• Police seek suspects in deadly birthday party shooting
  • Lawmakers launch inquires into U.S. boat strike
  • Nov. 29, 2025, 10:07 PM EST / Updated Nov. 30, 2025,…
  • Mark Kelly says troops ‘can tell’ what orders…

Be that!

contact@bethat.ne.com

 

Be That ! Menu   ≡ ╳
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics Politics
☰

Be that!

First lady talks about family reunification initiative

admin - Latest News - October 10, 2025
admin
33 views 27 secs 0 Comments



First Lady Melania Trump shares an update on her initiative to reunite children separated from families because of the war in Ukraine. The first lady says her team has been working with Russian president Vladimir Putin’s team since she wrote him a letter about the issue back in August.



Source link

TAGS:
PREVIOUS
Palestinians arrive in Gaza City as ceasefire continues
NEXT
Deadly explosion rocks Tennessee plant, leaving 'several people unaccounted for'
Related Post
November 21, 2025
Nov. 21, 2025, 6:00 PM ESTBy The Politics DeskWelcome to the online version of From the Politics Desk, a newsletter that brings you the NBC News Politics team’s latest reporting and analysis from the White House, Capitol Hill and the campaign trail.In today’s edition, Kristen Welker breaks down an unexpectedly warm meeting between President Donald Trump and New York Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani. Plus, Ben Kamisar explores how the redistricting fight is scrambling campaigns ahead of the midterms. Sign up to receive this newsletter in your inbox every weekday here.— Adam WollnerProgramming note: We’re taking a holiday break next week. We’ll be back on Dec. 1. Have a happy Thanksgiving!Trump and Mamdani find a surprising amount of common ground in their first meetingAnalysis by Kristen WelkerTheir improbable victories were fueled by populist messages, serving as direct repudiations of their parties’ elder statesmen and inspiring voters who normally sit on the sidelines. In countless ways — their backgrounds, their policies, their ages — President Donald Trump and New York Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani could not be more different. But the similar manner in which the two men rose to power provided the backdrop for their first face-to-face meeting in the Oval Office today. In an extraordinary reversal, the insults Trump and Mamdani have been trading for months evaporated in an instant this afternoon, with the two political foes shaking hands and showering each other with praise. Trump called his meeting with Mamdani “very productive,” adding that it “surprised” him — in a positive way. “We agree on a lot more than I would have thought,” said Trump, a native New Yorker. Trump and Mamdani downplayed their differences and played up their shared goals — on affordability, on peace in the Middle East and on wanting the best for New York City. “There were more New Yorkers who voted for President Trump in the most recent presidential election because of that focus on cost of living. And I’m looking forward to working together to deliver that affordability agenda,” Mamdani said, noting that about 1 in 10 of his voters backed Trump in 2024.Asked by reporters about the past attacks they’ve lobbed at each other, both politicians brushed them off. “I’ve been called worse than a despot,” Trump quipped in response to a question about Mamdani’s past criticism. And while Trump had previously floated cutting off federal funding to the city in response to Mamdani’s policy proposals, he told reporters today: “I don’t think that’s gonna happen. … I expect to be helping him, not hurting him.” The warm encounter between the two stands in stark contrast to how they treated each other in the run-up to this month’s mayoral election. Trump cast Mamdani, a democratic socialist, as a “communist” and issued a last-minute endorsement to his main opponent in the race, former Gov. Andrew Cuomo. Meanwhile, Mamdani called the administration “authoritarian” and memorably addressed Trump directly during his victory speech, telling him to “turn the volume up.”Today’s meeting is yet another way the 34-year-old Mamdani has stayed in the national spotlight since his election, perhaps sending a signal of the role he will play moving forward in a party that is still trying to find its footing following the 2024 election. His affordability-centric message has already inspired Democrats to follow a similar path heading into next year’s midterms. He publicly discouraged an ally who launched a primary challenge to House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y. — one of the party leaders who was slow to embrace Mamdani’s candidacy. And Mamdani will sit down with me for an exclusive interview that will air on “Meet the Press” this Sunday. I will also speak with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn. I hope you’ll join us.Read more on the Trump-Mamdani meeting →How the redistricting fight has scrambled dozens of midterm campaigns across the countryBy Ben KamisarThe national redistricting battle has cast a long shadow over the race for control of Congress next year — not only fundamentally reshaping the battlefield, but also creating a domino effect that’s pushing candidates into new seats, ushering longtime lawmakers to the exits and exposing deep political rifts in state parties across the country.The fight is still playing out across courtrooms, back rooms and President Donald Trump’s social media accounts, as Republicans and Democrats tinker with district lines. Developments like this week’s federal court ruling blocking the new Texas maps from going into effect — leaving the ultimate decision to the Supreme Court — also show how much remains to be determined in the redistricting fight.Texas: The map Texas enacted over the summer adds more Republicans to the battleground districts represented by Democratic Reps. Henry Cuellar and Vicente Gonzalez, while redrawing two districts in Houston and Dallas in a way that will likely force incumbent Democrats into primaries against each other. It also