• Dec. 13, 2025, 4:51 AM ESTBy Freddie ClaytonUnited…
  • Dec. 13, 2025, 6:30 AM ESTBy Nicole AcevedoLawful…
  • Dec. 13, 2025, 5:00 AM ESTBy Dareh Gregorian…
  • Dec. 13, 2025, 5:30 AM ESTBy Marin Scott…

Be that!

contact@bethat.ne.com

 

Be That ! Menu   ≡ ╳
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics Politics
☰

Be that!

Dec. 11, 2025, 1:05 PM EST / Updated Dec. 11, 2025, 1:20 PM ESTBy Sahil KapurWASHINGTON — The Republican-controlled Senate voted Thursday to reject health care bills offered by each party, as the U.S. barrels toward a cliff with steep premium hikes for millions of Americans set to hit next month.The failed votes raise the likelihood that enhanced Obamacare subsidies passed in 2021 will expire at the end of this year and cause premiums to double on average for some 22 million Americans who benefit from that funding.Neither bill achieved the 60 votes needed to advance, kicking the issue into the political arena. Democrats hope to use the issue to mobilize voters in the 2026 midterm elections if there is no outcome to prevent the cost increases.“The Republican plan is a ‘when you get sick, you go broke’ plan,” Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said Thursday on the Senate floor.Lawmakers spar over future of health insurance costs as subsidies are set to expire04:59The bill offered by Democrats on Thursday would have extended the enhanced Affordable Care Act funds for another three years. The legislation failed by a vote of 51-48, with Sens. Susan Collins, R-Maine, Josh Hawley, R-Mo., and Lisa Murkowski and Dan Sullivan, both Alaska Republicans, joining Democrats to support it.“Democrats may talk about helping Americans, but their bill is nothing more than a political messaging exercise that they hope they can use against Republicans next November,” Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., said Thursday.A competing bill, offered by Republicans, sought to let the ACA money expire and instead boost health savings accounts while making changes to the insurance marketplaces. It would allow adults earning under 700% of the federal poverty level to access $1,000 per year in a tax-advantaged HSA if they’re younger than 50, rising to $1,500 per year for those aged 50 to 64. And it would expand the availability of lower-tier “bronze” and “catastrophic” Obamacare insurance plans, which have lower premiums and higher out-of-pocket costs.The bill, written by Sens. Mike Crapo, R-Idaho, and Bill Cassidy, R-La., failed by a vote of 51-48. Along with all Democrats, Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., voted “no.” Sen. Steve Daines, R-Mont., missed both votes.“It delivers the benefit directly to the patient, not to the insurance company,” Thune said, saying it “saves money” for taxpayers. “That is a win-win proposal.”President Donald Trump said he likes the “concept” of the Crapo-Cassidy bill, but stopped short of endorsing it as his preferred measure. He has not offered a plan of his own.Democrats blasted the Republican proposal.“Under the Republican plan, the big idea is essentially to hand people about $80 a month and wish them good luck,” Schumer said before the vote, saying the only viable plans to access that money have deductibles of $7,000 or more. “So, to get that $80 a month, you’re going to pay $7,000 off the top before you even get any health insurance. How ridiculous. How stingy. And how mean and cruel to the American people.”Even some Republicans said their plan wasn’t enough, as it wouldn’t address the rising cost of insurance premiums.“I think giving people more money to pay for their deductible is a great idea. I think we probably still need to do something on premiums, because you can’t use the HSAs on premiums,” Hawley said. “That’s just the law. So you know, there’s probably more to do there.”Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H., said Thursday she wasn’t giving up on an ACA funding extension, and suggested there may be another opening in January to pass it. House Republican leaders have said they hope to hold a vote on a health care bill next week before leaving for the holiday recess. But the party has not yet found a plan that its members will rally around, much less one that can pass the Senate before the end of the year. No vote has been scheduled yet, and some swing district Republicans have signed on to two “discharge petitions” to defy Speaker Mike Johnson and force a vote on extending ACA money.Many Republicans in both chambers want the enhanced ACA funds to expire on schedule at the end of this year. Congress is scheduled to leave town at the end of next week for the holidays.Sahil KapurSahil Kapur is a senior national political reporter for NBC News.Frank Thorp V, Katie Taylor, Julie Tsirkin and Lizzie Jensen contributed.

admin - Latest News - December 11, 2025
admin
5 views 14 secs 0 Comments




The Senate rejected two health care bills, as the U.S. barrels toward a cliff with steep premium hikes for millions of Americans on Obamacare.



