• Police seek suspects in deadly birthday party shooting
  • Lawmakers launch inquires into U.S. boat strike
  • Nov. 29, 2025, 10:07 PM EST / Updated Nov. 30, 2025,…
  • Mark Kelly says troops ‘can tell’ what orders…

Be that!

contact@bethat.ne.com

 

Be That ! Menu   ≡ ╳
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics Politics
☰

Be that!

Nov. 11, 2025, 4:20 PM ESTBy Steve KopackFor only the second time in 10 years, one of America’s most broadly representative stock indexes, the S&P 500, is poised to give up its longtime spot as the world’s top performing stock index.But drill down deeper, and the scale of the S&P’s underperformance becomes even starker. Ranked against dozens of other countries’ indexes, the S&P’s annual performance so far is not even among the world’s top 20. Or the top 30, or 40.With annual returns of 16% through Monday, the S&P lands in 41st place among more than 60 stock indexes around the globe, according to an NBC News analysis. This number requires a few caveats, however. The companies in the S&P have created more value so far this year than listings on any other country’s index — more than $7.7 trillion in market value.That exceeds the annual economic output of every country on Earth, except the U.S. and China.Likewise, more than 5,400 companies choose to list their shares on the New York Stock Exchange or Nasdaq, according to the World Federation of Exchanges. This combined total gives the U.S. clear standing as the No. 1 destination for publicly traded companies outside of China.Still, the S&P’s relative performance this year is remarkably out of line with historical norms.window.addEventListener(“message”,function(a){if(void 0!==a.data[“datawrapper-height”]){var e=document.querySelectorAll(“iframe”);for(var t in a.data[“datawrapper-height”])for(var r,i=0;r=e[i];i++)if(r.contentWindow===a.source){var d=a.data[“datawrapper-height”][t]+”px”;r.style.height=d}}});On Wall Street, even the most bullish predictions for where the index will land at the end of 2025 would only bring the S&P just in line with the performance of most international markets.Another way to compare the S&P’s performance against the rest of the world is by comparing its returns to the MSCI All Country World Excluding U.S. Index, which tracks the indexes of 46 countries. The S&P 500 currently trails this index by more than 10%.That places the S&P on track to broadly underperform the rest of the world this year for only the second time in a decade, most recently in 2017.This gap in performance partly reflects the trade uncertainty that has cast a shadow over the U.S. economy since President Donald Trump began his second term in late January. Trump’s on-again-off-again tariff policies have caused investors around the world to look beyond the United States for more stable, safer opportunities. America’s mounting debt, a sinking U.S. dollar and Trump’s attacks on the independence of the Federal Reserve have also given investors pause.The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.Tariffs vs. AIAfter Trump won the 2024 election, stocks had a strong start to the year. Markets hit record highs in mid-February. But on worries about his tariff policies, markets plunged in March. When Trump rolled out his long-promised tariff policies in early April it sent markets spiraling further, with more than $5.8 trillion of value erased from the S&P 500 in a matter of days.On April 9, Trump announced he was pausing most of his global tariff rollout. Markets soared and the S&P 500 posted its third largest one-day gain in history. The Supreme Court is now considering the fate of Trump’s sweeping tariff agenda. Supreme Court hears oral arguments in Trump tariff case04:14If the administration loses, it could trigger refunds of the duties paid by importers due back to them, forcing the Treasury Department to issue new debt to pay for them, which could drive up yields.While tariff uncertainty has remained and the administration’s trade agenda has hit a number of speed bumps, most notably with China, equities have been buoyed by the rapidly expanding artificial intelligence boom.Trillions of dollars are being poured into the industry by companies and investments have sent the values of firms such as Nvidia, Apple, Amazon and Alphabet soaring to market values as high as $5 trillion. The U.S. currently has nine companies trading above $1 trillion in value. Fears have grown about a potential bubble in the sector. But still, the performance of U.S. stocks broadly lags the world by a wide margin.With AI and tech stocks fueling the momentum, a look at the other 493 companies in the S&P reveals some major differences. For the third quarter, those seven tech stocks are expected to post earnings growth of nearly 15%. The other 493 companies? The expectation is just 6.7%. “The economy is running at two speeds,” ABN AMRO senior economist Rogier Quaedvlieg wrote Tuesday. “AI and related sectors are thriving, whereas most other areas are stagnant or contracting.”The leadersThrough Monday, South Korea’s Kospi index held the No. 1 spot. The index that trades on the Korea Stock Exchange has posted a return of nearly 70% this year. “While semiconductor exports remain Korea’s central growth driver, the country is also emerging as a formidable defense exporter,” Franklin Templeton’s Dina Ting recently wrote. “Additionally, South Korea’s stock market has been buoyed by the rebound in its technology sector, notably semiconductors, as demand for memory chips recovers globally,” Ting added. “The country’s leadership in semiconductor manufacturing and AI-related investment are key drivers of this momentum.” window.addEventListener(“message”,function(a){if(void 0!==a.data[“datawrapper-height”]){var e=document.querySelectorAll(“iframe”);for(var t in a.data[“datawrapper-height”])for(var r,i=0;r=e[i];i++)if(r.contentWindow===a.source){var d=a.data[“datawrapper-height”][t]+”px”;r.style.height=d}}});After South Korea rank the likes of Kenya, Nigeria, Chile, Poland, Pakistan, Israel, Spain, Czechia and Jordan to round out the top 10.Not until more than 40 countries down the ranking does the S&P 500 appear. One of the ways that trade policies and tariffs have made the gap between the U.S. and other indexes wider than it might otherwise be is by weakening the U.S. dollar. The sinking dollar has helped propel international indexes higher. As the dollar weakens, the values of foreign investments and stock returns rise by comparison. In turn, a rising or stronger dollar would dampen the relative return of money invested outside the U.S.The currency factorThe Dollar Index, a measure of the U.S. currency’s strength against a basket of foreign currencies such as the pound, yen, euro, Swiss franc and Canadian dollar, has sunk 9% since the start of 2025. The continued erosion in the dollar’s value makes it more expensive for American companies and consumers to import goods, go on vacation or send money abroad.“I see signs that the attraction of the dollar is slightly eroded, and [the] future will tell whether there is more erosion of that,” European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde told CBS News in October.“For a currency to be really trusted you need a few things,” she said. “You need geopolitical credibility, you need the rule of law and strong institutions. And you need a military force that is strong enough.”“I think on at least one and possibly two accounts, the U.S. is still in a very dominant position,” Lagarde continued. But the central banker warned that the U.S. “needs to be very careful because those positions erode over the course of time.”Not everyone agrees. “The dollar’s been on a pretty good run over a long period of time and it’s certainly given back — this year given some of the policy actions — some of the gains, but fundamentally the dollar is the reserve currency of the world,” Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon said on Bloomberg Television on Oct. 30. “I don’t see anything at the moment that threatens that.”“I think it’s something to watch, but I’m not concerned that there’s some fundamental shift,” Solomon said.Steve KopackSteve Kopack is a senior reporter at NBC News covering business and the economy.

