• Diane Keaton, Oscar-winning actor who rose to fame…
  • AI data centers boom out West
  • Savewith a NBCUniversal ProfileCreate your free profile or…
  • Oct. 11, 2025, 8:00 AM EDTBy Alicia Victoria…

Be that!

contact@bethat.ne.com

 

Be That ! Menu   ≡ ╳
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics Politics
☰

Be that!

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian says Trump’s current path will ‘set fire’ to the Middle East: Full interview

admin - Latest News - September 27, 2025
admin
14 views 30 secs 0 Comments



In a wide-ranging interview with NBC Nightly News with Tom Llamas, the Iranian president responds to reports of construction at a new nuclear facility and telling Tom Llamas that nuclear inspectors are welcomed to visit his country. The interview was conducted with a government interpreter translating in real time, and NBC News reviewed the translation independently.



Source link

TAGS:
PREVIOUS
Sept. 26, 2025, 6:33 PM EDTBy Tim Stelloh and Brenda BreslauerEarlier this year, Daniel Krug was convicted of killing his wife in an insidious murder plot: He stalked her for months, sending increasingly terrifying messages and posing as someone she hadn’t seen in decades — an ex-boyfriend who’d struggled to get over their breakup.A cousin of Kristil Krug’s now believes she might still be alive if communications companies had responded faster to search warrants that eventually provided key evidence to authorities investigating the case. That evidence, which helped identify Krug’s husband as the stalker, didn’t come for weeks, until after Kristil, 43, was fatally struck in the head and stabbed on Dec. 14, 2023, in their suburban Colorado home.In an interview with “Dateline,” the cousin, Rebecca Ivanoff, called on state and federal lawmakers to require companies to respond to stalking-related search warrants within 48 hours.For more on the case, tune in to “The Phantom” on “Dateline” at 9 ET/8 CT tonight.DATELINE FRIDAY SNEAK PEEK: The Phantom01:58“I’m looking at a system here that has a fundamental flaw that we can fix easily,” said Ivanoff, a former prosecutor who specialized in domestic violence cases.Ivanoff pointed to the link between stalking and homicide — researchers have found that victims are significantly more likely to die at the hands of an intimate partner if they’ve been stalked — and called her proposal “homicide prevention.” She described the numerous steps her cousin took to protect herself, including installing security cameras, maintaining a detailed “stalker log” that she provided to law enforcement, and eventually carrying a handgun.Kristil Krug. Courtesy Dateline “Kristil did everything right,” she said. “The system operated as it’s currently designed, and she still got killed.”Emily Tofte Nestaval, executive director of a Colorado-based legal service nonprofit that assisted Kristil’s family, called Ivanoff’s 48-hour response window “more than reasonable.” She said her organization has encountered far too many cases “where a more timely and diligent response from communication providers could have — or would have — been lifesaving, as we believe was true in Ms. Krug’s situation.”The district attorney whose office prosecuted Daniel said it’s critical for companies to respond quickly because “criminals can turn from stalking a victim to killing that victim at any time.”Brian Mason, district attorney for Colorado’s 17th Judicial District, noted that many stalkers leave a digital trail of evidence that can be used to identify suspects and save lives — evidence that can be uncovered through forensic searches of phones and online accounts.“When law enforcement sends subpoenas to tech companies for this evidence, it is imperative that these companies respond in a timely and thorough manner,” he said. “Lives are literally on the line.”In response to questions about how search warrants were processed in Kristil’s case, officials with two of the companies — Verizon and Google — pointed to the many requests they said they receive from law enforcement annually. For Verizon, that number is 325,000, with 75,000 emergency requests, a spokesperson said. The spokesperson said the company typically responds to those requests in the order received and that it generally doesn’t know the nature of the investigations. They prioritize requests that law enforcement considers “emergent,” the spokesperson said.Data from Google shows the company received tens of thousands of warrants just in the second half of 2023. In a statement, Google said it prioritizes its responses based on a variety of factors, including whether law enforcement tells them if the matter is an ongoing emergency.