• Police seek suspects in deadly birthday party shooting
  • Lawmakers launch inquires into U.S. boat strike
  • Nov. 29, 2025, 10:07 PM EST / Updated Nov. 30, 2025,…
  • Mark Kelly says troops ‘can tell’ what orders…

Be that!

contact@bethat.ne.com

 

Be That ! Menu   ≡ ╳
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics Politics
☰

Be that!

How Bolton's indictment differs from those of other Trump foes

admin - Latest News - October 16, 2025
admin
23 views 20 secs 0 Comments



John Bolton is the third person to be hit with federal charges in the last month after President Trump called for their prosecution. NBC News’ Laura Jarrett and Ryan Reilly report on details of the investigation.



Source link

TAGS:
PREVIOUS
Trump reacts to Bolton indictment
NEXT
Oct. 16, 2025, 5:00 AM EDTBy Ben KamisarOne thing is certain in New York City’s race for mayor: There’s no love lost between the top candidates, Democratic nominee and state Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani and former Democratic governor-turned-independent Andrew Cuomo. And as the two prepare to face off in their first general election debate Thursday, along with Republican nominee Curtis Sliwa, a review of the tape from Mamdani and Cuomo’s two Democratic primary debates shows how they have positioned themselves in diametric opposition to each other — and as the answer for voters seeking to address the other’s shortcomings.To Cuomo, the almost 34-year-old Mamdani is a young man in a hurry whose lack of experience should disqualify him from leading America’s largest city. Not only that, Cuomo considers Mamdani to be the face of a wing of the Democratic Party that he believes is leading the whole organization astray on issues from support for Israel to economic policy. To Mamdani, Cuomo is the manifestation of a broken Democratic Party establishment, a root cause of the affordability crisis at the center of his entire campaign, and a politician who has lost the public trust after being accused of sexual misconduct, allegations Cuomo denies. Andrew Cuomo says he ‘learned to be more careful’ after harassment allegations but has no regrets01:24Perhaps no exchange typifies the pair’s disdainful dynamic than one from the NY1/Spectrum News primary debate in early June, when both men were asked about their experience. Cuomo responded by arguing that “inexperience is dangerous” before taking Mamdani head on. “He’s never dealt with a City Council, he’s never dealt with the Congress, he’s never dealt with the state legislature, he’s never negotiated with a union, he’s never built anything, he’s never dealt with a natural emergency, he’s never dealt with a hurricane, with a flood,” Cuomo said. “He’s never done any of the essentials, and now you have Donald Trump on top of all of that — and he’s never dealt with what I think is the greatest national threat that we face, in this president. To put a person in this seat at this time with no experience is reckless and dangerous.”Mamdani was ready with a laundry list of his own, as well as a dig at a rival who spent much of the primary campaign — and his time on the debate stage — incorrectly pronouncing his name as “Mamdami.”“To Mr. Cuomo: I have never had to resign in disgrace; I’ve never cut Medicaid, I’ve never stolen hundreds of millions of dollars from the MTA, I’ve never hounded the 13 women who credibly accused me of sexual harassment, I’ve never sued for their gynecological records and I have never done those things because I am not you,” Mamdani replied. “And furthermore, the name is Mamdani: M–A-M-D-A-N-I. You should learn how to say it, because we’ve gotta get it right,” he said.A direct foilAs the two men staked out their lanes in the Democratic primary, each constantly invoked the other to explain their theory of the case. Kicking off the first primary debate, which was hosted by NBC 4 New York, Mamdani’s first answer laid out his pitch to enact progressive policies by freezing rent-stabilized apartment costs, making city buses free and enacting universal child care — all while framing his platform in diametric opposition to Cuomo, at that point the longtime polling front-runner. “I will pay for this by taxing the 1%, the billionaires and the profitable corporations that Mr. Cuomo cares more about than working-class New Yorkers,” Mamdani said. When asked how he’d turn his policy proposals into enacted reality, Mamdani attacked Cuomo again, arguing that in the state Legislature, he successfully “overcame” the objections of “a governor then who didn’t want to raise taxes on billionaires and corporations. That was then-Gov. Cuomo.” Cuomo has taken a similar path, repeatedly contrasting his experience as a former governor and federal housing secretary to Mamdani’s, contending that his younger opponent is all flash, no substance by comparison. “Mr. Mamdani is very good on Twitter with videos, but he actually produces nothing,” Cuomo said during that same debate. And at the second debate, Cuomo framed himself as the only candidate on the stage with a record of translating plans into action. “Everyone has