Source link

TAGS:
PREVIOUS
Skydiver's parachute gets caught on plane tail
NEXT
Judge orders Abrego Garcia released from ICE custody
Related Post
November 28, 2025
Nov. 28, 2025, 6:00 PM ESTBy Freddie Clayton and Fiona DayThe rolling plains of Kenya’s Maasai Mara and the millions of animals that live there face a shiny new intrusion: a gleaming Ritz-Carlton safari camp.With private plunge pools, butler service and panoramic views commanding more than $5,000 a night, the 20-hectare lodge has become a luxury lightning rod for controversy.Leaders of the Maasai — an ethnic group of traditionally nomadic herders with ancestral ties to the area — and conservationists warn the new tourist destination threatens a migration corridor vital to the movement of vast numbers of animals and have filed a lawsuit to halt its operations.What’s at stake, they argue, is not just a new lodge, but the accelerating pressures of tourism on wildlife, biodiversity and the very spectacle that draws these tourists in the first place. The camp opened on Aug. 15 during the height of the Great Migration, where millions of wildebeest, zebras and other grazing animals move back and forth between the Serengeti plains in Tanzania and the Maasai Mara National Reserve (MMNR) in Kenya, a process that researchers say allows animals to find food and water and maintain genetic diversity among herds.The Ritz-Carlton, Masai Mara Safari Camp. The rapid growth in lodges and camps has sometimes clashed with conservation efforts.Jiri Lizler / Marriott InternationalTourists have long flocked to the savannah by the hundreds of thousands, hoping to witness one of the largest movements of mammals in the world, as herds cross rivers and plains teeming with predators.But the new camp, which boasts “front-row seats to one of the world’s greatest natural wonders” on its website, may threaten the migration that visitors come to witness, conservations and Maasai leaders say. The Ritz-Carlton camp, on a bend in the Sand River, sits on “one of the most favored corridors for these animals,” Maasai elder Meitamei Olol Dapash told NBC News in an interview Sunday.“Any guide will tell you, that is the crossing they use,” said Dapash, who filed a lawsuit in August in a Kenyan court against Ritz-Carlton’s owner, Marriott International, the world’s largest hotel chain, as well as the project’s local owner and operator, Lazizi Mara Limited, and Kenyan authorities.Dapash, executive director of the Institute for Maasai Education, Research and Conservation (MERC), who has a PhD in Sustainability Education from Prescott College in Arizona, alleges in the lawsuit that the 20-suite camp obstructs the crucial migration corridor and is asking the court to restore the land to its original condition.He told NBC News in an interview there had been instances of wildebeest turning back to avoid the camp and that an elephant was seen struggling to find a path across the river after using the location for more than a decade.Female lions with cubs in Masai Mara, Kenya.Henrik Karlsson / Getty Images file“Attachment to the land and to the wildlife exists up to this very day,” Dapash said, adding that the Maasai had seen populations dwindling. The new camp, he added, “was the last straw for us, we just didn’t want to let this happen.”The Kenya Wildlife Service government agency pushed back at claims the lodge has impacted wildebeest migration, citing monitoring data that it says shows it does not “fall within, obstruct, or interfere with any wildebeest migration corridors” and adding that migrating wildebeest “are using the entire breadth of the Kenya-Tanzania border.”It said that “all ecological, environmental and regulatory requirements were thoroughly met and validated.”Marriott International told NBC News that the development underwent an environmental impact assessment (EIA) “in full compliance with” Kenya’s environmental protections.The company said it is committed to “the principles of responsible tourism” but declined to comment on Dapash’s claims that the Ritz-Carlton blocked a key route for local wildlife or its own steps to mitigate the construction’s impact, saying these were matters for Narok County, which manages the reserve on the Maasai’s behalf.Narok County did not respond to NBC News’ request for comment. In court documents seen by NBC News, the county claims that the safari camp complies with the Maasai Mara Management Plan, which imposes a moratorium on new developments amid concerns that poorly regulated tourism was stifling wildlife migration and threatening the reserve’s ecosystem.Lazizi Mara Limited said the moratorium is part of the case before the court, adding: “We wouldn’t want to comment on issues that are pending determination.”Dapash told NBC News that he had “no issue with business, but this is not just about hotel, it is about the long-term survival of the game reserve.” “We feel like we are losing the land, we are losing the wildlife,” he said.The lawsuit comes amid mounting concerns about the health of the 580-square-mile reserve, where tourist numbers have nearly tripled in recent decades. The Maasai Mara National Reserve reported over 300,000 tourists in 2023. In 1980, total visitor entry was 114,000. Tourism in the Mara generates an estimated $20 million annually and thousands more indirectly, according to the reserve. In 2023, tourism across the country contributed around 7% of Kenya’s gross domestic product, according to the World Travel and Tourism Council.But the rapid growth in lodges and camps has sometimes clashed with conservation efforts. “A hotel is never just a hotel,” Dr. Chloe Buiting, a vet and wildlife researcher working in the Maasai Mara, said in an interview. “It’s infrastructure, it’s roads, it’s changes to the water and the resources and the use of land.”Seasonal variation in the availability and quality of food forces animals to move around, said Joseph Ogutu, a Kenyan researcher at the University of Hohenheim in Germany. But he said developments like the Ritz-Carlton are having “a negative effect on migration, because most of these facilities are close to rivers where animals either drink water or breed or seek refuge.”Dapash’s cause has also found support among experts and tourism groups.Grant Hopcraft, a professor of conservation ecology at the University of Glasgow, who has been collaring migratory wildebeest in the Serengeti-Mara since 1999, presented maps and data to the court in October showing “regular cross-border movement of wildebeest” at the location of the lodge, according to his affidavit.RIDE International, a U.S.