• Police seek suspects in deadly birthday party shooting
  • Lawmakers launch inquires into U.S. boat strike
  • Nov. 29, 2025, 10:07 PM EST / Updated Nov. 30, 2025,…
  • Mark Kelly says troops ‘can tell’ what orders…

Be that!

contact@bethat.ne.com

 

Be That ! Menu   ≡ ╳
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics Politics
☰

Be that!

Nov. 14, 2025, 5:00 AM ESTBy Allan SmithA new study found the total value of blocked or delayed data center projects during a three-month stretch earlier this year exceeded the total in the prior two years, signaling accelerating opposition to a foundational piece of artificial intelligence development in the U.S.The study — conducted by Data Center Watch, a project of AI intelligence firm 10a Labs that tracks local data center activity — found that an estimated $98 billion in data center projects were blocked or delayed from late March through June. That compares to $64 billion worth of projects that were blocked or delayed between 2023 and late March 2025.“Opposition to data centers is accelerating,” the authors wrote in the report, shared exclusively with NBC News. “As political resistance builds and local organizing becomes more coordinated, this is now a sustained and intensifying trend.”Leaders in both parties are locked in competition to encourage tech giants to put sprawling data centers in their states, looking for an economic leg up and an innovation edge in the early days of the artificial intelligence boom. But resident backlash has intensified in recent months as the projects have contributed to rising electricity bills, among other concerns.This month in Virginia, data centers were at the center of the campaign in one of the state legislative districts Democrats flipped, with Democratic challenger John McAuliff accusing Republican incumbent Geary Higgins of allowing the “unchecked growth” of data centers, while Higgins said in one of his own ads, “We need to ensure that data centers aren’t built near homes or in our open spaces.”Meanwhile, Meta is running a TV ad in markets around the country in which a longtime resident of Altoona, Iowa, praises the company for opening a data center in the town, saying it brought different kinds of jobs there, according to AdImpact, an ad-tracking firm.In a statement to NBC News last month, Dan Diorio, vice president of state policy for the Data Center Coalition, a group that advocates on behalf of the industry, highlighted the jobs, tax revenue and economic development connected to data center growth, adding the industry “is committed to paying its full cost of service for the energy it uses, including transmission costs.”The new study from Data Center Watch found that key projects were blocked or delayed in Indiana, Kentucky, Georgia and South Dakota, among other states. The researchers tracked “active opposition efforts” in 17 states, with 53 different groups taking action against 30 projects. Those opposition groups were successful in blocking or delaying two out of every three projects they protested, the report said, “underscoring the growing impact of organized local resistance.”“Opposition is cross-partisan and geographically mixed,” the researchers wrote. “Blue and red states alike are tightening rules or rethinking incentives; legislators in places like Virginia, Minnesota, and South Dakota are scrutinizing subsidies, grid impacts, and local authority, often cutting across traditional party lines.”“As development expands and media attention intensifies, local groups are learning from one another,” the researchers added. “Petitions, public hearings, and grassroots organizing are reshaping approval processes — especially in Indiana and Georgia.”The report’s authors cautioned, though, that such organized opposition can’t exclusively explain project delays, noting that multiple dynamics have played roles. That said, the authors wrote: “Political, regulatory, and community opposition is accelerating in both scale and frequency.”And the authors noted that data center tax incentives are starting to be rolled back as well.“Lawmakers are increasingly questioning the value of data center subsidies, citing concerns around energy use, fairness, and infrastructure impact,” the authors wrote.Political leaders are only recently gaining awareness of the opposition. One Pennsylvania official, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss the issue candidly, said they have seen opposition to data center projects sprout in Cumberland and York counties.“I am conflicted on the data centers because I don’t believe in holding back technology. I don’t support degrowth. We should be building great things,” this person said, adding: “I think the economic promise of data centers is muddy at best for the places that put them in.”This person said the opposition to the projects “is all grassroots-driven.”“People are really pissed off,” this person said. “They’re like, ‘I’m sick of this s—. I don’t get anything out of this.’ And I think people are a little freaked out by AI. I worry that people are a little blind to the public animosity.”Allan SmithAllan Smith is a political reporter for NBC News.

admin - Latest News - November 14, 2025
admin
11 views 42 secs 0 Comments




A new study found the total value of blocked or delayed data center projects during a three-month stretch earlier this year exceeded the total in the prior two years, signaling accelerating opposition to a foundational piece of artificial intelligence development in the U.S.The study — conducted by Data Center Watch, a project of AI intelligence firm 10a Labs that tracks local data center activity — found that an estimated $98 billion in data center projects were blocked or delayed from late