admin - Latest News - November 11, 2025
admin
13 views 15 secs 0 Comments




For only the second time in 10 years, the S&P 500 is poised to lag behind dozens of countries, even in a year of record highs.



Source link

TAGS:
PREVIOUS
What U.S. aircraft carrier in Caribbean could signal
NEXT
Supreme Court extends temporary pause on $4 billion in SNAP payments for November
Related Post
September 29, 2025
Sept. 29, 2025, 5:00 AM EDTBy Scott Wong, Sahil Kapur and Yamiche AlcindorWASHINGTON — President Donald Trump is scheduled to meet with the top four congressional leaders Monday in a high-stakes sit-down at the White House that could determine whether the federal government shuts down this week.Funding is set to run out at 12:01 a.m. Wednesday unless Trump and leaders on Capitol Hill can reach an eleventh-hour agreement.The Democratic leaders of the House and the Senate, Hakeem Jeffries and Chuck Schumer, both of New York, as well as their Republican counterparts, House Speaker Mike Johnson of Louisiana and Senate Majority Leader John Thune of South Dakota, are expected to attend.The standoff represents a test of wills between the parties, with Republicans determined to flex their muscle after they won full control of the government last year, while Democrats face a restive base and see a rare opportunity to advance health care policy goals, like extending key Obamacare subsidies.Six months ago, Democrats caved in to a GOP-written funding bill, but they insist that won’t happen again unless they have a say in the final legislative product.Even though Republicans control the White House and both chambers of Congress, Democrats have leverage because it takes 60 votes to pass a bill through the Senate; the GOP has 53 seats.Schumer made it clear Sunday on NBC’s “Meet the Press” that the only way to avoid a shutdown is for Republicans to get serious about negotiating with Democrats to win their votes, and he outlined demands on health care policy.“We need the meeting,” Schumer said. “It’s a first step, but only a first step. We need a serious negotiation. Now, if the president at this meeting is going to rant and just yell at Democrats and talk about all his alleged grievances and say this, that and the other thing, we won’t get anything done.”But Thune vowed that Republican leaders won’t negotiate on a short-term bill. Instead, he said, they’re willing to come to a compromise with Democrats on a longer-term government funding bill.“What the Democrats have done here is take the federal government as a hostage — and for that matter, by extension, the American people — to try and get a whole laundry list of things that they want that special interest groups on the far left are pushing them to accomplish,” Thune said on “Meet the Press.”Leader Thune says government shutdown is ‘totally up to the Democrats’: Full interview18:12Unless one party backs down or softens its demands, the U.S. government is on track for a shutdown in less than 48 hours. Senators will return to Washington on Monday evening with no clear plan, while the House is out of session.If the government shuts down, none of the millions of federal workers in the United States would be paid, and hundreds of thousands of them would be furloughed. In recent days, White House officials had tried to allow military personnel to continue receiving pay during a shutdown, according to a source familiar with the discussions, but those efforts were unsuccessful. So military personnel wouldn’t be paid during a shutdown, either.All federal workers, including military personnel, would be paid back after a shutdown ends, whether they were required to work during the closure or not.A prolonged government shutdown could put significant strain on federal workers and military members who would forgo their paychecks. But it also could be dangerous for a U.S. economy that is showing signs of fragility. While the stock market continues to hit highs, inflation has remained stubbornly high; Trump’s tariffs are hurting U.S. farmers, small businesses and consumers; and recent college graduates face a tough job market.Speaking to NBC News by phone Sunday, Trump warned that there could be a shutdown and reiterated an earlier threat that a closure could result in his administration’s mass firings of federal workers.“There is a possibility, yeah,” he said of a shutdown. “And if there is, we are going to cut a lot of the people that … we’re able to cut on a permanent basis, and we will be doing that. I’d rather not do that.”In addition to extending Obamacare funding, Democrats are demanding to roll back cuts and changes to Medicaid that were enacted in Trump’s sweeping domestic agenda law.Trump has responded by accusing Democrats of trying to permit health care for undocumented immigrants, which they flatly dismiss as a lie.