• Police seek suspects in deadly birthday party shooting
  • Lawmakers launch inquires into U.S. boat strike
  • Nov. 29, 2025, 10:07 PM EST / Updated Nov. 30, 2025,…
  • Mark Kelly says troops ‘can tell’ what orders…

Be that!

contact@bethat.ne.com

 

Be That ! Menu   ≡ ╳
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics Politics
☰

Be that!

Nov. 18, 2025, 12:01 AM ESTBy Berkeley Lovelace Jr.Americans are going into 2026 more anxious about health care costs than at any other point in recent years, a new West Health-Gallup survey finds. Almost half of adults, 47%, say they’re worried they won’t be able to afford health care next year — the highest level since West Health and Gallup began tracking in 2021, the survey published Tuesday found.Concerns about prescription drug costs have climbed steadily, the survey found — rising from 30% in 2021 to 37% in 2025, also the highest level recorded. And the share of adults who say health care costs cause “a lot of stress” in their daily lives has nearly doubled since 2022, rising from 8% to 15%. The survey also found that about 1 in 3 adults reported delaying or skipping medical care over the last year because they couldn’t afford it. The annual survey, conducted in June through August, was based on roughly 20,000 respondents across all 50 states and Washington, D.C., and asked 27 questions about people’s health care experiences. Health care has become a central issue in politics. Senate Democrats’ push to extend enhanced subsidies for the Affordable Care Act led to the longest government shutdown in history. The ACA tax credits, which have protected people from double-digit premium increases, are set to expire Dec. 31. Republicans blocked the effort, and the Trump administration has vowed to “fix Obamacare” but has yet to release a detailed plan. “The survey shows health care affordability isn’t just a political debate, it’s a problem many people are experiencing now,” said Larry Levitt, executive vice president for health policy at KFF, a nonpartisan research group. “Americans have been struggling to keep up with rising health costs generally and health care specifically.” He wasn’t involved in the survey. The survey didn’t touch on the subsidies’ expiring. Nor did it include questions about Medicaid work requirements that will go into effect in 2027. Taken together with the coverage losses that would follow, many people could face even greater challenges paying for health care in the years ahead, said Timothy Lash, president of West Health, a nonpartisan group that researches health care costs and aging. “The urgency around this is real,” Lash said. “When you look at the economic strain that is on families right now, even if health care prices didn’t rise, the costs are rising elsewhere, which only exacerbates the problem.”Lash said every metric in the survey has either held steady or gotten worse. “Americans are saying, ‘Hey, now that I really think about it, I’m paying too much and I’m not getting enough,’” Lash said. “Health care is not what it needs to be right now.”Differences across statesHow people experience health care varied greatly across states. Iowa, Massachusetts, Washington, D.C., and Rhode Island ranked highest for overall health care experiences, particularly in how easily residents can afford, access and get health care when and where they need it.Texas, New Mexico, Nevada and Alaska ranked at the bottom of the list.While 66% of people in Nebraska — which ranked 10th overall — said it’s easy to get the health care they need, just 30% in New Mexico and 31% in Nevada agreed.But even in the top-ranked states, many people still face difficulties, Lash said. About 15% of people in the top 10 states said they’ve been unable to pay for prescription drugs in the past three months, compared with 29% in the bottom 10. About 25% of people in the top 10 states reported skipping recommended lab tests or medical procedures because of the cost over the last year, compared with 40% of people in the bottom 10. Skipping or forgoing medical care was most common in states like Texas (43% reported doing so), Montana (43%) and Alaska (41%), the survey found.Beyond cost, Americans cited other barriers that have restricted access to care. Nationally, 55% said long wait times prevented or delayed care, and 27% cited work schedules as a barrier. The top 10 and the bottom 10 states had similar shares of people who delayed or prevented care because they didn’t know how to find providers: 25% and 31%, respectively. “When you look at the rankings … we have to be very careful to say that someone won,” Lash said. “It’s like being the tallest kid in kindergarten and then suddenly walking outside the classroom and realizing, like, maybe you’re not so tall after all.”Dr. Adam Gaffney, a critical care physician and assistant professor at Harvard Medical School, said the U.S. health care system is designed to make patients have “skin in the game” when it comes to paying for high health costs.“While it’s not surprising that states with high uninsurance rates — like Mississippi, which has not expanded Medicaid — have higher rates of cost problems than a state like Massachusetts, where I work,” Gaffney wrote in an email, “even here in the Bay State large numbers experience cost worries due to inadequate insurance.”Lawrence Gostin, director of the O’Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law at Georgetown University, said the findings may add pressure on Congress to extend the enhanced ACA subsidies before the end of the year.Even if they don’t, he said, the pressure could intensify once Medicaid work requirements begin in 2027. The Congressional Budget Office, a nonpartisan government group, projects that 4.8 million people will lose coverage because of the work requirements.“The public has major anxiety about access to affordable health care,” Gostin said. “Deep concern and anxiety over health insurance premiums and medical bills is only likely to become more acute due to the lapse in ACA premium subsidies and major cuts to Medicaid.”Berkeley Lovelace Jr.Berkeley Lovelace Jr. is a health and medical reporter for NBC News. He covers the Food and Drug Administration, with a special focus on Covid vaccines, prescription drug pricing and health care. He previously covered the biotech and pharmaceutical industry with CNBC.