“At Google, we recognize the critical importance of maintaining flexibility in our processes to effectively triage matters based on the individual circumstances, particularly when assessing the presence of an ongoing emergency,” the company said.A third company, TextNow, did not respond to requests for comment.The unnerving messages begin In Kristil’s case, the stalking began 10 weeks before her death. A police report shows the first message arrived Oct. 2 via text: “Hope its OK I looked u up. I go to boulder every few weeks and thought we could hook up. U game?” The author of the note identified himself as “Anthony” — an apparent reference to Jack Anthony Holland, a man Kristil began dating the summer before college. They were together for just over a year, according to a timeline Kristil provided to authorities, and he periodically reached out and expressed what Kristil believed was an interest in getting back together.She married Daniel, a financial analyst with the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, in 2007. They had three children.Kristil and Daniel Krug. Courtesy DatelineKristil didn’t respond to the text, or to a series of increasingly hostile messages the next day, according to the police report. But a few weeks later, the messages continued — and escalated dramatically, the police report shows.One — from an “a.holland” email address — included a vulgar note and a photo of her husband. Others contained sexually explicit photos and appeared to come from people responding to an ad posted on a classified site with Kristil’s phone number. Another message informed her that her license plate was expired. On Nov. 9, a message said: “saw u at dentist.”A few days later, Kristil got a lengthy message that appeared to threaten her husband’s life.“Ill get rid of him and then we can be together,” the text said. “So easy.”In the police report, the detective noted the toll the messages were taking.“Kristil is very fearful for her safety and the safety of her family,” Andrew Martinez wrote. “There is evidence and admission of repeated following and surveillance of her and her immediate family. The recent communication has caused her anxiety, hyper-vigilance, and paranoia.”At the time, authorities still thought of her husband, Daniel, as a possible victim. In a sometimes tearful interview with the detective, Daniel described how the stalking had caused his paranoia and anxiety to surge.“I’m panicking and I’m doing a s— job of protecting my wife,” said Daniel, 44, according to a video of the interview.Kristil — an engineer who had what her cousin described as a “super-analytical mind” — did everything she could to face the situation head-on, her family said.She began documenting the messages in a “stalker log.” She hired a private investigator to track down Holland’s last known address, according to her family. She armed herself and went to the Broomfield Police Department, which dispatched undercover officers to keep an eye out for the stalker. (The effort came up empty.)Although the private investigator had found addresses for Holland in Utah and Idaho, Martinez, the police detective, said he wanted digital evidence proving that Holland was actually behind the messages. If the detective confronted him without that proof, he could “just close the door in our face and that is the end of our case,” Martinez told “Dateline.”So on Nov. 12, Martinez applied for the warrants for Google, TextNow and Verizon that sought information for the phone numbers and email addresses associated with the messages, police records show. They were submitted to the companies five days later. There was a typo in the warrant to Google, so Martinez resubmitted a corrected version on Dec. 6. But as the weeks passed, neither of the other companies responded. And in the days after the corrected warrant was filed, Google did not respond either.That lag wasn’t unusual, Martinez said. “When we serve a search warrant to any major company, unfortunately, it takes time,” he said. “And a lot of times it takes weeks, if not months for some companies.”Following the wrong lead all along On Dec. 6, an email arrived in Kristil’s inbox.“Hey gorgeous i cant visit u no more,” it said, according to a police report. “No more colorado time. My girlfriend dosnt want us talking witout her. She says u will let cops get me aftr u off him but she dont kno u likei do.”Eight days later, Daniel Krug summoned police to the family’s house for a welfare check after he said he’d been unable to reach his wife. An officer found her body in the garage, body camera video shows.An April 1 image of the home in which Kristi Krug was found stabbed and beaten to death in Broomfield, Colo. David Zalubowski / APShe had a substantial head wound and appeared to have been stabbed in the chest.Authorities raced to track Holland down and — with a warrant for his arrest for stalking — they found him at home in Utah on Dec. 14. With help from a Utah sheriff’s office, they quickly concluded that it would have been “physically impossible” for Holland to have been in Colorado at the time of the killing, according to a prosecutor in the case, Kate Armstrong.Holland told “Dateline” that he didn’t think he’d get charged after authorities came to his door because he knew he hadn’t done anything wrong.”I was like, ‘I didn’t do it,'” he recalled telling the officers. “I knew I was OK once the police officers left my house.”At roughly the same time, investigators reached back out to Google, Verizon and TextNow, which still hadn’t responded to the warrants. This time, with the “exigent” circumstances of a homicide linked to the request, they responded within an hour, according to police records.That data revealed the stalker used an IP address “similar” to the government building where Daniel worked, according to police documents. Investigators then confirmed it was linked to a public wi-fi network at Daniel’s office building, the documents state.To Martinez, the revelation was “earth-shattering,” he said. It showed that he’d been on the wrong path the whole time.To Justin Marshall, the lead homicide detective, that evidence could have allowed them to act sooner.