• Police seek suspects in deadly birthday party shooting
  • Lawmakers launch inquires into U.S. boat strike
  • Nov. 29, 2025, 10:07 PM EST / Updated Nov. 30, 2025,…
  • Mark Kelly says troops ‘can tell’ what orders…

Be that!

contact@bethat.ne.com

 

Be That ! Menu   ≡ ╳
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics Politics
☰

Be that!

Nov. 20, 2025, 6:29 PM ESTBy Daniel ArkinLarry Summers’ ties to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein were long public knowledge. But the recent publication of emails between the two men show they were closer than had been publicly known, creating a dilemma — and a reputational headache — for Harvard University, the Ivy League institution where Summers is on the faculty and once served as president. In interviews this week, a group of Harvard faculty members and students decried Summers’ email correspondence with Epstein, which continued more than a decade after the disgraced financier pleaded guilty to soliciting prostitution from a minor. The two men chatted about politics and current affairs, and Summers looked to Epstein for advice on his relationship with a woman.Lola J. DeAscentiis, 21, an undergraduate student who is taking one of Summers’ classes, said she believes his decision to step back from teaching at the university was “the very least that can happen.” DeAscentiis is one of the organizers of a petition — “Tell Harvard: Shut Out Summers!” — demanding that Harvard revoke Summers’ tenure.“I think there’s hope that Harvard and people outside Harvard will recognize this is such a widespread issue on our campus,” DeAscentiis said. “Epstein is no longer alive, but his legacy is alive and well, and his friends are still in high places.”Summers, 70, announced earlier this week he would withdraw from “public commitments,” including his role on the board of directors at OpenAI. Harvard, for its part, said it would investigate links between faculty members and Epstein. Summers then announced late Wednesday that he would go on leave from his teaching duties while that investigation unfolds.Larry Summers at the Allen & Co. Media and Technology Conference in Sun Valley, Idaho, on July 9. David Paul Morris / Bloomberg via Getty Images file“I am deeply ashamed of my actions and recognize the pain they have caused. I take full responsibility for my misguided decision to continue communicating with Mr. Epstein,” Summers said in a statement earlier this week.Harvard’s media office did not immediately respond to an emailed list of questions. Summers’ spokesperson declined to comment.“The cozy friendship between Epstein and Summers on display in the emails is disgusting and disgraceful,” Joseph Blitzstein, a statistics professor, said in a statement to The Crimson, Harvard’s student-run newspaper. (Blitzstein did not respond to NBC News’ request for comment, one of dozens sent to Harvard faculty members this week.)Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., has effectively called for Summers’ ouster, saying in a statement that “Summers cannot be trusted to advise our nation’s politicians, policymakers, and institutions — or teach a generation of students at Harvard or anywhere else.”It would not be easy for Harvard to cut ties with Summers, a former treasury secretary and White House adviser. He has a tenured position, a form of permanent employment in academia. Harvard’s provost office says on its webpage that professors can be removed “only for grave misconduct or neglect of duty” by the Harvard Corporation, the school’s highest governing body.Summers has not been accused of taking part in Epstein’s criminal enterprise.In an interview, one professor said the recent scrutiny on Summers has reopened old wounds from his sometimes rocky time both as university president and instructor.“He’s known to be a bully,” said Alison Frank Johnson, a history professor and the chair of the department of Germanic languages and literature. Johnson used a moniker that has trailed Summers throughout his academic career. The New York Times, summing up his term as president, once wrote he “alienated professors with a personal style that many saw as bullying and arrogant.”Johnson said many on Harvard’s campus have long been skeptical of Summers in part because of “disgraceful” remarks he delivered at a closed-door economic conference in 2005. In a speech that year before the National Bureau of Economic Research, Summers said women might lack an “intrinsic aptitude” for science and engineering.Summers apologized and insisted his comments had been “misconstrued.” The Faculty of Arts and Sciences lodged a vote of no confidence in his leadership. The furor, combined with other campus controversies, including a public clash with the public intellectual Cornel West, proved too intense to surmount. Summers resigned from the presidency in February 2006.Four months later, Harvard announced Summers had been named a “University Professor” — the highest faculty rank, and an honor extended to only a handful of academic luminaries. He has held the distinction ever since.Summers waves during Harvard commencement exercises in Cambridge, Mass., on May 24, 2018.Michael Dwyer / AP fileSummers has more recently drawn criticism from some on campus over his public stances on the war between Israel and Hamas in Gaza. Summers, who has said he was “sickened” by what he viewed as the university’s silence after Oct. 7 and a rise in antisemitism, publicly castigated “Israel demonizing faculty” — namely, Walter Johnson, a fellow University Professor.Johnson, a history professor and former adviser to the campus’ Palestine Solidarity Committee, lambasted Summers in an email, calling him a “prejudiced and unprincipled bully” and assailing him for his criticism of pro-Palestinian activists at Harvard.