• Police seek suspects in deadly birthday party shooting
  • Lawmakers launch inquires into U.S. boat strike
  • Nov. 29, 2025, 10:07 PM EST / Updated Nov. 30, 2025,…
  • Mark Kelly says troops ‘can tell’ what orders…

Be that!

contact@bethat.ne.com

 

Be That ! Menu   ≡ ╳
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics Politics
☰

Be that!

Nov. 13, 2025, 6:05 AM ESTBy Kevin CollierA bipartisan group of former Federal Communications Commission leaders has petitioned the agency to repeal the policy the Trump administration invoked in discussions surrounding Jimmy Kimmel at ABC and in the investigation of “60 Minutes” at CBS.The group — which includes five Republican and two Democratic former FCC commissioners, as well as several former senior staffers — calls for eliminating the agency’s longstanding “News Distortion” policy. The policy, according to the FCC’s website description, allows the agency to sanction broadcasters if “they have deliberately distorted a factual news report.”The policy is not codified, but grew out of a standard used by the FCC to evaluate broadcasters. It was rarely invoked for decades until this year, when President Donald Trump’s pick to lead the FCC, Brendan Carr, cited it in several high-profile disputes with networks his agency regulates.A representative for the FCC did not immediately respond to a request for comment. According to the FCC, invoking the policy “must involve a significant event and not merely a minor or incidental aspect of the news report,” and that “expressions of opinion or errors stemming from mistakes are not actionable.” The petition was filed on Thursday by the Protect Democracy Project, a legal nonprofit “dedicated to defeating the authoritarian threat.”Any interested person or group can petition a federal agency to create, adjust or repeal a rule, according to the Administrative Conference of the United States. But agencies are not required to use specific procedures when receiving or responding to petitions.If the FCC chair declines to act — for instance, by directing the FCC to invite public comment — Gigi Sohn, an advisor to the petition, said that would give the Protect Democracy Project a stronger basis for a lawsuit over the issue. Sohn was a longtime public advocate in telecommunications policy and counsel to Tom Wheeler, the chair of the FCC during President Barack Obama’s second term. She was nominated to serve as an FCC commissioner under President Joe Biden, but withdrew her candidacy after a wave of personal attacks. Sohn said that Carr’s use of the policy illustrates the risk of government overreach.“In the right hands, it could stop misinformation, disinformation, what have you. But the problem is, it’s never been used that way, and the FCC has other tools,” she said. “Right now, it’s being used as a cudgel. And this is not just about Chair Carr. This is about future chairs or commissioners who want to use this as a tool of censorship.”The petition cites several incidents that it says illustrate the policy’s potential for abuse.In February, the FCC invoked the policy in its investigations into CBS over allegations that the news program “60 Minutes” intentionally deceived its viewers with its editing of an interview with Vice President Kamala Harris. Before the investigation began, Trump sued CBS’s parent company, Paramount, for $20 billion over the interview. In July, the parties settled for $16 million.Paramount at the time was pursuing an $8 billion merger with Skydance Media, which required FCC approval. The agency approved it later that month.In a September interview with conservative influencer Benny Johnson, Carr said that local ABC affiliates could be in violation of the News Distortion policy if they continued to air Jimmy Kimmel Live after the host’s remarks about the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk.In the episode, Kimmel criticized conservatives as “doing everything they can to score political points” from the killing.Licensed broadcasters that aired Kimmel risked “the possibility of fines or license revocations from the FCC if [they] continue to run content that ends up being a pattern of news distortion,” Carr said.ABC suspended Kimmel a few hours later. The network reinstated Kimmel the next week after substantial backlash, including from conservatives who criticized Carr. Ted Cruz, R-Texas called Carr’s remarks “dangerous as hell“ and Rand Paul, R-Ky. said they were “absolutely inappropriate.” Carr later denied his comments were intended as a threat.“What I spoke about last week is that when concerns are raised about news distortion there’s an easy way for parties to address that and work that out,” Carr said at the Concordia media summit in September. “In the main, that takes place between local television stations that are licensed by the FCC and what we call national programmers like Disney. They work that out, and there doesn’t need to be any involvement of the FCC.”But the former FCC chairs petitioning for the policy reversal say they took the comments as a threat.“Wielding the news distortion policy, the FCC has already opened or threatened to open investigations against private broadcasters due to disagreements with editorial decisions or statements made in a comedic monologue,” the petition said. “Because the FCC has no legitimate interest in correcting or punishing what it considers to be slanted news coverage, the news distortion policy lacks a meaningful function.”U.S. law, rooted in the First Amendment, generally prohibits the FCC from engaging in government censorship of speech.The FCC’s jurisdiction is limited to broadcast organizations like network television and radio stations, and cannot police cable news, newspapers or online-only news outlets. The agency didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.The petition says it is not designed to overturn the “hoax” rule, which bans broadcasters from deliberately presenting wholly false information about a crime or catastrophe without a disclaimer that it’s fiction.The signatories of the petition include: Thomas Wheeler, a Democratic chair appointed by Barack Obama; Rachelle Chong, a Republican commissioner appointed by Bill Clinton; Alfred Sikes, a Republican chair appointed by George H.W. Bush; Republican Andrew Barrett and Democrat Ervin Duggan, both commissioners appointed by H.W. Bush; Mark Fowler, a Republican chair appointed by Ronald Reagan; and Dennis Patrick, a Republican commissioner appointed by Ronald Reagan.Kevin CollierKevin Collier is a reporter covering cybersecurity, privacy and technology policy for NBC News.