a plan — they had a plan to build LaGuardia Airport, nobody did it until I did it. They had a plan to build the new Moynihan train station, but nobody could do it until I did it. They had a plan to finish the Second Avenue Subway, but nobody could do it until I could do it. Now we have plans to build affordable housing, and we do need hundreds of thousands of units,” Cuomo said. “It’s one thing to have a plan. It’s another thing to have the ability to do it. And that’s where New York City has fallen down time and time again,” Cuomo continued.Regrets, they have fewThe NBC4 debate moderators asked the Democratic primary candidates to share the biggest regret of their political careers. Like most of the candidates on the stage, both Cuomo and Mamdani delivered self-serving answers, and each focused on the other candidate in sharing their faux regret. “One of my regrets is having trusted leaders within our own party, leaders like Andrew Cuomo, because what we’ve seen is that kind of leadership has delivered us to this point where we are under attack by an affordability crisis on the inside and a Trump administration on the outside,” Mamdani said. “Democrats are tired of being told by leaders from the past we should continue to simply wait our turn, continue to simply trust when we know that’s the very leadership that got us to this point,” Mamdani said.Cuomo’s response took a similar tack, at least in terms of political strategy, saying his regret was that “the Democratic Party got to a point where we allowed Mr. Trump to get elected, that we’ve gotten to a point where the rhetoric has no connection to reality, where a person who has served in government for several years, only passed three bills, believes they have the experience and credentials to run the greatest city on Earth — and that the Democratic Party seems OK with that.” The two candidates’ symbiotic toxic relationship has been so obvious that it sometimes led to them breaking the fourth wall to acknowledge the dynamic. During the NY1 debate, each mayoral candidate was given the opportunity to ask an opponent a question. Cuomo asked an allied candidate a pointedly critical question about Mamdani.When Mamdani initially sought to continue a previous back-and-forth instead of taking the opportunity to ask his question of another candidate, it caused the debate’s moderators to press pause. “Wait, who are you going to ask your question to?” one of the debate’s moderators asked Mamdani.“I feel like most people would have known I’m going to ask Andrew Cuomo a question,” Mamdani replied. “I knew,” Cuomo chimed in.Ben KamisarBen Kamisar is a national political reporter for NBC News
Related Post
November 18, 2025
Insurance companies are trying to avoid big payouts by making AI safer
October 19, 2025
No Kings protesters march in Austin, Texas
November 4, 2025
Nov. 4, 2025, 1:05 PM ESTBy Scott Wong, Lillie Boudreaux, Frank Thorp V and Ryan NoblesWASHINGTON — As the 35-day government shutdown ties for the longest in American history on Tuesday, senators predicted that the impasse could end this week.“I’m pretty confident,” said Sen. Markwayne Mullin, R-Okla.After weeks without any movement, bipartisan talks among rank-and-file members have been picking up, leading to the first public signs of optimism that the shutdown could soon end.Mullin said that some Democrats had privately indicated last week that they were willing to vote for the short-term Republican spending bill that would reopen the government through Nov. 21. But, Mullin said, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., had instructed them to wait until after Tuesday’s elections so they wouldn’t depress turnout from the liberal base that has been urging the party to hold the line. Schumer’s office had no immediate comment.”I think there’s a possibility we could do it tomorrow night … but more than likely Thursday,” said Mullin, who regularly speaks with President Donald Trump, Democrats and his former House colleagues.Centrist Republican Sen. Mike Rounds of South Dakota, who has taken part in some of the bipartisan talks on how to get the government reopened, agreed, repeatedly saying he’s “optimistic” the shutdown could end this week. And Sen. Eric Schmitt, R-Mo., also pointed to Tuesday’s elections in Virginia, New Jersey, New York and California as a key factor that could shake loose a solution to the impasse.“After the elections come and go, I think the Democrats will reveal what this was about all the time, which was a political play. They want to keep their base upset, try to blame Republicans, even though they voted over 13 times now to continue to shut down the government,” Schmitt told reporters. “So my guess is that later this week, we’ll end up funding the government as Republicans had proposed 35 days ago.”Democrats, however, have dismissed the GOP argument that reopening the government will all hinge on the election, with Sen. Chris Murphy of Connecticut mocking it as “cynical galaxy brain thinking.”Republicans need just five more Democrats in the Senate to break with their leadership and vote for a continuing resolution or CR to reopen the government. On Sept. 26, the GOP-controlled House had passed a clean CR to fund the government through Nov. 21. But Senate Democrats opposed it, insisting that any bill to fund the government must also address health insurance subsidies that will expire at the end of this year, raising premiums for millions. Tuesday marked the 14th time that Democrats voted to block the House bill in the Senate.But with Nov. 21 and the Thanksgiving holiday fast approaching, there is now a need for Congress to pass a longer CR — possibly into the new year — to give bipartisan negotiators a longer runway to craft spending bills for the fiscal year that began on Oct. 1.