• Lava spills as Hawaii's Kilauea resumes eruptions
  • Protesters smear food on the case of the…
  • National Guard member 'slowly healing' after shooting
  • Dec. 6, 2025, 12:18 PM ESTBy Mirna Alsharif…

Be that!

contact@bethat.ne.com

 

Be That ! Menu   ≡ ╳
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics Politics
☰

Be that!

Dec. 2, 2025, 2:10 PM ESTBy Ryan J. Reilly, Gary Grumbach and Doha MadaniWASHINGTON — The man accused of shooting two National Guardsmen, killing one, made a virtual appearance in D.C. Superior Court on Tuesday to face a charge of first-degree murder.Afghan national Rahmanullah Lakanwal, who was also shot during the incident, could be seen on a video feed laying down in a hospital bed. Officials allege that Lakanwal gunned down Spc. Sarah Beckstrom, 20, and Staff Sgt. Andrew Wolfe, 24, last week while they were on patrol near the White House as part of the their deployment to the nation’s capital. Lakanwal, 29, is also charged with assault with intent to kill while armed, possession of a firearm, and possession of a firearm during a crime of violence in addition to murder. He pleaded not guilty to all counts. A judged ordered Lakanwal be held without bond.Court documents say that Lakawal yelled “Allahu Akbar!” as he shot the gun, and that he was subdued as he appeared to be reloading.Both the Guardsmen, who were serving in West Virginia’s National Guard, were shot in the head on Wednesday. Beckstrom died from her wounds, President Donald Trump told troops in a Thanksgiving Day call.Wolfe remains in serious condition. But West Virginia Gov. Patrick Morrisey said Monday that he showed signs of improvement after giving nurses a “thumb’s up” and showed he was able to wiggle his toes. Authorities have not yet identified a motive for the shooting. A relative of Lakanwal said he arrived in the U.S. in September 2021 after having served in the Afghan army for 10 years alongside U.S. Special Forces troops. He was living in Bellingham, Washington, with his wife and five children, the relative added.The CIA confirmed that Lakanwal worked for the U.S. government as a member of a partner force in Kandahar. His service ended in 2021 following the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Afghanistan.

admin - Latest News - December 2, 2025
admin
5 views 15 secs 0 Comments




The man accused of shooting two National Guardsmen, killing one, made a virtual appearance in D.C. Superior Court to face a charge of first-degree murder.



