• Police seek suspects in deadly birthday party shooting
  • Lawmakers launch inquires into U.S. boat strike
  • Nov. 29, 2025, 10:07 PM EST / Updated Nov. 30, 2025,…
  • Mark Kelly says troops ‘can tell’ what orders…

Be that!

contact@bethat.ne.com

 

Be That ! Menu   ≡ ╳
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics Politics
☰

Be that!

Oct. 13, 2025, 10:32 AM EDTBy Rob WileSix months into President Donald Trump’s unprecedented gambit to impose sizable tariffs on imports, U.S. consumers are already shouldering as much as 55% of their costs, according to a new report from Goldman Sachs analysts.And with new tariffs likely on the way, the cost burden could rise even higher, they said. The findings, released Sunday, suggest U.S. consumers will continue to struggle with high prices — something Trump had promised to address in the run-up to his re-election. While inflation rates have come down from the post-Covid peak, they have remained stuck above levels economists consider healthy, causing consumers and businesses alike to continue to report feeling burdened by price increases. Over the past six months, Trump has imposed tariffs on copper, steel, aluminum, and some automobiles and auto parts. He has also levied country-specific tariff rates of as much as 28% on China and 16% on much of the rest of the world, according to the Yale Budget Lab. Partially as a result, consumer prices tracked by the Bureau of Labor Statistics have increased every month since April, when Trump made his “Liberation Day” speech announcing the new duties. As of August, the BLS’ benchmark Consumer Price Index (CPI) stood at 2.93%. September CPI data has been delayed due to the government shutdown, now in its 13th day, and is now slated to be released later this month. A separate inflation measure preferred by the Federal Reserve has likewise continued to climb, rising to 2.7% for August — above the central bank’s 2% target. In August, Trump assailed an initial Goldman Sachs estimate that said consumers could bear as much as 67% of the cost of tariffs. A White House spokesperson did not respond to a request for comment Monday. The Goldman analysts arrived at their estimate of the tariffs’ burden on consumers by comparing how much consumer prices for tariffed products have deviated from previous trends. The burden is actually less than the estimated pass-through that occurred during the trade war Trump set off during his first term in 2018. In that period, evidence suggests foreign exporters did not bear any significant share of the tariff costs at the time, meaning consumers were shouldering even more of a burden.This time, exporters are bearing some cost, along with U.S. businesses, who may actually be sparing consumers even worse price increases for the moment. American companies may be waiting to see how the U.S. Supreme Court rules on tariffs, the Goldman analysts said. Businesses also might have accumulated inventory in advance of the tariffs setting in, allowing them to hold off on raising their retail prices more significantly. The nation’s highest court is set to hear opening arguments in the tariff case Nov. 5.Still, the analysts estimate tariffs have added 0.44% to the Fed’s preferred inflation measure. That figure could rise to as much as 0.6% if Trump makes good on recent threats to impose tariffs on products such as furniture and kitchen cabinets. Those were set to take effect Tuesday. In this scenario, the tariffs’ cost burden borne by consumers could rise to 70%. The analysts’ latest estimate does not take into account Trump’s threat Friday to double the tariffs on China. On Monday, Trump administration officials sought to reassure markets that they did not seek to reignite tensions with America’s largest overseas trading partnerIf those tariffs were to take effect, the impact would be significant, the analysts said. “We are not assuming any changes to tariff rates on imports from China, but events in recent days suggest large risks,” they wrote.Rob WileRob Wile is a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist covering breaking business stories for NBCNews.com.

admin - Latest News - October 13, 2025
admin
21 views 20 secs 0 Comments




Six months into President Donald Trump’s unprecedented gambit to impose sizable tariffs on imports, U.S. consumers are already shouldering as much as 55% of their costs, according to a new report from Goldman Sachs analysts



