Police seek suspects in deadly birthday party shooting
Lawmakers launch inquires into U.S. boat strike
Nov. 29, 2025, 10:07 PM EST / Updated Nov. 30, 2025,…
Mark Kelly says troops ‘can tell’ what orders…

Be that!

contact@bethat.ne.com

Menu ≡ ╳

Home
Travel
Culture
Lifestyle
Sport
Contact Us
Politics Politics

Be that!

FBI thwarts terror plot in Michigan on Halloween

admin - Latest News - October 31, 2025

admin

20 views 6 secs 0 Comments

FBI thwarts terror plot in Michigan on Halloween

Source link

TAGS:

PREVIOUS

Savewith a NBCUniversal ProfileCreate your free profile or log in to save this articleOct. 31, 2025, 12:53 PM EDTBy Sahil Kapur, Ryan Nobles and Brennan LeachWASHINGTON — President Donald Trump is pushing Senate Republicans to abolish the 60-vote filibuster rule in order to reopen the shuttered government without Democratic votes.But in a rarity for the president, he’s hitting firm and immediate resistance from his own party.“It is now time for the Republicans to play their ‘TRUMP CARD,’ and go for what is called the Nuclear Option — Get rid of the Filibuster, and get rid of it, NOW!” he wrote in a pair of late-night social media posts Thursday. “Well, now WE are in power, and if we did what we should be doing, it would IMMEDIATELY end this ridiculous, Country destroying ‘SHUT DOWN.’”Senate Republican leaders have been outspoken in their support for the 60-vote rule to pass most bills. The new Majority Leader, John Thune, R-S.D., promised shortly after the 2024 election that the legislative filibuster would remain unchanged on his watch.“Leader Thune’s position on the importance of the legislative filibuster is unchanged,” Thune spokesman Ryan Wrasse said Friday.A spokesperson for Senate Majority Whip John Barrasso, R-Wyo., said: “Senator Barrasso’s support of the filibuster is unchanged.”Yet the conversation about the filibuster escalated on Capitol Hill even before Trump’s comments after Sen. Bernie Moreno, R-Ohio, appeared on Fox News days into the shutdown and called on his party to eliminate the filibuster.But various Republicans have voiced opposition to that push, including Moreno’s fellow Ohio senator.“That’s not a step I think we should take,” Sen. Jon Husted, R-Ohio, told reporters.Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., who has said he would resign from the Senate on the same day if Republicans abolish the filibuster, said he doesn’t expect it to be nixed. He noted that Trump also called on the GOP to eliminate the 60-vote threshold during his first presidential term in order to pass his agenda.“We stood firm there,” Tillis said earlier this month. “I can’t imagine anybody changing now.”Sen. Roger Marshall, R-Kansas, said he “would not be” in favor of weakening the legislative filibuster to pass the funding bill.”That’s a nonstarter,” he said.Sen. Markwayne Mullin, R-Okla., said he would “absolutely not” favor abolishing the filibuster.”If we want to do something very, extremely limited” to “avoid shutdowns in the future, I may consider that,” he said.” But to nuke, to go nuclear into the filibuster — we all know that the Senate goes back and forth, and it’s in our favor when we have the minority.”The Senate, under the control of both parties, has eliminated the 60-vote threshold to confirm executive branch personnel and federal judges; those require a simple majority of the Senate.The legislative filibuster has evolved over the years, but since 1975, it has required 60 votes to achieve “cloture” in the Senate and ensure passage of most bills over the minority’s objections. There are exceptions, such as the budget “reconciliation” process that Republicans used to pass Trump’s “big, beautiful bill.” GOP senators have expanded those exceptions this year, but they’ve largely been opposed to fully removing the 60-vote threshold.That’s because they worry about what a future Democratic-controlled Washington would be able to do without requiring Republican support for legislation.“The 60 vote threshold has protected this country, and frankly, that’s what I think this last election was largely about,” Thune told reporters on Oct. 10, positing that if Democrats had won, they would have sought to get rid of the filibuster, make D.C. and Puerto Rico states with representation in Congress and expand the Supreme Court. “You’d have abortion on demand, a whole bunch of things that were on that laundry list,” he said. “There’s always pressure on the filibuster,” the majority leader said. “But I can tell you that the filibuster through the years has been something that’s been a bulwark against a lot of really bad things happening to the country.”House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., said he understands why Senate Republicans want to preserve the filibuster.“It’s not my call. I don’t have a say in this. It’s a Senate chamber issue. We don’t have that in the House, as you know,” he told reporters on Friday. “But the filibuster has traditionally been viewed as a very important safeguard. If the shoe was on the other foot, I don’t think our team would like it.”Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pa., one of many Democrats who ran in 2024 on nixing the filibuster, said Republicans should go ahead and “carve it out” for government funding bills.”We ran on killing the filibuster, and now we love it,” he said. “I support it because it makes it more difficult to shut the government down in the future, and that’s where it’s entirely appropriate. And I don’t want to hear any Democrat clutching their pearls about the filibuster. We all ran on it.”Democrats have all but dared Republicans to kill the filibuster and fund the government on their own if they don’t want to negotiate to secure bipartisan support. On NBC’s Meet The Press NOW, Rep. Chris DeLuzio, D-Pa., said Republicans “should have” nuked the filibuster if they didn’t want to deal with Democrats on a bill.Republicans ‘should’ eliminate filibuster or work with Democrats on shutdown, House Democrat says08:33In his Thursday posts, Trump noted that Democrats tried in 2022 to smash the 60-vote threshold, in an attempt to pass a sweeping voting rights law. But they failed to secure the majority vote needed to change the rules in the Senate, and the effort fizzled.“If the Democrats ever came back into power, which would be made easier for them if the Republicans are not using the Great Strength and Policies made available to us by ending the Filibuster, the Democrats will exercise their rights, and it will be done in the first day they take office, regardless of whether or not we do it,” the president added.Two weeks after his proposal, NBC News asked Moreno if he had made progress convincing his GOP colleagues to nix the filibuster.“Not yet,” Moreno replied.Sahil KapurSahil Kapur is a senior national political reporter for NBC News.Ryan NoblesRyan Nobles is chief Capitol Hill correspondent for NBC News.Brennan LeachBrennan Leach is an associate producer for NBC News covering the Senate.