Source link

TAGS:
PREVIOUS
Trump holds Cabinet meeting
NEXT
Prosecutors Play 911 Call That Led to Luigi Mangione Capture
Related Post
November 13, 2025
Nov. 13, 2025, 12:00 PM ESTBy Doha MadaniAriana Grande was rushed by a man ahead of the premiere of “Wicked: For Good” in Singapore on Thursday, appearing frightened as co-star Cynthia Erivo and security rushed to intervene. The man who rushed Grande, Johnson Wen, posted the video to his own Instagram account where he thanked Grande for “letting” him jump on to the carpet. Wen has an Instagram account under the name Pyjama Man man where he posts about rushing concert stages and sporting events. But it did not appear that Grande was aware of the situation in the video, looking scared as the man ran towards her and put his arm around her while she stood beside her “Wicked” co-star Michelle Yeoh. Cynthia Erivo, the film’s co-headliner, immediately jumped into action across the two women and tried to pry Wen off of Grande as security moved toward them. Yeoh also appeared to put her arms around Grande to pull her away from the man. Videos posted by others online showed that Erivo seemed to move positions on the carpet to ensure Grande walked in between her and Yeoh.Representatives for the “Wicked” film franchise did not immediately respond to a request for comment. “Wicked” For Good” is being released by Universal Pictures, which is owned by NBCUniversal, the parent company of NBC News. Cynthia Erivo and Ariana Grande discuss upcoming ‘Wicked: For Good’01:44Fans of Grande offered a fierce defense of the singer in the comments of Wen’s Instagram video, with some describing it as an assault on Grande. Commenters also called on others to report the man’s account.Some of Grande’s fans pointed out that the singer has experienced prior trauma at events, referencing the 2017 bombing of her concert in Manchester where 22 people were killed. Grande, who says she’s always dealt with anxiety, told British Vogue in 2018 that she dealt with symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder after the attack. “After all the trauma Ari has been through, this is beyond disrespectful,” one commenter wrote. “Not just to her, but to the cast and to all the fans. It’s literally infuriating. You should be ashamed.”Wen has posted videos of himself crashing concert stages, including at Katy Perry and The Weeknd shows, as well as rushing the fields at sporting events. In a message to NBC News, Wen described himself as a “mega fan” of Grande and that he was “happy” to meet her.”I dreamed about meeting her and now my dreams became true,” he wrote. He did not respond to a request for comment on the backlash he’s facing online or that he might have scared Grande through his actions. Doha MadaniDoha Madani is a senior breaking news reporter for NBC News. Pronouns: she/her.
November 23, 2025
Princess Diana wax figure unveiled in Paris
October 16, 2025
Oct. 16, 2025, 5:00 AM EDTBy Ben KamisarOne thing is certain in New York City’s race for mayor: There’s no love lost between the top candidates, Democratic nominee and state Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani and former Democratic governor-turned-independent Andrew Cuomo. And as the two prepare to face off in their first general election debate Thursday, along with Republican nominee Curtis Sliwa, a review of the tape from Mamdani and Cuomo’s two Democratic primary debates shows how they have positioned themselves in diametric opposition to each other — and as the answer for voters seeking to address the other’s shortcomings.To Cuomo, the almost 34-year-old Mamdani is a young man in a hurry whose lack of experience should disqualify him from leading America’s largest city. Not only that, Cuomo considers Mamdani to be the face of a wing of the Democratic Party that he believes is leading the whole organization astray on issues from support for Israel to economic policy. To Mamdani, Cuomo is the manifestation of a broken Democratic Party establishment, a root cause of the affordability crisis at the center of his entire campaign, and a politician who has lost the public trust after being accused of sexual misconduct, allegations Cuomo denies. Andrew Cuomo says he ‘learned to be more careful’ after harassment allegations but has no regrets01:24Perhaps no exchange typifies the pair’s disdainful dynamic than one from the NY1/Spectrum News primary debate in early June, when both men were asked about their experience. Cuomo responded by arguing that “inexperience is dangerous” before taking Mamdani head on. “He’s never dealt with a City Council, he’s never dealt with the Congress, he’s never dealt with the state legislature, he’s never negotiated with a union, he’s never built anything, he’s never dealt with a natural emergency, he’s never dealt with a hurricane, with a flood,” Cuomo said. “He’s never done any of the essentials, and now you have Donald Trump on top of all of that — and he’s never dealt with what I think is the greatest national threat that we face, in this president. To put a person in this seat at this time with no experience is reckless and dangerous.”Mamdani was ready with a laundry list of his own, as well as a dig at a rival who spent much of the primary campaign — and his time on the debate stage — incorrectly pronouncing his name as “Mamdami.”