admin - Latest News - November 13, 2025
admin
10 views 13 secs 0 Comments




A group of former FCC leaders has petitioned the agency to repeal the policy the Trump administration invoked in discussions surrounding Jimmy Kimmel.



Source link

TAGS:
PREVIOUS
Nov. 13, 2025, 5:00 AM ESTBy Aria BendixOne of the most common viruses in the world could be the cause of lupus, an autoimmune disease with wide-ranging symptoms, according to a study published Wednesday.Until now, lupus was somewhat mysterious: No single root cause of the disease had been found, and there is no designated treatment for it. The research, published in the journal Science Translational Medicine, suggests that Epstein-Barr virus — which 95% of people acquire at some point in life — could cause lupus by driving the body to attack its own healthy cells.It adds to mounting evidence that Epstein-Barr is associated with multiple long-term health issues, including other autoimmune conditions. As this evidence stacks up, scientists have accelerated calls for a vaccine that targets the virus.“If we now better understand how this fastidious virus is responsible for autoimmune diseases, I think it’s time to figure out how to prevent it,” said Dr. Anca Askanase, clinical director of the Lupus Center at Columbia University, who wasn’t involved in the new research.In lupus patients, an autoimmune attack can result in extreme fatigue, joint pain and skin rashes. In rare cases, the disease may lead to fatal or life-threatening issues such as kidney damage, or weaken the immune system so the body can’t fight off infections.Scientists have long suspected a link between Epstein-Barr and lupus, but the exact connection had remained elusive. Dr. William Robinson, a co-author of the new study and chief of the division of immunology and rheumatology at Stanford University, said his new findings solve a major piece of that puzzle.“From our perspective, it’s the key, missing mechanistic link,” Robinson said. “We think it applies to all lupus cases,” he added. Hundreds of thousands of people in the U.S. are living with the disease.But Hoang Nguyen, assistant vice president of research at the Lupus Research Alliance, said it’s too soon to know if the mechanism is behind every case.“Although the evidence is intriguing and promising, more evidence is needed to demonstrate that the link to EBV applies to all lupus,” Nguyen said. The alliance is a private funder of lupus research and contributed grant funding to Robinson’s study.An infection withe Epstein-Barr virus does not necessarily cause symptoms, especially among children, though the virus is also the most common cause of mononucleosis (often referred to as mono).It’s primarily transmitted by saliva from kissing or sharing drinks, food, utensils or toothbrushes. After someone is infected, the virus lingers permanently in the body, where it usually remains inactive — though not always. The new study is not the first to tie Epstein-Barr to autoimmune issues. Past research has linked it to multiple sclerosis. Though not the sole trigger of MS, the virus may be part of a chain of events that leads to the disease. Robinson said a pathway similar to the one described in his new study could also lead to other autoimmune diseases like rheumatoid arthritis and Crohn’s disease, but more research is needed to tease that out. Of course, the vast majority of people who contract Epstein-Barr do not go on to get lupus, MS or any other autoimmune disease. Robinson said it’s possible that only certain strains of Epstein-Barr trigger autoimmune reactions.To determine the causal link between Epstein-Barr and lupus, Robinson and his co-authors focused on B cells — white blood cells that help fight off infections. Even in healthy individuals, Epstein-Barr lies dormant in a tiny portion of B cells. But those virus-containing B cells are far more prevalent in lupus patients, who have a 25 times higher share of them, according to the new research.The study also highlights a type of protein called antinuclear antibodies, which bind to the nucleus of cells and are one of the hallmarks of lupus. The researchers found that Epstein-Barr infects and reprograms B cells to produce antinuclear antibodies that attack the body’s own tissue, thereby causing lupus.Robinson said the findings go hand-in-hand with some other theories about what causes lupus. For instance, scientists suspect that a person’s genetics or hormones can predispose them to the disease, as well. A study published last year in the journal Nature also found that people with lupus have too much of a particular T cell — another type of white blood cell — that’s associated with cell damage and too little of another T cell associated with repair. Robinson said the pathway described in his study could activate that T cell response.The new research points to a few potential options for lupus treatment, according to Robinson, who is the co-founder of two drug development companies exploring treatments for autoimmune diseases.Many of the current medications given to ease lupus symptoms, such as corticosteroids, broadly focus on reducing inflammation. Robinson said future therapeutics could specifically target B cells infected with Epstein-Barr.But an Epstein-Barr vaccine — several of which are in clinical trials — could someday stop infections in the first place.“Vaccination to protect people against ever being infected by EBV would be the ultimate, fundamental solution,” Robinson said.Aria BendixAria Bendix is the breaking health reporter for NBC News Digital.
