• Police seek suspects in deadly birthday party shooting
  • Lawmakers launch inquires into U.S. boat strike
  • Nov. 29, 2025, 10:07 PM EST / Updated Nov. 30, 2025,…
  • Mark Kelly says troops ‘can tell’ what orders…

Be that!

contact@bethat.ne.com

 

Be That ! Menu   ≡ ╳
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics Politics
☰

Be that!

Nov. 17, 2025, 8:03 PM ESTBy Nicole Acevedo, Ryan Chandler, Suzanne Gamboa and Julia AinsleyCHARLOTTE, N.C. — Jonathan Ocampo has called this Southern city home for six years but, after immigration enforcement descended here over the weekend, the American citizen of Colombian descent said he doesn’t leave the house without his U.S. passport.“I’m carrying it here right now, which is sad,” he told NBC News. Ocampo said that he worries that his father, a citizen who has been in the country for 40 years, could be targeted because of being Hispanic-looking and speaking what he described as very broken English. “It’s just scary,” he said.According to the Department of Homeland Security, more than 130 people have been arrested since Border Patrol began an immigration enforcement push it calls “Operation Charlotte’s Web” on Saturday, putting many residents and business owners of the state’s largest city on edge. A popular Latino bakery was closed on Monday over fears of Border Patrol activity. Several small businesses in a shopping center also shut their doors Monday after immigration authorities were seen smashing the car window of a Honduran-born U.S. citizen, Willy Aceituno, over the weekend. Aceituno told WCNC he was getting breakfast when he noticed immigration authorities chasing two people. Three vehicles then surrounded his car and agents began asking about his immigration status. “I was scared,” he said. Aceituno, who recorded the incident, is seen on video staying inside his car and telling agents that if they broke the window they’d have to pay for it. An agent ultimately shattered the window and opened Aceituno’s car door and pulled him to the ground. In a social media post, DHS accused Aceituno of “trying to distract officers so others could evade the law.”DHS assistant secretary Tricia McLaughlin said in a statement that those arrested in North Carolina “have all broken the immigration laws of our country.” The deployments in Charlotte are the latest in a string of high-profile immigration enforcement actions targeting specific cities across the nation such as Los Angeles, Portland and most recently Chicago, where hundreds of the people arrested did not have prior criminal history, according to the Chicago Tribune. Ocampo said he doesn’t think Charlotte is unique in being the focus of federal immigration enforcement. “I think they’re targeting wherever there is a strong Hispanic presence, whether it’s Charlotte, whether it’s Chicago, California, I’m seeing on the news, they’re everywhere,” he said.In Charlotte, residents have reported dozens of sightings of Border Patrol agents, including one on Monday outside the community center for ourBRIDGE for Kids, a non-profit that provides afterschool programs for refugee and immigrant students.Several trucks carrying more than 20 Border Patrol agents showed up to the center Monday morning, according to a witness who shared a video of the scene with NBC News. The witness asked not to be named out of fear it would cause retaliation against the business. It is not known whether anyone was arrested. No children were present at the time since programs run in the afternoons, which were canceled for this afternoon as a precaution, the person said.In