• Crowd goes wild at 'Silent Night' basketball game
  • Lava spills as Hawaii's Kilauea resumes eruptions
  • Protesters smear food on the case of the…
  • National Guard member 'slowly healing' after shooting

Be that!

contact@bethat.ne.com

 

Be That ! Menu   ≡ ╳
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics Politics
☰

Be that!

Matthew Perry’s doctor sentenced to prison for supplying ketamine

admin - Latest News - December 4, 2025
admin
7 views 7 secs 0 Comments



Matthew Perry’s doctor sentenced to prison for supplying ketamine



Source link

TAGS:
PREVIOUS
Deadly Israeli strike starts fire in Gaza tent camp
NEXT
Dec. 3, 2025, 5:57 PM ESTBy Angela YangWith short-form video now dominant on social media, researchers are racing to understand how the highly engaging, algorithm-driven format may be reshaping the brain.From TikTok to Instagram Reels and YouTube Shorts, short-form video content has become a cornerstone of just about every online platform, including LinkedIn and even Substack. But increasingly, studies are finding associations between heavy consumption of short-form video and challenges with focus and self-control.The research, though still early, seems to echo widespread concerns over “brain rot,” an internet slang term that the Oxford University Press defines as “the supposed deterioration of a person’s mental or intellectual state.” (The term became so mainstream that the academic publishing house crowned it as its 2024 word of the year.)A September review of 71 studies with a total of nearly 100,000 participants found that heavy consumption of short-form video was associated with poorer cognition, especially in regard to attention spans and impulse control, based on a combination of behavioral tests and self-reported data.The review, published in Psychological Bulletin, a journal of the American Psychological Association, also found links between heavy consumption of the videos and increased symptoms of depression, anxiety, stress and loneliness.A paper published in October, which summarized 14 studies of short-form video use, similarly described associations between heavy use and shorter attention spans, as well as poorer academic performance.Despite growing alarm, some researchers say the long-term picture is still unclear.James Jackson, a neuropsychologist at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, said there’s a long history of people crusading against new technologies and cultural phenomena, whether it’s video games or Elvis concerts. So he’s cautious about overreacting to the rise of short-form video, but he said nonetheless that he believes many of the concerns are justified.“The narrative that the only people who are worried about this are grumpy old grandpas who are yelling at you to get off their lawn or the idea that if you’re concerned about this you’re not in step with the times, I think that’s really simplistic,” Jackson said.Current research on the topic, he said, suggests that short-form video broadly seems to have harmful effects on the brain when it’s consumed in large doses. But it will take more research to parse the nuances, such as who’s most vulnerable, how permanent the effects are and which particular mechanisms cause harm.Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder diagnoses are rising in the U.S. About 1 in 9 children had received an ADHD diagnosis by 2022, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.But Keith Robert Head, a doctoral student in social work at Capella University in Minneapolis who authored the October paper, said there’s overlap between symptoms of ADHD and the risks he identified.“So one of the questions that would be interesting for researchers to study is: Are these ADHD diagnoses actually ADHD, or is it an impact from the continued use of short-form video?” Head said.Three experts told NBC News that research into the long-term impacts of excessive short-form video use is still emerging, especially in the U.S. However, studies from researchers around the world, including the U.K., Jordan, Saudi Arabia and Egypt, have also found associations between consumption of the videos and issues like attention problems, memory disruption and cognitive fatigue.Those studies don’t establish cause and effect, though, and most so far describe only a moment in time, rather than follow subjects for a longer period. Dr. Nidhi Gupta, a pediatric endocrinologist who researches the effects of screen time, said that while much of the existing body of research on short-term video consumption has centered on younger people, she’s eager to see more focus on older adults. They often have time on their hands and are less technologically savvy, so they might also be vulnerable to the risks of short-form content, she said.It may take many years of further study, Gupta added, to determine whether cognitive changes associated with short-form media consumption are reversible. But she’s concerned that it has created a new type of addiction — she describes it as “video games and TV on steroids.”