NEXT
80-year-old becomes oldest women to complete an Ironman triathlon
Related Post
October 29, 2025
Savewith a NBCUniversal ProfileCreate your free profile or log in to save this articleOct. 28, 2025, 5:10 PM EDTBy Courtney Kube, Carol E. Lee and Dan De LuceA recent U.S. intelligence assessment warned that Russian President Vladimir Putin is more determined than ever to carry on the war in Ukraine and prevail on the battlefield, according to a senior U.S. official and a senior congressional official.The analysis, which was communicated to members of Congress this month, indicated the agencies see no sign Russia is ready to compromise on Ukraine as President Donald Trump seeks to broker peace talks.The assessment is consistent with how U.S. and Western intelligence agencies have viewed the Russian regime’s stance since February 2022, when Putin ordered an unprovoked invasion of Ukraine, according to two other people with knowledge of the matter.But Putin is now believed to be more dug in than ever, according to the senior U.S. official and the senior congressional official.Facing steep Russian troop losses and economic setbacks at home, he is committed to securing Ukrainian land and expanding his country’s footprint to justify the human and financial toll, the intelligence assessment found, according to the officials. In a sign of Trump’s growing frustration, last week he called off a planned meeting with Putin in Budapest, Hungary, and for the first time since he returned to office in January he imposed punitive measures against Moscow, slapping sanctions on two major Russian oil companies. “I just felt it was time,” Trump told reporters, describing the new sanctions as “tremendous” and adding that he had “waited a long time” to implement them but hopes “they won’t be on for long.”“We hope that the war will be settled,” he said.The White House declined to comment on the recent intelligence assessment and pointed to Trump’s public comments on efforts to reach a peace deal.“As the president stated, these are tremendous sanctions against their two big oil companies which he hopes will help bring about the end of the war,” the official said in a statement. “He has been clear that it is time to stop the killing and make a deal to end the war. The United States will continue to advocate for a peaceful resolution to the war, and a permanent peace depends on Russia’s willingness to negotiate in good faith.”Trump has long vowed to broker an end to the war in Ukraine, and as a candidate he promised he would secure peace within 24 hours of his return to office. But his efforts to persuade Russia to come to the negotiating table and agree to a ceasefire have failed so far. Trump’s rhetoric has shifted in recent months, as he has expressed growing frustration and impatience with Putin, accusing him of failing to take action to back up positive statements made in their conversations.“Every time I speak with Vladimir, I have good conversations, and then they don’t go anywhere. They just don’t go anywhere,” Trump said last week.Trump even said publicly that he might provide long-range U.S-made Tomahawk missiles to Ukraine this month, though he later backed away from the idea after a phone conversation with Putin.Ukraine has appealed to Washington for longer-range missiles to strike at targets inside Russia, and European powers have endorsed its request.Ukrainian officials, European governments and Kyiv’s supporters in Congress have repeatedly urged Trump to exert pressure on Russia through arms shipments and sanctions to push Moscow to agree to a ceasefire and peace negotiations. The announcement of sanctions on Russian oil companies was the first time Trump has followed through on threats to introduce economic penalties against Moscow. The new sanctions on Russia, Ukraine’s drone attacks on Russia’s oil and gas facilities and European efforts to provide more weapons to Kyiv’s forces could alter the Kremlin’s calculations over time, according to European diplomats, former U.S. intelligence officials and experts.In August, the White House portrayed a summit in Alaska between Putin and Trump as a promising step toward possible peace negotiations. But the war has raged on, and Russia has stuck to the same hard-line demands that would effectively disarm Ukraine, ban it from joining the NATO alliance and block the deployment of any Western-led peacekeeping forces. Courtney KubeCourtney Kube is a correspondent covering national security and the military for the NBC News Investigative Unit.Carol E. LeeCarol E. Lee is the Washington managing editor.Dan De LuceDan De Luce is a reporter for the NBC News Investigative Unit. 