NEXT

Hurricane Melissa Death Toll Rises as Extent of Damage Emerges

Related Post

October 27, 2025

Oct. 26, 2025, 9:23 PM EDTBy Allan SmithNew York mayoral hopeful Zohran Mamdani and two of his most prominent backers, Sen. Bernie Sanders and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, framed his election as a one-on-one battle versus President Donald Trump and his administration at a raucous rally in Queens on Sunday,Speaker after speaker at Sunday’s rally, which drew thousands to a tennis stadium, said electing Mamdani would essentially serve as an opening salvo in a fight to take back the country from Trump and his allies.“We gather here today at both a perilous moment for our country,” said Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y. “And on the precipice of hope for our city.”She said electing Mamdani would “send a loud message” to Trump, adding that the opposition to Mamdani, a state legislator, in the election “mirrors what we are up against nationally,” condemning “an authoritarian, criminal presidency fueled by corruption and bigotry.”“There was a day before his presidency,” Ocasio-Cortez said. “And there will be a day after.”Mamdani, the Democratic nominee for mayor, rallied supporters alongside Sanders, I-Vt., and Ocasio-Cortez after early voting in the mayoral contest began Saturday — and as less than 10 days remain until the Nov. 4 election. The rally was billed as “New York Is Not For Sale,” echoing framing Sanders has used at rallies he has held across the country this year.Taking the stage after Ocasio-Cortez and Sanders, Mamdani talked up his improbable path to the Democratic nomination, saying that at one point he was tied in polls with “someone else,” at 1%.“Now as we stand on the precipice of taking this city back from corrupt politicians and the billionaires that fund them, let our words ring out so loud tonight that Andrew Cuomo can hear them in his $8,000-a-month apartment,” Mamdani said, adding he hoped Cuomo’s “puppet master in the White House” could hear them, too.“We climbed in the polls faster than Andrew Cuomo could dial Donald Trump’s number,” he added. “People began to be able to pronounce my name.”Cuomo, the former governor, is running as an independent in the general election.Mamdani called for an end to “the era of government that deems an issue too small or a crisis too big.”“Because we need a government that is every bit as ambitious as our adversaries,” he said. “A government strong enough to refuse the realities we will not accept and forge the future.“No longer will we allow the Republican Party to be the one of ambition,” he continued. “No longer will we have to open a history book to read about Democrats leading with big ideas. My friends, the world is changing. It’s not a question of whether that change will come. It’s a question of who will change it.”Polling has consistently shown Mamdani, 34, with a 10- to 20-point advantage over Cuomo in the three-way general election, which also features Republican nominee Curtis Sliwa. Cuomo recently got an endorsement from New York Mayor Eric Adams, who was also running as an independent before he dropped out last month. Influential Republican figures in the city have also rallied to Cuomo over Sliwa, seeing him as having the best shot at defeating Mamdani.Sanders said in his address: “This election is taking place when we have an administration in Washington which every day is moving us toward an authoritarian society, undermining our Constitution and the rule of law.”“The reason why this campaign has generated so much interest around the world and so much excitement is that people want to know the answer to one very simple question. And that is: In the year 2025, when the people on top have never, ever had so much economic and political power, is it possible for ordinary people, for working-class people, to come together and defeat those oligarchs? You’re damn right we can.”Some Democratic leaders have been slow to rally behind Mamdani, the onetime activist in the Democratic Socialists of America who is running on a platform of freezing rent in the city’s rent-stabilized units, enacting universal child care and providing free bus service, among other plans. His unapologetically pro-Palestinian stance has also energized anti-Israel progressives amid the war in Gaza. At one point during warmup speeches by progressive officials, the crowd began chanting “DSA, DSA, DSA” during a call-and-response for the Democratic Socialists of America.Speaking at the rally, state Sen. Julia Salazar talked up how many Democratic socialists have been elected in her state since her election in 2018 and won loud applause when she decried “the genocide in Palestine.”