• Police seek suspects in deadly birthday party shooting
  • Lawmakers launch inquires into U.S. boat strike
  • Nov. 29, 2025, 10:07 PM EST / Updated Nov. 30, 2025,…
  • Mark Kelly says troops ‘can tell’ what orders…

Be that!

contact@bethat.ne.com

 

Be That ! Menu   ≡ ╳
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics Politics
☰

Be that!

Nov. 27, 2025, 1:07 PM ESTBy Jennifer Jett, Peter Guo, Ed Flanagan and Jay GanglaniHONG KONG — Kan Shui-ying was home alone on Wednesday, watching television at her Hong Kong apartment while her husband and son were at work. It was around 3 p.m., she said, when she “smelled a strong burning odor.”She thought she might be boiling something, so she went to check.“I opened the window to see if there was anything,” Kan told NBC News. “Just then, a friend called me and said, ‘Wang Fuk Court is on fire!’”Grabbing only her phone, Kan went downstairs to see what was going on and found the fire was already “burning very fiercely.”“I thought I was just coming down to take a quick look,” she said, not realizing “that it was such a serious disaster.”Kan and her family are among hundreds who lost their homes in the fire at the high-rise housing complex in Hong Kong’s northern Tai Po district. At least 75 people are dead and dozens of others missing in the Chinese territory’s deadliest blaze in seven decades.Investigators are focusing on the bamboo scaffolding and mesh netting that surrounded the eight towers at Wang Fuk Court, seven of which were engulfed in flames. Three people from a contractor hired to carry out renovations have been arrested on suspicion of manslaughter, amid questions as to whether the building materials failed to meet safety standards and helped spread the fire.John Lee, Hong Kong’s top leader, said Thursday night that the blaze was now “largely under control.” He also said the city’s Development Bureau had met with industry representatives to discuss gradually replacing the city’s widely used bamboo scaffolding with metal.Bamboo scaffolding, a tradition with roots in ancient Chinese architecture, is an iconic part of Hong Kong, an international financial hub where skyscrapers are the norm. Bound together by nylon cords, the lattices are used for new construction as well as buildings under renovation.Construction workers with specialized training in bamboo scaffolding — known as “spidermen” — scramble hundreds of feet up the sides of gleaming buildings in Hong Kong, a densely populated city of 7.5 million people. The scaffolding is often covered in mesh safety nets in green and other colors to prevent debris from falling onto pedestrians below.

admin - Latest News - November 27, 2025
admin
5 views 13 secs 0 Comments




Bamboo scaffolding is still a common sight in the Chinese territory, but may be phased out after the devastating Wang Fuk Court blaze.



