• Police seek suspects in deadly birthday party shooting
  • Lawmakers launch inquires into U.S. boat strike
  • Nov. 29, 2025, 10:07 PM EST / Updated Nov. 30, 2025,…
  • Mark Kelly says troops ‘can tell’ what orders…

Be that!

contact@bethat.ne.com

 

Be That ! Menu   ≡ ╳
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics Politics
☰

Be that!

Inside Trump and Mamdani’s friendly meeting

admin - Latest News - November 22, 2025
admin
9 views 15 secs 0 Comments



For months, Donald Trump and Zohran Mamdani exchanged insults. All of that was put aside in an extraordinary Oval Office get-together, NBC News’ Garrett Haake reports.



Source link

TAGS:
PREVIOUS
Fugees rapper sentenced for illegal campaign donations
NEXT
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene to resign in January
Related Post
October 28, 2025
Jamaica warned 'little can stop a Cat. 5 hurricane'
November 4, 2025
Nov. 4, 2025, 1:05 PM ESTBy Scott Wong, Lillie Boudreaux, Frank Thorp V and Ryan NoblesWASHINGTON — As the 35-day government shutdown ties for the longest in American history on Tuesday, senators predicted that the impasse could end this week.“I’m pretty confident,” said Sen. Markwayne Mullin, R-Okla.After weeks without any movement, bipartisan talks among rank-and-file members have been picking up, leading to the first public signs of optimism that the shutdown could soon end.Mullin said that some Democrats had privately indicated last week that they were willing to vote for the short-term Republican spending bill that would reopen the government through Nov. 21. But, Mullin said, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., had instructed them to wait until after Tuesday’s elections so they wouldn’t depress turnout from the liberal base that has been urging the party to hold the line. Schumer’s office had no immediate comment.”I think there’s a possibility we could do it tomorrow night … but more than likely Thursday,” said Mullin, who regularly speaks with President Donald Trump, Democrats and his former House colleagues.Centrist Republican Sen. Mike Rounds of South Dakota, who has taken part in some of the bipartisan talks on how to get the government reopened, agreed, repeatedly saying he’s “optimistic” the shutdown could end this week. And Sen. Eric Schmitt, R-Mo., also pointed to Tuesday’s elections in Virginia, New Jersey, New York and California as a key factor that could shake loose a solution to the impasse.“After the elections come and go, I think the Democrats will reveal what this was about all the time, which was a political play. They want to keep their base upset, try to blame Republicans, even though they voted over 13 times now to continue to shut down the government,” Schmitt told reporters. “So my guess is that later this week, we’ll end up funding the government as Republicans had proposed 35 days ago.”Democrats, however, have dismissed the GOP argument that reopening the government will all hinge on the election, with Sen. Chris Murphy of Connecticut mocking it as “cynical galaxy brain thinking.”Republicans need just five more Democrats in the Senate to break with their leadership and vote for a continuing resolution or CR to reopen the government. On Sept. 26, the GOP-controlled House had passed a clean CR to fund the government through Nov. 21. But Senate Democrats opposed it, insisting that any bill to fund the government must also address health insurance subsidies that will expire at the end of this year, raising premiums for millions. Tuesday marked the 14th time that Democrats voted to block the House bill in the Senate.But with Nov. 21 and the Thanksgiving holiday fast approaching, there is now a need for Congress to pass a longer CR — possibly into the new year — to give bipartisan negotiators a longer runway to craft spending bills for the fiscal year that began on Oct. 1.#embed-20251002-shutdown-milestones iframe {width: 1px;min-width: 100%} Senate Appropriations Committee Chairman Susan Collins, whose panel is responsible for writing spending bills, said Monday night she is “very cautiously hopeful that it will be resolved by the end of this week.”“There have been a lot of conversations on both sides of the aisle and across the aisle, and across the chambers,” the Maine Republican said, “and I do believe that we are finally making progress.”Collins cited a level of “specificity” in the talks that had not been there in previous negotiations but admitted “it’s too soon to declare that this nightmare of a shutdown is over.”The Appropriations chair supports a new CR to keep the government funded through Dec. 19, which she said would pressure Congress to reach a spending deal right before the holidays.We’d like to hear from you about how you’re experiencing the government shutdown, whether you’re a federal employee who can’t work right now, a person who relies on federal benefits like SNAP, or someone who is feeling the effects of other shuttered services in your everyday life. Please contact us at tips@nbcuni.com or reach out to us here.It’s a well-worn tactic for forcing a funding deal, but it’s drawn opposition from many in the GOP in recent years. On Tuesday morning, House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., said he opposed setting a deadline in December, warning that it could entice lawmakers to pass a massive omnibus spending package, rather than individual funding bills that are more carefully crafted to address spending.He said he would back a CR that funds the government into January — a timeline endorsed by Florida Sen. Rick Scott and other Republicans.