• How might the U.S. fare in the 2026…
  • Dec. 6, 2025, 5:46 PM ESTBy Marlene LenthangAs…
  • Crowd goes wild at 'Silent Night' basketball game
  • Lava spills as Hawaii's Kilauea resumes eruptions

Be that!

contact@bethat.ne.com

 

Be That ! Menu   ≡ ╳
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics Politics
☰

Be that!

Dec. 3, 2025, 5:57 PM ESTBy Angela YangWith short-form video now dominant on social media, researchers are racing to understand how the highly engaging, algorithm-driven format may be reshaping the brain.From TikTok to Instagram Reels and YouTube Shorts, short-form video content has become a cornerstone of just about every online platform, including LinkedIn and even Substack. But increasingly, studies are finding associations between heavy consumption of short-form video and challenges with focus and self-control.The research, though still early, seems to echo widespread concerns over “brain rot,” an internet slang term that the Oxford University Press defines as “the supposed deterioration of a person’s mental or intellectual state.” (The term became so mainstream that the academic publishing house crowned it as its 2024 word of the year.)A September review of 71 studies with a total of nearly 100,000 participants found that heavy consumption of short-form video was associated with poorer cognition, especially in regard to attention spans and impulse control, based on a combination of behavioral tests and self-reported data.The review, published in Psychological Bulletin, a journal of the American Psychological Association, also found links between heavy consumption of the videos and increased symptoms of depression, anxiety, stress and loneliness.A paper published in October, which summarized 14 studies of short-form video use, similarly described associations between heavy use and shorter attention spans, as well as poorer academic performance.Despite growing alarm, some researchers say the long-term picture is still unclear.James Jackson, a neuropsychologist at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, said there’s a long history of people crusading against new technologies and cultural phenomena, whether it’s video games or Elvis concerts. So he’s cautious about overreacting to the rise of short-form video, but he said nonetheless that he believes many of the concerns are justified.“The narrative that the only people who are worried about this are grumpy old grandpas who are yelling at you to get off their lawn or the idea that if you’re concerned about this you’re not in step with the times, I think that’s really simplistic,” Jackson said.Current research on the topic, he said, suggests that short-form video broadly seems to have harmful effects on the brain when it’s consumed in large doses. But it will take more research to parse the nuances, such as who’s most vulnerable, how permanent the effects are and which particular mechanisms cause harm.Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder diagnoses are rising in the U.S. About 1 in 9 children had received an ADHD diagnosis by 2022, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.But Keith Robert Head, a doctoral student in social work at Capella University in Minneapolis who authored the October paper, said there’s overlap between symptoms of ADHD and the risks he identified.“So one of the questions that would be interesting for researchers to study is: Are these ADHD diagnoses actually ADHD, or is it an impact from the continued use of short-form video?” Head said.Three experts told NBC News that research into the long-term impacts of excessive short-form video use is still emerging, especially in the U.S. However, studies from researchers around the world, including the U.K., Jordan, Saudi Arabia and Egypt, have also found associations between consumption of the videos and issues like attention problems, memory disruption and cognitive fatigue.Those studies don’t establish cause and effect, though, and most so far describe only a moment in time, rather than follow subjects for a longer period. Dr. Nidhi Gupta, a pediatric endocrinologist who researches the effects of screen time, said that while much of the existing body of research on short-term video consumption has centered on younger people, she’s eager to see more focus on older adults. They often have time on their hands and are less technologically savvy, so they might also be vulnerable to the risks of short-form content, she said.It may take many years of further study, Gupta added, to determine whether cognitive changes associated with short-form media consumption are reversible. But she’s concerned that it has created a new type of addiction — she describes it as “video games and TV on steroids.”“It might be too early to claim universal doom,” Gupta said. “The research for alcohol, cigarettes and drugs took 75 years or more to develop. But I would be surprised if, in the next five to 10 years, we do not have similar signs validating the moral panic that we have around short-form videos.”Jackson, however, said short-form video can also be useful, as it has created opportunities for learning and community-building online. What’s important, he said, is balance: “There are people that engage with short-form videos in ways that are value-added, for sure. But if their engagement is pulling them away from other, more healthy opportunities, if it is isolating them from other people, if it is creating situations where they’re less and less likely to just sit around and be bored, I think that’s a problem.”Angela YangAngela Yang is a culture and trends reporter for NBC News.

admin - Latest News - December 4, 2025
admin
6 views 14 secs 0 Comments




With short-form video now dominant on social media, researchers are racing to understand how the highly engaging, algorithm-driven format may be reshaping the brain