“I wouldn’t miss him,” Johnson said in part, adding that he did not have a clear-cut take on Summers’ future at Harvard: “Whether it is appropriate for the University to discipline someone for things — no matter how tawdry and small-minded — revealed in a state-sponsored dump of their private email seems to me to be an open question.”The emails released by House lawmakers show that Summers and Epstein communicated as recently as 2019, more than a decade after Epstein pleaded guilty in Florida state court to soliciting prostitution from a minor. They continued to correspond until July 5, 2019, a day before Epstein was arrested and charged with sex trafficking of minors.The length of Summers’ relationship with Epstein represents not “just one lapse” but a “character flaw,” Rachel McCleary, an economics department lecturer, told The Crimson.In one set of emails, Summers, who is married to the academic Elisa New, sought Epstein’s advice on his romantic pursuit of an unnamed woman he described as a mentee. Epstein described himself as a “pretty good wing man” for Summers. Summers lamented that the woman seemed interested in someone else: “I dint [sic] want to be in a gift giving competition while being the friend without benefits.”Epstein replied: “shes smart. making you pay for past errors. ignore the daddy im going to go out with the motorcycle guy, you reacted well.. annoyed shows caring., no whining showed strentgh.” (NBC News is quoting from the messages verbatim, typos included.)In another set of emails, Summers decried that men who “hit on” women may face repercussions in the workplace. In an email dated Oct. 27, 2017, Summers revisited the subject of intellectual differences between men and women, telling Epstein: “I observed that half the IQ in world was possessed by women without mentioning they are more than 51 percent of population.”The cache of emails has been the subject of extensive reporting from The Crimson, which broke the news on Wednesday night that Summers would not finish his remaining three class sessions this semester and planned to go on leave as director of the Mossavar-Rahmani Center for Business and Government at the Harvard Kennedy School.Epstein’s ties to Harvard have been extensively documented. Harvard carried out what it characterized as a “full review” of the financier’s connections to the university, releasing a 27-page report in May 2020 that confirmed the school received $9.1 million in gifts from him between 1998 and 2008.Jeffrey Epstein in Cambridge, Mass., on Sept. 8, 2004.Rick Friedman / Corbis via Getty Images fileThe report said “no gifts were received from Epstein following his conviction in 2008.” (Epstein served a year in Florida jail as part of a secret agreement with federal prosecutors that later led to an internal Justice Department investigation. Epstein’s death in custody in 2019 while awaiting federal prosecution was ruled a suicide.)Lawrence Lessig, a Harvard law professor, said in an email to NBC News that the recent revelations about Summers’ relationship with Epstein raise questions about the 2020 report.“I think the important thing is that Harvard is revisiting the report they wrote in 2020,” Lessig wrote. “But the important output from that effort should not just be what we all know — that Larry was integral to Epstein’s relationship to the University — but the part we don’t know: Why did Harvard hide this connection in 2020? Their report was Hamlet without the prince. Why?”Harvard did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Lessig’s email. The day before Summers announced he would step back from teaching, he returned to a Harvard lecture hall and directly addressed the Epstein scandal, according to a video posted on TikTok that was verified by NBC News.“I think it’s very important to fulfill my teaching obligations,” he told his students, “and so, with your permission, we’re going to go forward and talk about the material in the class.”Summers changed his public position by the following night, and his future at Harvard remains unclear.“Mr. Summers has decided it’s in the best interest of the Center for him to go on leave from his role as Director as Harvard undertakes its review,” Summers’ spokesman, Steven Goldberg, said in a statement Wednesday.“He is not scheduled to teach next semester,” Goldberg added.Daniel ArkinDaniel Arkin is a senior reporter at NBC News.

