• Crowd goes wild at 'Silent Night' basketball game
  • Lava spills as Hawaii's Kilauea resumes eruptions
  • Protesters smear food on the case of the…
  • National Guard member 'slowly healing' after shooting

Be that!

contact@bethat.ne.com

 

Be That ! Menu   ≡ ╳
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics Politics
☰

Be that!

Dec. 4, 2025, 9:09 AM ESTBy Jane C. Timm and Matt DixonFlorida is entering the national redistricting arms race, with a legislative hearing Thursday set to kick off yet another contentious map-drawing fight.Republicans are hoping Florida, where they have full control of state government and already represent 20 of 28 congressional districts, will be fertile ground for further shoring up the party’s narrow House majority ahead of next year’s midterm elections.But it won’t be easy, legally or politically.From a legal standpoint, voters approved a constitutional amendment in 2010 that’s meant to block partisan gerrymandering. The state Supreme Court weakened the amendment’s ban on racial gerrymandering, but the prohibition of partisan gerrymandering remains intact.“No apportionment plan or individual district shall be drawn with the intent to favor or disfavor a political party or an incumbent,” the Florida Constitution reads.That means that lawmakers will need to explain and defend their reasoning for redrawing a map they enacted just three years ago without mentioning the partisan aims that have motivated other states around the country to pursue an unusually aggressive mid-decade redistricting push.“While that partisan redistricting battle is not illegal in other states, that is illegal in the state of Florida,” Amy Keith, executive director of Common Cause Florida, told NBC News.The politics aren’t simple, either. While the state has a Republican governor and Legislature, party leaders are divided on how to proceed.The Florida House, eager to engage in redistricting, has scheduled two hearings this month. But Gov. Ron DeSantis said this week he wants a new map to be drawn in the spring, just days before the candidate filing deadline. That way the state could take into consideration a potential Supreme Court ruling on a Louisiana redistricting case, which could weaken the Voting Rights Act and make the process easier.On Wednesday, the Senate’s GOP leader sided with DeSantis in the fight.“The Governor has expressed a desire to address this issue next Spring. As such, there is no ongoing work regarding potential mid-decade redistricting taking place in the Senate at this time,” Florida Senate President Ben Albritton told colleagues in a memo. Still, Albritton warned lawmakers to gear up for litigation, reminding them to stay away from partisans trying to influence the process and to keep all their communications and records for the likely lawsuits.State House Speaker Danny Perez did not return a request for comment.No map proposals have yet been filed, but there is an expectation that a redraw could net Republicans between three and five seats, with three seats seen as the most likely scenario.Any potential special legislative session would have to come by early April, as the state’s federal candidate qualifying deadline is April 20.Three seats that could be affected are held by Democratic Reps. Darren Soto in Orlando and Jared Moskowitz and Debbie Wasserman Schultz in South Florida.If they decide to be more aggressive, Republicans could also risk a “dummymander,” a redraw that helps the opposing party by making previously safe seats more competitive.Democrats have little ability to block any redistricting effort since the Florida Legislature is dominated by Republicans. But a coalition of more than 30 pro-democracy and progressive groups are planning to bus more than 300 protesters to the state Capitol in Tallahassee on Thursday in opposition to the GOP’s push.Florida’s entry into the redistricting battle comes at a critical moment for Republicans, who kicked off the cycle over the summer by passing a new map in Texas that could net the party up to five seats. But since then, fears have grown that Democrats could neutralize the GOP’s push.California Democrats responded with new district lines approved by voters last month that could cancel out any Republican gains in Texas. And while Republicans able to enact new maps in Missouri and North Carolina, efforts elsewhere have either not led to gains the party hoped for or stalled out.And now Republicans are waiting for a final ruling from the U.S. Supreme Court on whether they can use their new map in Texas in 2026.The redistricting season isn’t over, though. A map that could net Republicans two seats in Indiana is currently moving through the state Legislature, though it’s unclear if it has enough support in the Senate.In Virginia, Democrats kicked off a multistep process to draw new maps before the midterms in October that will stretch into the spring. State House Speaker Don Scott on Wednesday floated the possibility of an aggressive map that could result in a four-seat gain for Democrats.And there is continued pressure on lawmakers in Maryland, Illinois and Kansas on redistricting.Jane C. TimmJane C. Timm is a senior reporter for NBC News.Matt DixonMatt Dixon is a senior national politics reporter for NBC News, based in Florida.