“It might be too early to claim universal doom,” Gupta said. “The research for alcohol, cigarettes and drugs took 75 years or more to develop. But I would be surprised if, in the next five to 10 years, we do not have similar signs validating the moral panic that we have around short-form videos.”Jackson, however, said short-form video can also be useful, as it has created opportunities for learning and community-building online. What’s important, he said, is balance: “There are people that engage with short-form videos in ways that are value-added, for sure. But if their engagement is pulling them away from other, more healthy opportunities, if it is isolating them from other people, if it is creating situations where they’re less and less likely to just sit around and be bored, I think that’s a problem.”Angela YangAngela Yang is a culture and trends reporter for NBC News.
Related Post
November 7, 2025
'It's been awful': Passengers experience rough travels amid FAA flight disruptions
November 13, 2025
Nov. 12, 2025, 1:29 PM EST / Updated Nov. 12, 2025, 8:44 PM ESTBy Sahil Kapur, Scott Wong and Kyle StewartWASHINGTON — The House on Wednesday night voted to pass legislation to reopen the federal government and end an acrimonious 43-day shutdown, the longest in American history.The successful vote came after Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., brought the Republican-controlled chamber back into session for the first time since Sept. 19, wrapping up an extraordinarily long and unscheduled recess.The House passed the measure in a 222-209 vote, with six Democrats joining nearly all Republicans in voting yes and two Republicans joining most Democrats in voting no. The Senate had approved the same legislation Monday when eight Democrats peeled off and voted with Republicans to break a filibuster to end the shutdown.The bill now heads to President Donald Trump’s desk to become law and reopen the government, restoring funding that has been frozen or halted.Before the vote, Johnson apologized to Americans for the disruptive shutdown, blaming Democrats for mass flight delays and cancellations, millions of civilian workers going without pay, and families going hungry. He said Senate Democrats blocked a bill to fund the government 14 times before ultimately caving.“While the Democrats keep voting to shut their government down, Republicans are going to vote to open it back up,” Johnson said in a floor speech before the vote. “And with that, we’re going to get the American government running again and working for the people, as they deserve.”The package includes a “minibus” of three appropriations bills through next September and keeps the rest of the government open at current levels through Jan. 30.It includes full funding for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, also known as food stamps, which will keep the program afloat through September. More than 40 million Americans rely on SNAP. Some told NBC News that they ran out of food as the shutdown cut off money for the program, and the Trump administration fought in the courts against having to shift money around to fully fund it.The legislation also provides limited protections for federal workers who’ve been under assault since Trump’s inauguration. It reinstates thousands of workers who were laid off during the shutdown and ensures there are no more reductions in force (known as “RIFs”), at least through the end of January. And it provides back pay for workers who were furloughed or working without pay these past six weeks.But in a major concession from Democrats, the bill does not include an extension of enhanced subsidies under the Affordable Care Act, or Obamacare, after Republicans held firm against extending those funds beyond this year. That means more than 20 million Americans could see their premiums spike next year.Many House and Senate Democrats are fuming over the failure to secure health care funding as part of the bill. Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., has promised a Senate vote on a to-be-determined ACA funding bill, with no guarantees that it will pass. Johnson has not promised a vote in the House. “We cannot enable this kind of cruelty with our cowardice,” said progressive Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y. In the House Rules Committee on Tuesday, Republicans rejected Democratic motions to guarantee a floor vote on an ACA funding extension, and turned away an amendment by Rep. Steven Horsford, D-Nev., to redirect Trump’s $40 billion “bailout” to Argentina and instead put that to extending ACA funding.“I guess MAGA stands for MAKE ARGENTINA GREAT AGAIN,” Rep. Teresa Leger Fernández, D-N.M., said in response.#embed-20251002-shutdown-milestones iframe {width: 1px;min-width: 100%}In a bullish sign for the legislation’s prospects, the sometimes rebellious House Freedom Caucus circulated talking points internally praising the bill, which were obtained by NBC News. The document calls it a “responsible CR” that funds the government into 2026 and avoids a “bloated” omnibus to be negotiated over Christmas. And, it notes, the appropriations bills in the minibus either kept spending flat or contained only modest increases.