“If the information that we learned pursuant to exigency had been made available in mid-November, we would have known that every communication had originated at the same location — Dan’s work address,” he said. “We wouldn’t have been as far behind.” When investigators confronted Daniel with the evidence, he said their new “theory” was wrong and suggested the stalker may have accessed his workplace’s wi-fi, a video of the interview shows. Daniel and Kristil Krug. Courtesy Dateline Authorities came to believe that Daniel had been stalking Kristil — who’d wanted to end their marriage — in an effort to scare her and push her closer to him. He killed her out of fear of being found out, Armstrong, the prosecutor, said.Daniel was arrested two days after his wife’s killing and pleaded not guilty to charges of first-degree murder, stalking and criminal impersonation. Earlier this year, after a roughly two-week trial where his lawyers pointed to the lack of physical evidence and what they described as sloppy police work that failed to keep Kristil safe, he was convicted of all charges and sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole. Pushing for change In the months after the conviction, as Ivanoff processed the evidence presented at her cousin’s murder trial, she said one thing became clear: “We have a system failure that needs to be addressed.” She pointed to how quickly the emergency requests for data associated with the stalker’s devices and email addresses were returned and said it’s clear that the companies can move fast when they want to. Had they moved as quickly as they did after Kristil was killed, she said, perhaps the outcome would have been different.“They could’ve arrested him weeks before she’s killed, and she could’ve safety planned in a way that could’ve saved her life,” she said.Asked about Ivanoff’s claim that Kristil might be alive if the companies had acted faster, Google and TextNow did not respond, while Verizon said in a statement that it was “highly unlikely” that any of its data would have identified the source of the stalking messages.The statement added that the stalking warrant had not been designated as an emergency by law enforcement.Ivanoff said she is in the beginning stages of reaching out to lawmakers, victims’ rights groups and others in her push for swifter response times to search warrants. But she hopes federal lawmakers enact model legislation that states can adopt. The benefit is clear for law enforcement and victims, Ivanoff said, but defense attorneys should also support the change. She recalled that there was an arrest warrant for Holland, who she said could’ve been jailed while authorities awaited the digital evidence.“Think about the innocent person that’s accused having to wait and incur all of the attendant impacts of the full weight of the state’s system being brought to bear on them, losing their liberty, losing their job, losing connections with family, friends,” she said.Ivanoff’s proposal, which she’s calling Kristil’s Law, “is a fight worth taking on,” she said. “If Kristil could, I think, say anything right now, it would be: ‘Get that done.’”If you or someone you know is facing domestic violence, call the National Domestic Violence hotline for help at (800) 799-SAFE (7233), or go to www.thehotline.org for more. States often have domestic violence hotlines as well.Tim StellohTim Stelloh is a breaking news reporter for NBC News Digital.Brenda BreslauerBrenda Breslauer is a producer with the NBC News Investigative Unit.
NEXT
Protest in Des Moines after ICE detains superintendent
Related Post
September 21, 2025
‘Love Is Blind’ alum sues Netflix, show producers
September 21, 2025
CDC panel votes to limit who is eligible Covid vaccine
October 9, 2025
Celebrations erupt in Gaza after Israel-Hamas deal agreed
September 29, 2025
Sept. 29, 2025, 5:15 AM EDTBy Tim StellohThe trial of a Texas woman with a grim relationship history is set to begin this week in a courtroom near Houston in connection with allegations that she killed her most recent husband with a fatal dose of insulin.Jury selection for Sarah Hartsfield, a former U.S. Army sergeant who has been married five times and whose third husband previously accused her of asking her fourth husband to kill his new wife, is scheduled to begin Monday.She is charged with one count of murder in the January 2023 death of Joseph Hartsfield, 46. She has pleaded not guilty.More on Sarah HartsfieldAfter 5-time bride is charged in husband’s murder, other deaths get a fresh look Sarah Hartsfield’s marriages and romances often ended under grim circumstancesMurder suspect’s son has been waiting for his mom’s arrest his whole lifeHartsfield fatally shot her fiancé in 2018Sarah Hartsfield, 50, has admitted to fatally shooting another romantic partner — a former fiancé — in self-defense in Minnesota in 2018. She was cleared of wrongdoing, but a local prosecutor said he was re-examining the case after she was indicted on the murder charge in Joseph Hartsfield’s death.The status of that inquiry is unclear. The prosecutor, Chad Larson, did not respond to a request for comment.At the time of her indictment in Joseph Hartsfield’s death, the sheriff overseeing the case described Sarah Hartsfield’s past relationships ominously: “Everybody wants out of it because they fear for their life,” he told NBC affiliate KPRC of Houston.The trial in Texas’ Chambers County is expected to take two to three weeks.FULL EPISODE: Along Came Sarah08:31Sarah Hartsfield’s lawyers did not respond to requests for comment. A previous lawyer, Keaton Kirkwood, said she maintains her innocence and planned to assist the investigation into her husband’s “untimely death.”