admin - Latest News - December 4, 2025
admin
6 views 13 secs 0 Comments




Florida is entering the national redistricting arms race, with a legislative hearing Thursday set to kick off yet another contentious map-drawing fight



Source link

TAGS:
PREVIOUS
Dec. 4, 2025, 10:00 AM ESTBy Kaitlin SullivanCervical cancer screening can now include “self-swab” HPV tests, according to updated guidelines published Thursday by the American Cancer Society. The change, experts hope, will encourage more women to undergo regular screening for the cancer by giving them an alternative to a speculum exam.Testing for HPV, or human papillomavirus, has supplanted the Pap test as the preferred method for cervical cancer screening. Pap tests (also called cytology) involve collecting cells from a patient’s cervix during a pelvic exam, a process some women find uncomfortable and even painful. “HPV is such a strong indicator of cervical cancer, we know now that screening for HPV is screening for cervical cancer. This gives more options to women,” said Jane Montealegre, an associate professor of behavioral science at the The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, who was not involved in the updated guidelines. HPV testing has typically used a similar approach to a Pap test, using cells collected from the cervix. Since 2024, however, the Food and Drug Administration has approved three self-administered HPV tests, including one that can be done at home. Cervical cancer rates have been steadily falling in the United States since the 1970s, largely because of improved screening and widespread use of the HPV vaccine since its approval in 2006. There are 40 different types of HPV that can infect the genitals, 13 of which cause nearly all cervical cancers. HPV testing focuses on the high-risk strains.Despite falling rates of cervical cancer, more than 20% of American women aren’t up to date on screening, a JAMA Network Open study found. The self-administered tests allow patients to collect their own sample using a vaginal swab in a doctor’s office. One of the FDA-approved tests allows women to use the swab at home and mail it to a lab for analysis.The self-administered tests allow patients to collect their own sample using a vaginal swab in a doctor’s office. One of the FDA-approved tests allows women to use the swab at home and mail it to a lab for analysis.“A woman would be given a kit and could go some place, either the exam room or bathroom, and collect her own sample,” said Robert Smith, a cancer epidemiologist and senior vice president of early cancer detection science for the American Cancer Society. Smith was the senior author of the update.Both the American Cancer Society and the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force — a group of independent doctors, nurses and public health experts who regularly review the latest scientific research and issue recommendations for everything from diabetes to cancer screening — recommend women screen for cervical cancer using HPV testing every 5 years. If the test is positive, a doctor will follow up with additional testing.Both groups also say patients can be screened using a Pap test and a speculum exam every 3 years, or through using both methods every 5 years. Where the two groups differ is when screening should begin: The American Cancer Society recommends women start this screening regimen at age 25, and not screen before that. The task force, whose recommendations influence what screenings insurance will cover, recommends starting the HPV screening schedule at age 30, and screening with cytology alone every 3 years between ages 21 and 29.Montealegre said she does not expect the task force to change its stance on this, however, it is expected to update its guidelines for HPV screening to include self-administered tests. Cervical cancer screening is covered under the Affordable Care Act, and Montealegre said the self-administered tests, at least those administered at a health clinic, will likely be covered by insurance.“Primary HPV testing is already recommended by the USPSTF, so it is already covered by insurance, and they don’t specify how it has to be collected,” she said. Both organizations recommending the HPV test as the primary way to screen for cervical cancer “indicates that there is growing agreement that it is the gold standard,” Smith said.“We have known for years that primary HPV testing is much more efficient, now we are doing self-sampling to allow for better access,” said Dr. Diane Harper, a professor of obstetrics and gynecology and family medicine at the University of Michigan.The American Cancer Society update also included clarification on when a woman can stop cervical cancer screening. Previously, both the group and the task force recommended screening up to age 65. The updated guidelines clarify that this should be the case only if a woman has had consistent screening, with negative results, for at least a decade. “Despite clear recommendations on the importance of women being up to date with screening up to 65, very few women are,” Smith said. “It’s important for women to understand that there is a record they will want to have by the time they are 65 that will basically tell them it’s safe to stop screening for cervical cancer.”Harper, who wasn’t involved in drafting the new guidelines, expects that in the coming years, cervical cancer screening will likely be done at even longer intervals.“We have data showing now that in a highly vaccinated population, you can screen every 10 years, but we in the U.S. are lagging behind,” she said.Kaitlin SullivanKaitlin Sullivan is a contributor for NBCNews.com who has worked with NBC News Investigations. She reports on health, science and the environment and is a graduate of the Craig Newmark Graduate School of Journalism at City University of New York.