Source link

TAGS:
PREVIOUS
Matthew Perry’s doctor sentenced to prison for supplying ketamine
NEXT
Dec. 3, 2025, 8:23 PM ESTBy Melanie Zanona and Bridget BowmanWASHINGTON — Speaker Mike Johnson is staring down a revolt from House Republican women.Several female lawmakers have been increasingly defying Johnson, R-La., on legislative matters and lobbing public broadsides at him — including a member of Johnson’s own leadership team.This week alone, Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, R-Fla., launched a discharge petition to go around Johnson and force a floor vote on a congressional stock trading ban, posting on X that she’s “pissed” that leadership isn’t moving fast enough on the issue while clarifying, “I like Mike.” Johnson prefers to go through regular order, and there has been an initial hearing on the issue.Rep. Elise Stefanik of New York, the chair of House Republican Leadership, not only signed on to Luna’s petition but also publicly unloaded on Johnson over an unrelated issue in the national defense bill, suggesting in a series of social media posts that Johnson lied about the matter. The spat has seemingly since been resolved, but the bad blood between the two has long been simmering.Asked about Stefanik’s broadsides in the Capitol on Wednesday, Johnson shrugged off the complaints and said he’s “not worried” about his standing “at all.”Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene to resign from Congress next year16:05“There’s 220 or so people in this conference and lots of different opinions,” he told reporters. “Everybody’s not delighted with every decision every day, but that’s Congress.” Meanwhile, a number of high-profile Republican women are fleeing the House for other opportunities, weighing retirement or quitting Congress early, fueling some concern that GOP women’s ranks could be depleted in the next Congress.Taken together, it’s a sign of growing frustration among some House GOP women, who have less representation in leadership and hold only a single elected committee gavel. Two House Republican women, who spoke to NBC News on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive internal matters, said that they feel they have been passed over for opportunities, that their priorities don’t always get taken as seriously under Johnson’s leadership and that they believe that could be driving some of the exits and public fights with him. “It’s a sea change — for the worse. And it’s one of the many reasons that numerous House Republican women are running for higher office,” one of the GOP women said, accusing Johnson of “undercutting” some Republican women. “I’m concerned there will be less Republicans in Congress, period, next year, and certainly that means there will be less Republican women.”The second woman said: “We aren’t taken seriously. You have women who are very accomplished, very successful, who have earned the merit, who aren’t given the time of the day.”Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia — who blindsided Johnson with her recent resignation announcement, according to a GOP source familiar with the situation — has gone so far as to publicly accuse the current male GOP leaders of bias, telling The Washington Post in a recent interview she believes Republican women have been “marginalized.”Greene and Rep. Nancy Mace of South Carolina, who has also been a vocal critic of Johnson, are scheduled to meet next week to talk about their shared frustrations, according to a source familiar with the matter.A spokesman for Johnson’s political team said in a statement that he strongly supports the women in his conference and has been working hard to recruit even more women to the House, noting that several who are on the Speaker’s Joint Fundraising Committee have received an average of nearly $400,000 for their campaigns so far this year.“Not only has Speaker Johnson elevated women in leadership, he has also helped recruit and support women running for office,” the spokesman said. “This cycle, we have women running in 10 of the top districts we are watching. Our team is in touch with them and others across the country — just as we were in 2024 — as Speaker Johnson works to recruit strong conservatives who can win, help us grow our majority, and help us deliver on our agenda.”The majority of chairmanships and leadership positions are elected by the entire conference, but there are a few instances in which Johnson can make unilateral appointments or create new roles.He appointed Rep. Virginia Foxx of North Carolina, 83, to lead the Rules Committee, making her the only female chair in the House. He also put three Republican women on the Intelligence Committee, including Stefanik, whom he also made the chair of House Republican Leadership after her U.N. ambassadorship nomination was pulled.Still, there are zero elected female committee chairs — and some Republicans privately blame Johnson for that. During a GOP steering committee meeting at the beginning of this year, Johnson spoke favorably of Rep. Brian Mast of Florida, who was running for the Foreign Affairs Committee chairmanship against Ann Wagner of Missouri. Some in the room interpreted that as Johnson’s signaling his preference, but Johnson insisted he wasn’t purposely trying to tip the scales. Mast won.Republicans have long struggled with elevating women. A Republican woman has never served higher than as the GOP conference chair. That position, which is fourth-ranking in the majority and third-ranking in the minority, is held by Lisa McClain of Michigan. McClain nominated Johnson for the speakership.McClain said in a statement that it’s an “absurd suggestion” to imply that Johnson hasn’t done enough to promote GOP women. “As the House’s highest ranking woman, the Speaker has treated me with nothing less than respect. He values my opinion, not as a woman, but as a trusted colleague,” she told NBC News in a statement. “Driving an unnecessary divide over gender is a Democrat tactic, and Republicans would be foolish to give in to this left-wing framing.”Floor problemsIn recent weeks, sensitive issues related to women have pitted Republican women against their own leadership.Four Republicans — Mace, Greene and Reps. Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Lauren Boebert of Colorado — were involved in a discharge petition to force a floor vote on releasing the Jeffrey Epstein files, saying they want to help deliver justice for the women the late financier sexually abused.But it was the three Republican women who faced the brunt of a pressure campaign from both the White House and Johnson to drop off the petition. Johnson said he was against the discharge petition because he was concerned about protecting the identities of the female victims, although many of them had advocated for the release of the files.The discharge petition ultimately succeeded last month, and when the vote outcome looked inevitable, President Donald Trump then decided to get behind the issue. It passed with just one no vote, and Trump signed it into law.The same month, another divisive issue came to the floor — and it was once again predominantly Republican women who broke ranks with party leadership.Rep. Anna Paulina Luna is forcing a discharge petition to go around Speaker Johnson.Tom Williams / CQ-Roll Call via Getty ImagesMace forced a vote on a resolution to censure fellow GOP Rep. Cory Mills of Florida, in part over his alleged misconduct toward women. A judge granted a restraining order that an ex-girlfriend had been seeking, alleging Mills had harassed her and threatened her with blackmail and revenge porn.Mills has denied any wrongdoing and has vowed to comply with the House Ethics probe, saying on the House floor, “I believe all the accusations and false things being said will be proven to be absolutely false in many ways, and I have the evidence and receipts and look forward to working with them.”Eight Republicans voted with Democrats against a GOP motion to kill the resolution, six of them women: Mace, Boebert, Greene, Luna, Kat Cammack of Florida and Harriet Hageman of Wyoming.Mace also wrote a letter to Johnson raising concerns about Mills but said she never received a response.Johnson has argued he should let the investigative process play out, as the Ethics Committee has created a subpanel to probe the allegations against Mills. But some women were disappointed with his response when NBC News pressed them about the accusations at a news conference in October. Johnson called Mills a “faithful colleague” and then, growing frustrated with reporters for continuing to ask questions about Mills, suggested they “talk about some things that are really serious.”Future GOP ranksAt least four GOP women won’t return in the next Congress, raising the possibility that the number of House Republican women could actually decline after the 2026 midterms. Greene is resigning, Stefanik and Mace are running for governor, and Rep. Ashley Hinson of Iowa is running for the Senate. Greene and Stefanik are prolific fundraisers, and Stefanik in particular has worked to recruit and boost female GOP candidates through her PAC. Hinson has also been seen as a rising star in the party since she flipped a Democratic-held House seat in 2020. That was a banner election cycle for House Republican women, whose ranks more than doubled from a low point of just 13 after the 2018 midterms.There are 33 female Republicans in the House, including two nonvoting members, compared with 96 Democratic women. The number of GOP women in the House has declined slightly since the record number of 36 set in 2023. “The departures of these women, particularly in the House, makes returning to or exceeding the record for Republican women in the House more difficult,” said Kelly Dittmar, director of research and a scholar at the Center for American Women and Politics at the Eagleton Institute of Politics. While the number of GOP women who are retiring is still relatively small, Dittmar said a single loss is felt “that much more” because Republican women are already starting at low levels of representation. House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., said he is not worried about his standing with his members “at all.”Tom Brenner / Getty Images“There’s so much we don’t know about whether or not this will be a good year for Republicans or Democrats. But certainly, from all we know historically, it will take a particularly good year for Republicans and a high level of Republican women running, which were the conditions in 2020, to ensure that you could make up for these losses and maybe even exceed,” she said. Candidates are still considering and launching campaigns, so it’s not clear yet how many races will include Republican women.Maggie’s List, a group that supports GOP women for office, announced Wednesday that it is endorsing four additional House candidates, including two in Republican-leaning districts: state Rep. Shannon Lundgren in Iowa’s 2nd District, which Hinson is vacating to run for the Senate, and former Rep. Mayra Flores, who is challenging Democratic Rep. Vicente Gonzalez in Texas’ 34th District. The group also backed three candidates for governor, including Stefanik, bringing its 2026 endorsements so far to 27 GOP women, including 18 House candidates. Former Florida Lt. Gov. Jennifer Carroll, a national spokesperson for Maggie’s List, said she was confident that the number of GOP women in Congress would “stay steady.”Carroll said Johnson has been supportive of their efforts, and he appeared at the group’s fundraiser in Washington, D.C. But she said the party has more work to do to support female candidates, saying, “We still have to prove ourselves over and over again.” “On the Republican side, they try to, I guess, stay away from identity,” Carroll added later. “And on the Democrat side, they don’t care. They will embrace, if they’re pushing for more women to be elected, then that’s where the mantra will go and that’s where the money will go and that’s where the energy would go.”Winning for Women, a group that also supports GOP women and has a super PAC to boost its endorsed candidates, is also focused on recruitment. Executive Director Meredith Allen Dellinger said Winning for Women has already met with 60 prospective candidates across 32 states and is endorsing contenders like attorney Jessica Hart Stein and Army veteran Alex Mealer, who are running in ruby-red Texas districts.