admin - Latest News - November 21, 2025
admin
9 views 8 secs 0 Comments




Larry Summers’ ties to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein were long public knowledge.



Source link

TAGS:
PREVIOUS
New federal guidelines for female crash test dummies
NEXT
Nov. 20, 2025, 5:16 PM ESTBy Marina Kopf and Maggie VespaIn 2024, Kara Goodwin started feeling a pain in her arm and shoulder that wouldn’t go away. She was diagnosed with bicep tendinitis and frozen shoulder. Doctors thought the resident of Brooklyn, New York, who has run multiple marathons, had an overuse injury from her active lifestyle. Two months later, when the pain hadn’t gone away, Goodwin got an MRI. “They could visibly see the giant tumor that was shattering my humerus bone from the inside out,” she said.Goodwin, now 39, was diagnosed with stage 4 lung cancer that had spread to her bones. It was “quite shocking as a marathon runner,” she said. “I have no family history of cancer,” she added.Goodwin’s cancer, while treatable, can’t be cured. The treatments will keep the cancer at bay but eventually, she said, they’ll most likely stop working. Lung cancer is more curable when it’s found at an earlier stage, according to the American Lung Association. Kara Goodwin was diagnosed with stage 4 lung cancer after several months of arm pain. Evelyn Freja for NBC NewsFor Goodwin, it’s unlikely that would’ve happened: Lung cancer screening isn’t recommended for people her age, nor is it recommended for people who were never smokers. The current guidelines, from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, say that people ages 50 to 80 who smoked a pack a day for 20 years and still smoke or have quit in the past 15 years should get a yearly scan to screen for lung cancer. But up to 20% of lung cancer cases are diagnosed in people who never smoked or used any other form of tobacco, according to the American Cancer Society.A new study, published Thursday in JAMA Network Open, suggests that the guidelines are missing the majority of lung cancer cases.People still think of lung cancer as a disease that only affects older men and lifetime smokers, even though it’s becoming more common in younger women and people who never smoked, said lead study author Dr. Ankit Bharat, executive director of the Northwestern Medicine Canning Thoracic Institute in Chicago. “Every day, we are seeing patients who’ve never smoked, who may have had passive smoking exposure, they’re coming with advanced lung cancer, and then it’s not curable.”
Related Post
October 22, 2025
Savewith a NBCUniversal ProfileCreate your free profile or log in to save this articleOct. 22, 2025, 12:01 AM EDTBy David IngramHundreds of public figures, including Nobel Prize-winning scientists, former military leaders, artists and British royalty, signed a statement Wednesday calling for a ban on work that could lead to computer superintelligence, a yet-to-be-reached stage of artificial intelligence that they said could one day pose a threat to humanity.The statement proposes “a prohibition on the development of superintelligence” until there is both “broad scientific consensus that it will be done safely and controllably” and “strong public buy-in.”Organized by AI researchers concerned about the fast pace of technological advances, the statement had more than 800 signatures Tuesday night from a diverse group of people. The signers include Nobel laureate and AI researcher Geoffrey Hinton, former Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Mike Mullen, rapper Will.i.am, former Trump White House aide Steve Bannon and U.K. Prince Harry and his wife, Meghan Markle.The statement adds to a growing list of calls for an AI slowdown at a time when AI is threatening to remake large swaths of the economy and culture. OpenAI, Google, Meta and other tech companies are pouring billions of dollars into new AI models and the data centers that power them, while businesses of all kinds are looking for ways to add AI features to a broad range of products and services.Some AI researchers believe AI systems are advancing fast enough that soon they’ll demonstrate what’s known as artificial general intelligence, or the ability to perform intellectual tasks as a human could. From there, researchers and tech executives believe what could follow might be superintelligence, in which AI models perform better than even the most expert humans.The statement is a product of the Future of Life Institute, a nonprofit group that works on large-scale risks such as nuclear weapons, biotechnology and AI. Among its early backers in 2015 was tech billionaire Elon Musk, who’s now part of the AI race with his startup xAI. Now, the institute says, its biggest recent donor is Vitalik Buterin, a co-founder of the Ethereum blockchain, and it says it doesn’t accept donations from big tech companies or from companies seeking to build artificial general intelligence. Its executive director, Anthony Aguirre, a physicist at the University of California, Santa Cruz, said AI developments are happening faster than the public can understand what’s happening or what’s next.