• Police seek suspects in deadly birthday party shooting
  • Lawmakers launch inquires into U.S. boat strike
  • Nov. 29, 2025, 10:07 PM EST / Updated Nov. 30, 2025,…
  • Mark Kelly says troops ‘can tell’ what orders…

Be that!

contact@bethat.ne.com

 

Be That ! Menu   ≡ ╳
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics Politics
☰

Be that!

Nov. 18, 2025, 2:45 PM ESTBy Jared PerloThe robot warriors are coming, and so are the zillionaires, Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., warned in a wide-ranging interview with NBC News on the rise and risks of artificial intelligence.“I think we are not all that far away from the development of robotic soldiers,” Sanders said Sunday. “Right now, politicians — at least sometimes — have to worry about loss of life when they decide to go to war. If you don’t have to worry about loss of life, and what you worry about is loss of robots, what does that mean for issues of war and peace globally? It’s a big issue.” Sanders is known for his focus on the millionaires and billionaires of the world, and how the U.S. government might favor them. In recent months, he’s turned his attention to AI, which he says is an extension of his primary concerns about wealth inequality.“Today, before we have seen the full implications of robotics and AI, you’re looking at unprecedented wealth and income concentration,” Sanders said. “The top 1% of Americans own more wealth than the bottom 93%,” he said. “All of these zillionaires — the Musks, the Ellisons, the Bezoses, the Zuckerbergs — are investing hundreds and hundreds of billions of dollars into AI and robotics. What is the result of all that?”Elon Musk, the CEO of xAI, was just approved to receive a pay package from one of his other companies, Tesla, that could make him the world’s first trillionaire. “It will mean even more wealth and even more political power for these guys at the top, while our democracy gets weaker and weaker. Working people will see a significant decline in their standard of living unless we turn this around.”Sanders’ focus on AI comes as tech companies have announced historic AI investments and sought to secure goodwill from President Donald Trump. The Trump administration has prioritized ensuring America’s AI ecosystem is “unencumbered by bureaucratic red tape” to avoid an “onerous regulatory regime,” while also keeping many aspects of the Biden administration’s AI efforts.Sanders is not the only elected official bringing attention to the issue, with rising interest in AI legislation at both the state and the federal levels. On Tuesday, a House subcommittee met to discuss the safety of AI chatbots.In the interview with NBC News, Sanders said he sees the issue as an urgent matter and hopes to provoke more discussion about AI and its potential impacts on society: “The folks who have studied this moment are suggesting this ain’t just another technological revolution. It is a lot more profound, and it’s going to move a lot quicker.”With such a fast-moving and general purpose technology as AI, Sanders sees threats not only to workers, but also to larger notions of humanity. “People are worried that right now, many young people, teenagers, are relying on companionship from AI rather than fellow human beings,” Sanders said. “If kids today have AI as their best friends, as the ‘people’ they relate to, where they spend most of their time rather than other human beings, what kind of change does that mean for humanity?”“We’re talking about incredibly deep, deep issues of what it means to be human,” Sanders concluded. “This issue needs enormous discussion, and I hope we can provoke some of it.”Sanders will hold a town hall with “Godfather of AI” and Nobel Laureate Geoffrey Hinton on Tuesday night at Georgetown University to discuss AI’s trajectory, including its effect on workers. “People who know a lot more than I do about this, people like Elon Musk, Bill Gates, Dario Amodei, they are talking about massive, massive job dislocation,” Sanders said. “Musk recently said that ‘AI and robots will replace all jobs. Working will be optional.’”