• Video captures a train colliding with a vehicle
  • Dec. 9, 2025, 11:25 AM ESTBy Courtney KubeA…
  • Duffy and RFK Jr. square off in airport…
  • Supreme Court hears arguments for case on campaign…

Be that!

contact@bethat.ne.com

 

Be That ! Menu   ≡ ╳
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics Politics
☰

Be that!

Dec. 9, 2025, 11:25 AM ESTBy Courtney KubeA coalition of advocacy groups filed a lawsuit Tuesday against the Trump administration seeking the immediate release of the memo that provides the legal justification for U.S. military strikes on alleged drug boats.The complaint, filed in federal court in Manhattan, argues that the deadly strikes, which have killed at least 87 people since early September, are illegal and that Americans deserve to see the justification for them. The filing requests for the court to order the Justice, State and Defense Departments to immediately search for all records regarding the legal reasoning behind the U.S. military campaign against alleged drug boats, and to release them to the American Civil Liberties Union, or ACLU, and other plaintiffs, including the New York Civil Liberties Union and the Center for Constitutional Rights. “We think that the public deserves to know how our government is justifying the cold-blooded murder of civilians is lawful,” Jeffrey Stein, attorney for the ACLU, said in an interview. “We think that the Trump administration needs to stop these illegal and immoral strikes immediately, and that the officials who have carried them out must be held accountable, not gifted a ‘Get Out of Jail Free card.'”The U.S. military has conducted at least 22 strikes against boats that the Trump administration says are carrying drugs destined for the U.S. The administration has described the crew members targeted in the strikes as smugglers working on behalf of cartels. The first strike on Sept. 2 has become the subject of intense scrutiny after it was reported that two people survived the initial strike on the boat, and were later killed by a second one ordered by Adm. Frank “Mitch” Bradley, the commander overseeing the attacks. Some legal experts and Democratic politicians have argued that the follow-up strike, often known as a “double tap,” violated international law because it targeted two people who were in an incapacitated craft in open waters.Video footage shows a vessel being hit by a U.S. strike on Sept. 2 in the southern Caribbean.@realDonaldTrump via Truth SocialBradley and Gen. Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, briefed lawmakers on Capitol Hill last week. Reaction to the briefings was split down party lines, with Republicans defending the follow-up strikes and Democrats expressing continued concern.The advocacy groups said they filed their lawsuit after the government failed to respond to a Freedom of Information Act request for the documents filed on Oct. 15. “By claiming that these attacks are legal while refusing to provide any evidence or rationale, Trump shows once again his disdain for basic transparency, human rights, and the rule of law,” Ify Chikezie, staff attorney at the New York Civil Liberties Union, wrote in a statement. “The courts must step in and order the administration to release these documents immediately.” Stein, of the ACLU, said administrations have routinely released legal justification memos in the past, including regarding sensitive military operations, because they discuss the principles of constitutional law, and classified details can be redacted.In 2011, the Obama administration released a memo explaining why the Justice Department believed U.S. military operations in Libya were in the national interest and that then-President Obama could initiate them without prior authorization from Congress.And during Trump’s first administration, the Justice Department released its legal memo justifying U.S. military strikes on three Syrian chemical weapons facilities.Stein said he disagrees with some who have argued that the strikes amount to war crimes. “We are not in a war, and so any discussion of these illegal strikes as war crimes is inaccurate,” he said. “The law of armed conflict does not apply to these strikes. They are premeditated killings outside of the context of armed conflict, and we have a legal concept for that conduct. It’s murder.”Courtney KubeCourtney Kube is a correspondent covering national security and the military for the NBC News Investigative Unit.

admin - Latest News - December 9, 2025
admin
0 views 14 secs 0 Comments




Advocacy groups filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration seeking the release of the memo justifiying U.S. military strikes on alleged drug boats.