detailing immigration arrests in Charlotte, McLaughlin said some of the detainees have criminal records including “known gang membership, aggravated assault, possession of a dangerous weapon, felony larceny, simple assault, hit and run, possession of stolen goods, shoplifting, DUI, DWI, and illegal re-entry after prior deportation, a felony.” Staff at the Carolina Migrant Network said they are working on confirming these by tracking down all of those arrested.So far, some of the people detained by Border Patrol agents in Charlotte include workers at a Home Depot parking lot putting up Christmas decorations, a young man who worked at a grocery store and others in the surrounding areas of churches, apartment complexes and stores, according to Siembra NC, another advocacy group that manages an immigration hotline.“This is not about public safety,” said Stefania Arteaga, co-executive director and co-founder of the Carolina Migrant Network, a legal services group for those facing deportation. “We are seeing clear racial profiling on our streets and absolute militarization…This is about causing fear and destroying, really destroying our community.”Among the incidents confirmed by the group was an arrest reported to their hotline by a pastor at the Central United Methodist Church. Another incident outside the Weeping Willow AME Zion Church involved the detention of a “man who was participating in a church cleanup day,” according to Siembra NC. That man was hospitalized after having “a panic attack” following his immigration arrest, according to McLaughlin, who added that the man unsuccessfully tried to escape from the hospital and said he has a prior arrest for assault. Protesters gather at First Ward Park for the “No Border Patrol In Charlotte” rally before marching through uptown, in Charlotte, N.C., on Nov. 15.Grant Baldwin / Getty ImagesOn Sunday morning, a Spanish-language service at Casa Viva Church was half empty as hundreds of people in the congregation chose to stay home because they are “scared about going out because of the situation right now,” Pastor Alejandro Montez said.Jeremy McKinney, a North Carolina attorney who served as American Immigration Lawyers Association president from 2022-23, said an attorney confirmed that some of those arrested had been sent three states away to Stewart Detention Center in Lumpkin, Georgia.The privately run immigration center, about two and half hours south of Atlanta in a rural and isolated area, is often used because North and South Carolina have no detention centers. Because of overcrowding in Stewart, McKinney said attorneys were anticipating some of those arrested could be transferred to Louisiana. The distance and isolation makes getting legal counsel difficult for detainees who can face waiting up to a week to schedule an attorney meeting, McKinney said. Manolo Betancur, who owns Manolo’s Bakery in Charlotte, decided not to open his business Monday after he said he witnessed people being stopped by Border Patrol agents outside.“I’m not going to risk my customers,” Betancur told WCNC, NBC’s affiliate in Charlotte. “Safety is more important than any money.” Nicole Acevedo reported from New York, Ryan Chandler from Charlotte, Suzanne Gamboa from San Antonio and Julia Ainsley from Washington, D.C. Nicole AcevedoNicole Acevedo is a news reporter for NBC News.Ryan ChandlerRyan Chandler is a correspondent for NBC News.Suzanne GamboaSuzanne Gamboa is a national reporter for NBC News and NBC Latino. Julia AinsleyI am NBC News’ Senior Homeland Security Correspondent.Tangni Noriega contributed.