admin - Latest News - November 18, 2025
admin
9 views 14 secs 0 Comments




Americans are going into 2026 more anxious about health care costs than at any other point in recent years, a new West Health-Gallup survey finds.



Source link

TAGS:
PREVIOUS
Jets player Kris Boyd hospitalized after NYC shooting
NEXT
Uber, Joby, testing air taxis for city travel
Related Post
November 21, 2025
Trump says Mamdani will 'change' in office
November 2, 2025
Here's the biggest news you missed this weekend
October 31, 2025
Oct. 31, 2025, 5:00 AM EDT / Updated Oct. 31, 2025, 8:16 AM EDTBy Peter Nicholas and Megan LebowitzWASHINGTON — Over the years, a genteel nonprofit organization called the Trust for the National Mall has raised money to help care for the cherry trees dotting the Tidal Basin. It upgraded the U.S. Park Police stables on the National Mall and hosted pickleball games on the grassy expanse between American monuments.Now it has a new assignment: handling the millions of dollars pouring in for President Donald Trump’s gilded White House ballroom. The nonpartisan group is serving as the steward for what Trump has said is more than $350 million in private donations from individuals, foundations and corporations to remake part of the old East Wing into a 90,000-square-foot ballroom. Donors have been instructed to direct their ballroom contributions to the trust, a tax-exempt nonprofit organization. Individual and corporate donors can typically deduct the amount they contributed from their federal income taxes. A person raising money for the ballroom told NBC News that they have been asking for donations of $2.5 million to $5 million and that the deduction is one reason people choose to give. The fundraiser, like others in this article, was granted anonymity to speak candidly. The White House said donors will be able to remain anonymous if they wish.The trust’s involvement in Trump’s project has plunged it into politically divisive terrain that it has avoided since its founding in 2007. Senators are demanding answers about what the trust knows about the ballroom and its donors and when it found out.“This nonpartisan, independent organization is about to be enmeshed in the very perilous quicksand of Donald Trump’s donation scheme for his ballroom,” Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., said in an interview.Devoted to “restoring, preserving and enriching the National Mall,” the trust is now part of a project that is transforming the symbol of American history and power. Construction crews flattened the East Wing of the White House this month to make way for a ballroom that can seat nearly 1,000 people; in July, Trump said the addition wouldn’t touch the White House.In interviews, trust officials stressed that they’re playing only the limited role of managing the donations and have no say over the design or construction of the ballroom itself. The group is an official partner of the National Park Service, the federal agency that maintains the White House grounds. Traditionally, the trust assists the Park Service by raising private money for projects, thus defraying the cost to taxpayers.Over the summer, the Park Service approached the trust and asked whether it would handle the private donations for the ballroom, a trust staff member said.The group’s 14-member board discussed the request and agreed to take part, board member Eric Hoplin, who is CEO of the National Association of Wholesaler-Distributors, said in an interview. Neither he nor the staff member would say whether the group could have declined to participate.Asked whether the trust knew in advance that the East Wing would be torn down, Hoplin said, “Because we weren’t involved in the design or construction, we were learning about the evolution of the project as others have.”He made no apologies for the ballroom, pointing to past White House renovations that also drew public ire back in the day. “If you look to history and you think about Andrew Jackson’s addition of the North Portico and you look at Teddy Roosevelt’s addition of the West Wing, when you look at the Truman restoration, including the Truman Balcony, each of those projects in their time was controversial,” Hoplin said. “Now they’re widely accepted and in fact celebrated parts of the White House. So it’s not for us to judge the project. We’re the partner of the National Park Service, and we are playing this limited role.”Born out of a philanthropic impulse, the trust seems a throwback to an era that predated Trump’s rise. The ballroom project is an arranged marriage of sorts between MAGA and civic magnanimity.Chip Akridge, head of a local commercial real estate firm, would regularly jog through Washington to look at his properties. A friend urged him to inspect the Mall’s condition, and when he did, he saw it was “a disgrace,” he told a House committee in 2008. Akridge said he helped create the trust to restore the Mall’s luster.The East Wing was demolished to make room for Trump’s new ballroom.Andrew Harnik / Getty ImagesOver the years, the trust has led a string of efforts to improve the Mall and surrounding spaces. During Trump’s first term, it managed $4 million in private donations for a pair