“I am not a fan of extending it to December because, let’s be frank, a lot of people around here have PTSD about Christmas omnibus spending bills,” Johnson told reporters. “We don’t want to do that. It gets too close, and we don’t want to have that risk. We’re not doing that. We’re not doing that, but too many people have concern. I think putting it into January makes sense.”But there are no bipartisan negotiations happening at the leadership level with Schumer and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., about a longer-term CR.Across the aisle, some rank-and-file Democrats are hopeful for a breakthrough as the shutdown approaches the five-week mark on Wednesday. But they’re not sharing the GOP’s confidence that it will all be over by week’s end.Democrats have been demanding that Trump and other GOP leaders come to the table to negotiate extending the expiring Affordable Care Act subsidies. So far, Republicans have refused and say Democrats need to vote to reopen the government first before any substantive health care talks can take place.“There seems to be some indication of a thaw, but I see no immediate solution on the horizon,” said Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn. “Talks are a good thing, but so far, I sense no willingness on the part of Republicans to really assure the American people that health care insurance will be guaranteed.”Speaking on the Senate floor Tuesday, Schumer said Democrats are fighting to lower health care costs at a time when 24 million Americans on Obamacare are facing sticker shock due to uncertainty about the expiring subsidies.“Never have American families faced a situation where their healthcare costs are set to double— double in the blink of an eye,” Schumer said.“The biggest beneficiaries of these enhanced premium tax credits are red states. Millions of people in Texas, Florida. Republicans seem ready to tell their own constituents back home: screw you, I would rather cut taxes for billionaires — that’s what’s going on,” Schumer said. “Democrats are going to keep pushing to get these tax credits extended.”Scott WongScott Wong is a senior congressional reporter for NBC News. Lillie BoudreauxLillie Boudreaux is a desk assistant at NBC News.Frank Thorp VFrank Thorp V is a producer and off-air reporter covering Congress for NBC News, managing coverage of the Senate.Ryan NoblesRyan Nobles is chief Capitol Hill correspondent for NBC News.Gabrielle Khoriaty contributed.
November 9, 2025
Nov. 8, 2025, 7:00 AM ESTBy Alicia Victoria LozanoLOS ANGELES — Federal prosecutors in Los Angeles have taken a hard line against alleged violence at protests, charging nearly 100 protesters since June in cases that could result in long prison sentences. But a fifth of those cases have been dismissed or resulted in acquittals in what some former federal prosecutors and free speech advocates say is a rare rebuke of the U.S. attorney’s office’s mission and credibility.After tens of thousands of people flooded the streets in June and October during “No Kings” protests against the Trump administration, at least 20 of 97 federal cases filed against Los Angeles protesters since June have failed in court, according to records provided to NBC News by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Central District of California. Eighteen of those cases were dismissed and two ended in acquittals. Experts weren’t able to provide an average number of cases but said the recent rate of unsuccessful ones seemed high.Last week, Trump-appointed U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli announced charges against 12 defendants stemming from June 8 protests across Southern California. The defendants were charged in a single complaint with obstructing, impeding and interfering with law enforcement during a civil disorder, according to the Department of Justice.NBC News spoke with four former federal prosecutors who all said that in their experience, protest cases on the federal level were not common before this year. Instead, prosecutors in the U.S. attorney’s office typically focus on high-level crimes such as human and drug trafficking, corruption and white-collar offenses.Summer Lacey, who served as a federal public defender in Los Angeles from 2014 to 2018, said her team never came across such high numbers of federal charges against protesters. Those cases were usually left to local district attorneys.L.A. County District Attorney Nathan Hochman has charged 42 people in protest-related cases since June, according to his office. NBC News asked the district attorney’s office how many of these cases have been dismissed or resulted in acquittal but did not receive an immediate reply.