• Police seek suspects in deadly birthday party shooting
  • Lawmakers launch inquires into U.S. boat strike
  • Nov. 29, 2025, 10:07 PM EST / Updated Nov. 30, 2025,…
  • Mark Kelly says troops ‘can tell’ what orders…

Be that!

contact@bethat.ne.com

 

Be That ! Menu   ≡ ╳
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics Politics
☰

Be that!

Nov. 11, 2025, 12:52 PM ESTBy Mirna Alsharif, Austin Mullen and Aria BendixBaby formula maker ByHeart is recalling all of its products amid an outbreak of infant botulism likely tied to its powdered formula.Since August, 15 cases have been reported across 12 states, nearly all among babies between 16 days and around 5 months old, according to the Food and Drug Administration.After the FDA announced Saturday that it was investigating the outbreak and its link to ByHeart’s organic Whole Nutrition Infant Formula, the company recalled two lots of the product. ByHeart then expanded the recall Tuesday to include all batches of the formula, both in cans and “anywhere packs” — small, sealed pouches.”The safety and well‑being of every infant who uses our formula is, and always will be, our highest priority,” ByHeart’s co-founder and president, Mia Funt, said in a statement. “This nationwide recall reflects our commitment to protecting babies and giving families clear, actionable information. Alongside this recall, we are conducting a comprehensive investigation to do our part to get the answers parents expect and deserve.”Infant botulism arises when babies ingest food contaminated with Clostridium botulinum bacteria, which produce a toxin that affects the body’s nervous system. The infection can cause constipation, poor feeding, loss of head control and difficulty swallowing. Untreated, it can ultimately lead to paralysis and death, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. No deaths have been reported in the current outbreak.The FDA said Tuesday that 84 infants nationwide have received treatment for infant botulism since Aug. 1. Of that total, the agency is investigating 15 cases with “suspected or confirmed infant botulism and confirmed exposure to Byheart Whole Nutrition infant formula.” All of those infants were hospitalized.”This information shows that ByHeart brand formula is disproportionately represented among sick infants in this outbreak, especially given that ByHeart represents an estimated 1% of all infant formula sales in the United States,” the FDA said in an update Tuesday. “Investigations remain ongoing but have not identified any other infant formula brands or shared exposures that pose a risk to infants.”The cases linked to ByHeart formula have been reported in Arizona, California, Illinois, Kentucky, Minnesota, North Carolina, New Jersey, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Texas and Washington, according to the FDA. The agency instructed parents and caregivers to immediately stop using any ByHeart infant formula products and keep a close eye on children who consumed it recently, as botulism can take weeks to develop. If a child does not develop symptoms within 30 days, the agency says to throw the formula away. If a child does develop symptoms, however, the FDA advises that parents or caregivers hold on to the product for testing. Children who consumed ByHeart formula and are exhibiting possible botulism symptoms should receive immediate medical attention. The New York City-based company said it has invited the FDA and other public health agencies to test unopened cans of its formula to “provide reliable evidence that will help bring clarity to families who are understandably concerned, as currently, no U.S. or imported formula is required to be tested for Clostridium botulinum.”The California Public Health Department was first to report the observed increase in infant botulism cases among babies who consumed ByHeart formula. “As the FDA and CDPH continue their investigations, we stand ready to partner with them at every step, providing full access to our facilities and unopened cans, without restriction,” ByHeart said in an open letter issued Tuesday.Most recalls of infant formula in the past few years have occurred because of potential contamination with a different type of bacteria, Cronobacter sakazakii, which can also be life-threatening in infants. In 2022, Abbott Nutrition, one of the country’s top formula producers, recalled several brands of powdered infant formula after complaints of bacterial infections in infants who consumed the products. The recall contributed to a national formula shortage in 2022.The CDC later determined that Cronobacter infections may have contributed to the deaths of two infants in Ohio but was not able to definitively link the illnesses to contamination at an Abbott facility. Abbott said at the time that there was “no evidence” to demonstrate a link.Mirna AlsharifMirna Alsharif is a breaking news reporter for NBC News.Austin MullenAria BendixAria Bendix is the breaking health reporter for NBC News Digital.

admin - Latest News - November 11, 2025
admin
13 views 13 secs 0 Comments




Infant formula maker ByHeart is recalling all of its products amid an outbreak of botulism likely tied to its organic powdered formula.