“But what the hell does that mean if it’s going to replace all jobs? If I’m a factory worker today, if I’m working in an office, how am I going to feed my family? How am I going to pay the rent? Who is talking about that?” Sanders added, also referencing recent claims from Anthropic CEO Amodei that AI could eliminate half of all entry-level white-collar jobs and increase unemployment by up to 20% in the next one to five years. “There has been far, far, far too little discussion among the American people, in the media and certainly in Congress about the implications of AI and robotics.”In October, Sanders released a report on AI and led a hearing on AI’s potential to support American workers and families. He’s also proposed a limited set of policies that he says could help address some issues posed by AI, including increased employee ownership of companies, a reduced workweek and even a potential robot tax on large corporations, using “the revenue to improve the lives of workers who have been harmed.”Sanders has also proposed that leading American AI company OpenAI should be broken up given its size. In his interview with NBC News, he said his call “was more general” than just OpenAI and meant to implicate several of America’s largest AI companies.“When I talk about breaking these [companies] up, I mean creating a situation where this new technology is designed to benefit ordinary people, not just designed by a handful of billionaires to make them even richer,” he said.“I don’t have a blueprint in my back pocket here, because nobody has ever had to deal with this reality, but the idea that a handful of multibillionaires can determine the future of humanity seems a little bit crazy to me.”Sanders is also criticizing growing efforts by American venture capitalists and deep-pocketed donors to create super PACs designed to lobby against AI regulation. “You’ve got people who are suggesting that it’s almost anti-religious, the Antichrist, to be demanding regulation of AI and robotics right now,” he said, obliquely referencing recent speeches by Silicon Valley stalwart Peter Thiel. In one of these lectures, Thiel said: “In the 21st century, the Antichrist is a Luddite who wants to stop all science.” “It almost takes you back to the 1700s and the monarchies throughout Europe,” Sanders said. “Some of these Big Tech guys think that they have a God-given right to rule the world, and the idea that a Congress or ordinary citizens might object to what they are doing, they see as something that is unacceptable.”“So they will put unlimited amounts of money into super PACs to elect candidates who will allow them to do whatever they want. It’s very dangerous.”Asked about increasing cooperation between leading American AI companies and the U.S. military, Sanders highlighted growing concerns about privacy. “How far away are we from a small number of people having access to the email that you’ve sent out, every phone call that you’ve been on, really every aspect of your life? We’re not far.”“Either we’re there right now or we certainly assume we’ll be there. That gives the people on top extraordinary control when they have that knowledge,” he said.Sanders joins a growing and bipartisan group of national politicians focusing on AI. Some, like Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., have targeted the societal impacts of AI. Hawley has recently proposed several AI-related bills, including an effort to limit minors’ access to chatbots, a push to better track AI-related layoffs and a mechanism to evaluate AI models’ abilities. Others, including Sens. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., and Jim Banks, R-Ind., have proposed bills targeting the export of American AI technology and hardware to China. For his part, Sanders is hoping his voice can help advance the conversation. “I see growing awareness, but I don’t think Congress is moving anywhere near fast enough,” he said. Jared PerloJared Perlo is a writer and reporter at NBC News covering AI. He is currently supported by the Tarbell Center for AI Journalism.