“To Mr. Cuomo: I have never had to resign in disgrace; I’ve never cut Medicaid, I’ve never stolen hundreds of millions of dollars from the MTA, I’ve never hounded the 13 women who credibly accused me of sexual harassment, I’ve never sued for their gynecological records and I have never done those things because I am not you,” Mamdani replied. “And furthermore, the name is Mamdani: M–A-M-D-A-N-I. You should learn how to say it, because we’ve gotta get it right,” he said.A direct foilAs the two men staked out their lanes in the Democratic primary, each constantly invoked the other to explain their theory of the case. Kicking off the first primary debate, which was hosted by NBC 4 New York, Mamdani’s first answer laid out his pitch to enact progressive policies by freezing rent-stabilized apartment costs, making city buses free and enacting universal child care — all while framing his platform in diametric opposition to Cuomo, at that point the longtime polling front-runner. “I will pay for this by taxing the 1%, the billionaires and the profitable corporations that Mr. Cuomo cares more about than working-class New Yorkers,” Mamdani said. When asked how he’d turn his policy proposals into enacted reality, Mamdani attacked Cuomo again, arguing that in the state Legislature, he successfully “overcame” the objections of “a governor then who didn’t want to raise taxes on billionaires and corporations. That was then-Gov. Cuomo.” Cuomo has taken a similar path, repeatedly contrasting his experience as a former governor and federal housing secretary to Mamdani’s, contending that his younger opponent is all flash, no substance by comparison. “Mr. Mamdani is very good on Twitter with videos, but he actually produces nothing,” Cuomo said during that same debate. And at the second debate, Cuomo framed himself as the only candidate on the stage with a record of translating plans into action. “Everyone has a plan — they had a plan to build LaGuardia Airport, nobody did it until I did it. They had a plan to build the new Moynihan train station, but nobody could do it until I did it. They had a plan to finish the Second Avenue Subway, but nobody could do it until I could do it. Now we have plans to build affordable housing, and we do need hundreds of thousands of units,” Cuomo said. “It’s one thing to have a plan. It’s another thing to have the ability to do it. And that’s where New York City has fallen down time and time again,” Cuomo continued.Regrets, they have fewThe NBC4 debate moderators asked the Democratic primary candidates to share the biggest regret of their political careers. Like most of the candidates on the stage, both Cuomo and Mamdani delivered self-serving answers, and each focused on the other candidate in sharing their faux regret. “One of my regrets is having trusted leaders within our own party, leaders like Andrew Cuomo, because what we’ve seen is that kind of leadership has delivered us to this point where we are under attack by an affordability crisis on the inside and a Trump administration on the outside,” Mamdani said. “Democrats are tired of being told by leaders from the past we should continue to simply wait our turn, continue to simply trust when we know that’s the very leadership that got us to this point,” Mamdani said.Cuomo’s response took a similar tack, at least in terms of political strategy, saying his regret was that “the Democratic Party got to a point where we allowed Mr. Trump to get elected, that we’ve gotten to a point where the rhetoric has no connection to reality, where a person who has served in government for several years, only passed three bills, believes they have the experience and credentials to run the greatest city on Earth — and that the Democratic Party seems OK with that.” The two candidates’ symbiotic toxic relationship has been so obvious that it sometimes led to them breaking the fourth wall to acknowledge the dynamic. During the NY1 debate, each mayoral candidate was given the opportunity to ask an opponent a question. Cuomo asked an allied candidate a pointedly critical question about Mamdani.When Mamdani initially sought to continue a previous back-and-forth instead of taking the opportunity to ask his question of another candidate, it caused the debate’s moderators to press pause. “Wait, who are you going to ask your question to?” one of the debate’s moderators asked Mamdani.“I feel like most people would have known I’m going to ask Andrew Cuomo a question,” Mamdani replied. “I knew,” Cuomo chimed in.Ben KamisarBen Kamisar is a national political reporter for NBC News
October 26, 2025
Oct. 26, 2025, 5:00 AM EDTBy Berkeley Lovelace Jr.With the cost of health insurance set to rise, some Americans are asking a surprising question: Is it actually cheaper to get medical care without it?The short answer: Sometimes. But not often. And it may require a little — or a lot — of homework. Some hospitals and clinics offer self-pay or cash only discounts for patients who pay without insurance, skipping the paperwork and administrative fees that come with having coverage. Hospitals are required by federal law to make their discounted cash prices publicly available online. An allergy test or an X-ray, for example, may be a few hundred dollars cheaper this way, especially for people with high deductible plans. Nonprofit hospitals must provide charity care, which is free or discounted, to people who can’t afford it, even for those with insurance.But paying outside of health insurance means that cost doesn’t count toward your deductible or out-of-pocket limit — and if you end up needing more medical visits than expected, you could wind up worse off financially.“You have to be really careful,” said Stacie Dusetzina, a health policy professor at Vanderbilt University in Nashville, Tennessee. “The price that you pay with cash, even if they give you some sort of advertised discount, can be more than what you might actually pay through health insurance overall.”The question of whether to opt out of insurance and pay in cash is surfacing as many Americans are expected to face higher premiums next year. Enhanced subsidies, which kept Affordable Care Act premiums lower for many middle-class people, are set to expire at the end of the year without action from Congress. Premiums for people who get their health insurance through their jobs or outside the ACA are also expected to rise next year. Some ACA enrollees are debating whether to drop their coverage entirely — a decision that experts warn could leave them exposed to major medical bills if an unexpected emergency hits. “If you like Russian roulette, then you’ll like to approach health care this way,” said Michele Johnson, executive director of the Tennessee Justice Center, a law firm and nonprofit advocacy group that helps people dispute medical bills. Johnson said “part of the fallacy is that as American consumers, we’re all about, ‘How do I bargain the best deal?’”