• Palestinians Begin Return Home As Ceasefire Takes Effect
  • Oct. 11, 2025, 8:48 AM EDT / Updated Oct. 11, 2025,…
  • Inside the scramble to save lives as deadly…
  • Trump says he will impose a 100% tariff…

Be that!

contact@bethat.ne.com

 

Be That ! Menu   ≡ ╳
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics Politics
☰

Be that!

Family fights for son’s mental health treatment coverage

admin - Latest News - September 26, 2025
admin
16 views 19 secs 0 Comments



NBC News’ Kate Snow reports on the parents who sold off prized possessions to pay out of pocket for the treatment recommended by doctors after their son’s suicide attempt when insurance denied coverage.



Source link

TAGS:
PREVIOUS
Savewith a NBCUniversal ProfileCreate your free profile or log in to save this articleSept. 25, 2025, 8:33 PM EDTBy ReutersPresident Donald Trump on Thursday announced a new round of punishing tariffs, saying the United States will impose a 100% tariff on imported branded drugs, 25% tariff on imports of all heavy-duty trucks and 50% tariffs on kitchen cabinets.Trump also said he would start charging a 30% tariff on upholstered furniture next week.He said the new heavy-duty truck tariffs were to protect manufacturers from “unfair outside competition” and said the move would benefit companies such as Paccar-owned PCAR.O Peterbilt and Kenworth and Daimler Truck-owned DTGGe.DE Freightliner.Trump has launched numerous national security probes into potential new tariffs on a wide variety of products.He said the new tariffs on kitchen, bathroom and some furniture were because of huge levels of imports that were hurting local manufacturers.“The reason for this is the large-scale ‘FLOODING’ of these products into the United States by other outside Countries,” Trump said, citing national security concerns about U.S. manufacturing.The U.S. Chamber of Commerce urged the department not to impose new tariffs, noting the top five import sources are Mexico, Canada, Japan, Germany and Finland “all of which are allies or close partners of the United States posing no threat to U.S. national security.”Mexico is the largest exporter of medium- and heavy-duty trucks to the United States. A study released in January said imports of those larger vehicles from Mexico have tripled since 2019.Higher tariffs on commercial vehicles could put pressure on transportation costs just as Trump has vowed to reduce inflation, especially on consumer goods such as groceries.Tariffs could also affect Chrysler-parent Stellantis STLAM.MI, which produces heavy-duty Ram trucks and commercial vans in Mexico. Sweden’s Volvo Group VOLVb.ST is building a $700 million heavy-truck factory in Monterrey, Mexico, set to start operations in 2026.Mexico is home to 14 manufacturers and assemblers of buses, trucks, and tractor trucks, and two manufacturers of engines, according to the U.S. International Trade Administration.The country is also the leading global exporter of tractor trucks, 95% of which are destined for the United States.“We need our Truckers to be financially healthy and strong, for many reasons, but above all else, for National Security purposes!” Trump added.Mexico opposed new tariffs, telling the Commerce Department in May that all Mexican trucks exported to the United States have on average 50% U.S. content, including diesel engines.Last year, the United States imported almost $128 billion in heavy vehicle parts from Mexico, accounting for approximately 28% of total U.S. imports, Mexico said.The Japanese Automobile Manufacturers Association also opposed new tariffs, saying Japanese companies have cut exports to the United States as they have boosted U.S. production of medium- and heavy-duty trucks.ReutersReuters
NEXT
Sept. 25, 2025, 11:52 AM EDT / Updated Sept. 25, 2025, 3:36 PM EDTBy Steve KopackA group of the country’s top economic leaders, including every living former Federal Reserve chair, filed an amicus brief with the Supreme Court on Thursday in support of Fed governor Lisa Cook, who President Donald Trump is seeking to remove.The group, led former central bank chiefs Alan Greenspan, Ben Bernanke and Janet Yellen, said that “allowing the removal of Governor Lisa D. Cook while the challenge to her removal is pending would threaten that independence and erode public confidence in the Fed.” The bipartisan group, which also includes former Treasury Secretaries Robert Rubin, Larry Summers, Hank Paulson, Jack Lew and Timothy Geithner, added that “the independence of the Federal Reserve, within the limited authority granted by Congress to achieve the goals Congress itself has set, is a critical feature of our national monetary system.”As the U.S. central bank, the Federal Reserve is part of the U.S. government and its leaders are put in place by elected officials, but it also retains a considerable amount of independence that is meant to allow it to make decisions purely out of economic concerns rather than political ones. The former economic officials said that an erosion of Fed independence could result “in substantial long-term harm and inferior economic performance overall.”The Supreme Court is considering whether Trump has the authority to fire Cook, who has been a target for the White House for weeks as part of a broader pressure campaign to push the Fed to more aggressively cut