“And now we are on the verge of electing Zohran Mamdani to become our democratic socialist mayor right here in the largest, greatest city in the country,” she said.Gov. Kathy Hochul endorsed Mamdani last month, praising his focus on affordability. So too, on Friday, did House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y.Hochul spoke at Sunday’s rally flanked by Andrea Stewart-Cousins and Carl Heastie, the Democratic leaders of the state Senate and Assembly, respectively. She took aim at Trump, saying he is “taking a wrecking ball to our very values, our people and our progress” and condemning immigration raids in New York, Trump’s handling of the government shutdown and the federal indictment of New York Attorney General Letitia James, which Trump pushed prosecutors to pursue.“If they can come after Tish James, they can come after any of us,” Hochul said.She emphasized the need the three Democratic leaders have for Mamdani to be mayor in New York, calling for a fighter who will join them in pursuing their priorities.“He doesn’t get out in the gutter with everybody else,” Hochul said. “He rises up with grace and courage and grit.”The crowd at one point began chanting “tax the rich,” to which Hochul said, “I can hear you.”“I’ve got one plea for you,” she said. “I love to see this energy and this passion. … I am so excited about what is going on here. … But take that energy, that passion, and take it into ’26 so that we can take back the House of Representatives, so we can take back the Senate, and we can take back our country.”Trump has sought to influence the race, condemning Mamdani as a “communist” and threatening to withhold additional federal funding from the city should Mamdani win. Mamdani in turn has promised to fight Trump’s efforts to kneecap the city and has positioned himself as the candidate most open to combating him.In his address, Mamdani noted that Trump won the presidency just days after he had announced his mayoral campaign. The Bronx and Queens showed some of the most significant shifts to the right of any counties in the country in last November.“No matter what article you read or channel you turned to, the stories seemed to be the same,” Mamdani said. “Our city was headed to the right. Obituaries were written about Democrats’ abilities to reach Asian voters, young voters, male voters. Again and again, we were told that if we had any hope of beating the Republican Party, it would only be by becoming the Republican Party.“Andrew Cuomo himself said that we had lost not because we had failed to speak to the needs of working-class Americans, but because we had spent too much time talking about bathrooms and sports teams,” Mamdani continued. “This was a moment where it seemed our political horizon was narrowing. And in this moment New York, you had a choice, a choice to retreat or to fight. … And the choice that we made was to stop listening to those experts and to start listening to you.”The latest chapter in th heated mayoral race followed Mamdani’s emotional address Friday condemning the “racist, baseless” attacks he has faced for his Muslim faith in recent days, some of it from his main rival in the race, he said. Mamdani would be the first Muslim mayor in New York City history.“And I thought that if I behaved well enough or bit my tongue enough in the face of racist, baseless attacks, all while returning back to my central message, it would allow me to be more than just my faith,” Mamdani added, appearing to grow emotional. “I was wrong. No amount of redirection is ever enough.” In a radio appearance Thursday, Cuomo appeared to agree with a conservative host who said Mamdani would cheer if a terrorist attack happened in the city. A Cuomo campaign spokesperson later told NBC News that Cuomo did not agree with the host, and Cuomo said at a news conference that he thought the remark was “offensive.”“Zohran himself is the person who has created the tension with the Jewish community and the LGBT community and the Italian community and the Black community, etc.,” Cuomo said. “He is not the victim, he is the offender, and it’s a political tactic.”At Mamdani’s rally Sunday, New York City Comptroller Brad Lander, who also ran for mayor in the June primary, emphasized that Mamdani would “work to keep Jewish New Yorkers and all New Yorkers safe” and condemned anti-Islamic sentiment Mamdani has faced in recent weeks. Lander was among several Jewish and Muslim speakers who addressed the crowd.Sanders said: “Let me tell you something else. At a moment when Americans are extremely distressed about where we are as a nation, economically and politically, a victory here in New York will give hope and inspiration to people throughout our country and throughout the world.”Allan SmithAllan Smith is a political reporter for NBC News.