“Health care is not this way,” she said. “If you’re healthy, you’re basically pushing all the chips out onto the table in hopes that you basically will mostly be healthy.”Losing benefitsInsurance, for all its frustrations, can provide crucial protections: caps on out-of-pocket costs, access to negotiated rates and free preventive care, such as cancer screenings, annual physicals and routine vaccinations.For non-emergency care, a doctor or hospital may require the patient who isn’t using insurance to pay the entire cost upfront or see a different provider, said Erin Duffy, director of research training at the USC Schaeffer Center for Health Policy and Economics.“It does seem risky,” Duffy said. “If you were thinking that you could keep going to the primary care doctor that you’d go to when you were insured, you might find that there’s different financial obstacles.”For those who are healthy, paying in cash can be a smart move for predictable, lower cost-services — such as an X-ray or CT scan, Dusetzina said.“This comes up all the time in the prescription drug world,” Dusetzina said. “People will often fill generic drugs out of pocket because it happens for them to be cheaper to do that than paying with health insurance in some cases.”But patients wouldn’t have access to their insurer’s negotiated rate — the amount an insurance company agrees to pay for a medical service, Dusetzina said. Even if people haven’t reached their deductibles, they still get the negotiated rate, which might be cheaper than paying cash. And whatever they pay wouldn’t go toward their deductible or out-of-pocket limit. “What has historically happened is, if you went to a medical site and you wanted to pay in cash, the price that they start with is often twice as high or more than what the health insurance price would be,” she said. “So, you do lose the benefit of having a negotiated rate going without health insurance.”A person’s savings can disappear fast if something unexpected happens, Johnson said. Emergency room visits, hospital stays or surgeries — even at discounted rates — can cost tens of thousands of dollars. Uninsured patients are billed the full amount. It’s generally not possible to sign up for health coverage after an emergency has already happened, she said. There’s also a narrow period to enroll; in most states, ACA enrollment is Nov. 1 through Jan. 15. Open enrollment for people who get health insurance through their jobs is generally around the same time.“That’s the only time you can sign up until the next year, so essentially, you’re left holding the bag, not just for emergency visits, but for all the follow-up care,” she said. Johnson said that before people even think about negotiating care with a doctor or provider, they must first check if they have a federally qualified health center nearby. The health clinics receive federal grants to provide low-cost care to underserved populations, including the underinsured and the uninsured. “If you need primary care, you can often get primary care at a federally qualified health center,” she said. If specialty care is needed, doctors may negotiate, but they often require people to pay the full amount upfront, Johnson said. If you want to get an idea of how much you could pay, websites like Turquoise Health show the average cash price hospitals may charge for certain medical procedures. If you do get a lower rate from a doctor, the process might not end there, Johnson said. Depending on how complicated the medical procedure is, you may need to get an agreement with the entire health care team involved.“Even if you have a doctor who says, ‘I will do this for you,’ then somehow you have to get an anesthesiologist to do it, and you have to get labs to do it, and you have to get nurses doing it as well,” she said.Duffy said to call the billing office and “ask really specific questions about when you would have to pay, what are the full range of options for both assistance and payment plans that could be helpful to someone who’s uninsured or lower income or just facing a bill you might not be able to pay all at once.”For those in need of emergency care or hospital care, Duffy noted, there is a federal law — the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act — which requires Medicare-participating hospitals to provide care to anyone who comes to the emergency department, regardless of their ability to pay. After that, the person may be able to negotiate with the hospital or provider, or get a payment plan. None of these strategies are particularly useful for people who are not healthy and are likely to use a high amount of health care, said Lawrence Gostin, director of the O’Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law at Georgetown University.“The self-pay option will be most attractive to the healthy and well-off patient, who may forgo adequate health insurance,” he said.Berkeley Lovelace Jr.Berkeley Lovelace Jr. is a health and medical reporter for NBC News. He covers the Food and Drug Administration, with a special focus on Covid vaccines, prescription drug pricing and health care. He previously covered the biotech and pharmaceutical industry with CNBC.
Comments are closed.
Scroll To Top
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics
© Copyright 2025 - Be That ! . All Rights Reserved