interest rates.Cook’s attempted removal stems from allegations of mortgage fraud, made in August by top Trump ally and Federal Housing Finance Authority Director Bill Pulte.Cook has repeatedly denied the allegations and has not been charged with any crime. Documents reviewed by NBC News in mid-September appeared to contradict Pulte’s allegations.Two courts have so far blocked Cook’s removal, leading Trump to ask the Supreme Court a week ago to allow him to fire her. In a court filing, Solicitor General D. John Sauer said a judge’s ruling that blocked the firing constituted “improper judicial interference.”In a filing to the Supreme Court on Thursday, Cook’s lawyers said that “she committed neither ‘fraud’ nor ‘gross negligence’ in relation to her mortgages.”Cook asked the court to deny Trump’s attempt to remove her while the case is argued. The White House has repeatedly maintained that Trump “lawfully removed Lisa Cook for cause.”The brief filed Thursday is a who’s who of the country’s top economic minds. Former Fed governor Dan Tarullo is also listed as a signatory to the brief, as well as the economists Ken Rogoff, Phil Gramm and John Cochrane.Glenn Hubbard, Greg Mankiw, Christina Romer, Cecilia Rouse, Jared Bernstein and Jason Furman, a group who served as top officials on the White House’s council of economic advisers during Republican and Democrat administrations, also signed the brief.None of the officials who signed the filing have served in either of Trump’s administrations.Lisa Cook is sworn in during a Senate Banking hearing in 2023.Drew Angerer / Getty Images fileTrump is the first president in U.S. history to try to remove a sitting Fed official. “There is broad consensus among economists, based on decades of macroeconomic research, that a more independent central bank will lead to lower and more stable inflation without creating higher unemployment — thus helping to achieve the Federal Reserve’s statutory objective of price stability and maximum employment,” the officials said in the brief.”The Federal Reserve walks a careful line in pursuit of its goals.”They noted that “elected officials often favor lowering interest rates to boost employment, particularly leading up to an election.””Although that approach may satisfy voters temporarily, it does not lead to lasting gains for unemployment or growth and can instead lead to persistently higher inflation in the long-term and thus ultimately harm the national economy.”The former Fed chairs and economic officials, in their filing, highlight a notorious case of political pressure on the Fed: “In the early 1970s, President Richard Nixon famously exerted political pressure over then-Chair of the Fed Arthur Burns to lower unemployment by reducing interest rates. During this period ‘the Fed made only limited efforts to maintain policy independence and, for doctrinal as well as political reasons, enabled a decade of high and volatile inflation.’ This contributed to an ‘inflationary boom’ and deep recession that took years to bring back under control.”Steve KopackSteve Kopack is a senior reporter at NBC News covering business and the economy.Lawrence Hurley contributed.
Related Post
September 22, 2025
Donald Trump Jr. gives speech at Charlie Kirk memorial
September 24, 2025
Sept. 24, 2025, 12:52 AM EDTBy Phil Helsel, Angela Yang and Doha MadaniLOS ANGELES — Returning to the air to thunderous cheers and applause in his first episode since ABC suspended his late-night show, Jimmy Kimmel on Tuesday took direct aim at President Donald Trump while also trying to smooth tensions following his joke about the Republican reaction to the killing of Charlie Kirk.”You understand that it was never my intention to make light of the murder of a young man,” Kimmel said, his voice breaking, during his opening monologue. “I don’t think there’s anything funny about it.”Disney-owned ABC took “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” off the air last Wednesday after conservative fury over comments Kimmel made during a show monologue and after public criticism from the Trump-appointed chair of the Federal Communications Commission.A furious backlash to ABC’s decision followed, with prominent voices in and outside the entertainment industry saying it amounted to an attack on free speech by the administration.Kimmel said Tuesday that the Trump administration “tried to coerce the affiliates who run our show, in the cities that you live in, to take my show off the air.””That’s not legal. That’s not American, that is un-American, and it’s so dangerous,” he said.The events that led to Kimmel’s suspension began Sept. 15, five days after a gunman fatally shot Kirk, a popular activist on the right, as Kirk was at a public event at Utah Valley University in Orem.Kimmel’s comments came at a time when investigators had not released details about the suspect’s potential motives.Jimmy Kimmel on “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” in Los Angeles on Tuesday.Randy Holmes / Disney“We hit some new lows over the weekend, with the MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it,” Kimmel said in the monologue.Tyler Robinson, 22, was charged the next day with Kirk’s murder. In charging documents, prosecutors released text messages in which, they said, Robinson said he targeted Kirk because he had “had enough of his hatred.”During his monologue Tuesday, Kimmel praised Kirk’s widow, Erika Kirk, for saying at a memorial Sunday that she has forgiven her husband’s killer.