Source link

TAGS:
PREVIOUS
Researchers in Australia discover the 'Lucifer' bee
NEXT
Nov. 11, 2025, 1:31 PM ESTBy Sahil KapurWASHINGTON — Senate Republicans say they’re open to extending a pot of Affordable Care Act funds that will expire at the end of the year — but only if Democrats acquiesce to stricter abortion restrictions on insurance plans.The demand presents a significant hurdle to reaching a bipartisan deal to extend ACA funding designed to avoid major premium hikes next year for more than 20 million Americans, as Democrats are adamant that existing abortion guardrails under Obamacare are sufficient.If the funds are not extended by the end of the year, some people insured under Obamacare could see their bills rise by thousands of dollars per month, raising concerns that millions will choose to go uninsured.Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., said there will be a negotiation about an extension after the government reopens. He said one condition will be stricter rules pertaining to the Hyde amendment, which bars federal funding from being used for abortion.Senate Democrats only got a ‘pink promise’ on health care subsidies, says House Democrat08:00To satisfy Democratic demands to comply with the Hyde amendment when the first law passed in 2010, Obamacare does not allow federal funds to cover abortions. Some states allow people insured under Obamacare to access abortion coverage using state or other funding. Republicans want to change that.“That’s what we’re going to negotiate,” Thune told reporters before the Senate passed the bill to end the government shutdown. “A one-year extension along the lines of what [Democrats] are suggesting, and without Hyde protections — there’s just not even, doesn’t even get close.”Thune’s demand for more stringent abortion limits on Obamacare money is backed by colleagues, including Sen. Mike Rounds, R-S.C., an outspoken proponent of extending the ACA funds, as well as Sens. Steve Daines, R-Mont., and Mike Lee, R-Utah.Rounds warned that “you won’t get any” Republican votes to extend the money without more stringent abortion limitations.“That’s the message that we shared with a lot of our Democratic colleagues is you can’t do it under your existing framework, and you’re never going to get any Republican votes. Because we believe strongly taxpayer dollars should not go to fund abortions,” he said. “They have a different point of view, but it’s pretty clear that Republicans are solid on that particular issue.”But Democrats say there’s no way they’ll agree to that.Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H., responded with a flat “no” when asked if there’s any way Democrats agree to stricter abortion limitations in order to extend the ACA funds.“It’s a nonstarter,” Shaheen told NBC News, pointing to existing guardrails on abortion funding built into the ACA. “It’s not an issue. We already dealt with that issue.”Other Democrats share her opposition to changing those rules.Behind the push is a pressure campaign by Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America, an influential group fighting to ban abortion in the U.S., to condition Republican support for ACA funding on tougher abortion restrictions.“Since Democrat offers to pass a ‘clean’ extension of these ACA subsidies would extend funding of elective abortion coverage through Obamacare, Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America strongly opposes and will score against any such offers — even for one year,” SBA President Marjorie Dannenfelser told senators in a letter dated Nov. 7 and shared with NBC News. “A vote for this extension is a vote for abortion coverage. Votes will be scored, and double-weighted, in each member’s profile on SBA Pro-Life America’s National Pro-Life Scorecard.”Katie Keith, a Georgetown Law professor and founding director of its Center for Health Policy and the Law, said existing law bans any federal funds from flowing to abortion care through ACA plans, including the premium tax credits and cost-sharing reduction payments, consistent with the Hyde amendment.States have the option to create separate revenue streams where enrollees can pay a surcharge to gain abortion coverage through their plans. 25 states ban abortion coverage through ACA marketplaces entirely. The rest are split between requiring it through additional state funding or deferring to insurers.Still, even for states that allow ACA plans to cover abortion, “there are strict segregation requirements,” Keith said. “Since the law was enacted, no federal funds flow toward abortion care.”She said the same rule applies to Medicaid funding.“What critics of the current policy are arguing is they want Hyde plus-plus. This goes far beyond what Hyde requires,” she added. “It’s not about federal funds flowing toward the care, it’s about federal funds flowing toward coverage, even if it’s financed separately. … They want to knock out abortion coverage fully.”And if the SBA proposal becomes law, it would create a serious conflict with the dozen blue states that use their own funds to permit abortion coverage through the ACA marketplaces.“It could knock out federal subsidies for coverage altogether in those states if those funds cannot flow,” said Keith, who worked a stint in the Biden administration before returning to Georgetown.Daines, who sits on the Finance Committee that oversees health policy, said additional Hyde protections have “got to be in there, absolutely” — in any ACA deal.“We’ve got the language for it, the Hyde language,” he said. “Hyde has been a longstanding principle here of not allowing the federal taxpayers to be used for abortion.”Shaheen, a moderate Democrat who is not seeking re-election next year, is the author of a permanent ACA funding extension. She also helped craft the deal to reopen the government. She said she’s open to other reforms to the enhanced ACA tax credits, such as income-based limits, but going beyond existing abortion limitations is a red line.Other Democrats take a similar view.