“The problem we have with the shutdown is that Democrats want to do all health care for illegal immigrants … many of whom are criminal and that we are removing from our country,” Trump told NBC News. “We’re not going to do that.”Monday’s meeting is a sign that neither party wants a shutdown — or that both sides are concerned about getting blamed in the event of one. Trump abruptly canceled a meeting with Democratic leaders last week, making a shutdown seem practically inevitable. And Republicans and Democrats have been pointing fingers at each other in recent days as the deadline ticks closer. But the risk of a shutdown — which would be the first federal closure in Trump’s second term — remains extremely high. This month, the House passed a stopgap bill to avoid a shutdown that would extend government funding at current levels through Nov. 21. The House isn’t scheduled to be back in session until Oct. 7, one week after the shutdown deadline.The Senate rejected both the House-passed extension and a separate Democratic plan that would permanently extend Obamacare subsidies set to expire at the end of the year and reverse Medicaid cuts enacted in Trump’s “big, beautiful bill.”If a last-minute deal is unexpectedly reached, Johnson would need to call House members back to Washington on short notice to keep the government’s lights on. Although the House is out of session, Jeffries has asked House Democrats to return to Washington on Monday evening to show they are working to solve the impasse.Scott WongScott Wong is a senior congressional reporter for NBC News. Sahil KapurSahil Kapur is a senior national political reporter for NBC News.Yamiche AlcindorYamiche Alcindor is a White House correspondent for NBC News.Monica Alba contributed.
November 5, 2025
Two killed in U.S. strike on alleged drug boat
November 19, 2025
Nov. 18, 2025, 6:40 PM ESTBy Sahil Kapur, Melanie Zanona and Julie TsirkinWASHINGTON — Inside a closed-door meeting of House Republicans on Tuesday, Rep. Jen Kiggans, a swing district member who is a linchpin of the party’s narrow majority, stood up and made a plea. “Doing nothing on health care is not the right answer,” the Virginia Republican later told NBC News, summing up her message to colleagues. “I would really appreciate if we could have a timeline because we know that the end of the calendar year is coming, and I don’t want to see people’s premiums go up. I don’t want to see people lose their health insurance.”The remarks drew an unspectacular reception.“Average,” Kiggans replied when asked how it was received. “We line up, we have our one minute to state our case. Usual reaction.”Republicans seek an alternative to Obamacare03:33Republicans are careening to a health care cliff with no solution in hand. An estimated 22 million people in the U.S. are about to see their health insurance premiums soar by, in some cases, thousands of dollars per month, as billions in funding for the Affordable Care Act expires on Dec. 31. The expiring funds, costing about $35 billion per year, were first passed during the pandemic to subsidize insurance payments, capping premiums for a “benchmark” ACA, or “Obamacare,” plan to 8.5% of income.Kiggans has offered a bill to extend those funds for one year, as a stopgap option to prevent cost increases while Congress haggles over a longer-term solution.But just 14 Republicans have signed on. And her plea appears to be falling on deaf ears with the rest of the party.President Donald Trump and Republicans have dialed up their attacks on that pot of funding, making increasingly clear they won’t allow an extension in its current form.“It’s going to end,” Sen. Rick Scott, R-Fla., said Tuesday evening, citing Trump’s opposition as part of the reason.Instead, Republican leaders have deputized committee chairs and rank-and-file members to draft alternative options that would give the funds directly to people, perhaps through tax-advantaged health savings accounts (HSAs), flexible savings accounts (FSAs) or even direct cash payments.“The only healthcare I will support or approve is sending the money directly back to the people,” Trump wrote Tuesday in all caps on social media, saying he won’t accept a continuation of the ACA structure where the funds are provided to insurance companies to keep premiums down. “Congress, do not waste your time and energy on anything else,” Trump added.Party leaders have taken note.House Republican leadership railed against the ACA during a closed-door conference meeting Tuesday and made a forceful case against extending the subsidies, according to two lawmakers in attendance. Instead, Republican leaders presented other potential ideas to help lower health care costs.But at least one House Republican expressed frustration with how little time they have left to write, much