“She forgave him. That is an example we should follow,” Kimmel said, emotion in his voice. “If you believe in the teachings of Jesus, as I do, there it was. That, that’s it. A selfless act of grace. Forgiveness from a grieving widow.”“It touched me deeply, and I hope it touches many,” Kimmel said. “And if there’s anything we should take from this tragedy to carry forward, I hope it can be that.”Dandidi outside the taping of “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” on Tuesday.Alex Welsh for NBC NewsOn Tuesday outside the El Capitan Entertainment Centre in Hollywood, where “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” is taped, ticket holders were eager to file in to be in the audience. Gabriela De Vries, who is from Germany, said she was shocked when the show got pulled off the air just as she had flown in to see Kimmel. Dressed head to toe in a star-spangled outfit and matching face paint, a man who goes by Dandidi applauded those who “pressured [Disney] by taking action — no thoughts and prayers, action — by canceling their Disney, putting that heat under them.”ABC suspended Kimmel’s show after FCC Chair Brendan Carr described his monologue jokes as “the sickest conduct possible” in an interview with conservative commentator Benny Johnson. Carr threatened regulatory action. Hours later, Nexstar Media Group said it would pre-empt Kimmel’s show for the “foreseeable future” on all its ABC-affiliated channels. Carr thanked Nexstar for “doing the right thing” on X and encouraged other local broadcasters to follow its lead. Sinclair, another broadcast ownership group, quickly followed Nexstar in saying it, too, would pre-empt Kimmel’s show on its 30 ABC-affiliated stations. The companies reiterated this week that they would continue to do so. Both companies have pending business before the FCC. Nexstar said last month it intends to put in a bid to buy another broadcast company, Tegna, which would most likely require the FCC to loosen its 39% cap on national television audience reach. Sinclair is exploring merger options for its broadcast business, according to CNBC.Democratic lawmakers on Tuesday wrote to the corporate heads of both Nexstar and Sinclair, asking how their decisions to pre-empt Kimmel’s show “may relate to regulatory issues pending with the Trump administration.”Guillermo Rodriguez and Jimmy Kimmel hug on “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” on Tuesday.Randy Holmes / DisneyA spokesperson for ABC had initially said Kimmel’s show would be “pre-empted indefinitely,” sparking immediate backlash, with many decrying what they described as an infringement on his constitutional right to free speech and others calling for a boycott of the Disney-owned streaming services Hulu, Disney+ and ESPN. Comedian, actor and podcaster Marc Maron called on free speech advocates to speak out against pulling Kimmel’s show.”If you have any concern or belief in real freedom or the Constitution and free speech, this is it,” Maron said in a video on his Instagram account. “This is the deciding moment; this is what authoritarianism looks like in this country. It’s happening.”Hollywood rallies behind Kimmel, while Trump and supporters cheer suspension03:08Even some Republicans took issue with the matter. Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, said Friday on his podcast that while he thought what Kimmel said was wrong, what Carr was doing was “unbelievably dangerous.” Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., called Carr’s comments about Kimmel “absolutely inappropriate” in an interview on NBC News’ “Meet the Press” on Sunday.Carr later denied that he threatened the stations, saying Monday that he was referring to the FCC’s ability to review a license because of a “news distortion complaint.” He said Disney made its own “business decision” to pre-empt Kimmel’s show.”What I’ve been very clear in the context of the Kimmel episode is the FCC, and myself in particular, have expressed no view on the ultimate merits had something like that been filed, what our take would be one way or another,” Carr said.After days of mounting pressure, Disney said Monday that Kimmel would return to the air in a statement that did not address the freedom-of-speech concerns or the calls for a boycott.Kimmel said in Tuesday’s monologue that Trump has targeted his critics on late-night television to intimidate them and to bully corporations to remove them. “The president of the United States made it very clear he wants to see me and the hundreds of people who work here fired from our jobs. Our leader celebrates Americans losing their livelihoods because he can’t take a joke,” Kimmel said.“We have to speak out against this,” he said.Phil HelselPhil Helsel is a reporter for NBC News.Angela YangAngela Yang is a culture and trends reporter for NBC News.Doha MadaniDoha Madani is a senior breaking news reporter for NBC News. Pronouns: she/her.Rebecca Cohen contributed.
September 27, 2025