“I don’t think you’re going to get Democratic votes talking about abortion,” said Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn. “But there are conversations you can have about the structure of the subsidies once you get into a negotiation. I’ve heard their concerns about income caps and no-premium plans.”Sen. Brian Schatz, D-Hawaii, said the GOP’s abortion demand seems like a smokescreen to disguise the party’s unwillingness to continue that money, which was first passed during the Covid pandemic in 2021 and extended the following year. The subsidies limit premiums to 8.5% of an enrollee’s income.“At that point, they’re just unserious about extending the ACA [funds],” he said. “Once they get into restrictions on abortion, everyone knows what that means. It means that they would like to say they’re for extending ACA, but that they don’t have the votes to do it right now.”Schatz indicated that President Donald Trump, who softened his position on abortion during the 2024 campaign and said it should be left up to states, can steer his party to a viable solution.“This is solved in 10 seconds if Donald Trump wants it solved,” Schatz said.Sahil KapurSahil Kapur is a senior national political reporter for NBC News.Frank Thorp V and Scott Wong contributed.
Related Post
November 17, 2025
Trump says he supports release of Epstein files
November 1, 2025
Houston hosts food aid ‘supersite’ with SNAP in limbo
November 5, 2025
Philadelphia restaurants hit with fake one-star reviews
November 9, 2025
Nov. 9, 2025, 2:27 PM ESTBy Alexandra MarquezPresident Donald Trump this weekend floated directly paying Americans for their health care costs and giving out $2,000 dividends from tariff revenue, ideas that administration officials later said were not formal proposals being sent to the Senate.In one Truth Social post on Saturday, the president wrote, “I am recommending to Senate Republicans that the Hundreds of Billions of Dollars currently being sent to money sucking Insurance Companies in order to save the bad Healthcare provided by ObamaCare, BE SENT DIRECTLY TO THE PEOPLE SO THAT THEY CAN PURCHASE THEIR OWN, MUCH BETTER, HEALTHCARE.”The following day, he again posted that Republicans should give money directly to people’s health savings accounts, which allow people to save pretax money that can be used for certain medical expenses.Referring to his tariff agenda, Trump wrote, “We are taking in Trillions of Dollars and will soon begin paying down our ENORMOUS DEBT, $37 Trillion. Record Investment in the USA, plants and factories going up all over the place. A dividend of at least $2000 a person (not including high income people!) will be paid to everyone.”Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Sunday that the president’s recommendation to Senate Republicans on health care was not yet fully worked out.“We don’t have a formal proposal,” Bessent told ABC’s “This Week,” adding, “We’re not proposing it to the Senate right now, no.”Bessent said any such proposal was contingent on ending the government shutdown, which on Monday will stretch into its 40th day.“The president is posting about it, but again, we have got to get the government reopened before we do this. We are not going to negotiate with the Democrats until they reopen the government. It’s very simple,” he said.Kevin Hassett, the director of the National Economic Council, similarly downplayed the idea on CBS News’ “Face the Nation” Sunday morning.“He’s brainstorming and trying to help the Senate come up with a deal that can get the government open,” Hassett said.“Everybody believes that people should have health care, and so why not take the people who have higher health care premiums and just mail them a check and let them decide,” he added.Hassett said the idea hasn’t been widely discussed within the Senate or the Trump administration.“The president started this idea yesterday. I don’t think that it’s been discussed widely in the Senate yet. It’s the weekend,” Hassett added. The Senate remained in Washington over the weekend, gaveling into rare Saturday and Sunday sessions to continue discussions about how to end the shutdown.Bessent was also asked on ABC about Trump’s proposal to give people a $2,000 tariff “dividend.” He said he hadn’t yet spoken to the president about it, but that it “could come in lots of forms.”“It could be just the tax decreases that we are seeing on the president’s agenda: no tax on tips, no tax on overtime, no tax on Social Security, deductibility of auto loans,” he said. “So those are substantial deductions that are being financed in the tax bill.”The idea of sending tariff rebate checks came up earlier this year as well.After Trump in July said he would favor sending tariff rebate checks to Americans, Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., introduced a bill that would provide $600 checks to American adults and children using tariff revenue. The Senate has not yet taken up that bill for a vote.Trump’s posts came as Democrats and Republicans on Capitol Hill remained in a stalemate over the ongoing government shutdown, with no clear path to a deal.An NBC News poll released earlier this month found that Americans blame Republicans more for the shutdown than they do Democrats.Democrats swept Tuesday’s elections, winning by larger-than-expected margins in key races in New Jersey and Virginia. Exit polls found that voters in those states generally disapproved of Trump’s job in office so far and were sour on the state of the U.S. economy.Since then, Trump has doubled down on his insistence that the economy is strong. In one of the Truth Social posts on Sunday, the president wrote, “People that are against Tariffs are FOOLS! We are now the Richest, Most Respected Country In the World, With Almost No Inflation, and A Record Stock Market Price. 401k’s are Highest EVER.”Still, the posts this weekend seemed to be an acknowledgment that Republicans may need to do more.In a memo Friday, Democratic National Committee Chair Ken Martin called Tuesday’s elections “an unequivocal Blue Sweep” brought about because “Donald Trump and the Republicans are screwing Americans, while Democrats are fighting for them.”Alexandra MarquezAlexandra Marquez is a politics reporter for NBC News.
Comments are closed.
Scroll To Top
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics
© Copyright 2025 - Be That ! . All Rights Reserved