Source link

TAGS:
PREVIOUS
Nov. 27, 2025, 11:05 AM ESTBy Elmira AliievaIn the latest twist in human evolution, scientists have discovered that a mysterious foot found in Ethiopia belonged to a previously unknown ancient relative.Dated to around 3.4 million years ago, the species was likely similar to Lucy, an ancient human relative who lived in the area at around the same time, according to a study published Wednesday in the scientific journal Nature. But researchers found that the Burtele foot — named after the place in northeastern Ethiopia where it was discovered in 2009 — was unmistakably different.With an opposable big toe resembling a human thumb, the fossilized Burtele foot suggests its owner was a skilled climber, spending more time in the trees than Lucy, the study said.Elements of the Burtele foot, discovered in Ethiopia in 2009.Yohannes Haile-Selassie / Institute of Human Origins Arizona State via AFPFor decades, Lucy’s species was considered the ancestor of all later hominids — an ancient relative more closely related to humans, including Homo sapiens, than to chimpanzees.Scientists were unable to confirm the foot belonged to a new species until they were able to study new fossils, including a jawbone with 12 teeth, that were found at the same site.After identifying them as Australopithecus deyiremeda, they found the Burtele foot belonged to the same species.John Rowan, an assistant professor in human evolution at Britain’s University of Cambridge, said their conclusion was “very reasonable.”“Now we have much stronger evidence that, at the same time, there lived a closely related but adaptively distinct species,” Rowan, who was not associated with the study, told NBC News in an email Thursday.The study also looked at how these species shared the same environment. The research team, led by Yohannes Haile-Selassie from Arizona State University, concluded that the new species spent much of its time in the forest.Lucy, or Australopithecus afarensis, likely roamed the ground, the study said, before going on to suggest that the two species likely had different diets and used the landscape in different ways.Multiple examinations of the newly found teeth indicated that A. deyiremeda was more primitive than Lucy and likely relied on a diet of leaves, fruit and nuts, the study said.“These differences meant that they were unlikely to be directly competing for the same resources,” said Ashleigh L.A. Wiseman, an assistant research professor at the McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, which is also based at the U.K.’s University of Cambridge.Highlighting the broader impact of this discovery on our understanding of evolution, Wiseman said in an email Thursday that the findings reminded us “that human evolution wasn’t a straight ladder with one species turning into the next.”Instead, she said, it should be viewed as a family tree with several so-called “cousins” alive at the same time, and each having a different way of surviving. “Did they interact? We will likely never know the answer to that question,” she added.Rowan also contended that as the number of well-documented human-related species grows, so do our questions about our ancestry. “Which species were our direct ancestors? Which were close relatives? That’s the tricky part,” he said. “As species diversity grows, so do the number of plausible reconstructions for how human evolution played out.”And Wiseman cautioned against making definitive species assignments, as those should rest on well-preserved parts of skull and fossils that belong to multiple associated individuals. While the new research strengthens the case for A. deyiremeda’s existence, she said, it “doesn’t remove all other alternative interpretations.”Elmira AliievaElmira Aliieva is an NBC News intern based in London.
NEXT
Nov. 27, 2025, 1:59 PM ESTBy Katherine DoyleA federal judge is pressing the Justice Department to explain how it will protect the identities of Jeffrey Epstein’s victims after lawyers said that dozens of survivors’ names appeared unredacted in documents released by Congress, prompting what they described as “widespread panic.”Judge Richard Berman of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on Wednesday night requested a detailed description of the materials the government intends to release and an explanation of how it will safeguard the privacy of victims, including through redactions. Berman, who oversaw the trafficking case against Epstein, attached a letter from attorneys Bradley Edwards and Brittany Henderson that calls for strict privacy protections in future releases.The House Oversight Committee’s public release of more than 20,000 documents caused “widespread panic” among Epstein’s survivors, the lawyers wrote.Newly released emails bring Trump’s relationship with Epstein back into spotlight02:20Edwards and Henderson, who represent hundreds of Epstein’s victims, urged the Justice Department to redact all victims’ names in any future materials sent to Congress or made public. They also asked for a private meeting with the DOJ to share a list of more than 300 victims they represent so that federal officials can protect against further disclosures.The lawyers said dozens of victims’ names appeared unredacted in the cache of documents and emails from the Justice Department released this month, turning the release into a new source of concern for victims who had sought to maintain their anonymity.“[T]ransparency CANNOT come at the expense of the privacy, safety, and protection of sexual abuse and sex trafficking victims, especially these survivors who have already suffered repeatedly,” the lawyers wrote. According to the letter, some victims warned that releasing their names would put them in physical danger. Several told their lawyers that they had been approached on the street by reporters, including one who said she was confronted while standing with her nine-year old son, according to the letter.The lawyers pointed to one document released by the Justice Department that they said listed the names of “at least 28 victims … including individuals who were minor children at the time of the abuse,” as well as women granted protection in the same legal jurisdiction “as a result of grave public safety concerns.”“This type of negligence by the government to a survivor is just unable to comprehend,” one alleged victim wrote in a document included in the court filing. “I don’t understand how this is possible.”“I have been unable to mentally and emotionally function or sleep,” said another.A third questioned, “I thought the government had promised to redact our names and identifying material. I don’t understand how this is happening again.”Virginia Giuffre’s family reacts to House vote on Epstein files08:08In their letter, Edwards and Henderson said some survivors fear the Justice Department “intentionally exposed their names” when it released thousands of unredacted files tied to Epstein’s case to Congress this year.