• Police seek suspects in deadly birthday party shooting
  • Lawmakers launch inquires into U.S. boat strike
  • Nov. 29, 2025, 10:07 PM EST / Updated Nov. 30, 2025,…
  • Mark Kelly says troops ‘can tell’ what orders…

Be that!

contact@bethat.ne.com

 

Be That ! Menu   ≡ ╳
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics Politics
☰

Be that!

Indonesian rescuers look for survivors after school collapse

admin - Latest News - September 30, 2025
admin
32 views 25 secs 0 Comments



At least one person was killed at dozens more missing after the collapse of an Islamic boarding school in Indonesia’s East Java province. The country’s disaster mitigation agency said the building’s foundation could not support the weight of construction on its fourth floor.



Source link

TAGS:
PREVIOUS
Trump, top lawmakers fail to make progress in averting looming shutdown
NEXT
Small airplane makes emergency landing on Southern California freeway
Related Post
October 13, 2025
Oct. 13, 2025, 10:32 AM EDTBy Rob WileSix months into President Donald Trump’s unprecedented gambit to impose sizable tariffs on imports, U.S. consumers are already shouldering as much as 55% of their costs, according to a new report from Goldman Sachs analysts.And with new tariffs likely on the way, the cost burden could rise even higher, they said. The findings, released Sunday, suggest U.S. consumers will continue to struggle with high prices — something Trump had promised to address in the run-up to his re-election. While inflation rates have come down from the post-Covid peak, they have remained stuck above levels economists consider healthy, causing consumers and businesses alike to continue to report feeling burdened by price increases. Over the past six months, Trump has imposed tariffs on copper, steel, aluminum, and some automobiles and auto parts. He has also levied country-specific tariff rates of as much as 28% on China and 16% on much of the rest of the world, according to the Yale Budget Lab. Partially as a result, consumer prices tracked by the Bureau of Labor Statistics have increased every month since April, when Trump made his “Liberation Day” speech announcing the new duties. As of August, the BLS’ benchmark Consumer Price Index (CPI) stood at 2.93%. September CPI data has been delayed due to the government shutdown, now in its 13th day, and is now slated to be released later this month. A separate inflation measure preferred by the Federal Reserve has likewise continued to climb, rising to 2.7% for August — above the central bank’s 2% target. In August, Trump assailed an initial Goldman Sachs estimate that said consumers could bear as much as 67% of the cost of tariffs. A White House spokesperson did not respond to a request for comment Monday. The Goldman analysts arrived at their estimate of the tariffs’ burden on consumers by comparing how much consumer prices for tariffed products have deviated from previous trends. The burden is actually less than the estimated pass-through that occurred during the trade war Trump set off during his first term in 2018. In that period, evidence suggests foreign exporters did not bear any significant share of the tariff costs at the time, meaning consumers were shouldering even more of a burden.This time, exporters are bearing some cost, along with U.S. businesses, who may actually be sparing consumers even worse price increases for the moment. American companies may be waiting to see how the U.S. Supreme Court rules on tariffs, the Goldman analysts said. Businesses also might have accumulated inventory in advance of the tariffs setting in, allowing them to hold off on raising their retail prices more significantly. The nation’s highest court is set to hear opening arguments in the tariff case Nov. 5.Still, the analysts estimate tariffs have added 0.44% to the Fed’s preferred inflation measure. That figure could rise to as much as 0.6% if Trump makes good on recent threats to impose tariffs on products such as furniture and kitchen cabinets. Those were set to take effect Tuesday. In this scenario, the tariffs’ cost burden borne by consumers could rise to 70%. The analysts’ latest estimate does not take into account Trump’s threat Friday to double the tariffs on China. On Monday, Trump administration officials sought to reassure markets that they did not seek to reignite tensions with America’s largest overseas trading partnerIf those tariffs were to take effect, the impact would be significant, the analysts said. “We are not assuming any changes to tariff rates on imports from China, but events in recent days suggest large risks,” they wrote.Rob WileRob Wile is a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist covering breaking business stories for NBCNews.com.
October 19, 2025
Zelenskyy says Putin is similar but stronger than Hamas
October 31, 2025
Savewith a NBCUniversal ProfileCreate your free profile or log in to save this articleOct. 31, 2025, 12:53 PM EDTBy Sahil Kapur, Ryan Nobles and Brennan LeachWASHINGTON — President Donald Trump is pushing Senate Republicans to abolish the 60-vote filibuster rule in order to reopen the shuttered government without Democratic votes.But in a rarity for the president, he’s hitting firm and immediate resistance from his own party.“It is now time for the Republicans to play their ‘TRUMP CARD,’ and go for what is called the Nuclear Option — Get rid of the Filibuster, and get rid of it, NOW!” he wrote in a pair of late-night social media posts Thursday. “Well, now WE are in power, and if we did what we should be doing, it would IMMEDIATELY end this ridiculous, Country destroying ‘SHUT DOWN.’”Senate Republican leaders have been outspoken in their support for the 60-vote rule to pass most bills. The new Majority Leader, John Thune, R-S.D., promised shortly after the 2024 election that the legislative filibuster would remain unchanged on his watch.