“The House Freedom Caucus has fought in lock-step with President Trump and Republican leadership in Congress,” the Freedom Caucus document said.The two Republicans who bucked their leadership and voted against the bill Wednesday night were Reps. Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Greg Steube of Florida.The six Democrats who broke with their party and voted yes all hail from swing districts: Reps. Henry Cuellar of Texas, Don Davis of North Carolina, Marie Glusenkamp Perez of Washington, Jared Golden of Maine, Adam Gray of California, and Tom Suozzi of New York. Golden is not seeking re-election next year.Tucked inside the bill is a provision that is generating heavy pushback from Democrats and even some grumbling among House Republicans. It would allow senators — but not House members — to sue the federal government for hundreds of thousands of dollars if their phone records were obtained without prior notification as part of the Jan. 6, 2021, investigation. It appears to apply to eight specific GOP senators.Although emotions are raw in the Democratic caucus over some of their senators caving, party leaders say the high-stakes showdown with Trump and the Republicans “crystallized” how Democrats are fighting for health care and affordability for millions of Americans. That economic message, they say, juiced turnout and propelled them to victory in last week’s elections in Virginia and New Jersey and will help the party in 2026.“That will be one of the defining contrasts of the midterms: Democrats working on behalf of the people to lower costs versus Republicans who have made life more expensive for everyday families,” Rep. Suzan DelBene, D-Wash., head of the House Democrats’ campaign arm, said in a statement to NBC News.“The House Democrats have the better message, stronger candidates, and as we all saw in last week’s elections, the American people are on our side as we go into the midterms,” the statement said.Shortly before Wednesday’s vote, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., filed a discharge petition in a bid to bypass Johnson and force a future floor vote on a three-year extension of the expiring Obamacare subsidies. But that would need the support of at least four House Republicans to force a vote.“We’ll fight until we win this battle for the American people. That’s our commitment as House Democrats,” Jeffries said on the floor, adding that the fight will end either Republicans accept a funding extension to prevent premium hikes, “or the American people will throw Republicans out of their jobs next year and end the speakership of Donald J. Trump once and for all.”The U.S. Capitol is shown the morning after the Senate passed legislation to reopen the federal government on November 11, 2025 on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC. The Senate reached a deal late Sunday to fund the government, aiming to end the longest shutdown in history once the House of Representatives votes on the legislation later this week.Win McNamee / Getty ImagesThere was plenty of pain during the six-week impasse, some of it caused by the Trump administration as it tried to ramp up pressure on the targeted bloc of moderate Senate Democrats. In addition to the mass layoffs, the White House had threatened to halt SNAP payments to states until the shutdown ended; it ultimately doled out partial payments under a judge’s order, while fighting the issue up to the Supreme Court.On top of that, Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy last week announced that the Federal Aviation Administration would have to cut the number of flights in American skies by 4% starting last weekend and ramped up reductions to 6% by Tuesday, due to air traffic controller staffing shortages spurred by the shutdown.Thousands of flights have been either delayed or canceled, snarling airports nationwide. It is expected to take a few days for airports to recover after the bill is signed into law.And while the end of the shutdown will spark a new debate about the expiring health care funds, some conservatives feel emboldened in their push to end them, including Rep. Ralph Norman, R-S.C.. who said shortly before the final vote that the money should “absolutely” expire.“There’s not gonna be any deal cut,” Norman said Wednesday evening, adding that he believes Johnson shares his view.Sahil KapurSahil Kapur is a senior national political reporter for NBC News.Scott WongScott Wong is a senior congressional reporter for NBC News. Kyle StewartKyle Stewart is a producer and off-air reporter covering Congress for NBC News, managing coverage of the House.Lillie Boudreaux, Frank Thorp V and Brennan Leach contributed.
November 15, 2025
Air traffic slowly improves after government reopens
October 7, 2025
FAA announces possible staffing issues potentially caused by government shutdown 
Comments are closed.
Scroll To Top
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics
© Copyright 2025 - Be That ! . All Rights Reserved