“We’ve, at some level, had this path chosen for us by the AI companies and founders and the economic system that’s driving them, but no one’s really asked almost anybody else, ‘Is this what we want?’” he said in an interview.“It’s been quite surprising to me that there has been less outright discussion of ‘Do we want these things? Do we want human-replacing AI systems?’” he said. “It’s kind of taken as: Well, this is where it’s going, so buckle up, and we’ll just have to deal with the consequences. But I don’t think that’s how it actually is. We have many choices as to how we develop technologies, including this one.”The statement isn’t aimed at any one organization or government in particular. Aguirre said he hopes to force a conversation that includes not only major AI companies, but also politicians in the United States, China and elsewhere. He said the Trump administration’s pro-industry views on AI need balance.“This is not what the public wants. They don’t want to be in a race for this,” he said. He said there might eventually need to be an international treaty on advanced AI, as there is for other potentially dangerous technologies.The White House didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment on the statement Tuesday, ahead of its official release.Americans are almost evenly split over the potential impact of AI, according to an NBC News Decision Desk Poll powered by SurveyMonkey this year. While 44% of U.S. adults surveyed said they thought AI would make their and their families’ lives better, 42% said they thought it would make their futures worse.Top tech executives, who have offered predictions about superintelligence and signaled that they are working toward it as a goal, didn’t sign the statement. Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg said in July that superintelligence was “now in sight.” Musk posted on X in February that the advent of digital superintelligence “is happening in real-time” and has earlier warned about “robots going down the street killing people,” though now Tesla, where Musk is CEO, is working to develop humanoid robots. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said last month that he’d be surprised if superintelligence didn’t arrive by 2030 and wrote in a January blog post that his company was turning its attention there.Several tech companies didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment on the statement.Last week, the Future of Life Institute told NBC News that OpenAI had issued subpoenas to it and its president as a form of retaliation for calling for AI oversight. OpenAI Chief Strategy Officer Jason Kwon wrote on Oct. 11 that the subpoena was a result of OpenAI’s suspicions around the funding sources of several nonprofit groups that had been critical of its restructuring.Other signers of the statement include Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak, Virgin Group co-founder Richard Branson, conservative talk show host Glenn Beck, former U.S. national security adviser Susan Rice, Nobel-winning physicist John Mather, Turing Award winner and AI researcher Yoshua Bengio and the Rev. Paolo Benanti, a Vatican AI adviser. Several AI researchers based in China also signed the statement.Aguirre said the goal was to have a broad set of signers from across society.“We want this to be social permission for people to talk about it, but also we want to very much represent that this is not a niche issue of some nerds in Silicon Valley, who are often the only people at the table. This is an issue for all of humanity,” he said.David IngramDavid Ingram is a tech reporter for NBC News.
November 17, 2025
Trump Reverses Course on Release of Epstein Files
November 14, 2025
ICE eyes new AI translation technology
October 22, 2025