split Austin to create one deep-blue seat and one additional Republican-leaning seat that stretches toward San Antonio. The Supreme Court’s eventual decision will have a significant impact on a spate of races, starting with whether Austin-area Democratic Rep. Lloyd Doggett decides to retire. There’s also the question of whether the winner of January’s special election to succeed the late Democratic Rep. Sylvester Turner will have to immediately run against a longtime Democratic incumbent, and how Democratic Reps. Marc Veasey, Julie Johnson and Jasmine Crockett handle a potentially significant redraw in North Texas that could leave one of them out of a job. The redistricting plan already has Crockett weighing a Senate bid.California: The Democratic-drawn map voters approved earlier this month has similar potential to upend the Republican caucus in the state. The districts represented by GOP Reps. Doug LaMalfa, Darrell Issa, Kevin Kiley, Ken Calvert and David Valadao are becoming significantly more vulnerable to being flipped by Democrats, according to an analysis from the University of Virginia Center for Politics.One early bit of fallout: Calvert’s decision to seek re-election in a nearby district currently represented by fellow Republican Rep. Young Kim, which will likely trigger an expensive primary between two prominent incumbents. In an early show of force, Kim has already announced plans to spend more than $3 million on ads ahead of the 2026 primary.Utah: A court decision to enact a new map over the protests of Republicans created a new blue seat in the Salt Lake City area — one that could spark a primary focused on ideology as well as electability, an unusual position for Utah’s Democratic minority. Read more from Ben →🗞️ Today’s other top stories🌏 Russia-Ukraine update: Trump said he wants Ukraine to accept a new peace deal by Thanksgiving, after Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy warned the proposal was forcing his country to choose between its “dignity” and a “key partner.” Read more →🗣️ War of words: Trump said that he’s “not threatening death” toward a group of Democratic members of Congress whom he accused of committing “seditious behavior,” which he said a day earlier was “punishable by death.” Read more →🛥️ Reality check: Drug cartels operating vessels in the Caribbean, where roughly 50% of U.S. airstrikes have taken place, are mainly moving cocaine from South America to Europe — not to the U.S., according to current and former U.S. law enforcement and military officials as well as narcotics experts. Read more →🛢️ Drill, baby, drill: The Trump administration announced new oil drilling off the California and Florida coasts for the first time in decades. Read more →🗳️ Special election watch: The Democratic group House Majority PAC is putting more than $1 million into TV and digital ad reservations ahead of the Dec. 2 special election in Tennessee’s deep-red 7th District. Democrat Aftyn Behn raised more than $1 million from Oct. 1 to Nov. 12, while Republican Matt Van Epps brought in about $591,000. Read more →💰 Money moves: The Democratic National Committee took out a $15 million loan in October, an unusually large amount of debt for this point in the political calendar, as the party looks to rebuild its brand and infrastructure under new leadership. Read more →🔵 2026 watch: Rep. Eric Swalwell announced that he will run for California governor, the latest Democrat to join the crowded race to succeed outgoing Gov. Gavin Newsom. Read more →🗽 2026 watch, cont.: 72-year-old Rep. Nydia Velázquez, D-N.Y., will not seek re-election next year, telling The New York Times that “now is the right moment to step aside and allow a new generation of leaders to step forward.” Read more →🔴 2028 watch: Long-simmering tensions between Trump and Sen. Ted Cruz are boiling over, with White House allies convinced that the Texas Republican is aiming to boost his 2028 presidential prospects at the expense of Vice President JD Vance. Read more →💲 It’s still the economy: In Nevada, concerns about the direction of the economy and high costs are threatening to wipe away the gains Trump and the GOP have made with Latino voters. Read more →That’s all From the Politics Desk for now. Today’s newsletter was compiled by Adam Wollner.If you have feedback — likes or dislikes — email us at politicsnewsletter@nbcuni.comAnd if you’re a fan, please share with everyone and anyone. They can sign up here. The Politics Desk    
October 15, 2025
Zelenskyy revokes Ukrainian citizenship of Odesa mayor
November 23, 2025
Trump says Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene a ‘nice person’ when asked about her shock resignation
November 13, 2025
Nov. 12, 2025, 6:27 PM EST / Updated Nov. 12, 2025, 9:09 PM ESTBy Kyle Stewart, Frank Thorp V and Sahil KapurWASHINGTON — Speaker Mike Johnson said the House will vote next week to repeal a provision slipped into the bill to end the shutdown that would allow senators to sue the government for potentially millions of dollars if their data is obtained without their notification.Johnson said he was “shocked” and “angry” when he learned about the provision, which would uniquely benefit eight Republican senators, whose phone records — but not the contents of their calls or messages — were found to have been accessed as part of the investigation that led to former special counsel Jack Smith’s probe of the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol.When asked Wednesday if he knew about the provision, which was tucked into the bill to reopen the government, Johnson replied, “No, I found out about it last night.”