Source link

TAGS:
PREVIOUS
Duffy and RFK Jr. square off in airport pull-ups
NEXT
Video captures a train colliding with a vehicle
Related Post
October 19, 2025
Thieves steal jewels from the Louvre in daylight heist
November 14, 2025
Man dies from a meat allergy caused by a tick bite
November 5, 2025
Nov. 4, 2025, 8:41 PM ESTBy Alexandra MarquezVirginia state Sen. Ghazala Hashmi on Tuesday became the first Muslim American woman elected to statewide office in the U.S. with her victory in the state’s lieutenant governor’s race, NBC News projects.Her historic victory comes the same night that former Rep. Abigail Spanberger, whom NBC News projects as the winner in Virginia’s governor’s race, became the first woman elected governor in the state.This is the second time Hashmi has made history in an election; in 2019 she was the first Muslim American woman elected to Virginia’s state Legislature. Since then, Hashmi has served in the statehouse representing a district southwest of Washington, D.C.Last month, Hashmi told The Washington Post that she hoped voters would send a message showing that they’re “not divided” on “lines of bigotry.”“We’re really showing the rest of the country that Virginia is in a position where we embrace diversity,” she said.Spanberger and Hashmi, both Democrats, ran alongside other members of their party seeking statewide office in Virginia, but governors and lieutenant governors are elected separately in the state. Ghazala Hashmi won the election to be Virginia’s next lieutenant governor, NBC News projects.Caroline Gutman for The Washington Post via Getty ImagesVirginia’s lieutenant governor holds few official responsibilities, but the person can serve as a crucial tie-breaker in the state Senate and is first-in-line to succeed the governor in the case of death or resignation.Several lieutenant governors in the state have used the position as a launching pad for gubernatorial campaigns, including Lt. Gov. Winsome Earle-Sears, the Republican nominee for governor this year.“Lieutenant Governor-elect Hashmi ran a brilliantly focused campaign all about lowering costs, growing Virginia’s economy, and ensuring our kids have access to high-quality child care and education,” Democratic National Committee Chair Ken Martin said in a statement. Alexandra MarquezAlexandra Marquez is a politics reporter for NBC News.
November 19, 2025
Savewith a NBCUniversal ProfileCreate your free profile or log in to save this articleNov. 19, 2025, 6:00 AM ESTBy Kevin CollierMany of the largest and most widely established state-sponsored online propaganda campaigns have embraced using artificial intelligence, a new report finds — and they’re often bad at it.The report, by the social media analytics company Graphika, analyzed nine ongoing online influence operations — including ones it says are affiliated with China’s and Russia’s governments — and found that each has, like much of social media, increasingly adopted generative AI to make images, videos, text and translations.The researchers found that sponsors of propaganda campaigns have come to rely on AI for core functions like making content and creating influencer personas on social media, streamlining some campaigns. But the researchers say that content is low quality and gets little engagement. The findings run counter to what many researchers had anticipated with the growing sophistication of generative AI — artificial intelligence that mimics human speech, writing and images in pictures and videos. The technology has rapidly become more advanced in recent years, and some experts warned that propagandists working on behalf of authoritarian countries would embrace high-quality, convincing synthetic content designed to deceive even the most discerning people in democratic societies.Resoundingly, though, the Graphika researchers found that the AI content created by those established campaigns is low-quality “slop,” ranging from unconvincing synthetic news reporters in YouTube videos to clunky translations or fake news websites that accidentally include AI prompts in headlines.“Influence operations have been systematically integrating AI tools, and a lot of it is low-quality, cheap AI slop,” said Dina Sadek, a senior analyst at Graphika and co-author of the report. As was the case before such campaigns started routinely using AI, the vast majority of their posts on Western social media sites receive little to no attention, she said.Online influence campaigns aimed at swaying American politics and pushing divisive messages go back at least a decade, when the Russia-based Internet Research Agency created scores of Facebook and Twitter accounts and tried to influence the 2016 presidential election.As in some other fields, like cybersecurity and programming, the rise of AI hasn’t revolutionized the field of online propaganda, but it has made it easier to automate some tasks, Sadek said.“It might be low-quality content, but it’s very scalable on a mass scale. They’re able to just sit there, maybe one individual pressing buttons there, to create all this content,” she said.Examples cited in the report include “Doppelganger,” an operation the Justice Department has tied to the Kremlin, which researchers say used AI to create unconvincing fake news websites, and “Spamoflauge,” which the Justice Department has tied to China and which creates fake AI news influencers to spread divisive but unconvincing videos on social media sites like X and YouTube. The report cited several operations that used low-quality deepfake audio.One example posted deepfakes of celebrities like Oprah Winfrey and former President Barack Obama, appearing to comment on India’s rise in global politics. But the report says the videos came off as unconvincing and didn’t get much traction.Another pro-Russia video, titled “Olympics Has Fallen,” seemed to be designed to denigrate the 2024 Summer Olympic Games in Paris. A nod to the 2013 Hollywood film “Olympus Has Fallen,” it starred an AI-generated version of Tom Cruise, who didn’t participate in either film. The report found it got little attention outside of a small echo chamber of accounts that normally share that campaign’s films.Spokespeople for China’s embassy in Washington, Russia’s Foreign Affairs Ministry, X and YouTube didn’t respond to requests for comment.Even if their efforts don’t reach many actual people, there is value for propagandists to flood the internet in the age of AI chatbots, Sadek said. The companies that develop those chatbots are constantly training their products by scraping the internet for text they can rearrange and spit back out.A recent study by the Institute for Strategic Dialogue, a nonprofit pro-democracy group, found that most major AI chatbots, or large language models, cite state-sponsored Russian news outlets, including some outlets that have been sanctioned by the European Union, in their answers.Kevin CollierKevin Collier is a reporter covering cybersecurity, privacy and technology policy for NBC News.
Comments are closed.
Scroll To Top
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics
© Copyright 2025 - Be That ! . All Rights Reserved