admin - Latest News - November 19, 2025
admin
10 views 11 secs 0 Comments




Sen. Bernie Sanders explains why he thinks artificial intelligence poses profound risks for American workers and society at large.



Source link

TAGS:
PREVIOUS
Wall Street Woes: Is the AI Bubble Starting to Burst?
NEXT
Nov. 17, 2025, 9:00 PM EST / Updated Nov. 19, 2025, 10:06 AM ESTBy Scott Wong, Melanie Zanona, Kyle Stewart and Brennan LeachWASHINGTON — Congress voted overwhelmingly Tuesday to pass legislation to compel the Justice Department to release its records related to the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein — a major victory for lawmakers in both parties who’ve been leading the push for months.As the final vote tally in the House, 427-1, was read, several Epstein survivors who were sitting in the gallery embraced one another and loud cheers went up through the chamber. Rep. Clay Higgins, R-La., was the only lawmaker to vote no.Just hours later, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., headed to the floor and requested unanimous consent that the measure be passed in the upper chamber once it was received from the House.Not a single senator objected. The bill was sent to President Donald Trump, who has vowed to sign it into law, on Wednesday morning.Epstein abuse survivor Danielle Bensky, left, and Lauren Hersh, National Director of World Without Exploitation, embrace after receiving word that the Senate unanimously approved passage of the measure Tuesday. Heather Diehl / Getty ImagesThe measure, which last week secured enough bipartisan support to head straight to the House floor, got a big boost over the weekend, when Trump reversed his position and urged Republicans to support it.Reps. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., and Ro Khanna, D-Calif. — the bipartisan duo who co-authored the legislation and successfully forced the vote on the House floor, despite leadership’s objections — had spent the past few days trying to drive up the vote tally to put pressure on the Senate. The votes in both chambers exceeded their expectations. At a candlelight vigil with Epstein survivors and lawmakers outside the Capitol on Tuesday night, survivor Annie Farmer invoked the memory of Virginia Giuffre, the Epstein survivor and sexual abuse advocate who died by suicide in April at age 41. Her memoir, “Nobody’s Girl,” was posthumously published last month.“She immediately rallied all of us together and had this vision for what could happen, what people could learn from this, what she wanted to do with this platform and push that forward in such a brave way,” Farmer said, breaking down in tears.“I feel like she’s here with us. I feel like she can see this. So thank you, Virginia, for all that you’ve done for us,” she continued.Epstein survivors speak out ahead of House vote on releasing Epstein files05:26The bill would require the attorney general to release in a searchable and downloadable format “all unclassified records, documents, communications, and investigative materials” related to Epstein and his co-conspirator Ghislaine Maxwell, flight logs or travel records, people and entities connected with Epstein and internal emails, notes and other internal Justice Department communications. Those records would need to be released “not later than 30 days” after the law is enacted.The legislation says the attorney general may withhold or redact any information that identifies victims or would jeopardize an active federal investigation.Ahead of the House vote, Massie, Khanna and Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., held an emotional news conference outside the Capitol with more than a dozen Epstein survivors, urging senators to quickly take up the bill.”You had Jeffrey Epstein, who literally set up an island of rape — a rape island — and you had rich and powerful men, some of the richest people in the world, who thought that they could hang out with bankers, buy off politicians and abuse and rape America’s girls with no consequence,” Khanna told reporters Tuesday.”Because survivors spoke up, because of their courage, the truth is finally going to come out,” he added. “And when it comes out, this country is really going to have a moral reckoning.”Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., and Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., outside the Capitol on Tuesday.Graeme Sloan / Bloomberg via Getty Images fileEarlier in the day, House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., had been working to persuade the Senate to amend language in the bill to better protect the identities of victims. Higgins, the lone no vote, wrote on X that the bill, as written, could reveal “thousands of innocent people — witnesses, people who provided alibis, family members, etc.”But Massie urged his fellow Republicans not to “muck it up in the Senate.” And in the end, with such a large vote in the House, no GOP senator dared stand in the way.”We fought the president, the attorney general, the FBI director, the speaker of the House and the vice president to get this win,” Massie said, adding that opponents deserved some “credit” because they ultimately came around to the legislation. “They are finally on the side of justice.”Even after having voted for the bill, Johnson was still fuming over the process hours later. Returning to the Capitol from a White House dinner honoring Saudi Arabia’s crown prince, Johnson said, “I’m deeply disappointed in this outcome,” and he lamented that “Chuck Schumer rushed it to the floor.” Senate Majority John Thune, R-S.D., didn’t object, despite being aware of Johnson’s concerns.Johnson said he was