“What we’re seeing is that when these cases are scrutinized, so many of them are falling apart,” said Lacey, who is now an attorney with the ACLU’s Southern California chapter. “There isn’t an evidentiary base to support it, but people are being put through the process.”Across the nation, the Trump administration has used increasingly hostile language to describe protesters, sometimes calling them “domestic terrorists” and “rioters,” while characterizing cities like Portland, Oregon, and Chicago as “war-ravaged” and a “war zone.” Yet firsthand accounts from those cities paint a very different picture.Some former federal prosecutors say the discrepancies in how the Trump administration is describing protest behavior has created a credibility problem for current prosecutors, who are increasingly facing skeptical juries and judges. One said that is happening not just in Los Angeles but also in cities like Chicago and Portland, where protests and arrests continue.“People want federal prosecutors to be thoughtful and careful as to how they use their discretion,” said Laurie Levenson, a former federal prosecutor and a current law professor at Loyola Marymount University in Los Angeles. “It takes a long time to regain the public’s confidence, and the presumption of credibility is weakening.”On Tuesday, federal prosecutors in Illinois filed a motion to dismiss a case against an Oak Park resident who was accused of shoving a border agent during an Oct. 3 protest outside an Immigration and Customs Enforcement facility near Chicago. Cole Sheridan was charged with assaulting, impeding or resisting a federal agent.Magistrate Judge Heather K. McShain appeared skeptical of the federal government’s case during a recent hearing, according to local media reports. Arguments largely hinged on testimony provided by U.S. Border Patrol boss Gregory Bovino, who was involved in Sheridan’s arrest but testified that he was not wearing body cameras at the time of the skirmish.How Greg Bovino became a rising star in Trump’s immigration efforts03:55“This is part of a larger political narrative and discussion as opposed to really being about doing anything to enhance or increase public safety,” said Ed Yohnka, director of communications and public policy at the American Civil Liberties Union of Illinois, which was not involved in the Sheridan case.“This administration clearly believes that anybody who protests against them is an enemy that has to be punished,” he added.The U.S. attorney’s office in Chicago did not return a request for comment.“We’re seeing grand juries reject those cases, or seeing those cases being dismissed,” said Cristine DeBerry, a former federal prosecutor who is now with the nonprofit watchdog Prosecutors Alliance, which advocates for criminal justice reform. “They’re weak at best, and that there’s very little evidence to support what the federal government is trying to do.”Federal prosecutors have been facing an uphill battle in Los Angeles as charges continue to be dropped against protesters.Last month, assault charges were dismissed against a protester who was accused of intentionally hitting a federal officer during an October protest outside an immigration detention facility.But defense lawyers for Ashleigh Brown argued that prosecutors’ account was inaccurate. According to court filings, Brown was followed to her car by two federal officers who attempted to block her from driving away. Brown’s lawyers argued that the federal government failed to disclose a history of assault and excessive force by one of the officers who was allegedly attacked by Brown, according to court documents provided to NBC News.Her case was dismissed with prejudice, meaning new charges cannot be brought against her for the same incident.In an emailed statement, a spokesperson for the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Central District of California, which includes Los Angeles, said, “First Amendment protects peaceful protest. Violence — including violence against law enforcement and property — is not constitutionally protected.”“There has been an incredible amount of violence directed at federal officers and property in what has been the largest immigration enforcement action in decades,” Ciaran McEvoy wrote in the statement. “That must be factored in.”In the first cases brought against protesters following the June 8 No Kings protests, seven of nine assault and impeding cases were dismissed, according to court documents.DHS agents accused protesters of shoving or assaulting law enforcement officers, but footage presented in court appeared to show the opposite, which led to at least one acquittal.“The challenge we have is we don’t have a federal government that is playing by the normal rules,” DeBerry said. “We are not supposed to bring a case you cannot prove beyond a reasonable doubt. But they are filing cases they know they cannot prove beyond a reasonable doubt.”Alicia Victoria LozanoAlicia Victoria Lozano is a California-based reporter for NBC News focusing on climate change, wildfires and the changing politics of drug laws.
October 27, 2025
Trump rules out running for vice president in 2028
Comments are closed.
Scroll To Top
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics
© Copyright 2025 - Be That ! . All Rights Reserved