October 7, 2025

Oct. 7, 2025, 6:30 PM EDTBy Kaitlin SullivanShort bursts of purposeful activity –– such as walking around the block or lifting small weights –– may be the best way to get in the habit of exercising. Bite-sized bits of exercise also improve heart and muscle fitness, a study published Tuesday in BMJ Sports Medicine found.Less than half of adults in the United States get enough aerobic activity and less than a quarter get the recommended amount of both aerobic and muscle-strengthening exercise. “When people are asked why they don’t exercise, the answers are almost always the same, no time and no motivation,” Miguel Ángel Rodríguez, a doctoral student in clinical research at the University of Oviedo in Spain, who led the study, said in an email.Rodríguez and his team measured how brief bouts of exercise spread throughout the day –– which he calls exercise snacks –– affected cardiorespiratory and muscular fitness, as well as blood pressure and body composition in adults who did not regularly exercise. The team compiled data from seven randomized clinical trials that included people ages 18 to 80. There were more than 400 inactive people across the study, about 70% of whom women.What’s an effective exercise snack? An exercise snack was defined as a bout of vigorous physical activity that lasted less than five minutes. The activity had to be done at least two times a day on at least three days per week, for four to 12 weeks. The exercise was short and deliberate, such as climbing flights of stairs for the purpose of exercise. Stair-climbing was most common in adults younger than 65, while exercise, including tai chi, that strengthened lower body muscles was more common in older adults. They found that in adults younger than 65, these small acts of physical activity significantly improved cardiorespiratory fitness. For older adults –– those 65 and older –– exercise snacks significantly improved muscular endurance. People were also extremely likely to adhere to these small bouts of exercise –– about 91% of adults and 83% of older adults routinely engaged in them.“The biggest benefits happen at the very beginning, when someone goes from being inactive to a little bit active. That’s where exercise snacks can really help,” Rodríguez said. The study did have limitations, including the fact that the seven clinical trials they included used different methods to collect data, and had people exercise for different lengths of time between four and 12 weeks. For this reason, some of the benefits of moving may have been masked.For example, contrary to what past research has found, the new study found that short bursts of activity did not appear to have an effect on cardiometabolic health, such as body composition, blood pressure and blood lipids. Lipids are fatty substances, including LDL (bad cholesterol), HDL (good cholesterol) and triglycerides, that perform critical functions in the body but can be harmful if they build up in the blood.“It was surprising that they didn’t find any improvement in those other markers of cardiometabolic health because most other studies have,” said Carol Ewing Garber, director of both the Applied Physiology Laboratory and the EXerT Clinic at the Columbia University Teachers College, who wasn’t involved in the study. Cardiorespiratory health is a measure of how well the heart and lungs deliver oxygen to the muscles during exercise and predicts a person’s risk of developing heart disease and diabetes. The new study showed short bursts of exercises improved cardiorespiratory fitness.At the very least, getting small amounts of deliberate exercise on a regular basis will make everyday tasks, such as hauling groceries or making the bed, much easier, Garber said. “Most of us could probably find these five-minute bouts of time in our day, to walk around the building we work in, or up and down the stairs. We just don’t think we can,” she said. Short workouts create changes in the bodyPerhaps the biggest benefit of starting an exercise snack routine is that it can help people who are inactive build upon these small changes, said Dr. Tamanna Singh, director of the Sports Cardiology Center at Cleveland Clinic. “If you do the same snack, for the same amount of time, at the same frequency, your body will get used to it. The body needs a challenge,” she said. “The exercise snack can be the start of a foundation for more intense exercise.”Short workouts create key changes in the body that make intensifying workouts easier, Singh added. Within a couple of weeks of getting exercise, aerobic activity initiates cellular changes that increase the amount of plasma in the blood, which allows the blood to deliver more oxygen to the muscles and lengthens endurance. Even small amounts of aerobic activity strengthens the network of tiny blood vessels, called capillaries, that remove waste from muscles. Consistent activity also improves the amount of energy cells can provide, she added. These changes make it easier to exercise for longer periods of time or at a higher intensity. “The main takeaway here is that anything is better than nothing, but that does not mean you should just get three minutes of exercise,” Singh said. “Use that as a base, hopefully these exercise snacks will make people want to have an exercise meal.”Kaitlin SullivanKaitlin Sullivan is a contributor for NBCNews.com who has worked with NBC News Investigations. She reports on health, science and the environment and is a graduate of the Craig Newmark Graduate School of Journalism at City University of New York.

October 30, 2025

Trump says it's an 'honor' to be with Xi as meeting begins

September 22, 2025

At Memorial, Charlie Kirk’s Widow Says She Forgives Accused Killer

Comments are closed.

Home
Travel
Culture
Lifestyle
Sport
Contact Us
Politics

© Copyright 2025 - Be That ! . All Rights Reserved