NEXT
Art exhibit features robot dogs with tech mogul heads
Related Post
December 4, 2025
Dec. 3, 2025, 8:23 PM ESTBy Melanie Zanona and Bridget BowmanWASHINGTON — Speaker Mike Johnson is staring down a revolt from House Republican women.Several female lawmakers have been increasingly defying Johnson, R-La., on legislative matters and lobbing public broadsides at him — including a member of Johnson’s own leadership team.This week alone, Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, R-Fla., launched a discharge petition to go around Johnson and force a floor vote on a congressional stock trading ban, posting on X that she’s “pissed” that leadership isn’t moving fast enough on the issue while clarifying, “I like Mike.” Johnson prefers to go through regular order, and there has been an initial hearing on the issue.Rep. Elise Stefanik of New York, the chair of House Republican Leadership, not only signed on to Luna’s petition but also publicly unloaded on Johnson over an unrelated issue in the national defense bill, suggesting in a series of social media posts that Johnson lied about the matter. The spat has seemingly since been resolved, but the bad blood between the two has long been simmering.Asked about Stefanik’s broadsides in the Capitol on Wednesday, Johnson shrugged off the complaints and said he’s “not worried” about his standing “at all.”Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene to resign from Congress next year16:05“There’s 220 or so people in this conference and lots of different opinions,” he told reporters. “Everybody’s not delighted with every decision every day, but that’s Congress.” Meanwhile, a number of high-profile Republican women are fleeing the House for other opportunities, weighing retirement or quitting Congress early, fueling some concern that GOP women’s ranks could be depleted in the next Congress.Taken together, it’s a sign of growing frustration among some House GOP women, who have less representation in leadership and hold only a single elected committee gavel. Two House Republican women, who spoke to NBC News on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive internal matters, said that they feel they have been passed over for opportunities, that their priorities don’t always get taken as seriously under Johnson’s leadership and that they believe that could be driving some of the exits and public fights with him. “It’s a sea change — for the worse. And it’s one of the many reasons that numerous House Republican women are running for higher office,” one of the GOP women said, accusing Johnson of “undercutting” some Republican women. “I’m concerned there will be less Republicans in Congress, period, next year, and certainly that means there will be less Republican women.”The second woman said: “We aren’t taken seriously. You have women who are very accomplished, very successful, who have earned the merit, who aren’t given the time of the day.”Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia — who blindsided Johnson with her recent resignation announcement, according to a GOP source familiar with the situation — has gone so far as to publicly accuse the current male GOP leaders of bias, telling The Washington Post in a recent interview she believes Republican women have been “marginalized.”Greene and Rep. Nancy Mace of South Carolina, who has also been a vocal critic of Johnson, are scheduled to meet next week to talk about their shared frustrations, according to a source familiar with the matter.A spokesman for Johnson’s political team said in a statement that he strongly supports the women in his conference and has been working hard to recruit even more women to the House, noting that several who are on the Speaker’s Joint Fundraising Committee have received an average of nearly $400,000 for their campaigns so far this year.“Not only has Speaker Johnson elevated women in leadership, he has also helped recruit and support women running for office,” the spokesman said. “This cycle, we have women running in 10 of the top districts we are watching. Our team is in touch with them and others across the country — just as we were in 2024 — as Speaker Johnson works to recruit strong conservatives who can win, help us grow our majority, and help us deliver on our agenda.”The majority of chairmanships and leadership positions are elected by the entire conference, but there are a few instances in which Johnson can make unilateral appointments or create new roles.He appointed Rep. Virginia Foxx of North Carolina, 83, to lead the Rules Committee, making her the only female chair in the House. He also put three Republican women