Dec. 6, 2025, 6:00 AM ESTBy Mithil AggarwalHONG…
Dec. 6, 2025, 9:05 AM ESTBy Rohan NadkarniAt…
How might the U.S. fare in the 2026…
Dec. 6, 2025, 5:46 PM ESTBy Marlene LenthangAs…

Be that!

contact@bethat.ne.com

Menu ≡ ╳

Home
Travel
Culture
Lifestyle
Sport
Contact Us
Politics Politics

Be that!

New letter summarizes Trump’s MRI results

admin - Latest News - December 1, 2025

admin

9 views 5 secs 0 Comments

New letter summarizes Trump’s MRI results

Source link

TAGS:

PREVIOUS

Megan Thee Stallion wins defamation lawsuit against blogger

NEXT

Dec. 1, 2025, 4:36 PM ESTBy Dareh Gregorian and Rebecca ShabadThe White House on Monday released a summary of the results of a magnetic resonance imaging scan President Donald Trump underwent in what had been described as a “routine” physical in October, with the president’s doctor saying he’s in “excellent” health.The White House physician, Sean P. Barbabella, wrote in a memo that the MRI was of Trump’s cardiovascular system and abdomen, and said all of the imaging was “perfectly normal.” He said that the imaging was done “because men in his age group benefit from a thorough evaluation of cardiovascular and abdominal health.”Trump is 79.“The purpose of this imaging is preventive: to identify issues early, confirm overall health, and ensure he maintains long-term vitality and function,” the memo says.Barbabella wrote that there was “no evidence of arterial narrowing impairing blood flow or abnormalities in the heart or major vessels. The heart chambers are normal in size, the vessel walls appear smooth and healthy, and there are no signs of inflammation, or clotting.”As for the abdominal imaging, he wrote that “all major organs appear very health and well-perfused. Everything evaluated is functioning within normal limits with no acute or chronic concerns.”The memo called the type of scan “standard for an executive physical at President Trump’s age.”Such imaging is not standard during the typical annual physical, but some high-end “executive physicals” used by hospitals can include scans like full-body MRIs.The scan was done on Oct. 10, during what White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt described as Trump’s “routine yearly checkup” — even though he’d undergone an annual physical exam in April.A memo from Barbabella in October said the checkup was part of Trump’s “ongoing health maintenance plan.” The president underwent “advanced imaging, laboratory testing, and preventative health assessments,” the doctor wrote, not specifically mentioning the MRI.Trump revealed he’d had the MRI scan over two weeks after the exam, while talking to reporters on Air Force One en route to Japan.“We had an MRI, MRI and the machine, you know, the whole thing, and it was perfect,” he said Oct. 27. Asked for details, Trump said, “You can ask the doctors.”“I think they gave you a very conclusive — nobody has ever given you reports like I gave you. And if I didn’t think it was going to be good, either I would let you know negatively, I wouldn’t run, I’d do something. But the doctors said some of the best reports for the age, some of the best reports they’ve ever seen,” he said at the time.Speaking to reporters on Air Force One during a Nov. 14 trip, he again did not say what had been scanned, and said the testing was “standard.””I have no idea what they analyze, but whatever they analyze, they analyze it well, and they said that I had as good a result as they’ve ever seen,” he said.Speaking to reporters Sunday, the president again said he had “no idea” what was scanned. “What part of the body? It wasn’t the brain because I took a cognitive test and I aced it,” he said, before saying he would release the records.Leavitt read the new memo from the doctor during her daily briefing Monday, and said it shows how transparent the administration is.”I think that’s quite a bit of a detail. And in the effort of transparency, the president promised it last night and we have delivered today,” she said.Dareh GregorianDareh Gregorian is a politics reporter for NBC News.Rebecca ShabadRebecca Shabad is a politics reporter for NBC News based in Washington.Akshay Syal, M.D. contributed.