“Since getting into this fight in 2019, the number of Republican women serving in the House has more than doubled and today we have a record number of Republican women in the U.S. Senate. That progress is real, but there’s more work to do, which is why we’re heavily focused on recruitment this cycle,” Dellinger said in a statement, describing Stein and Mealer as candidates who “embody principled, solutions‑oriented conservatism and the leadership our party needs to build a durable House majority.” And while various GOP groups are engaged in supporting female candidates, Dittmar said a lack of targeted infrastructure within the party itself is a “continued and persistent problem” for Republican women looking to grow their ranks. “There’s just opposition to it, like there’s just both ideological opposition, strategic opposition to it,” Dittmar said, adding that Republican women have pushed efforts to support female candidates themselves.The National Republican Congressional Committee also had an initiative in the 2014 election cycle dubbed “Project GROW,” aimed at recruiting and empowering female GOP candidates, but that program didn’t last long. “All these efforts have just really struggled to stay,” Dittmar said. “And again, I don’t put it on the women. I think it’s the party overall that’s not seeing this as a priority.”Melanie ZanonaMelanie Zanona is a Capitol Hill correspondent for NBC News.Bridget BowmanBridget Bowman is a national political reporter for NBC News.
Related Post
November 22, 2025
Savewith a NBCUniversal ProfileCreate your free profile or log in to save this articleNov. 22, 2025, 1:52 PM ESTBy Kate ReillyTatiana Schlossberg, the daughter of Caroline Kennedy and Edwin Schlossberg and granddaughter of John F. Kennedy, has revealed her terminal cancer diagnosis in an essay published by The New Yorker on Saturday.The 35-year-old has acute myeloid leukemia, with a rare mutation called Inversion 3.Schlossberg said she was diagnosed on May 25, 2024, the same day she gave birth to her second child. Hours after delivery, her doctor noticed her abnormally high white-blood-cell count and moved her to another floor for further testing. She initially dismissed the possibility of cancer and was stunned when the diagnosis was confirmed, saying she had considered herself “one of the healthiest people” she knew. “This could not possibly be my life,” she wrote.Schlossberg spent five weeks at Columbia Presbyterian after her daughter’s birth before her blast-cell count dropped enough for her to begin chemotherapy at home. Her care later moved to Memorial Sloan Kettering, where she underwent a bone-marrow transplant and spent more than 50 days before returning home for more treatment.In January, Schlossberg joined a clinical trial for CAR T-cell therapy. She wrote that much of the treatment unfold from her hospital bed as her cousin, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., was nominated and confirmed as secretary of health and human services, a role she believes he was unqualified for.Schlossberg thanked her husband and her family for their support for countless days spent at her bedside.“My parents and my brother and sister, too, have been raising my children and sitting in my various hospital rooms almost every day for the last year and a half,” she added.Her brother, Jack Schlossberg, announced earlier this month that he is running for Congress. The 32-year-old is running for the New York City seat which has long been held by Democratic Rep. Jerry Nadler, who in September announced he will not seek re-election.Despite all of Schlossberg’s treatments, she said, the cancer continued to return.“During the latest clinical trial, my doctor told me that he could keep me alive for a year, maybe,” she wrote. “My first thought was that my kids, whose faces live permanently on the inside of my eyelids, wouldn’t remember me.”Schlossberg is now trying her best to be in the present with her children.By profession a writer, for several years Schlossberg was a reporter for the Science section of The New York Times where she covered climate change and the environment. Schlossberg’s essay comes on the 62nd anniversary of her grandfather’s assassination, adding her diagnosis to a long history of tragedy within the Kennedy family. JFK’s son, John F. Kennedy Jr. and his wife Carolyn Bessette Kennedy died in a plane crash in 1999.Ethel Kennedy, the widow of Robert F. Kennedy who was assassinated in 1968, died in Oct. 2024 from complications from a stroke. She was 96.Kate ReillyKate Reilly is a news associate with NBC News.
October 24, 2025
NY AG James speaks after pleading not guilty
September 21, 2025
Charlie Kirk honored by Trump & Republican leaders at memorial service
November 2, 2025
Newsom explains why he imitates Trump on social media
Comments are closed.
Scroll To Top
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics
© Copyright 2025 - Be That ! . All Rights Reserved