• Police seek suspects in deadly birthday party shooting
  • Lawmakers launch inquires into U.S. boat strike
  • Nov. 29, 2025, 10:07 PM EST / Updated Nov. 30, 2025,…
  • Mark Kelly says troops ‘can tell’ what orders…

Be that!

contact@bethat.ne.com

 

Be That ! Menu   ≡ ╳
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics Politics
☰

Be that!

Remembering Cliff Lambert

admin - Latest News - October 10, 2025
admin
33 views 11 secs 0 Comments



Cliff’s friends remember him as a larger-than-life personality who loved the finer things, and cherished his friends.



Source link

TAGS:
PREVIOUS
President Trump makes an announcement on lowering drug prices
NEXT
Are there health benefits to communal screaming?
Related Post
November 11, 2025
Savewith a NBCUniversal ProfileCreate your free profile or log in to save this articleNov. 11, 2025, 5:00 AM ESTBy Steve KornackiWith the government shutdown now poised to end, it’s clear Republicans are in worse shape politically now than when it started. The question is whether that will prove to be temporary — as has been the case with past funding showdowns — or if the political atmosphere has been reset in a way that will linger into next year’s midterm elections. As the six-week shutdown played out, President Donald Trump’s job approval rating ebbed to the lowest point of his second term, with a majority of voters pinning the blame on him and Republicans in Congress. Democrats opened up a wide lead in the generic congressional ballot — 8 points in our NBC News poll, a level last seen in the run-up to the “blue wave” in the 2018 midterms.And then there was last Tuesday, when Democrats posted an unexpected landslide in New Jersey, a state where both parties saw the gubernatorial contest as competitive and recent elections had suggested Republican momentum. Gov.-elect Mikie Sherrill’s victory was so staggering that it lifted a host of down-ballot Democrats and gave the party its largest state Assembly majority in a half-century. The Democratic rout was even bigger in Virginia: The party’s deeply flawed candidate for attorney general, Jay Jones, coasted easily on the coattails of Gov.-elect Abigail Spanberger.An unpopular president, a wide generic ballot gap and off-year election results like this are all early warning signals of a midterm debacle for Republicans. But they have been here before. And in two previous shutdowns, Republicans saw their public standing buckle only for it to recover in its aftermath.This was the case during President Barack Obama’s second term, when a dispute over funding for Obamacare precipitated a government shutdown that started on Oct. 1, 2013, and lasted for several weeks. Like now, the public sided squarely against the GOP. An NBC News poll at the time showed voters blamed congressional Republicans over Obama by a 22-point margin. Like now, Republicans suddenly found themselves 8 points behind on the generic ballot. And like now, there was apparent fallout in that year’s elections, with Democrat Terry McAuliffe narrowly defeating Republican Ken Cuccinelli in the Virginia governor’s race.Cuccinelli had liabilities as a candidate, but 2013 stands as the so the shutdown drama of late 1995, a collision between the Republican Congress, led by Speaker Newt Gingrich, R-Ga., and President Bill Clinton. And the public’s verdict was clear: They blamed the GOP. The political legacy of that 1995 shutdown is complicated. Clinton’s standing did improve, while Gingrich’s fell to a level from which he never fully recovered. It also established a framework for Clinton’s 1996 re-election campaign, when he presented himself as a middle-of-the-road bulwark against the ideological fervor of congressional Republicans and Gingrich himself. Clinton ended up breezing to victory over Sen. Bob Dole of Kansas in one of the least suspenseful presidential campaigns of modern times. House Speaker Newt Gingrich, left, gestures during a budget meeting with President Bill Clinton and Senate Majority Leader Bob Dole in December 1995.Greg Gibson / AP fileBut critically, most of the political benefits that Clinton reaped didn’t extend to the rest of his party. During the shutdown, Democrats opened a sizable lead on the generic congressional ballot, but the gap narrowed again by early 1996. It fluctuated as the year progressed, but ultimately Republicans lost only four House seats — even as Clinton won the popular vote by 8 points. The 1996 election marked the first time since 1928 that a GOP House majority lasted more than a single term. With the current shutdown seemingly at its end, the hope for Republicans is that over the next month, polling will return to its pre-shutdown levels — meaning a bump in Trump’s approval rating and a tightening of the generic ballot.The GOP would still face some serious 2026 headwinds, with the economy remaining a top concern to voters and Trump receiving poor marks for his handling of it (not to mention the history of the president’s party struggling in midterms). Still, through a combination of the Democratic Party’s own image problem and the new congressional maps Republicans are drawing in some states, they would conceivably have a chance to hold their own.But that’s only if the shutdown effect proves to be temporary. If the political environment stays like this — or gets worse — Republicans could be staring at a wipeout.Steve KornackiSteve Kornacki is the chief data analyst for NBC News.
November 21, 2025
Media companies submit bids for Warner Bros. Discovery
September 25, 2025
ICE director calls Dallas shooting 'worst nightmare'
September 23, 2025
