• Police seek suspects in deadly birthday party shooting
  • Lawmakers launch inquires into U.S. boat strike
  • Nov. 29, 2025, 10:07 PM EST / Updated Nov. 30, 2025,…
  • Mark Kelly says troops ‘can tell’ what orders…

Be that!

contact@bethat.ne.com

 

Be That ! Menu   ≡ ╳
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics Politics
☰

Be that!

Nov. 6, 2025, 5:00 AM ESTBy Emily Lorsch and Vicky NguyenEver scroll through Instagram or TikTok and suddenly stop in your tracks because you see a beautiful apartment for rent for only $1,100 a month?The listing looks real … because it is. The real estate agent appears legitimate … because the person is real. But it’s only after you pay the “refundable” $350 application fee that you learn the truth: It’s a scam. “I knew it in my gut but I double checked everything, looked him up, my friend checked too … it all seemed so legitimate,” Jenny Diaz, 28, said. Earlier this year, Diaz landed a new job and was ready to live on her own. Her friend sent her an Instagram post — a video of what looked like the perfect Manhattan apartment. The profile had more than 27,000 followers, making it feel credible.“It’s so hard to find apartments. I was using all sorts of apps but they get taken so quickly. And then my friend alerted me to these videos she was seeing on IG of these great apartments for reasonable prices.”What happened next, NBC News learned, has become all too common for prospective renters across the country.Diaz said she and her friend messaged the poster, who claimed to be a real estate agent. She shared her personal information — name, move-in date, and income — and was told that paying the $350 refundable application fee would secure her a tour. But, she said, after she paid and received a confirmation email, follow-up messages went unanswered. That’s when reality hit.“They stopped responding to me and my heart just dropped. I knew it instantly and I couldn’t believe it,” she said.It’s a growing problem, according to the FBI. The bureau’s internet crime complaint center received more than 130 real estate complaints referencing social media sites, with losses of approximately $600,000 in just the first five months of this year. That’s compared to a total of 150 complaints last year with about $1.5 million in losses.These scams are sophisticated. Fraudsters use real agents’ names and license numbers. If questioned, they’ll send a doctored photo of a legitimate license or direct victims to fake company websites that look authentic, complete with agent photos and contact details.After NBC News spoke with a scammer posing as an agent for Keller Williams NYC and sent this website, the company confirmed that the agent and website are not affiliated with it. The company now has a consumer alert on its website warning visitors of such schemes. Compass’ Shane Boyle is one of the dozens of real estate brokers who these imposters are pretending to be. “I have a pit in my stomach looking at that. I mean, it’s horrible,” he said as he scrolled through online profiles using his name and personal photos. “Usually, I’m getting the angry phone call because they’ve done a little bit of Googling, and they’ve got then to my real account and to my real number, and they’ll start questioning me.”Boyle showed NBC News dozens of texts and emails from people who believed he deceived them. On his real social media accounts, he’s received furious comments such as, “You need to rot for what you’ve done.”“I try to block that out, actually. That’s gonna get me a bit emotional,” he said after reading through some of the comments. But it’s not just agents’ identities being hijacked — scammers are also stealing real video listings to lure in prospective renters.Mike Bussey, a Compass agent who runs Real NYC Apartments with more than 125,000 TikTok followers and nearly 50,000 Instagram followers, regularly posts virtual apartment tours. Those are the videos many of these scammers are using alongside names like Boyle’s to deceive people looking for a new home. “My mother had shown me the video and gone, ‘Mike, this is such a good deal, I’ll rent it myself.’ And I was like, ‘Mom, that’s not real.’ And she goes, ‘No, this is your voice. This is you.’ And I had to explain to her, ‘No, somebody is taking my videos, putting fake prices on them, and trying to scam people.’”In one case, a video of a $12,000-a-month apartment was reposted on a fake profile claiming it was being listed for $1,700 a month.“The thing that broke my heart is my mother’s a very intelligent person, so she fell for this. Imagine how many other people have fallen for this, and also she had assumed that I was trying to drum up more business by lying. So I can’t imagine how many people have thought that of me as well,” Bussey said. NBC News sent Meta and TikTok links to accounts on their platforms that appeared to be scams and both companies took those specific profiles down. TikTok told NBC News it proactively removed 97% of content that violated its guidelines on impersonation in the first quarter of this year. Meta says it uses automated and manual systems to block accounts that abuse the company’s standards, but that fraudsters are constantly changing their tactics.Bussey has reported more than 1,000 of his videos that were posted on fake TikTok and Instagram accounts — a task so time-consuming he had to hire someone to help get them taken down. Boyle says he, too, has been reporting these scams for years, but it’s a never-ending cycle.“Let’s say I put down one today. If I report it to whatever social media channel, maybe two goes up the next day. So it’s like it’s such a whack-a-mole situation.”If you are a renter, protecting yourself starts with vigilance. If a deal looks too good to be true, it probably is. Check the market rate, never pay someone you haven’t met in person, and don’t send money for an apartment you haven’t toured. Agents say that typically, an application fee will not be more than $50. Also, independently verify an agent’s contact information — don’t rely on the listing profile. And if you do fall victim, contact your bank, the platform and the FBI immediately.Emily LorschEmily Lorsch is a producer at NBC News covering business and the economy.Vicky NguyenVicky is an NBC News chief consumer investigative correspondent, anchor of NBC News Daily and New York Times best selling author of the new memoir “Boat Baby.” She reports for the Today show, Nightly News with Tom Llamas and NBC News Now. She graduated as valedictorian from the University of San Francisco. Vicky lives in New York with her husband and three daughters.

admin - Latest News - November 6, 2025
admin
12 views 12 secs 0 Comments




Scammers are using genuine apartment listings and stealing real estate agents’ identities on social media to con desperate prospective renters.