Related Post

October 1, 2025

Oct. 1, 2025, 6:00 AM EDTBy Denise ChowIf an asteroid is on a collision course with the moon, what should humanity do? Try to nudge the space rock out of the way before it strikes? Obliterate it with a nuclear explosion?Those are the questions explored in a recent paper from more than a dozen researchers, including several NASA scientists. And they’re not purely hypothetical: An asteroid known as 2024 YR4 is estimated to have a 4% chance of hitting the moon in 2032.Such a cosmic collision could produce debris “up to 1,000 times above background levels over just a few days, possibly threatening astronauts and spacecraft” in low-Earth orbit, the researchers wrote in the paper, which was uploaded to the preprint website arXiv on Sept. 15 but has yet to be peer-reviewed.To avoid creating that potentially dangerous debris field, one option is to nuke the asteroid, according to the paper — or trigger what the scientists call a “robust disruption” — before it reaches the moon. Cue the “Armageddon” movie references.But using a nuclear explosion to destroy an asteroid has never been tested, so the plan would come with a slew of major risks.Various key characteristics about asteroid 2024 YR4 aren’t known, including its mass, which would be critical in figuring out how to properly “disrupt” it without creating more problems.“If the explosion is not enough, you’re just going to create a debris field anyway,” said Julie Brisset, interim director of the Florida Space Institute, who wasn’t involved with the paper.Asteroid 2024 YR4 was first detected by the Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System station in Chile in December. NASA estimates that it measures up to 220 feet across, large enough to be considered a “city killer” because it could be capable of causing severe damage to a city or region on Earth.Experts initially thought there was a small chance the asteroid could hit our planet, and the probability of such an impact was estimated to be as high as 3% earlier this year. But a collision with Earth was later ruled out.With Earth now thought to be in the clear, asteroid 2024 YR4 has an estimated 4.3% chance of smacking into the moon.The authors of the recent paper suggested launching a mission to conduct reconnaissance of the asteroid, including estimating its mass from up close. After that, they proposed, an explosive device could be built, then deployed to the space rock.Alternatively, if destroying the asteroid with a nuclear explosion is too extreme, the researchers detailed how it could be nudged out of the way.NASA has some experience with that: In a first-of-its-kind test in 2022, its DART probe intentionally crashed into a small space rock known as Dimorphos to alter its trajectory. The maneuver was carried out 6.8 million miles from Earth and changed Dimorphos’ path in space, shortening its orbit by 33 minutes, according to NASA.But a successful deflection would also require knowing the mass of asteroid 2024 YR4, Brisset said.In response to an NBC News inquiry to NASA about the recent paper, Kelly Fast, the agency’s acting planetary defense officer, said in a statement that there are no plans to deflect or otherwise interfere with the asteroid.However, she said there are plans to study it early next year using the James Webb Space Telescope. Any findings could provide better insight into its orbital path.“If observed, the additional data could improve our knowledge of where the asteroid will be in December 2032,” Fast said, “and could drop the impact probability to 0%.”Even if space missions like those described in the paper could be carried out, there would be political considerations to navigate.Although no astronauts or long-term habitats are on the moon, that might not always be the case. China, for instance, has said it aims to land its astronauts on the moon by 2030. Chinese officials have also said the country may build a nuclear plant on the lunar surface to power a moon base that it plans to jointly operate with Russia. The United States plans to launch regular missions to the lunar surface before NASA eventually ventures to Mars. But NASA’s future missions and priorities remain in flux amid significant personnel cuts and President Donald Trump’s budget blueprint for NASA, which proposes slashing more than $6 billion from its budget.Detonating a nuclear device in space could also add tension to the burgeoning space race among the United States, China and other spacefaring countries, with potential conflicts over which countries and space agencies would lead or participate in the project, Brisset said.“It would probably be countries that have the technical capability to do it,” she said, “which maybe narrows it down to three or four, but would they want to work together?”Denise ChowDenise Chow is a science and space reporter for NBC News.

September 30, 2025

AI 'actor' draws backlash in Hollywood

October 26, 2025

Oct. 26, 2025, 9:51 AM EDTBy Freddie ClaytonA number of countries have offered to take part in the international stabilization force expected to operate in Gaza, Secretary of State Marco Rubio has said, even as key details, including its mandate, were still being negotiated.Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Sunday that Israel would determine “which forces are unacceptable to us.”“This is, of course, acceptable to the United States as well, as its most senior representatives have expressed in recent days,” Netanyahu told a session of his Cabinet.During a visit to Israel, Rubio said Friday that the force would have to be made up of countries that Israel is “comfortable with,” adding that any potential role for the Palestinian Authority has yet to be determined.The discussions come as President Donald Trump said the U.S.-backed ceasefire in Gaza remained strong, even as Israel launched a fresh airstrike in the enclave on Saturday, and as tensions escalate over the bodies of 13 hostages that remain in Gaza.Israeli forces carried out a “targeted strike” on an individual in central Gaza on Saturday, Israel’s military said, the latest incident since the ceasefire came into effect.The attack targeted “a terrorist from the Islamic Jihad terrorist organization who planned to carry out an imminent terrorist attack against IDF troops,” the Israeli military said in a statement.On Saturday, Rubio said a number of countries have offered to take part in the force to support the demilitarization of Gaza and monitor compliance with the ceasefire between Israel and Hamas.But he stressed that many governments first need clarity on the force’s legal basis and rules of engagement.“I think they’d want to know what’s the mandate, what’s the mission, what are the rules of engagement, what is this force supposed to do,” Rubio told reporters. “All of that’s being worked on.” Rubio added that the force would have to be an “international mission” that could work as part of an agreement through the United Nations.“A lot of countries have expressed interest,” he said, without specifying which countries. “I think they want to know what it is they’re signing up for, which is a very reasonable thing.”Indonesia, the United Arab Emirates, Egypt, Qatar and Azerbaijan were among the countries that had “raised their hand” to contribute, two senior U.S. advisers said last week.Trump said Saturday he discussed the Gaza peace deal with Qatari Emir Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani during a meeting aboard Air Force One on Saturday on his way to Asia.Asked by reporters after the meeting when a stabilization force would be ready to deploy in Gaza, Trump replied, “pretty quickly.”“They’re actually picking leaders right now,” he said. “This is real peace.”A U.S.-backed ceasefire remains in force in Gaza, but each side has accused the other of violations. As part of the ceasefire agreement, Hamas returned all living Israeli hostages, but the remains of 13 are still in the enclave. The group has warned it will take time to locate and recover the remains.In a post on Truth Social on Saturday, Trump said that Hamas must return the remaining bodies of deceased hostages, or “the other Countries involved in this GREAT PEACE will take action.”“When I said, ‘Both sides would be treated fairly,’ that only applies if they comply with their obligations. Let’s see what they do over the next 48 hours,” he wrote.Freddie ClaytonFreddie Clayton is a freelance journalist based in London.

December 5, 2025

The last supermoon of 2025 rises over South America

Comments are closed.

Home
Travel
Culture
Lifestyle
Sport
Contact Us
Politics

© Copyright 2025 - Be That ! . All Rights Reserved