• Dec. 6, 2025, 6:00 AM ESTBy Mithil AggarwalHONG…
  • Dec. 6, 2025, 9:05 AM ESTBy Rohan NadkarniAt…
  • How might the U.S. fare in the 2026…
  • Dec. 6, 2025, 5:46 PM ESTBy Marlene LenthangAs…

Be that!

contact@bethat.ne.com

 

Be That ! Menu   ≡ ╳
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics Politics
☰

Be that!

Dec. 4, 2025, 10:00 AM ESTBy Kaitlin SullivanCervical cancer screening can now include “self-swab” HPV tests, according to updated guidelines published Thursday by the American Cancer Society. The change, experts hope, will encourage more women to undergo regular screening for the cancer by giving them an alternative to a speculum exam.Testing for HPV, or human papillomavirus, has supplanted the Pap test as the preferred method for cervical cancer screening. Pap tests (also called cytology) involve collecting cells from a patient’s cervix during a pelvic exam, a process some women find uncomfortable and even painful. “HPV is such a strong indicator of cervical cancer, we know now that screening for HPV is screening for cervical cancer. This gives more options to women,” said Jane Montealegre, an associate professor of behavioral science at the The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, who was not involved in the updated guidelines. HPV testing has typically used a similar approach to a Pap test, using cells collected from the cervix. Since 2024, however, the Food and Drug Administration has approved three self-administered HPV tests, including one that can be done at home. Cervical cancer rates have been steadily falling in the United States since the 1970s, largely because of improved screening and widespread use of the HPV vaccine since its approval in 2006. There are 40 different types of HPV that can infect the genitals, 13 of which cause nearly all cervical cancers. HPV testing focuses on the high-risk strains.Despite falling rates of cervical cancer, more than 20% of American women aren’t up to date on screening, a JAMA Network Open study found. The self-administered tests allow patients to collect their own sample using a vaginal swab in a doctor’s office. One of the FDA-approved tests allows women to use the swab at home and mail it to a lab for analysis.The self-administered tests allow patients to collect their own sample using a vaginal swab in a doctor’s office. One of the FDA-approved tests allows women to use the swab at home and mail it to a lab for analysis.“A woman would be given a kit and could go some place, either the exam room or bathroom, and collect her own sample,” said Robert Smith, a cancer epidemiologist and senior vice president of early cancer detection science for the American Cancer Society. Smith was the senior author of the update.Both the American Cancer Society and the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force — a group of independent doctors, nurses and public health experts who regularly review the latest scientific research and issue recommendations for everything from diabetes to cancer screening — recommend women screen for cervical cancer using HPV testing every 5 years. If the test is positive, a doctor will follow up with additional testing.Both groups also say patients can be screened using a Pap test and a speculum exam every 3 years, or through using both methods every 5 years. Where the two groups differ is when screening should begin: The American Cancer Society recommends women start this screening regimen at age 25, and not screen before that. The task force, whose recommendations influence what screenings insurance will cover, recommends starting the HPV screening schedule at age 30, and screening with cytology alone every 3 years between ages 21 and 29.Montealegre said she does not expect the task force to change its stance on this, however, it is expected to update its guidelines for HPV screening to include self-administered tests. Cervical cancer screening is covered under the Affordable Care Act, and Montealegre said the self-administered tests, at least those administered at a health clinic, will likely be covered by insurance.“Primary HPV testing is already recommended by the USPSTF, so it is already covered by insurance, and they don’t specify how it has to be collected,” she said. Both organizations recommending the HPV test as the primary way to screen for cervical cancer “indicates that there is growing agreement that it is the gold standard,” Smith said.“We have known for years that primary HPV testing is much more efficient, now we are doing self-sampling to allow for better access,” said Dr. Diane Harper, a professor of obstetrics and gynecology and family medicine at the University of Michigan.The American Cancer Society update also included clarification on when a woman can stop cervical cancer screening. Previously, both the group and the task force recommended screening up to age 65. The updated guidelines clarify that this should be the case only if a woman has had consistent screening, with negative results, for at least a decade. “Despite clear recommendations on the importance of women being up to date with screening up to 65, very few women are,” Smith said. “It’s important for women to understand that there is a record they will want to have by the time they are 65 that will basically tell them it’s safe to stop screening for cervical cancer.”Harper, who wasn’t involved in drafting the new guidelines, expects that in the coming years, cervical cancer screening will likely be done at even longer intervals.“We have data showing now that in a highly vaccinated population, you can screen every 10 years, but we in the U.S. are lagging behind,” she said.Kaitlin SullivanKaitlin Sullivan is a contributor for NBCNews.com who has worked with NBC News Investigations. She reports on health, science and the environment and is a graduate of the Craig Newmark Graduate School of Journalism at City University of New York.

admin - Latest News - December 4, 2025
admin
6 views 12 secs 0 Comments




Cervical cancer screening can now include “self-swab” HPV tests, according to updated guidelines published Thursday by the American Cancer Society.



