessment. This week, JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon compared AI to the internet, which led to its own “dot com” bubble but ultimately created real economic and societal impact. “You can’t look at AI as a bubble, though some of these things may be in the bubble. In total, it’ll probably pay off,” Dimon said at a conference hosted by Fortune. Predictions about the economic impact of AI continue to run the gamut, from only a modest bump in productivity to the end of all jobs as we know them. Evidence of current effects so far is mixed, though the roster of companies citing AI or automation as a reason for job cuts — whether they actually intend to meaningfully increase its use — continues to grow.Amid all those variables, AI’s biggest impact has arguably been on stock returns. Despite some recent drawdowns, major U.S. stock indexes continue to sit near all-time highs, thanks largely to gains from tech companies participating in the AI boom. Peloton turns to AI in hope of boosting slumping sales03:41On Thursday, tech stocks got another lift when chip manufacturer Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (TSMC) reported record profits and soaring revenues. TSMC is the main supplier of semiconductors for Nvidia — the most valuable publicly traded company in the world — and it also counts Apple, Qualcomm and AMD as clients. “Our conviction in the megatrend is strengthening, and we believe the demand for semiconductors will continue to be very fundamental as a key enabler of AI applications,” TSMC Chief Executive C.C. Wei told analysts on an earnings call. Briggs of Goldman didn’t offer a direct comment about whether his analysis means AI-related stocks themselves have room to run. And there are growing signs that many investors now believe that whatever AI’s broader economic payoff is, stock valuations have become stretched. In its latest weekly investor sentiment survey, the American Association of Individual Investors found bullish sentiment had dipped below its historical average of 37.5% for the first time in five weeks, with 55% of respondents agreeing “stocks in general are overvalued.” Briggs did warn that some of the companies whose shares have had the greatest run-ups so far won’t necessarily be the ones who end up reaping the greatest overall returns from the AI revolution.“The ultimate winners from infrastructure builds are determined by a complex set of factors including timing, regulation, and market competition,” he wrote. Eventually, Briggs said, computing costs will decrease, meaning some proportion of the current AI spending boom will look overdone in hindsight. But given a 15% boost to productivity, a slower adoption timeline and other factors, current spending levels on AI investment are sound, he added. “While investment should eventually moderate as the AI investment cycle moves beyond the build phase and declining hardware costs dominate, the technological backdrop still looks supportive for continued AI investment,” he wrote.Jim Cramer, host of CNBC’s “Mad Money,” had a similar assessment this week, comparing the current AI moment to the dawn of the railroad age. “I am telling you, this is just the beginning,” he said. While not every company riding the wave will survive, the build-out itself changed the economy forever, he said, and “once the losers got wiped out, the winners won big.” Rob WileRob Wile is a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist covering breaking business stories for NBCNews.com.
September 30, 2025
Government Appears Poised to Shut Down: What to Know
October 26, 2025
Oct. 26, 2025, 6:30 AM EDTBy Corky SiemaszkoThe Russian chess master accused by his peers of bullying Daniel Naroditsky, the U.S. grandmaster who was found dead last week, has himself been hit with unfounded cheating allegations in the past — a 2006 chess scandal that came to be known as “Toiletgate.”The manager of Vladimir Kramnik’s opponent in that title match, Veselin Topalov, claimed the Russian was using the bathroom up to 50 times per match to surreptitiously look up chess moves on a computer — a charge that Kramnik’s manager hotly denied.“It should also be mentioned that Mr. Kramnik has to drink a lot of water during the games” and likes to pace in the bathroom, Carsten Hansel added, according to news reports.Kramnik eventually won the match and became the undisputed World Champion of chess, but only after agreeing to World Chess Federation (FIDE) demands that he use the same bathroom as his opponent. It was a concession Kramnik initially protested with a sit-in near the bathroom, causing him to forfeit one of the games in the match.Later, Topalov and his manager were sanctioned by the FIDE Ethics Commission for “making unsubstantiated accusations of cheating.”Kramnik, responding to an NBC News request for comment on the renewed interest in “Toiletgate,” said in an email on Friday, “Since I always played fair throughout