less pass, an alternative before the looming ACA cliff. During Tuesday’s meeting, Rep. Nathaniel Moran of Texas stood up and complained that Republicans could have been working on their own health care plan “for months,” the two lawmakers in the room said, instead of six weeks before the tax credits expire.Trump told reporters in West Palm Beach on Sunday that he is talking with Democrats about a direct health care payment plan, saying: “I’ve had personal talks with some Democrats.”But a senior White House official on Tuesday could not identify a single Democrat with whom Trump has discussed the issue. On a call with reporters on Monday, Senate Health Committee Chair Bill Cassidy, R-La., couldn’t name a Democrat who is even open to the idea.“I’ll let Democrats speak for themselves, because I can’t tell you that they’ve all bought in,” he said.Any plan would require 60 votes to advance in the Senate, which means at least seven Democrats would have to support the legislation. Republicans have floated the prospect of using the filibuster-proof reconciliation process to push through a health care solution without Democrats, but a variety of their proposals would be deemed ineligible for that.Rep. Rob Bresnahan, R-Pa., who narrowly won a competitive district around Scranton, said expiration of the ACA money without a replacement plan would harm his constituents.“My district is especially hit hard on this. Ripping the rug out certainly is not the solution,” Bresnahan said. “So I am in support of extending the ACA, the enhanced premium tax credits, for some period of time.”Rep. Andy Harris, R-Md., said he’s certain ACA funds won’t be extended in their current form.“There is no way a clean extension comes to the House floor,” Harris said Tuesday after the GOP meeting, even suggesting that it would spark a revolt. “The business would stop in the House completely if an attempt was made to bring that to the floor.”Rep. Derrick Van Orden, R-Wis., who represents a competitive district that Democrats are targeting in 2026, blasted the law he called the “Unaffordable Care Act” as a failure. He said the subsidies prove that.“If you have to subsidize something, by definition, it’s not affordable,” Van Orden said, arguing that Democrats don’t “give a s—” about health care beyond their ability to benefit from it politically. “It’s all about their political survival, and it’s, quite frankly, revolting.”Cassidy said it’s “incorrect to assume that a temporary extension” of ACA funds “can be quickly implemented,” suggesting it’s too late because insurers have set rates for 2026. And even if Democrats prefer a short-term extension, he said, “the president’s not going to sign it.”Michael Linden, an economic policy expert who worked in the Biden White House budget office while the enhanced health care tax credits were crafted, said Republicans missed their chance to extend the subsidies earlier this year.“If Republicans in Congress had wanted to avoid big spikes in health care premiums, the logical moment for them to have done so was in the midst of their massive reconciliation bill,” he said.There may yet be an eleventh-hour push if Republicans are sitting on the brink of the new year with no health care plan.Rep. Jeff Van Drew, R-N.J., a co-sponsor of the Kiggans bill, said he might consider signing a “discharge petition” to end-run party leaders and force the measure to a House vote.“I would only think of it if nothing is done that’s satisfactory, and we just have some concepts, but nothing specific,” he said.Bresnahan didn’t shut the door to supporting a discharge petition but said that one offered by House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., to extend the subsidies for three years is “a little bit too long.” He said he’s also open to ideas to reform the existing ACA tax credits.Rep. Mike Lawler, R-N.Y., said he supports a one-year extension of ACA subsidies to give his party time to work on “longer-term issues” with the health care plan.“Right now, this should be negotiated between the House and the Senate. That will be the fastest way to get an agreement on this,” he said. “A discharge [petition] may move it out of the House, but if the Senate is not in agreement, it’s not going to go anywhere. The objective here is to get this done before the end of the year.”Sahil KapurSahil Kapur is a senior national political reporter for NBC News.Melanie ZanonaMelanie Zanona is a Capitol Hill correspondent for NBC News.Julie TsirkinJulie Tsirkin is a correspondent covering Capitol Hill.Peter Alexander contributed.
October 23, 2025
'Your winning streak has ended': Officials announce charges in sports corruption scheme
Comments are closed.
Scroll To Top
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics
© Copyright 2025 - Be That ! . All Rights Reserved