of White House projects: a tennis pavilion and a renovation of the Rose Garden. Trump paved over the garden grass after he returned to office.The group brought in volunteers to help with White House garden tours, along with experts to “shape” White House educational tours in President Joe Biden’s administration, the staff member said.Donors have been invited to “adopt” a cherry tree as part of the trust’s effort to preserve the 3,700-some cherry trees on the Tidal Basin. A total of $42,000 was raised in 2023 to help protect 40 trees. The group also worked to upgrade horse stables on the Mall that were first built in the 1970s, among other projects. And it marshals volunteers for smaller tasks, such as painting benches and laying mulch.Current board members aren’t Trump’s traditional MAGA allies. Some are past or present executives at corporations like Humana and Wells Fargo, while others are philanthropists who have supported cultural and artistic endeavors. The group’s president and CEO is Catherine Townsend, who was appointed in 2016. That year, she donated $250 to the Democratic presidential campaign of Hillary Clinton, campaign finance records show. Townsend also made a pair of $250 donations to the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee in 2010. The trust didn’t make Townsend available for an interview and didn’t respond to questions about the donations.Since he took office, Trump has pushed hard to do away with diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives. The trust hosted “conversations” during Joe Biden’s presidency that amplified minority voices. One such event in 2021 focused on African Americans and the influential role they’ve played on the National Mall. Another one that year, “Herstory on America’s Civic Stage,” dealt with “important moments for America’s women.” A third celebrated Asian American and Pacific Island Heritage Month. This week, the White House fired all six members of the Commission of Fine Arts, an independent government agency that is expected to review Trump’s construction projects, including the ballroom. A White House official said it plans to replace them with people who are “more aligned with President Trump’s America First Policies.”Blumenthal and four other Democratic senators sent a letter to the trust and its governmental partner, the National Park Service, on Oct. 23 with a list of questions and a Nov. 7 deadline for answers. “Is the demolition consistent with the Trust’s mission to ‘preserve the National Mall as a symbol of our nation’s ideals and civic purpose?’” the senators asked.“What procedures are in place to pay for the project if costs exceed the amount raised via the Trust? Will taxpayers be liable for any potential costs of this project?” wrote Blumenthal and Sens. Elizabeth Warren and Edward Markey of Massachusetts, Ron Wyden of Oregon and Chris Van Hollen of Maryland.In a statement to NBC News, Warren said that “billionaires and giant corporations with business in front of the Trump administration are not coughing up millions of dollars to build Trump’s ballroom out of concern for the National Mall.”“The Trust for the National Mall appears to have become a vehicle for favor-seeking and possible corruption,” she said. “I’m pushing to find out if the Trust is facilitating wink-and-nod arrangements — and what these ballroom donors are getting in return.”The trust has not yet responded to the senators’ letter. In the past, the trust has raised comparatively modest amounts of money. In 2022, it received only about $2.2 million in contributions and grants, according to its IRS tax returns. Last year, it raised about $9.5 million.The ballroom project has attracted donations from major companies such as Google, Amazon, Apple, Microsoft and beyond. Comcast Corp., the parent company of NBCUniversal, was also on the White House list of donors. The trust staff member said that “financials can vary widely year over year based on projects being built or completed and where we are in a fundraising cycle.”The group has stepped up its fundraising efforts ahead of July 4, 2026, when the nation will celebrate its 250th anniversary. It has set out to raise $250 million, with the money going toward projects that include restoring the fountains of Lafayette Square, across the street from the White House.A former IRS official who reviewed the trust’s most recent tax return expressed doubts that the group is equipped to manage the ballroom donations.“The main thing is that this is not an organization that shows any indication of being able to have an inflow of hundreds of millions of dollars,” the person said, speaking on condition of anonymity.Hoplin voiced confidence the trust can do the job.“We have the capacity and the ability and the track record for a project of this magnitude,” he said.Peter NicholasPeter Nicholas is a senior White House reporter for NBC News.Megan LebowitzMegan Lebowitz is a politics reporter for NBC News.Christina Wilkie contributed.
October 2, 2025
Missing California sisters found alive after 36 years
Comments are closed.
Scroll To Top
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics
© Copyright 2025 - Be That ! . All Rights Reserved