Source link

TAGS:
PREVIOUS
Man behind viral Jonas Brothers resume speaks out
NEXT
Iran showcases military hardware in new exhibition
Related Post
November 8, 2025
Nov. 8, 2025, 11:07 AM ESTBy Freddie ClaytonLONDON — It’s been a strange sort of prison break: no daring escapes, no Hollywood getaways — just inmates quietly released, by mistake, onto the streets of Britain.What once might have been an isolated blunder comes at an unwelcome time in a country strained by rising prices, stagnant wages and crumbling public services.One man, an Algerian sex offender, was arrested in London on Friday after being freed in error nine days earlier; another, a British national and convicted fraudster, accidentally released from the same prison shortly afterward and turned himself in on Thursday.Their cases followed the mistaken release of a convicted sex offender from a separate prison in October, which sparked a three-day manhunt before he was rearrested.At least four prisoners released in error over the past year remain at large, the BBC reports. More than 260 were wrongly released in England and Wales in the year to March, official data shows — more than double the figure the year before.Deputy Prime Minister and Justice Secretary David Lammy said on X Friday that he was “appalled at the rate of releases in error,” and had ordered “tough new release checks, launched an investigation, and started overhauling archaic prison systems.”He told Parliament on Wednesday that the opposition Conservative Party, whose 14-year spell in government was ended by Prime Minister Keir Starmer last year, had “left our prisons on the brink of collapse entirely.”But the recent litany of errors coincides with the ruling Labour Party battling its own economic constraints and record-setting unpopularity.British prisons have been in a state of crisis for several years, with the prison population more than doubling in size since 1990, while staffing and infrastructure struggle to keep pace.The Algerian offender, Brahim Kaddour-Cherif, 24, was mistakenly let out on Oct. 29, though police say they weren’t informed until nearly a week later. He was rearrested for being unlawfully at large and on suspicion of assaulting an emergency worker in connection with an earlier incident.As officers bundled him into a van, he offered his own verdict on the system that lost track of him: “Look at the justice of the U.K., they release people by mistake,” he said in a video aired by NBC News’ British partner Sky News.It’s a throwaway line, but it lands with an uncomfortable truth. In a country where little seems to function as it should — from the courts to the National Health Service to the trains — even the prisons can’t quite manage to keep the doors locked.Years of budget cuts are “catching up” with Britain’s public services, according to Glen O’Hara, a professor of modern and contemporary history at Oxford Brookes University.“The whole system of social care, for instance, is completely overwhelmed,” he told NBC News on Saturday, adding that Britain’s prisons had been swamped by a large number of short prison sentences.“It’s just overwhelming the system that can’t cope economically with all these numbers,” he said.Last summer, the men’s prison system was nearly filled to capacity with only a hundred or so empty places, a crisis that triggered the government’s emergency release scheme, allowing some inmates to leave after serving 40% of their sentence instead of the usual 50%. Introduced to ease overcrowding, the policy has since seen nearly 40,000 prisoners released early, Ministry of Justice figures show.Staffing issues have also plagued the services. In the year to June, nearly 13% of staff left British prisons, according to data from the Prison and Probation Service.Prison officers said a clerical error meant there was no warrant from the court to hold Kaddour-Cherif, and he was let go. William Smith, the convicted fraudster, was released as a result of a clerical error at the court level, the BBC reports.Wandsworth prison, where Smith and Kaddour-Cherif were released, was built in 1851 to house fewer than 1,000 prisoners. An August 2024 report by the prison’s independent monitoring board found inmate numbers had grown to 1,513.“Wings were chaotic and staff across most units were unable to confirm where all prisoners were during the working day,” the report said.The Victorian-era prison, one of many still in use dating back to the 1800s, has previously been the scene of high-profile escapes. Wandsworth made headlines in 2023 when former British soldier Daniel Khalife escaped by clinging to the underside of a lorry while awaiting trial for espionage and terrorism offenses.A Ministry of Justice spokesperson said that the recent cases “further expose the scale of the crisis in our prisons we inherited,” adding: “This will not be fixed overnight, but we are using every possible lever to bear down on these errors.”For all the headlines and investigations, the mistakes continue to pile up in a country struggling to hold itself together, one unlocked gate at a time.Freddie ClaytonFreddie Clayton is a freelance journalist based in London. 
October 1, 2025