“We adamantly denounce the misinformation that has been provided to the public regarding her past,” the lawyer told KPRC in 2023.Kirkwood withdrew from the case that year over what he described as an irreconcilable conflict of interest with Hartsfield.“She is not wanting to follow the advice of her legal counsel and has taken actions that have precipitated said conflict,” he wrote in a filing.An insulin overdoseJoseph and Sarah Hartsfield had been married for 11 months when he was hospitalized on Jan. 7, 2023, with what a nurse described as a life-threatening illness, according to an affidavit in support of a search warrant.He was diabetic and was admitted to a hospital east of Houston with low blood sugar, but he didn’t respond to glucose and his blood sugar kept crashing, the affidavit states.The nurse suspected insulin — the lifesaving drug that can double as a difficult-to-detect murder weapon — may have been to blame for his condition, according to the affidavit.At the hospital, Joseph Hartsfield’s family told authorities that he’d recently returned to his hometown, opened a new bank account and planned to divorce his wife.“He was concerned for his safety, thinking Sarah might try to kill him,” the affidavit states.Facebook messages that Sarah Hartsfield sent a friend weeks before his hospitalization show her disparaging her husband.“I’ve paid for everything to the point I have nothing left,” she wrote in the messages, which the friend shared with NBC News. “He was just looking for a meal ticket and way back to a lifestyle he could never attain on his own.”Joseph Hartsfield was pronounced dead on Jan. 15, according to the Harris County Institute of Forensic Sciences. The nurse’s suspicion was later confirmed by the institute, which concluded that he died from complications of toxic effects of insulin.His manner of death was listed as undetermined.Hartsfield testified at a March 2023 bond hearing that her husband died from a stroke that resulted from a “100 percent clogged artery,” a transcript shows. She attributed that cause of death to the lead neurologist who treated her husband.After Joseph Hartsfield’s death, she wrote on Facebook that she was “numb and lost” without him and listening to old phone messages to hear his voice.“I guess I’m going to try to sleep, I can’t possibly cry and weep anymore than I have this evening,” she wrote on Jan. 27. “I love you Joseph Hartsfield.”She was arrested a week later.Fiancé fatally shotHartsfield testified at the bond hearing that she shot her former partner David Bragg in 2018 after he became upset about her third husband coming to town to see their children.The couple, who were briefly engaged, had moved to Minnesota a few months before after meeting at Fort Hood, according to Hartsfield’s son.David Bragg.KPRCDuring the hearing, Hartsfield testified that she “took the beating of my life for letting my child see her father.”She said she dove to the floor and “blindly fired” after Bragg threatened to shoot her.“I didn’t aim,” she testified. “It was such an automatic response.”The Douglas County attorney who later reopened the investigation into Bragg’s death concluded in 2019 that Sarah Hartsfield had “no reasonable possibility of retreating.” Bragg’s family described the circumstances surrounding his death as “farfetched, and almost made up.”An alleged murder plotTwo years later, the third husband, Christopher Donohue, sought a protection order against Sarah Hartsfield. In an affidavit in support of the order, Donohue alleged that Sarah Hartsfield’s fourth husband told him that she’d been pushing him for months to kill Donohue’s new wife.She’d given her fourth husband, David George, a pistol to carry out the act and wouldn’t let him come home until he’d done so, according to the affidavit.In an interview with “Dateline,” George said he had no intention of following through with the alleged plot. During the bond hearing in her fifth husband’s death, Hartsfield said George made a “full retraction” of the claim that she’d pressured him to carry out the shooting, which she said he made for “retaliation purposes.” She has not been charged with a crime in the alleged plot.Donohue has declined previous interview requests. The two ex-husbands have been subpoenaed to testify at Hartsfield’s trial.Tim StellohTim Stelloh is a breaking news reporter for NBC News Digital.
Comments are closed.
Scroll To Top
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics
© Copyright 2025 - Be That ! . All Rights Reserved