“I was surprised. I was shocked by it, and I was angry about it, to be honest,” he said.The House passed the package to reopen the government later Wednesday, sending it to President Donald Trump to sign, and end the 43-day government shutdown.But Johnson vowed on X that House Republicans would introduce stand-alone legislation to undo the provision, adding that he will put it on a fast track to get a vote in the House next week. That process means it will need the support of two-thirds of House members to pass and move on to the Senate.Democrats and many House Republicans have been critical of the measure, which appears to apply only to senators and retroactively applies to data requests that were made on or after Jan. 1, 2022.Rep. Greg Steube, R-Fla., one of two Republicans who voted against the legislation, vented his frustrations with the process that led to the provision being included, and the fact that House Republicans were being asked to vote for the bill regardless.“That does nothing to change the fact that certain senators will get paid an additional $500k of taxpayer money. The Senate will never take up your ‘standalone’ bill,” he wrote on X in response to Johnson. “This is precisely why you shouldn’t let the Senate jam the House.”Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, the chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee, released an unclassified document in October showing that the FBI requested a review of phone data for eight Republican senators and one House member on Sept. 27, 2023.It is unclear who initially pushed for the provision. But Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., included it in a part of the package that will fund the legislative branch through September.Sen. Martin Heinrich, D-N.M., the top Democrat on the subcommittee responsible for funding the legislative branch, said in a statement shared with NBC News: “I am furious that the Senate Minority and Majority Leaders chose to airdrop this provision into this bill at the eleventh hour — with zero consultation or negotiation with the subcommittee that actually oversees this work.”“This is precisely what’s wrong with the Senate,” Heinrich said.A GOP aide said the language was a member-driven provision but did not name which senators made the push, and they said that Thune did include the language at their request. Thune’s office declined to comment.“Leader Thune inserted that in the bill to provide real teeth to the prohibition on the Department of Justice targeting senators,” said Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas.A Democratic aide told NBC News that Schumer fought to make the provision prospective to protect his members from a corrupt and out-of-control DOJ under Attorney General Pam Bondi.But a Schumer spokesperson said later Wednesday that Schumer now supports Johnson’s effort to strip the language from the bill and will push for that in the Senate.The eight Republican senators whose phone “tolling records” were accessed were: Ron Johnson of Wisconsin; Lindsey Graham of South Carolina; Bill Hagerty of Tennessee; Josh Hawley of Missouri; Dan Sullivan of Alaska; Tommy Tuberville of Alabama; Cynthia Lummis of Wyoming; and Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee.Rep. Mike Kelly of Pennsylvania also had his tolling records disclosed as part of the probe, but the provision in the government funding bill specifically focuses on senators.The “tolling data” would include who was called, when and the length of a call, but not what was said.The provision added to the government funding bill would require that senators be notified if their data is disclosed. If they aren’t — as the eight Republican senators were not — and they successfully sue, the court would be required to award “the greater of statutory damages of $500,000 or the amount of actual damages” for each violation.It would not apply if the senator was the target of a criminal investigation or if a court ordered that the notification be delayed.Graham, whose call data was accessed, said he favors the provision because it would “protect the Senate in the future, and it will also cover any Democrats in this Senate this term that may have something happened to them.”Graham said he “definitely” plans to sue under the provision if it becomes law.“I want to make it so painful no one ever does this again,” he added.Johnson didn’t indicate who was responsible for the provision but said he trusts Thune. “He’s a great leader, but some members got together and hoisted that upon — put it into the bill at the last minute. And I wish they hadn’t,” Johnson said. “I think it was a really bad look, and we’re going to fix it in the House.”The eight Democratic caucus members who voted for the legislation were Sens. Angus King, I-Maine, Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H., Maggie Hassan, D-N.H., Catherine Cortez Masto, D-Nev., Jacky Rosen, D-Nev., Dick Durbin, D-Ill., John Fetterman, D-Pa., and Tim Kaine, D-Va.NBC News asked each of their offices whether they knew the language was in the bill when they voted for it, and whether they agree with Johnson that it should be stripped out.Durbin’s office said he didn’t know about the provision and supports repealing it.A Rosen spokesperson said, “Given that this provision was added at the eleventh hour, Senator Rosen strongly supports efforts in the House to strip it out from the bill.”A Cortez Masto spokesperson said the senator “had nothing to do with the decision to add this provision to the bill at the last minute, and she supports stripping it from the bill.”A Shaheen spokesperson said: “Senator Shaheen was not involved in adding this language.”A Hassan spokesperson said, “Senator Hassan strongly opposes this provision that was added to the legislation by Senate leadership at the last minute without her knowledge and supports action to reverse it.”“Can absolutely say that Sen. King wasn’t aware” of that provision, said a spokesperson for King.The others didn’t immediately return requests for comment.Kyle StewartKyle Stewart is a producer and off-air reporter covering Congress for NBC News, managing coverage of the House.Frank Thorp VFrank Thorp V is a producer and off-air reporter covering Congress for NBC News, managing coverage of the Senate.Sahil KapurSahil Kapur is a senior national political reporter for NBC News.
Comments are closed.
Scroll To Top
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics
© Copyright 2025 - Be That ! . All Rights Reserved