my career, this insinuation didn’t bother me much, I took it quite lightly.”Since Kramnik had repeatedly suggested Naroditsky had cheated, his own brush with what turned out to be apparently baseless allegations resurfaced this week in the wake of Naroditsky’s death. A cause of death for Naroditsky has not been announced. “It is a bit ironic for someone like Kramnik, who had been accused of cheating, to then turn around and accuse somebody else of cheating,” Erik Allebest, CEO of Chess.com, which is the largest chess platform in the world, said Friday.Young chess champ found deadNaroditsky, 29, was found dead Sunday at his home in Charlotte, North Carolina. Police on Thursday said they were investigating his death as a possible suicide or drug overdose.FIDE said it would investigate whether Kramnik should be disciplined for the disparaging public statements he made “before and after the tragic death” of Naroditsky.During his last livestream on Saturday, Naroditsky told his audience that the cheating claims by Kramnik, whom he once idolized, had taken a toll on him.Daniel Naroditsky.Kelly Centrelli / Charlotte Chess Center“Ever since the Kramnik stuff, I feel like if I start doing well, people assume the worst of intentions,” he said.Chess.com banned Kramnik in 2023 from taking part in prize tournaments after he accused multiple players of cheating, said Allebest.Kramnik has claimed to be the “subject of a bullying and slandering PR campaign,” as well as ongoing threats to him and his family since Monday. That was when the Charlotte Chess Center in North Carolina, where Naroditsky trained and worked as a coach, announced on social media that he had died.The Russian has also denied bullying Naroditsky and said in an email Friday that his lawyers were “preparing a major case against every media resource publishing this false information.”Do chess players cheat?Allebest acknowledged there is cheating in competitive chess.“It’s just a human thing and it’s the same with any sport,” he said. “For some the rewards of winning outweigh the cost to their consciences. For some it’s monetary, although it’s rare that the prize money is that big.”Among other things, Chess.com runs weekly online money matches where players can take home up to $3,000.“It’s not big money,” Allebest said. “More often, players will be cheating to gain notoriety, to boost their streaming audience, to rise in the rankings and get famous by taking on the best players. It’s a perception thing.”Those matches, he said, are also closely monitored.“For players competing in prize money matches, we have a monitoring program called Proctor that they download that keeps track of what’s going on on their computers,” Allebest said. “We have front and rear-facing cameras to monitor the players.”Now that so much chess is played online, the cheating methods have also gone digital.“They’ll use computer algorithms to determine the best move, they’ll have a second program running on their computer while the game is being played,” he said. “Sometimes they’ll have somebody sitting next to them with an iPad looking up the best moves.”So Chess.com looks for red flags.“We have statistical models that help us identify possible cheaters,” Allebest said. “For example, if a new player signs up and suddenly starts winning a lot of games in a row, or whose ranking starts climbing fast, or if we detect other factors that we cannot disclose, we will look into it.”In their most recent “Fair Play Update” from September, Chess.com reported that 125,000 accounts were “closed for cheating.”‘Painful’ allegationsStarting in October 2024, Kramnik publicly accused Naroditsky of cheating in online chess, suggesting his near-perfect play was “statistically impossible.”Allebest said statistics don’t always tell the whole story.Russian chess Grandmaster Vladimir Kramnik in Paris in 2016.Joel Saget / AFP / Getty Images file“The thing that often gets forgotten is that in statistics, lightning does, sometimes, strike twice,” Allebest said. “When you have 20 million games being played every day, a one in a million chance thing happens every day. Some players, especially old guard players who didn’t grow up playing online chess, often find that hard to understand.”Allebest said he gets why Naroditsky, a child prodigy, might have felt despondent in the face of accusations leveled at him by a world-renowned player like Kramnik.“It is painful for players like Danya to be accused of cheating because since they were young they put in hours and hours and hours of work,” he said, referring to Naroditsky by his nickname. “For some, that all gets thrown into the garbage by an accusation. For players who view chess as sacred, it hurts them in the soul.”Corky SiemaszkoCorky Siemaszko is a senior reporter for NBC News Digital.
Comments are closed.
Scroll To Top
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics
© Copyright 2025 - Be That ! . All Rights Reserved