Source link

TAGS:
PREVIOUS
Car explodes into massive fireball in the Bronx
NEXT
Nov. 6, 2025, 5:00 AM ESTBy Erika EdwardsTreating childhood fevers has long been a source of parental angst. Do you feed a fever or starve it? (Spoiler: Kids who are sick need to eat and drink enough to keep their bodies hydrated and well-nourished, doctors say.)But in September, when President Donald Trump told pregnant women to “fight like hell not to take” Tylenol over unfounded claims it was linked to autism, the ongoing debate over what’s long been considered a standard of care for kids’ fevers bubbled up again. “A friend’s baby (7 months) was running a 101 fever on Friday night and she texted me, ‘of course now I’m scared to give him Tylenol,’” one Reddit user posted recently. A person identifying as a health care worker posted in a different Reddit thread last month that a patient “brought their infant in with 103 fever and said they were too afraid to give acetaminophen.”The president, who has no medical training, said multiple times that pregnant women and their children should “tough it out” instead of taking the pain reliever.Acetaminophen is the generic name for Tylenol and is an ingredient in a variety of medications. There is no credible data, experts say, showing the fever-reducer isn’t safe when it’s used correctly. The American Academy of Pediatrics wrote last week that studies don’t find a “causal link” between acetaminophen and autism in children or during pregnancy. “Misleading claims that the medicine is not safe and is linked to increased rates of autism send a confusing, dangerous message to parents and expectant parents,” the group wrote. What’s the point of a fever?When a new and potentially harmful germ invades our immune system, the body reacts by raising its core temperature. Viruses and bacteria tend not to thrive in warm environments.That’s not necessarily a bad thing — within reason, said Dr. Molly O’Shea, a pediatrician in Michigan and spokesperson for the American Academy of Pediatrics.“Fever has value in fighting infection,” she said. “But there is a tipping point where that value is lost.”That’s when the child is so uncomfortable that they don’t want to eat or drink. “That’s when reducing the temperature makes sense,” she said. “More harm may come from dehydration.”Is a high fever always dangerous?When Seth Creech caught the flu during the 2009 H1N1 pandemic, age 6 at the time, his fever soared to 106 degrees Fahrenheit. Seth Creech in 2009 at age 6. A bout with H1N1 sent his fever soaring to 106 degrees. Courtesy of Buddy CreechIt’s a frighteningly high temperature that would send most parents into a panic. Seth’s father, Dr. Buddy Creech, a professor of pediatric diseases at Vanderbilt University Medical Center in Nashville, Tennessee, had a different view. “As a pediatrician, I knew that 106 wasn’t going to hurt him,” he said. “In a normal, healthy child, the body is really well calibrated to keep that temperature in a range that’s not going to be harmful to the child. That’s important for parents to realize.”What was concerning, Creech said, was how his son was acting while sick. “He looked terrible,” he said. “His eyes were glassy. He didn’t want to move.”Fever-reducing medications like acetaminophen and ibuprofen brought Seth’s fever down to about 101 degrees. “He was totally fine at that point,” Creech said. “He was gold, playing Legos, video games.” Seth Creech recovered and is now a 22-year-old college senior.“If the child looks well and is feeling fine, is playful and is active, you really don’t have to do anything,” Buddy Creech said. “You can ride that out in part to see how they’re doing and to let the fever increase the pressure on the germ to die.”O’Shea supported the stance that a child’s behavior is key in determining how to react to high temperatures. Signs to treat fevers include being unusually sleepy, cranky and refusing food and drinks.Still, the AAP recommends calling the pediatrician for advice when a child’s fever reaches 104 degrees.The threshold for babies younger than 3 months old is much lower, according to the group, at 100.4 degrees.Creech said there’s no evidence that giving kids Tylenol or other medicines to ease their pain or fevers would prolong their illness.“Parents should feel very safe giving their kids Tylenol when they need it,” he said.Erika EdwardsErika Edwards is a health and medical news writer and reporter for NBC News and “TODAY.”
Related Post
November 13, 2025
Trump blames Democrats after end of government shutdown
September 27, 2025
Gloria Estefan and Laila Lockhart Kraner Talk ‘Gabby's Dollhouse’
October 12, 2025
Oct. 12, 2025, 5:00 AM EDTBy Lawrence HurleyWASHINGTON — The way Louisiana’s Republican leaders put it, the pervasive racial discrimination in elections that led to the passage of the 1965 Voting Rights Act is all in the past.That is why they are now urging the Supreme Court, in a case being argued on Wednesday, to bar states from using any consideration of race when drawing legislative districts, gutting a key plank of the law that was designed to ensure Black voters would have a chance of electing their preferred candidates.Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill told NBC News that the Voting Rights Act was designed to address blatantly discriminatory policies and practices that prevented Black people and other minorities from voting decades ago.