#embed-20251002-shutdown-milestones iframe {width: 1px;min-width: 100%} Senate Appropriations Committee Chairman Susan Collins, whose panel is responsible for writing spending bills, said Monday night she is “very cautiously hopeful that it will be resolved by the end of this week.”“There have been a lot of conversations on both sides of the aisle and across the aisle, and across the chambers,” the Maine Republican said, “and I do believe that we are finally making progress.”Collins cited a level of “specificity” in the talks that had not been there in previous negotiations but admitted “it’s too soon to declare that this nightmare of a shutdown is over.”The Appropriations chair supports a new CR to keep the government funded through Dec. 19, which she said would pressure Congress to reach a spending deal right before the holidays.We’d like to hear from you about how you’re experiencing the government shutdown, whether you’re a federal employee who can’t work right now, a person who relies on federal benefits like SNAP, or someone who is feeling the effects of other shuttered services in your everyday life. Please contact us at tips@nbcuni.com or reach out to us here.It’s a well-worn tactic for forcing a funding deal, but it’s drawn opposition from many in the GOP in recent years. On Tuesday morning, House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., said he opposed setting a deadline in December, warning that it could entice lawmakers to pass a massive omnibus spending package, rather than individual funding bills that are more carefully crafted to address spending.He said he would back a CR that funds the government into January — a timeline endorsed by Florida Sen. Rick Scott and other Republicans.“I am not a fan of extending it to December because, let’s be frank, a lot of people around here have PTSD about Christmas omnibus spending bills,” Johnson told reporters. “We don’t want to do that. It gets too close, and we don’t want to have that risk. We’re not doing that. We’re not doing that, but too many people have concern. I think putting it into January makes sense.”But there are no bipartisan negotiations happening at the leadership level with Schumer and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., about a longer-term CR.Across the aisle, some rank-and-file Democrats are hopeful for a breakthrough as the shutdown approaches the five-week mark on Wednesday. But they’re not sharing the GOP’s confidence that it will all be over by week’s end.Democrats have been demanding that Trump and other GOP leaders come to the table to negotiate extending the expiring Affordable Care Act subsidies. So far, Republicans have refused and say Democrats need to vote to reopen the government first before any substantive health care talks can take place.“There seems to be some indication of a thaw, but I see no immediate solution on the horizon,” said Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn. “Talks are a good thing, but so far, I sense no willingness on the part of Republicans to really assure the American people that health care insurance will be guaranteed.”Speaking on the Senate floor Tuesday, Schumer said Democrats are fighting to lower health care costs at a time when 24 million Americans on Obamacare are facing sticker shock due to uncertainty about the expiring subsidies.“Never have American families faced a situation where their healthcare costs are set to double— double in the blink of an eye,” Schumer said.“The biggest beneficiaries of these enhanced premium tax credits are red states. Millions of people in Texas, Florida. Republicans seem ready to tell their own constituents back home: screw you, I would rather cut taxes for billionaires — that’s what’s going on,” Schumer said. “Democrats are going to keep pushing to get these tax credits extended.”Scott WongScott Wong is a senior congressional reporter for NBC News. Lillie BoudreauxLillie Boudreaux is a desk assistant at NBC News.Frank Thorp VFrank Thorp V is a producer and off-air reporter covering Congress for NBC News, managing coverage of the Senate.Ryan NoblesRyan Nobles is chief Capitol Hill correspondent for NBC News.Gabrielle Khoriaty contributed.
October 3, 2025
Hamas says it agrees to release all Israeli hostages
Comments are closed.
Scroll To Top
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics
© Copyright 2025 - Be That ! . All Rights Reserved