on the Intelligence Committee, including Stefanik, whom he also made the chair of House Republican Leadership after her U.N. ambassadorship nomination was pulled.Still, there are zero elected female committee chairs — and some Republicans privately blame Johnson for that. During a GOP steering committee meeting at the beginning of this year, Johnson spoke favorably of Rep. Brian Mast of Florida, who was running for the Foreign Affairs Committee chairmanship against Ann Wagner of Missouri. Some in the room interpreted that as Johnson’s signaling his preference, but Johnson insisted he wasn’t purposely trying to tip the scales. Mast won.Republicans have long struggled with elevating women. A Republican woman has never served higher than as the GOP conference chair. That position, which is fourth-ranking in the majority and third-ranking in the minority, is held by Lisa McClain of Michigan. McClain nominated Johnson for the speakership.McClain said in a statement that it’s an “absurd suggestion” to imply that Johnson hasn’t done enough to promote GOP women. “As the House’s highest ranking woman, the Speaker has treated me with nothing less than respect. He values my opinion, not as a woman, but as a trusted colleague,” she told NBC News in a statement. “Driving an unnecessary divide over gender is a Democrat tactic, and Republicans would be foolish to give in to this left-wing framing.”Floor problemsIn recent weeks, sensitive issues related to women have pitted Republican women against their own leadership.Four Republicans — Mace, Greene and Reps. Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Lauren Boebert of Colorado — were involved in a discharge petition to force a floor vote on releasing the Jeffrey Epstein files, saying they want to help deliver justice for the women the late financier sexually abused.But it was the three Republican women who faced the brunt of a pressure campaign from both the White House and Johnson to drop off the petition. Johnson said he was against the discharge petition because he was concerned about protecting the identities of the female victims, although many of them had advocated for the release of the files.The discharge petition ultimately succeeded last month, and when the vote outcome looked inevitable, President Donald Trump then decided to get behind the issue. It passed with just one no vote, and Trump signed it into law.The same month, another divisive issue came to the floor — and it was once again predominantly Republican women who broke ranks with party leadership.Rep. Anna Paulina Luna is forcing a discharge petition to go around Speaker Johnson.Tom Williams / CQ-Roll Call via Getty ImagesMace forced a vote on a resolution to censure fellow GOP Rep. Cory Mills of Florida, in part over his alleged misconduct toward women. A judge granted a restraining order that an ex-girlfriend had been seeking, alleging Mills had harassed her and threatened her with blackmail and revenge porn.Mills has denied any wrongdoing and has vowed to comply with the House Ethics probe, saying on the House floor, “I believe all the accusations and false things being said will be proven to be absolutely false in many ways, and I have the evidence and receipts and look forward to working with them.”Eight Republicans voted with Democrats against a GOP motion to kill the resolution, six of them women: Mace, Boebert, Greene, Luna, Kat Cammack of Florida and Harriet Hageman of Wyoming.Mace also wrote a letter to Johnson raising concerns about Mills but said she never received a response.Johnson has argued he should let the investigative process play out, as the Ethics Committee has created a subpanel to probe the allegations against Mills. But some women were disappointed with his response when NBC News pressed them about the accusations at a news conference in October. Johnson called Mills a “faithful colleague” and then, growing frustrated with reporters for continuing to ask questions about Mills, suggested they “talk about some things that are really serious.”Future GOP ranksAt least four GOP women won’t return in the next Congress, raising the possibility that the number of House Republican women could actually decline after the 2026 midterms. Greene is resigning, Stefanik and Mace are running for governor, and Rep. Ashley Hinson of Iowa is running for the Senate. Greene and Stefanik are prolific fundraisers, and Stefanik in particular has worked to recruit and boost female GOP candidates through her PAC. Hinson has also been seen as a rising star in the party since she flipped a Democratic-held House seat in 2020. That was a banner election cycle for