• Dec. 6, 2025, 6:00 AM ESTBy Mithil AggarwalHONG…
  • Dec. 6, 2025, 9:05 AM ESTBy Rohan NadkarniAt…
  • How might the U.S. fare in the 2026…
  • Dec. 6, 2025, 5:46 PM ESTBy Marlene LenthangAs…

Be that!

contact@bethat.ne.com

 

Be That ! Menu   ≡ ╳
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics Politics
☰

Be that!

Dec. 4, 2025, 2:37 PM ESTBy Scott Wong, Melanie Zanona and Kyle StewartWASHINGTON — Less than a year before the critical 2026 midterm elections, Speaker Mike Johnson is losing control of the House floor.The Louisiana Republican suffered a bruising defeat before Thanksgiving when Donald Trump foe, Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., and a trio of GOP women defied Johnson and his top lieutenants and teamed with Democrats to force a near-unanimous vote to release the Jeffrey Epstein files to the public.Seeing Massie’s huge success in getting the Epstein bill signed into law, other Republicans are now turning to that same playbook to go over the speaker’s head.This week, Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, R-Fla., filed a discharge petition in a bid to bypass Johnson and force a vote on a bipartisan bill that would ban members of Congress from owning or trading individual stocks. Nine other Republicans have joined Luna and signed the petition, along with six Democrats.That’s a far cry from the 218 signatures needed to go around the speaker and force a floor vote. But the signatures are notable; it was once unheard of for members of the majority to use discharge petitions against their own leadership.Moderate Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick, R-Pa., a leader of the bipartisan Problem Solvers Caucus, is threatening to file his own discharge petition to impose “crushing” U.S. sanctions on Russia as Trump’s proposed peace deal to end the Ukraine war appears to be faltering. And he’s considering another one to extend expiring Obamacare subsidies unless leaders act before the Dec. 31 deadline.“We’re not afraid to use that option,” Fitzpatrick said. “It’s not a tool of the minority — it’s a tool of the rank and file.”House passes bill to release Epstein files04:45On Wednesday, Johnson’s team abruptly yanked the SCORE Act — which would create federal standards for compensating student athletes — off the House floor amid opposition from a bloc of conservative Republicans led by Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas. It was their most important bill of the week.On top of that, Johnson has been contending with rank-and-file members forcing votes to censure other colleagues, with Rep. Nancy Mace, R-S.C., even targeting a fellow Republican, Rep. Cory Mills of Florida.Mace is part of a group of high-profile female lawmakers who’ve been slinging arrows at Johnson, lambasting his leadership and making life miserable for the speaker, who unexpectedly rose from obscurity to the top job two years ago after Kevin McCarthy was toppled by his own internal revolt.Many of Johnson’s headaches stem from the fact that he is presiding over one of the smallest majorities in history. Since he swore in Tennessee Republican Matt Van Epps on Thursday morning, Republicans have a 220-213 edge over the Democrats, meaning Johnson can afford only three GOP defections on any bill he brings to the floor.’A lot of anxiety and stress’Privately, senior Republicans point to a “confluence” of circumstances and events that has resulted in the flurry of discharge petitions and other rogue antics on the floor. Trump’s approval ratings continue to fall. Democratic candidates overperformed in recent elections in New Jersey, Virginia and Tennessee, a grim sign for House Republicans in next year’s midterm elections. Trump’s “big, beautiful bill” has not resulted in lower costs and curbing inflation. And Johnson’s decision to keep the House in recess for 54 days because of the shutdown meant less committee work and fewer bills being passed.“The confluence is weakened political power by Trump, the result from the elections in New Jersey, New York and Virginia, and people getting anxious about the election. There’s a lot of anxiety and stress about the election, and people looking at their own districts, saying, ‘I thought things were going to be different,’” one senior House Republican lawmaker said.“And I just think being off for 50 days, there was no continuity. Nobody was here. There was nobody like, ‘Hey, you’re doing great. Keep it up,’” the lawmaker continued. “Everyone being back in their district, there was a loneliness. A lot of members may have felt like we’re on our own.”Johnson, a bespectacled and buttoned-up constitutional attorney, rarely appears flustered or angry. While other candidates for speaker in 2023 faced vocal opposition, Johnson catapulted to speaker from the No. 7 leadership slot, in part, because he had no enemies.During the past two years in the role, that certainly has changed. But Johnson downplayed the drama on the floor and in his 220-member conference, saying that despite the variety of opinions and narrow margins, his party has been able to move “a very aggressive agenda on a very short time frame.” “Sometimes there’s friction, sometimes there’s vigorous debate. That’s all part of the process. People are going to have emotions. They’re going to get upset about things. That’s part of the process. It doesn’t deter me in any way. It doesn’t bother me,” Johnson told reporters Thursday. “But when there is a conflict or concern, I always ask all members, come to me. Don’t go to social media, call me. Come by the office.”While he has his share of detractors, Johnson, a Trump loyalist who’s been accused by Democrats of handing over too much congressional authority to the president, has an equal number of defenders.