November 14, 2025
Nov. 14, 2025, 5:00 AM ESTBy Allan SmithA new study found the total value of blocked or delayed data center projects during a three-month stretch earlier this year exceeded the total in the prior two years, signaling accelerating opposition to a foundational piece of artificial intelligence development in the U.S.The study — conducted by Data Center Watch, a project of AI intelligence firm 10a Labs that tracks local data center activity — found that an estimated $98 billion in data center projects were blocked or delayed from late March through June. That compares to $64 billion worth of projects that were blocked or delayed between 2023 and late March 2025.“Opposition to data centers is accelerating,” the authors wrote in the report, shared exclusively with NBC News. “As political resistance builds and local organizing becomes more coordinated, this is now a sustained and intensifying trend.”Leaders in both parties are locked in competition to encourage tech giants to put sprawling data centers in their states, looking for an economic leg up and an innovation edge in the early days of the artificial intelligence boom. But resident backlash has intensified in recent months as the projects have contributed to rising electricity bills, among other concerns.This month in Virginia, data centers were at the center of the campaign in one of the state legislative districts Democrats flipped, with Democratic challenger John McAuliff accusing Republican incumbent Geary Higgins of allowing the “unchecked growth” of data centers, while Higgins said in one of his own ads, “We need to ensure that data centers aren’t built near homes or in our open spaces.”Meanwhile, Meta is running a TV ad in markets around the country in which a longtime resident of Altoona, Iowa, praises the company for opening a data center in the town, saying it brought different kinds of jobs there, according to AdImpact, an ad-tracking firm.In a statement to NBC News last month, Dan Diorio, vice president of state policy for the Data Center Coalition, a group that advocates on behalf of the industry, highlighted the jobs, tax revenue and economic development connected to data center growth, adding the industry “is committed to paying its full cost of service for the energy it uses, including transmission costs.”The new study from Data Center Watch found that key projects were blocked or delayed in Indiana, Kentucky, Georgia and South Dakota, among other states. The researchers tracked “active opposition efforts” in 17 states, with 53 different groups taking action against 30 projects. Those opposition groups were successful in blocking or delaying two out of every three projects they protested, the report said, “underscoring the growing impact of organized local resistance.”“Opposition is cross-partisan and geographically mixed,” the researchers wrote. “Blue and red states alike are tightening rules or rethinking incentives; legislators in places like Virginia, Minnesota, and South Dakota are scrutinizing subsidies, grid impacts, and local authority, often cutting across traditional party lines.”“As development expands and media attention intensifies, local groups are learning from one another,” the researchers added. “Petitions, public hearings, and grassroots organizing are reshaping approval processes — especially in Indiana and Georgia.”The report’s authors cautioned, though, that such organized opposition can’t exclusively explain project delays, noting that multiple dynamics have played roles. That said, the authors wrote: “Political, regulatory, and community opposition is accelerating in both scale and frequency.”And the authors noted that data center tax incentives are starting to be rolled back as well.“Lawmakers are increasingly questioning the value of data center subsidies, citing concerns around energy use, fairness, and infrastructure impact,” the authors wrote.Political leaders are only recently gaining awareness of the opposition. One Pennsylvania official, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss the issue candidly, said they have seen opposition to data center projects sprout in Cumberland and York counties.“I am conflicted on the data centers because I don’t believe in holding back technology. I don’t support degrowth. We should be building great things,” this person said, adding: “I think the economic promise of data centers is muddy at best for the places that put them in.”This person said the opposition to the projects “is all grassroots-driven.”“People are really pissed off,” this person said. “They’re like, ‘I’m sick of this s—. I don’t get anything out of this.’ And I think people are a little freaked out by AI. I worry that people are a little blind to the public animosity.”Allan SmithAllan Smith is a political reporter for NBC News.
October 23, 2025
Mosquitoes discovered in Iceland for the first time
October 22, 2025
Driver arrested after car hits Secret Service property
Comments are closed.
Scroll To Top
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics
© Copyright 2025 - Be That ! . All Rights Reserved