House Republican women, whose ranks more than doubled from a low point of just 13 after the 2018 midterms.There are 33 female Republicans in the House, including two nonvoting members, compared with 96 Democratic women. The number of GOP women in the House has declined slightly since the record number of 36 set in 2023. “The departures of these women, particularly in the House, makes returning to or exceeding the record for Republican women in the House more difficult,” said Kelly Dittmar, director of research and a scholar at the Center for American Women and Politics at the Eagleton Institute of Politics. While the number of GOP women who are retiring is still relatively small, Dittmar said a single loss is felt “that much more” because Republican women are already starting at low levels of representation. House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., said he is not worried about his standing with his members “at all.”Tom Brenner / Getty Images“There’s so much we don’t know about whether or not this will be a good year for Republicans or Democrats. But certainly, from all we know historically, it will take a particularly good year for Republicans and a high level of Republican women running, which were the conditions in 2020, to ensure that you could make up for these losses and maybe even exceed,” she said. Candidates are still considering and launching campaigns, so it’s not clear yet how many races will include Republican women.Maggie’s List, a group that supports GOP women for office, announced Wednesday that it is endorsing four additional House candidates, including two in Republican-leaning districts: state Rep. Shannon Lundgren in Iowa’s 2nd District, which Hinson is vacating to run for the Senate, and former Rep. Mayra Flores, who is challenging Democratic Rep. Vicente Gonzalez in Texas’ 34th District. The group also backed three candidates for governor, including Stefanik, bringing its 2026 endorsements so far to 27 GOP women, including 18 House candidates. Former Florida Lt. Gov. Jennifer Carroll, a national spokesperson for Maggie’s List, said she was confident that the number of GOP women in Congress would “stay steady.”Carroll said Johnson has been supportive of their efforts, and he appeared at the group’s fundraiser in Washington, D.C. But she said the party has more work to do to support female candidates, saying, “We still have to prove ourselves over and over again.” “On the Republican side, they try to, I guess, stay away from identity,” Carroll added later. “And on the Democrat side, they don’t care. They will embrace, if they’re pushing for more women to be elected, then that’s where the mantra will go and that’s where the money will go and that’s where the energy would go.”Winning for Women, a group that also supports GOP women and has a super PAC to boost its endorsed candidates, is also focused on recruitment. Executive Director Meredith Allen Dellinger said Winning for Women has already met with 60 prospective candidates across 32 states and is endorsing contenders like attorney Jessica Hart Stein and Army veteran Alex Mealer, who are running in ruby-red Texas districts.“Since getting into this fight in 2019, the number of Republican women serving in the House has more than doubled and today we have a record number of Republican women in the U.S. Senate. That progress is real, but there’s more work to do, which is why we’re heavily focused on recruitment this cycle,” Dellinger said in a statement, describing Stein and Mealer as candidates who “embody principled, solutions‑oriented conservatism and the leadership our party needs to build a durable House majority.” And while various GOP groups are engaged in supporting female candidates, Dittmar said a lack of targeted infrastructure within the party itself is a “continued and persistent problem” for Republican women looking to grow their ranks. “There’s just opposition to it, like there’s just both ideological opposition, strategic opposition to it,” Dittmar said, adding that Republican women have pushed efforts to support female candidates themselves.The National Republican Congressional Committee also had an initiative in the 2014 election cycle dubbed “Project GROW,” aimed at recruiting and empowering female GOP candidates, but that program didn’t last long. “All these efforts have just really struggled to stay,” Dittmar said. “And again, I don’t put it on the women. I think it’s the party overall that’s not seeing this as a priority.”Melanie ZanonaMelanie Zanona is a Capitol Hill correspondent for NBC News.Bridget BowmanBridget Bowman is a national political reporter for NBC News.