Sept. 27, 2025, 7:30 AM EDTBy Jared PerloNEW YORK — The United States clashed with world leaders over artificial intelligence at the United Nations General Assembly this week, rejecting calls for global oversight as many pushed for new collaborative frameworks.While many heads of state, corporate leaders and prominent figures endorsed a need for urgent international collaboration on AI, the U.S. delegation criticized the role of the U.N. and pushed back on the idea of centralized governance of AI.Representing the U.S. in Wednesday’s Security Council meeting on AI, Michael Kratsios, the director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy, said, “We totally reject all efforts by international bodies to assert centralized control and global governance of AI.”The path to a flourishing future powered by AI does not lie in “bureaucratic management,” Kratsios said, but instead in “the independence and sovereignty of nations.”While Kratsios shot down the idea of combined AI governance, President Donald Trump said in his speech to the General Assembly on Tuesday that the White House will be “pioneering an AI verification system that everyone can trust” to enforce the Biological Weapons Convention.“Hopefully, the U.N. can play a constructive role, and it will also be one of the early projects under AI,” Trump said. AI “could be one of the great things ever, but it also can be dangerous, but it can be put to tremendous use and tremendous good.”.In a statement to NBC News, a State Department spokesperson said, “The United States supports like-minded nations working together to encourage the development of AI in line with our shared values. The US position in international bodies is to vigorously advocate for international AI governance approaches that promote innovation, reflect American values, and counter authoritarian influence.”The comments rejecting collaborative efforts around AI governance stood in stark contrast to many of the initiatives being launched at the General Assembly.On Thursday, the U.N. introduced the Global Dialogue on AI Governance, the U.N.’s first body dedicated to AI governance involving all member states. U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres said the body would “lay the cornerstones of a global AI ecosystem that can keep pace with the fastest-moving technology in human history.” Speaking after Guterres, Nobel Prize recipient Daron Acemoglu outlined the growing stakes of AI’s rapid development, arguing that “AI is the biggest threat that humanity has faced.”But in an interview with NBC News, Amandeep Singh Gill, the U.N.’s special envoy for digital and emerging technologies, told NBC News that the United States’ critical perception of the U.N.’s role in international AI governance was misconstrued.“I think it’s a misrepresentation to say that the U.N. is somehow getting into the regulation of AI,” Gill said. “These are not top-down power grabs in terms of regulation. The regulation stays where regulation can be done in sovereign jurisdictions.”Instead, the U.N.’s mechanisms “will provide platforms for international cooperation on AI governance,” Gill said.In remarks immediately following Kratsios’ comments, China’s Vice Minister of Foreign Affairs Ma Zhaoxu said, “It is vital to jointly foster an open, inclusive, fair and nondiscriminatory environment for technological development and firmly oppose unilateralism and protectionism.”“We support the U.N. playing a central role in AI governance,” Ma said.One day after Kratsios’ remarks at the Security Council, Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez seemed to push back on Kratsios and gave full-throated support for international cooperation on AI and the U.N.’s role in AI governance.“We need to coordinate a shared vision of AI at a global level, with the U.N. as the legitimate and inclusive forum to forge consensus around common interests,” Sánchez said. “The time is now, when multilateralism is being most questioned and attacked, that we need to reaffirm how suitable it is in addressing challenges such as those represented by AI.”Reacting to the week’s developments, Renan Araujo, director of programs for the Washington, D.C.-based Institute for AI Policy and Strategy, told NBC News that “no one wants to see a burdensome, bureaucratic governance structure, and the U.S. has succeeded in starting bilateral and minilateral coalitions. At the same time, we should expect AI-related challenges to become more transnational in nature as AI capabilities become more advanced.”This is not the first time the U.N. has addressed AI, having passed the Global Digital Compact last year. The compact laid the foundation for the AI dialogue and for an independent international scientific panel to evaluate AI’s abilities, risks and pathways forward. Guterres announced that nominations to this panel are now open.While Thursday’s event marked the launch of the global dialogue and panel, the dialogue will have its first full meeting in Geneva in summer 2026, in tandem with the International Telecommunication Union’s annual AI for Good summit. The dialogue’s exact functions and first actions will be charted out over the coming months.Jared PerloJared Perlo is a writer and reporter at NBC News covering AI. He is currently supported by the Tarbell Center for AI Journalism.
October 4, 2025
Japan elects first female prime minister
Comments are closed.
Scroll To Top
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics
© Copyright 2025 - Be That ! . All Rights Reserved