Sept. 23, 2025, 4:00 PM EDTBy Daniella Silva, Rob Wile and Nicole AcevedoAfter announcing a new $100,000 fee on H-1B visas, the Trump administration on Tuesday proposed overhauling the visa’s lottery selection process to prioritize higher-paid and higher-skilled foreign employees.The proposed policy changes could reignite the debate over the use of foreign labor by U.S. employers. The move comes as President Donald Trump has taken aim at H-1B visas, a program used widely by Big Tech and outsourcing companies to hire foreign workers, announcing Friday that companies would be required to pay a $100,000 fee with new applications submitted after Sept. 21. The administration on Tuesday targeted H-1B visa allocation, proposing a “weighted selection process” for when annual demand for the visas tops the 85,000 limit set by Congress, which it says has happened every year for more than a decade. The new process would replace the current lottery system that determines who gets to apply for those limited visa spots in favor of putting more weight on higher skilled and higher paid foreign workers, according to a proposed rule set to be published in the Federal Register on Wednesday. Under the current lottery rules, offers to apply for an H-1B visa are assigned at random. The Trump administration’s proposal would assign prospective employees to four different wage bands, with workers in the highest wage category being entered into the selection pool four times and those in the lowest wage category being entered into the selection pool once. The Department of Homeland Security stated in the proposal that the weighted system would better serve the visa program’s original intent and “incentivize employers to offer higher wages or higher skilled positions to H-1B workers and disincentivize the existing widespread use of the H-1B program to fill lower paid or lower skilled positions.”It said the proposed selection process would still maintain opportunities for employers to hire H-1B workers at “all wage levels.” ‘A strong signal’The H-1B visa program allows U.S. employers to temporarily hire skilled foreign workers in “specialty occupations” across health care, tech and finance industries, and other STEM-related fields.The two new proposed policies together send “a strong signal of the direction that the administration wants to go,” said Xiao Wang, CEO of Boundless Immigration, a company that offers services to people navigating the immigration process in the U.S.If adopted, the policies would benefit companies seeking to keep foreigners with specialized skills who studied at American universities in the U.S., as well as ensuring H-1B visas “disproportionately go to people who are deemed higher skilled, represented by higher wages and higher salary,” he said.Trump stated Friday that changes were needed in the visa system, saying it was designed to bring in temporary workers with “additive, high-skilled functions, but it has been deliberately exploited to replace, rather than supplement, American workers with lower-paid, lower-skilled labor.”For the last H-1B lottery round, which closed its registration in March, about 339,000 people applied. Of those, 120,141 applications were selected for the lottery, according to USCIS data.The proposal faces a 30-day public comment period before it is considered by the administration for a final rule, a process that could take months.If the changes are adopted, companies seeking to hire lower-wage workers from India and China for computer-related jobs appear likely to be among the most affected. For more than a decade, about 60% of H-1B workers approved every year have held computer-related jobs, according to Pew Research.Start-ups and smaller companies who cannot afford to pay their workers in the higher pay categories compared to major tech companies would also be impacted, Wang said.Deedy Das, a partner at Menlo Ventures venture capital group, said in a social media post that the latest proposal would hurt many tech companies.“Overall, it’s really bad for startups, early employees, helps IT consulting shops and can be easily gamed,“ Das wrote.Trump’s announcement of a new $100,000 fee on H-1B visas touched off a frenzy among current visa holders, the companies that employ them and countries around the world as they worked to understand the edict.Eventually, the White House clarified that it would be a one-time fee and apply only to new visa applicants. Trump said companies would have to pay the fee for new H-1B visa applications submitted after Sept. 21. That’s a steep rise from current fees, which are usually $2,000 to about $5,000.Both the fee and Tuesday’s proposal are likely to face challenges in court. A growing chorus on both the left and the right say an over-reliance on the visa by U.S. firms has put U.S.-born workers at a disadvantage. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick has called the H-1B visa program a “scam,” while the left-leaning Economic Policy Institute has claimed that some of the companies most reliant on H-1B visas, such as Amazon and Facebook’s parent, Meta, have also had sizable layoffs, though it did not cite evidence that the use of the visa and the layoffs are related.In the first half of 2025, Amazon received approval for more than 12,000 H-1B visas, while Meta received more than 5,000. Representatives for both companies did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Daniella SilvaDaniella Silva is a national reporter for NBC News, focusing on immigration and education.Rob WileRob Wile is a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist covering breaking business stories for NBCNews.com.Nicole AcevedoNicole Acevedo is a national reporter for NBC News and NBC Latino.
Comments are closed.
Scroll To Top
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics
© Copyright 2025 - Be That ! . All Rights Reserved