November 19, 2025
Plane carrying mining minister crashes in Congo
October 5, 2025
Pilots lift off for New Mexico balloon festival
November 21, 2025
Nov. 21, 2025, 1:44 AM EST / Updated Nov. 21, 2025, 4:54 AM ESTBy Mithil AggarwalShe went from walking out after being publicly chided by the pageant’s co-owner to being crowned its 74th victor.Fátima Bosch Fernández of Mexico was named Miss Universe on Friday, bringing to a close an exceptionally controversial pageant that first made headlines after Thai official Nawat Itsaragrisil berated Bosch, 25, in front of several contestants for not participating in promotional activities. The competition was further plunged into disarray when two of its judges resigned, one of whom accused the organizers of rigging and threatened a lawsuit. Two judges quit Miss Universe, one claiming rigged competition03:24It came as Miss Universe, which makes its revenue from licensing its broadcasting rights to various countries, has faced declining viewership in part from concerns over what some see as its objectification of women and declining relevance.The competition was started in 1952 by a Californian swimwear brand and owned, at least in part, by President Donald Trump from 1996 till 2022.But this year’s pageant became a symbol of a different kind.“It seems to me that it is an example of how women should raise our voices,” Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum, the country’s first female leader, told reporters, referring to Bosch standing up to one of the hosts.“We women look more beautiful when we raise our voice and participate, because that has to do with the recognition of our rights,” she said, adding that she wanted to give “recognition” to Bosch for voicing her disagreement in a “dignified” way.”Miss Thailand Praveener Singh, 29, was crowned the first runner-up, followed by Miss Venezuela Stephany Adriana Abasali Nasser, 25.The pageant is seldom devoid of controversy, with sexual harassment and rigging complaints almost every year. And this year was no exception. Nawat, the Thai national director, hectored Bosch for not following the promotional activities guidelines in a livestreamed sashing ceremony on Nov. 4 and called security when the Mexican delegate stood up for herself.Bosch refused to be silenced and walked out unbowed, joined by others, including last year’s winner, Denmark’s Victoria Kjær Theilvig.“What your director did is not respectful: he called me dumb,” Bosch told Thai reporters then. “If it takes away your dignity, you need to go.”The public embarrassment for the organizers was palpable, prompting Miss Universe’s co-owner, Mexican businessman Raúl Rocha Cantú, to call out Nawat, saying he won’t let contestants be “humiliated.”Nawat later offered a teary apology.“If anyone (was) affected and not comfortable it happened, I am so sorry,” he said with the contestants behind him. He then turned to them and said, “It’s passed. OK? Are you happy?”Then, Omar Harfouch, a Lebanese-French composer, stepped down from the eight-member jury panel, saying Tuesday that there had been a “secret vote” by people not officially part of the jury to preselect the top 130 contestants out of 136.Hours later, another judge, former French soccer star Claude Makélélé, announced he was stepping down, citing “unforeseen personal reasons.” Harfouch on Wednesday said he was considering suing the Miss Universe Organization, which runs the competition, citing emotional trauma and reputational damage.The organization has denied his claims, saying there was no impromptu jury.Meanwhile, Garbielle Henry of Jamaica is recovering at a hospital after she fell offstage on Wednesday during a preliminary round. The Associated Press contributed.
Comments are closed.
Scroll To Top
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics
© Copyright 2025 - Be That ! . All Rights Reserved