-based nonprofit providing cultural exchanges and immersive tours in East Africa, has also thrown its support behind Dapash’s lawsuit.The Mara has been suffering for a long time, said Riley Jon Blackwell, the company’s executive director, with “large hotel chains coming in and trying to service the luxury guests who command to see the best of the best for wildlife.”The Ritz-Carlton safari camp was “not surprising,” he added in an interview. “It’s just kind of a culmination of a long time, of a direction of things leading this way.”The camp holds a 2.2-star rating on Google Reviews, with many posters criticizing its environmental impact. Others have praised their stay at the park. A court is scheduled to hear the case in December.If Dapash is successful with his lawsuit, Buiting said it could “set a very interesting precedent” for future developments in the reserve.“From a legal perspective, this could actually be groundbreaking, a turning point,” she added.Freddie ClaytonFreddie Clayton is a freelance journalist based in London. Fiona DayFiona Day is a social news editor for NBC News based in London.Reuters contributed.
November 18, 2025
Immigration arrests in Charlotte spark protests
October 1, 2025
Sept. 30, 2025, 8:49 PM EDTBy Monica Alba and Raquel Coronell UribeWASHINGTON — National parks will remain partially open during the government shutdown set to begin Wednesday, according to an Interior Department contingency plan posted Tuesday evening.Open-air sites will remain open to the public, but buildings that require staffing, such as visitor centers or sites like the Washington Monument, will be closed. Health and safety will continue to be addressed for sites that remain operational, meaning restrooms will be open and trash will be collected, the Interior Department said.The contingency plans specify that park roads, lookouts, trails and open-air memorials will stay open but emergency services will be limited. The department added that if public access begins to pose a safety, health or resource protection issue, an area must close.Critical Senate vote fails as shutdown deadline looms02:02The contingency plan says that about 64% of the National Park Service workforce is set to be furloughed and that those kept on would perform “excepted” activities, such as law enforcement or emergency response, border and coastal protection and surveillance, and fire suppression and monitoring.The published plans come hours before a funding lapse across the federal government. Office of Management and Budget Director Russell Vought told agencies in a memo Tuesday night to begin implementing their shutdown plans.Recent shutdowns led to confusion about the public’s access to national parks. During the last shutdown, in his first term, President Donald Trump ordered parks to remain open. Trails and outdoor sites stayed open ,and some staff members stayed on to clean restrooms and empty trash cans.Still, many park employees were furloughed, resulting in trash piling up and restrooms filling up with human waste. Some parks, including California’s Joshua Tree, eventually had to close because of damage made by unsupervised visitors.That shutdown was the longest in U.S. history, lasting 34 days.During the 2013 shutdown, the park service took a different approach to park access. At the time, park gates were closed and bathrooms were locked. Trash went uncollected, and fencing went up around some sites, like the Lincoln Memorial.In both shutdowns, there was more notice about the plan, whereas the contingency plans published Tuesday night came just hours before a shutdown.The park service workforce, which could experience significant furloughs, is already more depleted than usual. The National Parks Conservation Association, an advocacy organization, estimated in July that the park service lost 24% of its permanent staff as a consequence of the Trump administration’s efforts to reduce the federal workforce through the Department of Government Efficiency.The park service reinstated a number of purged employees, however, The Associated Press reported this month.The park service did not immediately respond to a request for comment Tuesday night on the number of job cuts and how many people were rehired.The National Parks Conservation Association said Monday that the impacts of keeping parks open last time were “disastrous” and that some parks suffered damage that took months or even years to recover from.“A government shutdown would leave our parks understaffed and vulnerable, putting our most cherished places and millions of visitors at risk. If a national park has a gate or door, it must be locked until a funding deal is reached and our parks can be staffed and protected,” it said in a news release.Meanwhile, a letter signed by more than 40 former park superintendents urged Interior Secretary Doug Burgum to close parks, too, arguing that keeping them open during past shutdowns caused harm to them and jeopardized visitor safety.“If you don’t act now, history is not just doomed to repeat itself, the damage could in fact be much worse,” the letter said.Monica AlbaMonica Alba is a White House correspondent for NBC News.Raquel Coronell UribeRaquel Coronell Uribe is a breaking news reporter. 
October 27, 2025
AI glasses can be a lifeline for the visually impaired
Comments are closed.
Scroll To Top
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics
© Copyright 2025 - Be That ! . All Rights Reserved