Savewith a NBCUniversal ProfileCreate your free profile or log in to save this articleOct. 1, 2025, 3:17 PM EDTBy Sahil Kapur, Hallie Jackson, Kyle Stewart and Gabe GutierrezWASHINGTON — With the government shut down, Republicans are centering their message on a simple argument: “Democrats are grinding America to a halt in order to give illegal immigrants free health care.”That message, from a new ad from the National Republican Congressional Committee, has been echoed by GOP lawmakers and the Trump administration in recent days.Vice President JD Vance claimed on Fox News that the GOP’s “big beautiful bill” turned off health funding for “illegal aliens.”“Democrats want to turn it back on,” he said. “It’s not something that we made up. It’s not a talking point. It is in the text of the bill that they initially gave to us to reopen the government.”Republican lawmakers point blame at Democrats on first day of government shutdown04:27U.S. law already prohibits unauthorized immigrants from gaining any federally subsidized health care coverage — through Medicaid, the Affordable Care Act, the Children’s Health Insurance Program or otherwise. A 1996 statute established that.House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., said Republicans are “lying” about the Democratic bill out of weakness.“Nowhere have Democrats suggested that we’re interested in changing federal law,” he said one day before the shutdown. “The question for the president is whether he’s interested in protecting the health care of the American people.”We’d like to hear from you about how you’re experiencing the government shutdown, whether you’re a federal employee who can’t work right now or someone who is feeling the effects of shuttered services in your everyday life. Please contact us at tips@nbcuni.com or reach out to us here.The factsThe Republican claim is highly misleading.The Democratic bill would not change existing law barring people who are in the U.S. illegally from getting federal health care coverage.The dispute centers around immigrants whom the federal government has decreed as “lawfully present,” but who haven’t formally been given legal status that is enforceable in court.There are an estimated 1.4 million people considered “lawfully present” in the United States — including Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program beneficiaries, who came to the U.S. illegally as children; people who have Temporary Protected Status; and refugees and people seeking asylum who are still going through the legal process. Republicans are seeking to prohibit Medicaid or ACA eligibility for those groups.They are not “undocumented” or “illegal” immigrants. The government knows who they are, and many are going through the process of seeking official legal status or green cards. Among other things, they are not unlawful border-crossers who have been flagged for deportation.The GOP law prohibited those “lawfully present” immigrants from accessing federal health care programs. The Democratic bill would restore that access — but not for undocumented people who lack protected status — while also restoring the $1 trillion in Medicaid cuts, a core goal for Democrats.The White House defended its claim by pointing to one portion of the “big beautiful bill” that Democrats are seeking to repeal, a section called “Alien Medicaid eligibility.” That section establishes the new limitations on health care access for lawfully present immigrants (“alien” is the federal term used to describe a noncitizen).The White House also says the Biden administration abused the immigration parole program to grant temporary entry to the U.S. for people who shouldn’t have received it. But if the Trump administration revoked that parole status, those individuals would lose their eligibility for any health care coverage under the Democratic proposal.Another provision in the Democratic bill would extend subsidies that keep health insurance premiums low for people insured through the Affordable Care Act, which are set to expire later this year. Undocumented immigrants are already barred from accessing that money, and nothing in the Democrats’ bill changes that.Sahil KapurSahil Kapur is a senior national political reporter for NBC News.Hallie JacksonHallie Jackson is senior Washington correspondent for NBC News.Kyle StewartKyle Stewart is a producer and off-air reporter covering Congress for NBC News, managing coverage of the House.Gabe GutierrezGabe Gutierrez is a senior White House correspondent for NBC News.Megan Lebowitz and Tara Prindiville contributed.
October 22, 2025
Oct. 22, 2025, 8:07 AM EDTBy Jason Abbruzzese and Corky SiemaszkoAmerican grandmaster Daniel Naroditsky’s death has sent shock waves through the professional chess world, with many top players blasting a Russian rival who accused him of cheating during online matches.They said Naroditsky, whose death at age 29 was reported Monday, was bullied relentlessly online by Russian former world champion Vladimir Kramnik, with some calling for Kramnik to be banned from the game.Kramnik, who has accused many players of cheating in online play, first voiced “concerns” about Naroditsky’s play last year, leading to an ongoing feud between the two players. Kramnik routinely posted online about Naroditsky, calling for an investigation into his play and at times appearing to threaten legal action against him.In an October 2024 interview, Naroditsky characterized Kramnik’s efforts as “a sustained, evil and absolutely unhinged attempt to destroy my life.”Others in the chess community said the accusations had taken their toll.”He said he was under immense stress due to a lot of baseless accusations — headed by Kramnik, of course,” Indian grandmaster Nihal Sarin, who said he was the last to play Naroditsky, told The Indian Express.”I can totally imagine the pain he was going through and it has been going on for a very long time,” he told the paper. Sarin did not immediately respond to an NBC News request for comment.
November 16, 2025
President Trump feuds with Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene over Epstein files
Comments are closed.
Scroll To Top
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics
© Copyright 2025 - Be That ! . All Rights Reserved