admin - Latest News - November 18, 2025
admin
11 views 17 secs 0 Comments




After immigration officials arrested more than 130 people, some churches report being half empty, an after school program canceled activities and one U.S. citizen said he started carrying his passport.



Source link

TAGS:
PREVIOUS
Why did Trump change course on Epstein files?
NEXT
Trump’s reversal on release of Epstein files
Related Post
November 10, 2025
Senators advance tentative deal to ending shutdown
October 3, 2025
Massive blaze erupts at Chevron refinery in California
November 29, 2025
Nov. 29, 2025, 7:00 AM ESTBy Tyler Kingkade and Ben KamisarDuring a segment on HBO’s “Real Time with Bill Maher” in August, activist Christopher Rufo astonished the studio audience when he said the Watergate scandal that toppled President Richard Nixon “was a setup from start to finish.” The crowd hooted. Maher retorted that there were plenty of “smoking guns” showing the late president’s guilt. But Rufo insisted that there were federal agencies that had had illegal backdoor meetings and that there was a judge who was “out to get Nixon.”Maher muttered, “Oh, geez,” to which Rufo replied with a grin and a prediction: “Nixon vindication by 2035.”The Watergate scandal has long been viewed as a defining moment in presidential corruption and accountability, prompting a series of government transparency reforms and influencing generations of journalists. It became a shorthand comparison for political scandal and lent the omnipresent “-gate” suffix to many that followed.But those lessons are now being flipped by some of the most influential right-wing figures, including people known to have President Donald Trump’s ear, who insist that Watergate was actually an underhanded scheme by the “deep state” and the press to take down a popular Republican president.Watergate has often been invoked in comparison to Trump’s scandals, in both his first and current term. Many people — from historians to former Nixon officials — argue that were Watergate to happen in today’s media landscape, with the influence of conservative outlets and in particular Fox News, Nixon most likely would have survived it.“In some ways, the reframing of Watergate seems like an attempt to try and rehabilitate the current president’s image,” said Brendan Gillis, director of teaching and learning initiatives at the American Historical Association, a nonprofit professional organization. “In a lot of ways, it’s about what’s happened the last few years.”Michael Koncewicz, a historian who has been sounding the alarm on Watergate revisionism and who formerly worked at the Nixon presidential library, said the scandal has always been remembered as one in which “the system worked.” But if these pundits “can make Americans believe that that story is bulls—,” he said, “then they can ensure that another Watergate will never happen again.”Beyond Rufo, the conservative media personalities Tucker Carlson, Michael Knowles and Steve Bannon have pushed this revisionist Watergate narrative in the past year. Hillsdale College, a conservative college in Michigan, promoted and endorsed a Carlson podcast episode that described Watergate as a “scam.” Even actor Bill Murray suggested this year on Joe Rogan’s podcast that Nixon might have been “framed.”Republican-controlled states like Idaho and Louisiana have approved a video for use in public school social studies classes that was produced by the conservative media organization PragerU, in which the conservative radio host Hugh Hewitt quotes a historian who argues that Watergate was the media’s attempt to reverse an election.Hewitt, who serves on the board of the Nixon Foundation, contends that the media and the “East Coast liberal elite” had it out for Nixon in part because of his “staunch anti-communist” views. PragerU worked over the past two years with many Republican-led states to get its content into public schools, and it recently partnered with the Trump administration on a civics education initiative. After Rufo’s proclamation on HBO, Marissa Streit, PragerU’s CEO, said he is “right about Nixon!” and directed people to watch Hewitt’s video on X.Through a spokesperson, Streit declined an interview request. In response to specific questions, PragerU said people should watch its Watergate content.Rufo also declined an interview request, but said in an email that the Nixon era is crucial to understanding why he believes politics has been in a loop since 1968. “To understand our moment — and to move beyond it — we must understand Nixon and learn from his experience, his successes, and his failures. BLM, Russiagate, gender ideology, left-wing terrorism: all of our current challenges can be understood through the prism,” Rufo said, of Nixon, “one of the twentieth century’s greatest presidents.”Hillsdale College, Hewitt and Idaho and Louisiana’s education agencies did not respond to requests for comment, nor did Carlson and Bannon’s shows.Kenneth Hughes Jr., a researcher at the University of Virginia’s Miller Center, who is considered one of the foremost experts on the audiotapes from Nixon’s White House, said the recordings clearly demonstrate that Nixon was “the ring leader of the abuses of power that we group under the heading of Watergate.” “They do show Nixon deliberately, consciously and illegally weaponizing the government against those he considered political threats,” Hughes said.Nixon has always been a conflicted character in American consciousness. His congressional career defined him as a strident anti-communist, but as president he opened diplomacy with China. Liberals have praised him for signing Title IX and the Environmental Protection Agency into law but criticized his administration for launching a “war on drugs.”After losing the 1960 presidential election and the 1962 California gubernatorial race, Nixon famously told reporters that they “won’t have Nixon to kick around anymore,” only to then become president in 1968 and subsequently win every state except for Massachusetts and the District of Columbia in his 1972 re-election.The scandal that brought down Nixon, in oversimplified terms, centered around his complicity in attempts to cover up the involvement of members in his administration in a botched break-in to bug the Democratic Party’s headquarters. The fallout from the episode then exposed other illegal activity he authorized to go after political enemies.While the twists and turns were widely covered by multiple national media at the time, the scandal was immortalized by the book and film “All the President’s Men,” based on the work of Washington Post reporters Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein — relying in part on an anonymous source known as “Deep Throat” — to expose the plot.Nixon resigned in August 1974, once it became clear he’d lost the support of many Republicans in Congress and would likely face impeachment.