Oct. 22, 2025, 5:24 AM EDT / Updated Oct. 22, 2025, 5:35 AM EDTBy Alexander Smith and Daryna MayerJust hours after President Donald Trump said peace talks with Russia’s Vladimir Putin were on hold to avoid wasting his time, the Kremlin launched intense overnight strikes that killed at least six people in Ukraine.Ukrainian officials said the Russian attacks on Kyiv and other cities were the latest proof that Putin was not ready for peace and merely wanted to use negotiations to drag out the war.Asked about Trump’s remarks, the Kremlin said Wednesday that neither president wanted to waste time — and cautioned that any meeting would require further “preparation.”Two children were among those killed in the overnight strikes on the Ukrainian capital and other cities, President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said in a post. In total over the past 24 hours, at least 13 people were killed and dozens others injured in Russian attacks across Ukraine, according to local officials.An apartment building damaged by a drone strike in Zaporizhzhia, southern Ukraine, on Wednesday.Stringer / ReutersAs in previous years, when the frigid months are about to bite, Russia has targeted energy facilities in an attempt to put Ukrainians in the cold and dark.“Another night proving that Russia does not feel enough pressure for dragging out the war,” Zelenskyy said. He called on Western allies to supply Ukraine with long-range missiles capable of striking deeper into Russia, saying that Moscow had been emboldened to up its attacks by Kyiv’s current lack of such capabilities.“Russia continues to do everything to weasel out of diplomacy,” he said in his nightly address. “The greater Ukraine’s long-range reach, the greater Russia’s willingness to end the war.”A firefighter works at the site of a Russian strike in Zaporizhzhia.State Emergency Service Of Ukraine In Zaporizhzhia Region / via ReutersThe attacks came after Trump confirmed his much anticipated meeting with Putin in Hungary had been shelved.“I don’t want to have a wasted meeting; I don’t want to have a waste of time,” Trump said, adding that he would “see what happens” as events played out.Asked about Trump’s comments Wednesday, Putin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters that neither Trump nor Putin “wants to waste time.” He called them “two presidents who are accustomed to working effectively and efficiently, but effectiveness always requires preparation.”The American president’s remarks came after Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov reasserted Tuesday that Russia opposed an immediate ceasefire before talks begin.”This is the basic difference which is existing now between Russia and the United States,” Andrei Fedorov, former deputy foreign minister of Russia, told NBC News in an interview in Moscow on Wednesday.Putin and his team have not shifted publicly during these talks about talks, insisting on hardline demands and balking at the insistence from Kyiv and its European allies to halt fighting along current lines before conducting deeper negotiations.Trump this week echoed that European position.Though Trump has claimed victories in helping calm other global conflicts, Ukraine — a war he once said he could solve in 24 hours — has so far proved more difficult. He has variously sought to strongarm Zelenskyy and Putin with few tangible results.Trump essentially pressed pause on his latest effort, believing both sides in the conflict were not ready to seriously talk peace, after he was briefed on a “productive” call between Lavrov and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, a senior White House official told NBC News. The Kremlin insisted it wanted to adhere to what it said was agreed in Alaska between Trump and Putin.Jae C. Hong / APDespite this, the would-be host of the Trump-Putin summit said it could still happen.Viktor Orban, Hungary’s Prime Minister who is a long-time ally of Trump’s and has warm relations with Putin, said that his ambassador in Washington was still working on the meeting.”Preparations for the peace summit continue,” Orban wrote on Facebook. “The date is still uncertain. When the time comes, we will organize it.”Alexander SmithAlexander Smith is a senior reporter for NBC News Digital based in London.Daryna MayerDaryna Mayer is an NBC News producer and reporter based in Kyiv, Ukraine.Keir Simmons and Natasha Lebedeva contributed.
Comments are closed.
Scroll To Top
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics
© Copyright 2025 - Be That ! . All Rights Reserved