“Leader Thune’s position on the importance of the legislative filibuster is unchanged,” Thune spokesman Ryan Wrasse said Friday.A spokesperson for Senate Majority Whip John Barrasso, R-Wyo., said: “Senator Barrasso’s support of the filibuster is unchanged.”Yet the conversation about the filibuster escalated on Capitol Hill even before Trump’s comments after Sen. Bernie Moreno, R-Ohio, appeared on Fox News days into the shutdown and called on his party to eliminate the filibuster.But various Republicans have voiced opposition to that push, including Moreno’s fellow Ohio senator.“That’s not a step I think we should take,” Sen. Jon Husted, R-Ohio, told reporters.Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., who has said he would resign from the Senate on the same day if Republicans abolish the filibuster, said he doesn’t expect it to be nixed. He noted that Trump also called on the GOP to eliminate the 60-vote threshold during his first presidential term in order to pass his agenda.“We stood firm there,” Tillis said earlier this month. “I can’t imagine anybody changing now.”Sen. Roger Marshall, R-Kansas, said he “would not be” in favor of weakening the legislative filibuster to pass the funding bill.”That’s a nonstarter,” he said.Sen. Markwayne Mullin, R-Okla., said he would “absolutely not” favor abolishing the filibuster.”If we want to do something very, extremely limited” to “avoid shutdowns in the future, I may consider that,” he said.” But to nuke, to go nuclear into the filibuster — we all know that the Senate goes back and forth, and it’s in our favor when we have the minority.”The Senate, under the control of both parties, has eliminated the 60-vote threshold to confirm executive branch personnel and federal judges; those require a simple majority of the Senate.The legislative filibuster has evolved over the years, but since 1975, it has required 60 votes to achieve “cloture” in the Senate and ensure passage of most bills over the minority’s objections. There are exceptions, such as the budget “reconciliation” process that Republicans used to pass Trump’s “big, beautiful bill.” GOP senators have expanded those exceptions this year, but they’ve largely been opposed to fully removing the 60-vote threshold.That’s because they worry about what a future Democratic-controlled Washington would be able to do without requiring Republican support for legislation.“The 60 vote threshold has protected this country, and frankly, that’s what I think this last election was largely about,” Thune told reporters on Oct. 10, positing that if Democrats had won, they would have sought to get rid of the filibuster, make D.C. and Puerto Rico states with representation in Congress and expand the Supreme Court. “You’d have abortion on demand, a whole bunch of things that were on that laundry list,” he said. “There’s always pressure on the filibuster,” the majority leader said. “But I can tell you that the filibuster through the years has been something that’s been a bulwark against a lot of really bad things happening to the country.”House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., said he understands why Senate Republicans want to preserve the filibuster.“It’s not my call. I don’t have a say in this. It’s a Senate chamber issue. We don’t have that in the House, as you know,” he told reporters on Friday. “But the filibuster has traditionally been viewed as a very important safeguard. If the shoe was on the other foot, I don’t think our team would like it.”Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pa., one of many Democrats who ran in 2024 on nixing the filibuster, said Republicans should go ahead and “carve it out” for government funding bills.”We ran on killing the filibuster, and now we love it,” he said. “I support it because it makes it more difficult to shut the government down in the future, and that’s where it’s entirely appropriate. And I don’t want to hear any Democrat clutching their pearls about the filibuster. We all ran on it.”Democrats have all but dared Republicans to kill the filibuster and fund the government on their own if they don’t want to negotiate to secure bipartisan support. On NBC’s Meet The Press NOW, Rep. Chris DeLuzio, D-Pa., said Republicans “should have” nuked the filibuster if they didn’t want to deal with Democrats on a bill.Republicans ‘should’ eliminate filibuster or work with Democrats on shutdown, House Democrat says08:33In his Thursday posts, Trump noted that Democrats tried in 2022 to smash the 60-vote threshold, in an attempt to pass a sweeping voting rights law. But they failed to secure the majority vote needed to change the rules in the Senate, and the effort fizzled.“If the Democrats ever came back into power, which would be made easier for them if the Republicans are not using the Great Strength and Policies made available to us by ending the Filibuster, the Democrats will exercise their rights, and it will be done in the first day they take office, regardless of whether or not we do it,” the president added.Two weeks after his proposal, NBC News asked Moreno if he had made progress convincing his GOP colleagues to nix the filibuster.“Not yet,” Moreno replied.Sahil KapurSahil Kapur is a senior national political reporter for NBC News.Ryan NoblesRyan Nobles is chief Capitol Hill correspondent for NBC News.Brennan LeachBrennan Leach is an associate producer for NBC News covering the Senate.
November 27, 2025
Campbell’s fires exec accused of making racist comments
Comments are closed.
Scroll To Top
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics
© Copyright 2025 - Be That ! . All Rights Reserved