continuing to have conversations with Trump about those issues. “I’m frustrated with the process,” he said, “but I trust Leader Thune.”Why Trump reversed courseMomentum on the Epstein discharge petition had been building in the House, which allowed rank-and-file members to circumvent leadership and force a vote.All House Democrats were on board, and after half the House signed the discharge petition to force a vote, a deluge of Republicans began announcing they would vote for it.Trump and the White House had worked behind the scenes to stop the effort, trying to pressure a handful of GOP women to drop off the petition.But with the writing on the wall, Trump abruptly reversed course Sunday night, posting on Truth Social that House Republicans should vote for the bill. On Friday, Trump directed Attorney General Pam Bondi to investigate Epstein’s ties to prominent Democrats and financial institutions.Trump, who had supported releasing the Epstein files before his re-election last year, vowed Monday to sign the legislation should it reach his desk, which he said would allow the GOP to turn the page and focus on the economy.”Some of the people that we mentioned are being looked at very seriously for their relationship to Jeffrey Epstein, but they were with him all the time — I wasn’t. I wasn’t at all,” Trump said in the Oval Office.”What I just don’t want Epstein to do is detract from the great success of the Republican Party, including the fact that the Democrats are totally blamed for the shutdown,” he continued.Standing with fellow Epstein survivors Tuesday, Jena-Lisa Jones lashed out at Trump over the new Justice Department probe.“I beg you, President Trump: Please stop making this political,” Jones said. “It is not about you, President Trump. You are our president. Please start acting like it. Show some class, show some real leadership, show that you actually care about the people other than yourself.”Jones said she voted for Trump. “Your behavior on this issue has been a national embarrassment,” she said.Marjorie Taylor Greene speaks at news conference with Epstein victims03:55Asked about the criticism, White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson said: “Democrats and the media knew about Epstein and his victims for years and did nothing to help them while President Trump was calling for transparency, and is now delivering on it with thousands of pages of documents as part of the ongoing Oversight investigation.”A conservative Trump ally in the House told NBC News that Republicans have been widely frustrated with the White House’s dismissive handling of the Epstein saga and have privately encouraged it to shift strategy — which was communicated as recently as Friday, days before Trump flipped on the issue. The White House was also warned that there would be mass Republican defections on the House floor.Thousands of documents releasedThe Justice Department has already turned over tens of thousands of documents from the Epstein investigation to the House Oversight Committee, which is conducting its own probe and has made many of those records public. In addition, Democrats on the Oversight Committee released a series of emails last week from Epstein to Maxwell and journalist Michael Wolff that refer to Trump, which Epstein’s estate turned over in response to a subpoena. In one 2019 email, Epstein wrote of Trump, “Of course he knew about the girls as he asked ghislaine to stop,” but he didn’t accuse Trump of any wrongdoing.Trump has consistently denied involvement in any of Epstein’s crimes. The two men had socialized in the 1980s and the 1990s, including at a 1992 party at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida, where video shows them discussing women. But Trump and Epstein had a falling-out in the 2000s, when Trump accused Epstein of hiring away girls and young women from his resort’s spa. Trump said he banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago. In 2008, Epstein pleaded guilty to Florida state charges of soliciting prostitution with a minor. In July 2019, the Justice Department charged him with sex trafficking of minors. A month later, authorities said, Epstein killed himself in his jail cell while he was awaiting trial.Johnson has argued for months that the Epstein legislation isn’t needed because the Oversight Committee has been releasing documents to the public. He dodged questions Monday about Trump’s about-face and his conversations with the president.”He’s never had anything to hide. He and I had the same concern — that we wanted to ensure that victims of these heinous crimes are completely protected from disclosure, those who don’t want their names out there,” Johnson told reporters. “And I’m not sure the discharge petition does that, and that’s part of the problem.”Scott WongScott Wong is a senior congressional reporter for NBC News. Melanie ZanonaMelanie Zanona is a Capitol Hill correspondent for NBC News.Kyle StewartKyle Stewart is a producer and off-air reporter covering Congress for NBC News, managing coverage of the House.Brennan LeachBrennan Leach is an associate producer for NBC News covering the Senate.Megan Lebowitz, Tara Prindiville and Frank Thorp V contributed.
Related Post
October 16, 2025
Decades-old cold case solved with DNA from smoothie cup
November 6, 2025
Car explodes into massive fireball in the Bronx
October 10, 2025
Virginia gubernatorial candidates spar during debate
November 24, 2025
U.S. lawmakers, allies voice concern over Trump’s Ukraine peace proposal
Comments are closed.
Scroll To Top
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics
© Copyright 2025 - Be That ! . All Rights Reserved