“These women now beg this Court and beg the United States Department of Justice to allow them to choose to remain protected,” the attorneys said.While Epstein’s estate also failed to redact some names, the lawyers said they believed these to be “genuine mistakes.”The lawyers also accused the DOJ of creating a “perpetual distraction” through the release of grand jury materials tied to Epstein co-conspirator Ghislaine Maxwell, arguing that the documents provide little meaningful information and are being used as a diversion.The Justice Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment Thursday.Berman presided over the government’s 2019 case against Epstein before the disgraced financier and sex offender died in jail while awaiting trial.The letter from Edwards and Henderson comes after President Donald Trump signed a bill on Nov. 19 directing the DOJ to release its Epstein files. The president, who for months argued against passing the legislation, has continued to call the push to release the files part of a “hoax.”Congress passed the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which directs Attorney General Pam Bondi to release all unclassified records tied to Epstein within 30 days, while withholding or redacting material that could jeopardize a federal investigation. It is still not known exactly when or how the files will ultimately be released.Some victims have criticized the attempts to unseal the grand jury testimony, saying those attempts have disregarded victims’ repeated calls for privacy.Katherine DoyleKatherine Doyle is a White House reporter for NBC News.
Related Post
September 30, 2025
Nicole Kidman and Keith Urban separate after 19 years
October 4, 2025
Savewith a NBCUniversal ProfileCreate your free profile or log in to save this articleOct. 3, 2025, 11:45 PM EDTBy Didi Martinez, Laura Strickler and Julia AinsleyThe federal government is offering unaccompanied migrant children 14 and older $2,500 to leave the United States of their own volition, or “self-deport” back to their countries, according to a memo sent by the Department of Health and Human Services and obtained by NBC News.The notice was sent Friday afternoon to legal service providers around the country that represent unaccompanied migrant children. Eligible children are those who are from countries other than Mexico and who are currently in the custody of the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR), which is part of HHS.“This benefit is intended to support reintegration efforts following departures,” the notice reads. The notice also says that the Department of Homeland Security, which is issuing the stipends, has already identified unaccompanied children in ORR custody who have said they want to file or who will file “for voluntary departure.”Health and Human Services referred all queries to the Department of Homeland Security. The effort to entice minors to self-deport emerged as a rumor on social media Thursday night among immigrant advocates who said they had heard Immigration and Customs Enforcement was labeling the operation “Freaky Friday.” ICE said the name was a made up “ridiculous term” but conceded the agency was offering money to unaccompanied minor children to self deport.Emily Covington, the assistant director of ICE’s Office of Public Affairs, said in a statement that the offer from the federal government was a “strictly voluntary option to return home to their families.”Covington said that the option gives unaccompanied children “a choice and allows them to make an informed decision about their future. Any payment to support a return home would be provided after an immigration judge grants the request and the individual arrives in their country of origin.”The move alarmed immigration advocates around the country.Wendy Young with Kids in Need of Defense said in a statement, “Unaccompanied children should never be removed from the United States without a full and fair process to determine if they are eligible for U.S. protection.”“This operation undermines laws that guarantee that process for unaccompanied children, and it runs counter to our nation’s longstanding commitment to protect the most vulnerable among us — children — from violence, trafficking, abuse, persecution, and other grave dangers,” she continued.Roxana Cortés-Mills, who runs the Center for Immigrant and Refugee Advancement in Nebraska, said regardless of the offer, the rumors about it had sowed fear among immigrant communities. She said a rural school district in the state called her office asking, “should we tell parents to pull their kids from school?” She added, “This is the first time in my nine years of working with unaccompanied children that I am hearing this type of offer.” In Houston, Dalia Castillo-Granados, director of Children’s Immigration Law Academy, said offering money to children “raises many concerns given the vulnerable position these children are in.”The Trump administration offer comes amid an overall push to get undocumented immigrants to self-deport, offering adults and their families $1,000 to leave the country under a separate program. Over Labor Day weekend, the administration also tried to deport several unaccompanied children back to their home country of Guatemala but was temporarily blocked from doing so following court proceedings as DHS was loading the children on planes.“We are seeing a lot of patterns and receiving a lot of reports that ICE is using a lot of pressure tactics to encourage people to take deportation. It’s bad enough to use these tactics on adults to encourage them to self deport but it’s a whole new level of concern to try to use it with children,” Vanessa Dojaquez-Torres, practice and policy counsel with the American Immigration Lawyers Association, said about Friday’s news. More than 300,000 children entered the U.S. by themselves during the Biden administration before being released to parents, relatives or non-family sponsors across the country. As of August, the federal government had 2,011 unaccompanied minor children in its custody, according to the HHS website. Typically, children who cross the border without a legal parent or guardian are transferred temporarily to HHS custody until they can be matched with a U.S.-based sponsor. Children who immigrate to the United States without parents have special protections under the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act, unless they are from Mexico or Canada. The Trump administration has sought to thwart those special protections and recently attempted to deport Guatemalan children who were still in the process of seeking asylum. Though they have special protections to ensure they are screened for possible trafficking, unaccompanied children who crossed the border illegally have been previously deported, including under Democratic administrations. But incentivizing children to leave through financial plans has never been done before.Under the Biden administration, unaccompanied minors crossing the border surged to record numbers in 2021, causing backlogs at Health and Human Services as the agency struggled to place them with appropriate sponsors. The Trump administration has said many of those children were placed in unsafe environments where they could be abused or exploited for labor. Didi MartinezDidi Martinez is a producer for NBC News’ national security unit.Laura StricklerLaura Strickler is the senior investigative producer on the national security team where she produces television stories and writes for NBCNews.com.Julia AinsleyI am NBC News’ Senior Homeland Security Correspondent.
October 5, 2025
Here's the biggest news you missed this weekend
November 21, 2025
Missouri judge loses job over too many Elvis references
Comments are closed.
Scroll To Top
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics
© Copyright 2025 - Be That ! . All Rights Reserved