Source link

TAGS:
PREVIOUS
All living Israeli hostages have been released from Gaza
NEXT
Israeli hostage Evyatar David released by Hamas
Related Post
October 21, 2025
Oct. 21, 2025, 12:50 PM EDTBy Alexander SmithLONDON — Prince Andrew may have given up his titles, but the questions about his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein haven’t given up on him — or Britain’s embattled royal family.Seemingly every day, damaging new reports emerge about Andrew, 65, his friendship with the late pedophile financier, and allegations the prince had sex with trafficked Epstein victim Virginia Roberts Giuffre when she was 17, which he denies.In her posthumous memoir “Nobody’s Girl” released Tuesday, Giuffre, who died by suicide in April at age 41, said Andrew acted as though having sex with her “was his birthright.” Andrew, who in February 2022 reached a legal settlement with Giuffre after she filed a civil case against him in a New York court, has repeatedly denied having met her.’Nobody’s Girl’ by Virginia Giuffre on display at a bookshop in London on Tuesday.Ming Yeung / Getty ImagesBut the rolling scandal refuses to go away, and has the potential to inflict further damage on a monarchy whose popularity continues to dwindle after the death of the widely beloved Queen Elizabeth II in 2022. King Charles III has sought to insulate “the Firm” from the cloud over his younger brother. Andrew said in a statement last week that with Charles’ “agreement,” he would “no longer use my title or the honours which have been conferred upon me,” including Duke of York.But there are still unanswered questions about what the palace knew, and when, with calls from lawmakers and others for the royals to oust Andrew entirely.“The deep and wide support for the queen meant the family was able to better weather all the controversies that could emerge — and this is a bad one,” said Craig Prescott, who teaches law at Royal Holloway, University of London and specializes on the constitutional and political role of the monarchy.“These specific allegations are, of course, extraordinarily damaging in the first place, but they also run counter to some of the causes that members of the royal family take up,” he said.Jeffrey Epstein in 2017.New York State Sex Offender Registry via AP fileFriday’s agreement for Andrew to relinquish his titles came after emails published in documents for a court case not involving the prince showed he had been in contact with Epstein for longer than he previously admitted.That “makes him look, in black and white, a liar,” NBC News’ royal contributor Daisy McAndrew told “TODAY” on Sunday. “And so how can you trust anything else he says?”Then Sunday, London’s Metropolitan Police said it was investigating reports that Andrew had asked one of its officers to dig up dirt on Giuffre. A Buckingham Palace official told NBC News these reports should be “examined in the appropriate way.”Virginia Giuffre (then Roberts) with Prince Andrew and Ghislaine Maxwell at Prince Andrew’s London home, in a photo released with court documents.Monday brought two further revelations: First that Andrew had not paid rent on his Royal Lodge residence for 20 years, revealed in a Freedom of Information request by The Times newspaper to the Crown Estate, which handles royal finances. Neither Andrew nor Buckingham Palace have responded to the report.Then came the publication of Giuffre’s posthumous memoir.She wrote that she had sex with the prince on three occasions, including an “orgy” involving “eight other young girls” who “appeared to be under the age of 18 and didn’t really speak English.”She then suffered three weeks of “irregular bleeding,” before waking up in a “pool of blood” and being taken to hospital by Epstein, she wrote. Epstein, who died by suicide in jail in 2019 shortly after he was arrested on federal sex trafficking charges, later told her she had suffered a miscarriage, and she suspected him of conspiring with the doctor to keep it quiet, Giuffre said.On seeing a photo of Andrew and Epstein walking in New York’s Central Park in 2010 — after Epstein was convicted of soliciting prostitution of someone under the age of 18 — Giuffre wrote she was “revolted to see two of my abusers together, out for a stroll.” But “mostly I was amazed that a member of the Royal Family would be stupid enough to appear in public with Epstein.”Andrew has previously denied these allegations, saying that he has “no recollection of ever meeting this lady, none whatsoever.” In his statement announcing the relinquishment of his titles, he said, “I vigorously deny the accusations against me.”Virginia Giuffre, center, leaves federal court in New York on Aug. 27, 2019.Jeenah Moon / Bloomberg via Getty Images fileThe civil sex abuse lawsuit brought by Giuffre against Andrew was settled out of court for an undisclosed sum.Though Buckingham Palace routinely says it does not speak for the prince, Andrew has enjoyed a prominent role at some recent royal events, including the queen’s funeral.Some lawmakers are demanding that Andrew be formally stripped of his titles by an act of Parliament — a rare foray into regal matters by Britain’s supposedly separate government.The last time this happened was in 1917, when Parliament used the Titles Deprivation Act to strip German members of the British royal family of their titles during World War I.That’s not without risks, according to Prescott at Royal Holloway.”If you have legislation removing the dukedom from Prince Andrew, might a cheeky MP want to table an amendment and remove the dukedom of Sussex from Prince Harry?” he said.The government indicated it does not support this. Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson said Monday that while “our thoughts have to be with the victims of Jeffrey Epstein, these “are matters for the royal family.”The nuclear option would involve the king himself using something called “Letters Patent” to strip Andrew of his designation as prince.In doing so, the palace must weigh distancing itself from Andrew with ensuring the blowback from any further censure does not do even more damage to an institution that requires public buy-in.“It’s true that the monarchy isn’t voted in,” Prescott said. “But if the public mood shifted and people no longer wanted to have the monarchy, then you imagine that politics would follow.”Alexander SmithAlexander Smith is a senior reporter for NBC News Digital based in London.Mahalia Dobson, Max Taylor and Jackson Peck contributed.
November 17, 2025
Trump says he would sign bill to release Epstein files
October 4, 2025
Sanae Takaichi Set to Become Japan First Female Prime Minister
October 29, 2025
Hurricane Melissa leaves trail of devastation in Jamaica
Comments are closed.
Scroll To Top
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics
© Copyright 2025 - Be That ! . All Rights Reserved