“If Donald Trump and his advisors and his supporters, in the media and within his administration, can alter the history of Watergate, then they can pretty much change anything, and that’s why the history of Watergate matters so much,” said Koncewicz, associate director of New York University’s Institute for Public Knowledge.The revisionism arguments generally concede that the president’s aides and campaign staff were involved in boneheaded and nefarious activities. But they contend Nixon was oblivious to much of it until after it happened. And they say the true scandal was that Nixon’s due process rights were violated by prosecutors who secretly met with judges and by the release of confidential grand jury testimony to Congress.“It sends chills down your spine about how close this is to what they’re trying to do to President Trump right now with this radical judiciary,” Bannon said on his podcast in August.Monica Crowley, a Trump administration official and former Fox News host, said on a New York Post podcast in July that “the full vindication, I think, of President Nixon is coming to pass.” She said Trump passes Nixon’s portrait every day, and she sees the two men as similarly “forging their own path, which inevitably put them in a collision course with the deep state.”Many of these conservative commentators rely on or feature Geoff Shepard, a former Nixon administration lawyer, who’s written for decades about ways he believes the president was wronged in the Watergate investigation.Bannon, who helped run Trump’s first campaign and remains a loyal booster, provided his streaming subscribers with free access this past summer to a new documentary based on Shepard’s work. In September, a historian spotted one of Shepard’s Watergate books displayed prominently at the gift shop of the National Archives, which is currently managed by the former head of the Nixon Foundation.A key piece of Shepard’s argument is that the “smoking gun” tape is misunderstood. The tape is typically interpreted as showing that Nixon approved White House interference in the FBI probe into the DNC break-in, but according to Shepard, it was actually a narrow question as to whether investigators could look into donations the Department of Justice had deemed outside of the Watergate case. In other words, he writes on his website, it “did not remotely prove that Nixon was in on, much less directing, the cover-up from its outset.”Shepard, who is also on the Nixon Foundation’s board, declined an interview request, but said in an email that his focus has always been on ways he believes the Watergate Special Prosecution Force violated the due process rights of the president and his aides.“In short, lawfare (the misuse of criminal law to undercut political opponents) didn’t begin with President Trump; it began with President Nixon,” Shepard said.Jill Wine-Banks, an assistant Watergate special prosecutor, said these arguments are nonsense. Nixon’s team distributed cash as hush money payments, the president is on tape approving it, the grand jury testimony was provided to Congress through a judicial process and there were no secret meetings with a federal judge, she said. And the smoking gun tape includes Nixon giving instructions on how to tell the FBI to avoid questioning certain people that would expose where hush money payments came from.“That’s him directing an action,” she said in an interview. “How much more do you need than that for him to be guilty of the cover-up?”The Nixon Foundation, which gave Trump an Architect of Peace Award last month, has welcomed the newfound interest in dismantling the mainstream narrative around Watergate. On social media, the organization has amplified examples of popular pundits defending Nixon. It recently published a video featuring podcast host Michael Knowles describing him as “the first president taken down by the deep state.”Speaking at the Nixon Library in Yorba Linda, California, this month, Knowles said the investigations into Trump during his first term started the process of exonerating Nixon by demonstrating “the lengths to which ‘deep state’ would go to undermine the will of the electorate.” “Was it so crazy that the man whom they dubbed ‘Tricky Dick’ might be the target of their shenanigans?” Knowles said in his speech, later adding, “The forces that sought to destroy him are the forces that threaten us again.”Knowles was unavailable for an interview. Historians, however, argue that the only person who set up Nixon was Nixon himself.Hughes, from the University of Virginia, said Nixon pursued a cover-up to protect himself because he had committed crimes to target political enemies, and it’s what makes his actions most relevant today.“What Nixon hid, Trump is doing much more blatantly,” Hughes said. “He’s weaponizing the government against people who he deems political threats, and that’s just something that America has not allowed, and something that America came together against during Watergate.”Tyler KingkadeTyler Kingkade is a national reporter for NBC News, based in Los Angeles.Ben KamisarBen Kamisar is a national political reporter for NBC News
October 13, 2025
Released hostage Guy Gilboa-Dalal reunites with family
Comments are closed.
Scroll To Top
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics
© Copyright 2025 - Be That ! . All Rights Reserved