“I support Mike Johnson and what he’s been doing. I think he’s in line with the president. I think he has the ear of the president,” Rep. Troy Nehls, R-Texas, said. “If it’s not Mike Johnson, well, then who? … Who could get enough votes to even replace him? And quite honestly, it’s probably nobody.”A flurry of discharge petitionsDischarge petitions rarely succeed. Only 4% of discharge petitions introduced from 1935 to 2022 were successful in bringing a bill to the floor, according to a review by the Brookings Institution. Johnson has repeatedly railed against the practice, saying they cede power — and control of the floor — to the opposition party. “We continue to see the norms of the House diminish over time. I think that’s unfortunate,” said GOP Rep. Dusty Johnson, who is running for South Dakota governor and is not related to the speaker. “A discharge petition, I don’t think, helps the institution. … It clearly empowers the minority in what is otherwise a majoritarian institution.”But facing fewer opportunities to secure bipartisan accomplishments, vulnerable Republicans are turning to the legislative tool to advance policy priorities they can tout back home.On Tuesday, Luna, a Democratic target whose private investments have come under scrutiny, filed her petition on a bipartisan stock trading ban for members of Congress and their immediate family members. Reps. Fitzpatrick, Mace, Elise Stefanik, R-N.Y., Tim Burchett, R-Tenn., Mike Lawler, R-N.Y., Eli Crane, R-Ariz., Greg Steube, R-Fla., Lauren Boebert, R-Colo., and Zach Nunn, R-Iowa, have all signed on.It’s unclear, however, if backers of the bill will be able to secure the requisite 218 signatures, given that a large number of lawmakers hold and trade individual stocks, some in industries related to the committees on which they serve.“Congress is infinitely broken under either party, and the committee system bogs things down,” said Burchett, the author of the underlying stock ban legislation. “This is the only way to get the bill to the floor.”Johnson and his team were dealing with other setbacks as well this week. Leaders had to pull the SCORE Act shortly before the floor vote Wednesday after Roy, who is running for attorney general in Texas, and a handful of other Republicans remained opposed to the bill. Earlier in the week, Roy and a band of conservative allies almost blocked a procedural rule vote that would have immediately killed the sports bill. Majority Leader Steve Scalise, R-La., and Majority Whip Tom Emmer, R-Minn., were needed to twist arms and flip votes on the floor; the rule passed 210-209. Roy and Reps. Byron Donalds, R-Fla., and Scott Perry, R-Pa., all voted no.Roy said on X on Wednesday that the bill was “not ready for prime time” and questioned why Congress was even getting involved in trying to regulate college sports. “There were a whole lot of no votes. It wasn’t just me,” Roy told NBC News after the bill was pulled. “Obviously, there were three of us on the rule, but there was, like, I’m not gonna give the number … There were a lot of people who were not prepared to be on this bill today.”Rep. Jim McGovern, D-Mass., who served as Rules Committee chairman and now is the top Democrat on the panel, said he understands Republicans who are turning to discharge petitions amid a gridlocked floor. “They get no help from their own leadership. This place doesn’t function anymore. I mean, we reported out a rule for the six bills this week — all of them are closed, no amendments made in order. Even Republican amendments were rejected,” McGovern said in an interview outside the Capitol.“For some Republicans, their priorities are not being addressed by their leadership, and so they’re kind of going around their leadership,” he added. “I don’t always agree with everything they’re doing, but I certainly share their frustration.”Scott WongScott Wong is a senior congressional reporter for NBC News. Melanie ZanonaMelanie Zanona is a Capitol Hill correspondent for NBC News.Kyle StewartKyle Stewart is a producer and off-air reporter covering Congress for NBC News, managing coverage of the House.

admin - Latest News - December 5, 2025
admin
6 views 11 secs 0 Comments




Less than a year before the critical 2026 midterm elections, Speaker Mike Johnson is losing control of the House floor.