“I think the question now is, have we gotten to a point where those obstacles really don’t exist anymore?” she said. “I don’t think they exist in Louisiana,” she added.At issue is a congressional district map that Louisiana grudgingly redrew last year after being sued under the Voting Rights Act to ensure that there were two majority-Black districts. The original map only had one in a state where a third of the population is Black, according to the U.S. census.The state’s new legal argument, which may appeal to a conservative-majority Supreme Court, is that drawing a map to ensure majority-Black districts violates the Constitution’s 14th and 15th Amendments, which were both enacted after the Civil War to ensure former slaves had equal rights under the law, including the right to vote.Supreme Court appears skeptical of LGBTQ conversion therapy bans04:02Conservatives say those amendments bar any consideration of race at any time, and the Supreme Court has previously embraced this “colorblind” interpretation of the Constitution.Civil rights activists say that approach makes a mockery of both the post-Civil War amendments and the Voting Rights Act, not to mention their experience on the ground in Louisiana.Press Robinson, who is one of the plaintiffs who challenged Louisiana’s original congressional map, said he had to sue in 1974 just so he could take his place as an elected official on the East Baton Rouge Parish School Board.“Has Louisiana really changed? I don’t see it,” he told reporters on a recent call.The issue reaches the court, which has a 6-3 conservative majority, just two years after it surprisingly rejected a similar bid to weaken the Voting Rights Act in another redistricting case.The court, however, has struck blows against the law in other rulings in 2013 and 2021.In the 2023 case, the court rejected a Republican-drawn congressional map in Alabama on the grounds that it discriminated against Black voters, leading to a new map being drawn that included two majority-Black districts.The vote was 5-4, with two conservatives, Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Brett Kavanaugh, joining the court’s three liberals in the majority. Four other conservatives dissented.In Wednesday’s oral argument, Kavanaugh will be a focus of attention, in part because of what he said in his separate concurring opinion in the Alabama case.Although Kavanaugh voted with the majority, he expressed some sympathy for the argument that even if race could at one point be considered as a factor in ensuring compliance with the Voting Rights Act, it no longer can be.But, he added, “Alabama did not raise that temporal argument in this Court, and I therefore would not consider it at this time.”Now, piggybacking on Kavanaugh’s opinion, Louisiana’s lawyers eagerly embrace the argument Alabama did not make.Among other things, Louisiana points to the court’s 2023 ruling that ended the consideration of race in college admissions, which was issued just three weeks after the Alabama voting rights ruling.Chris Kieser, a lawyer at the right-leaning Pacific Legal Foundation, which supports Louisiana in the case, said in an interview that the upshot of a ruling in the state’s favor is that there could be no obligation to ever intentionally draw majority-Black districts.“Districts should not be drawn based on the expected race of the — whoever is going to be the member of Congress representing it,” he said.That could lead to a decline in the number of legislators at the national and state level who are Black or Latino.In that scenario, minority voters would still be able to bring separate racial gerrymandering claims under the Constitution if there is obvious racial discrimination, Kieser argued, although such cases are difficult to win.Depending on what the court does, the provision of the Voting Rights Act in question, known as Section 2, could survive in limited form.A ruling that leads to a reduction in majority-Black and other minority districts would have a partisan impact that could favor Republicans, as Black voters historically favor Democrats. If the court rules quickly, there is even a chance that new maps could be drawn ahead of the hotly contested 2026 midterm elections.The case has a convoluted history, arising from litigation over the earlier map drawn by the state Legislature after the 2020 census that included one Black-majority district out of the state’s six districts.The state drew the current map in order to comply with that ruling, but was then sued by a group of self-identified “non-African American” voters who argued that in seeking to comply with the Voting Rights Act, the state had violated the Constitution.The Supreme Court originally heard the current case earlier this year on a narrower set of legal issues but, in an unusual move, asked in June for the parties to reargue it. Over the summer, the court then raised the stakes by asking the lawyers to focus on the constitutional issue.As a result of that complicated background, the various briefs filed in the case — including one submitted by the Trump administration in support of Louisiana — make a number of different legal arguments.That makes it difficult to know ahead of Wednesday’s oral argument what the justices will focus on, said Sophia Lin Lakin, a lawyer at the American Civil Liberties Union who is part of the legal team defending the latest Louisiana map.“It is so strange. Normally, we would always understand the question we are trying to answer,” she said.Lin Lakin does not think the case should be used as the vehicle for a “full-on assault” on the Voting Rights Act.But, she conceded, “there is some risk the way that’s being presented that the court may be interested in that bigger question.”Lawrence HurleyLawrence Hurley is a senior Supreme Court reporter for NBC News.
November 6, 2025
Nancy Pelosi says she will not seek re-election in 2026
Comments are closed.
Scroll To Top
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics
© Copyright 2025 - Be That ! . All Rights Reserved