Source link

TAGS:
PREVIOUS
Suspect arrested in January 2021 D.C. pipe bomb case
NEXT
Dec. 4, 2025, 9:09 AM ESTBy Jane C. Timm and Matt DixonFlorida is entering the national redistricting arms race, with a legislative hearing Thursday set to kick off yet another contentious map-drawing fight.Republicans are hoping Florida, where they have full control of state government and already represent 20 of 28 congressional districts, will be fertile ground for further shoring up the party’s narrow House majority ahead of next year’s midterm elections.But it won’t be easy, legally or politically.From a legal standpoint, voters approved a constitutional amendment in 2010 that’s meant to block partisan gerrymandering. The state Supreme Court weakened the amendment’s ban on racial gerrymandering, but the prohibition of partisan gerrymandering remains intact.“No apportionment plan or individual district shall be drawn with the intent to favor or disfavor a political party or an incumbent,” the Florida Constitution reads.That means that lawmakers will need to explain and defend their reasoning for redrawing a map they enacted just three years ago without mentioning the partisan aims that have motivated other states around the country to pursue an unusually aggressive mid-decade redistricting push.“While that partisan redistricting battle is not illegal in other states, that is illegal in the state of Florida,” Amy Keith, executive director of Common Cause Florida, told NBC News.The politics aren’t simple, either. While the state has a Republican governor and Legislature, party leaders are divided on how to proceed.The Florida House, eager to engage in redistricting, has scheduled two hearings this month. But Gov. Ron DeSantis said this week he wants a new map to be drawn in the spring, just days before the candidate filing deadline. That way the state could take into consideration a potential Supreme Court ruling on a Louisiana redistricting case, which could weaken the Voting Rights Act and make the process easier.On Wednesday, the Senate’s GOP leader sided with DeSantis in the fight.“The Governor has expressed a desire to address this issue next Spring. As such, there is no ongoing work regarding potential mid-decade redistricting taking place in the Senate at this time,” Florida Senate President Ben Albritton told colleagues in a memo. Still, Albritton warned lawmakers to gear up for litigation, reminding them to stay away from partisans trying to influence the process and to keep all their communications and records for the likely lawsuits.State House Speaker Danny Perez did not return a request for comment.No map proposals have yet been filed, but there is an expectation that a redraw could net Republicans between three and five seats, with three seats seen as the most likely scenario.Any potential special legislative session would have to come by early April, as the state’s federal candidate qualifying deadline is April 20.Three seats that could be affected are held by Democratic Reps. Darren Soto in Orlando and Jared Moskowitz and Debbie Wasserman Schultz in South Florida.If they decide to be more aggressive, Republicans could also risk a “dummymander,” a redraw that helps the opposing party by making previously safe seats more competitive.Democrats have little ability to block any redistricting effort since the Florida Legislature is dominated by Republicans. But a coalition of more than 30 pro-democracy and progressive groups are planning to bus more than 300 protesters to the state Capitol in Tallahassee on Thursday in opposition to the GOP’s push.Florida’s entry into the redistricting battle comes at a critical moment for Republicans, who kicked off the cycle over the summer by passing a new map in Texas that could net the party up to five seats. But since then, fears have grown that Democrats could neutralize the GOP’s push.California Democrats responded with new district lines approved by voters last month that could cancel out any Republican gains in Texas. And while Republicans able to enact new maps in Missouri and North Carolina, efforts elsewhere have either not led to gains the party hoped for or stalled out.And now Republicans are waiting for a final ruling from the U.S. Supreme Court on whether they can use their new map in Texas in 2026.The redistricting season isn’t over, though. A map that could net Republicans two seats in Indiana is currently moving through the state Legislature, though it’s unclear if it has enough support in the Senate.In Virginia, Democrats kicked off a multistep process to draw new maps before the midterms in October that will stretch into the spring. State House Speaker Don Scott on Wednesday floated the possibility of an aggressive map that could result in a four-seat gain for Democrats.And there is continued pressure on lawmakers in Maryland, Illinois and Kansas on redistricting.Jane C. TimmJane C. Timm is a senior reporter for NBC News.Matt DixonMatt Dixon is a senior national politics reporter for NBC News, based in Florida.
Related Post
November 17, 2025
Savewith a NBCUniversal ProfileCreate your free profile or log in to save this articleNov. 17, 2025, 12:28 PM ESTBy Gary Grumbach and Dareh GregorianA federal judge in Virginia on Monday ordered prosecutors to turn over grand jury materials in the criminal case against James Comey after finding the government’s handling of the case raises “genuine issues of misconduct” that could result in the charges against the former FBI director being dismissed. Magistrate Judge William Fitzpatrick said in his ruling that the type of relief Comey’s lawyers are seeking is “rarely granted,” but that “the record points to a disturbing pattern of profound investigative missteps, missteps that led an FBI agent and a prosecutor to potentially undermine the integrity of the grand jury proceeding.” The ruling directs the government to turn over the material to Comey’s team by the end of the day.Among the missteps the judge said he found while reviewing the grand jury proceedings in the case were statements made to the panel by acting U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan, a former personal lawyer to President Donald Trump who had no prior prosecutorial experience. Fitzpatrick said the court “identified two statements by the prosecutor to the grand jurors that on their face appear to be fundamental misstatements of the law that could compromise the integrity of the grand jury process,” he wrote. Acting U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan is prosecuting former FBI Director James Comey.Al Drago / Bloomberg via Getty Images fileFitzpatrick also pointed to the government’s handling of potentially privileged attorney-client information in the case.“The nature and circumstances surrounding the government’s potential violations of the Fourth Amendment and court orders establish a reasonable basis to question whether the government’s conduct was willful or in reckless disregard of the law,” Fitzpatrick wrote.Halligan’s office declined to comment. The Justice Department also did not immediately respond to a request for comment.Gary GrumbachGary Grumbach is an NBC News legal affairs reporter, based in Washington, D.C.Dareh GregorianDareh Gregorian is a politics reporter for NBC News.
November 7, 2025
Jon Allen recalls covering Nancy Pelosi
November 19, 2025
Cleveland Browns Shedeur Sanders' home burglarized
September 30, 2025
A look at Medicaid work requirements in Georgia
Comments are closed.
Scroll To Top
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics
© Copyright 2025 - Be That ! . All Rights Reserved