Source link

TAGS:
PREVIOUS
Radio icon Delilah reflects on her career
NEXT
Trump, first lady light National Christmas Tree
Related Post
November 1, 2025
President Trump hosts Mar-a-Lago Halloween party
October 1, 2025
Vance says shutdown firings are 'not targeting federal agencies based on politics'
October 7, 2025
Oct. 6, 2025, 7:40 PM EDTBy Zoë RichardsPresident Donald Trump said Monday that he would consider invoking the Insurrection Act “if it was necessary,” particularly if the courts or state and local officials delay his plans to deploy the National Guard.”I’d do it if it was necessary. So far it hasn’t been necessary. But we have an Insurrection Act for a reason,” Trump told reporters in the Oval Office when he was asked under what conditions he would consider the rarely used 19th century law.”If I had to enact it, I’d do that. If people were being killed and courts were holding us up or governors or mayors were holding us up, sure, I’d do that. I mean, I want to make sure that people aren’t killed. We have to make sure that our cities are safe,” he added.The Insurrection Act of 1807 allows the president to mobilize the U.S. military to conduct civilian law enforcement activities under certain circumstances. It was last used during the 1992 Los Angeles riots.Trump was speaking about his efforts to federalize troops and crack down on crime in Democratic-run cities.A federal judge in Oregon on Sunday blocked the Trump administration from deploying federalized National Guard members from California or other states to Portland’s streets.U.S. District Judge Karin Immergut, a Trump appointee, had also blocked the administration from deploying Oregon National Guard troops in Portland.”Portland’s been on fire for years, and not so much saving it,” Trump told reporters Monday. “We have to save something else, because I think that’s all insurrection. I really think that’s really criminal insurrection.”Oregon AG: Trump shouldn’t deploy troops to cities unless under ‘extreme circumstances’02:44Trump and his allies similarly referred to protesters opposing Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids in Los Angeles as “insurrectionists,” and Trump offered a similar answer in June when he was asked about any plans to invoke the Insurrection Act. “Depends on whether or not there’s an insurrection,” he said at the time, without ruling out the possibility of using it in the future.A key Trump ally argued earlier Monday that such action is needed now.In a text message to NBC News before Trump’s Oval Office remarks, former White House strategist Steve Bannon said Trump “needs to invoke the Insurrection Act of 1807 immediately and deploy active duty U.S. Army personnel and assets to Portland and Chicago — he needs to put Pritzker and Newsom in their place.”California Gov. Gavin Newsom and Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker, both Democrats, have opposed Trump’s National Guard efforts in their states.At a news conference earlier Monday, Pritzker suggested that Trump is trying to sow unrest so he can invoke the Insurrection Act.”The Trump administration is following a playbook cause chaos, create fear and confusion, make it seem like peaceful protesters are a mob by firing gas pellets and tear gas canisters at them,” Pritzker said. “Why? To create the pretext for invoking the Insurrection Act so that he can send military troops to our city.”Illinois sued Monday to block the Trump administration from deploying federalized National Guard troops to Chicago. A judge declined to immediately block the administration’s move and instead scheduled a hearing for Thursday.White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson said in a statement that Pritzker had failed to address violence in his state.“Amidst ongoing violent riots and lawlessness, that local leaders like Pritzker have refused to step in to quell, President Trump has exercised his lawful authority to protect federal officers and assets,” Jackson said. “President Trump will not turn a blind eye to the lawlessness plaguing American cities.”During his first term, despite nudging from allies, Trump ultimately did not invoke the Insurrection Act, which the White House said was a possibility in response to demonstrations stemming from the death of George Floyd in Minneapolis in May 2020.Zoë RichardsZoë Richards is a politics reporter for NBC News.Katherine Doyle and Dareh Gregorian contributed.
September 21, 2025
Sen. Rand Paul says FCC chair’s comments threatening ABC over Jimmy Kimmel were ‘absolutely inappropriate’
Comments are closed.
Scroll To Top
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics
© Copyright 2025 - Be That ! . All Rights Reserved