• Police seek suspects in deadly birthday party shooting
  • Lawmakers launch inquires into U.S. boat strike
  • Nov. 29, 2025, 10:07 PM EST / Updated Nov. 30, 2025,…
  • Mark Kelly says troops ‘can tell’ what orders…

Be that!

contact@bethat.ne.com

 

Be That ! Menu   ≡ ╳
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics Politics
☰

Be that!

Remembering Dr. Steven Schwartz

admin - Latest News - November 1, 2025
admin
19 views 10 secs 0 Comments



Friends and family share how Dr. Schwartz’s kindness and care for his patients left a lasting impression.



Source link

TAGS:
PREVIOUS
Savewith a NBCUniversal ProfileCreate your free profile or log in to save this articleNov. 1, 2025, 5:15 AM EDTBy Jeremy Mikula and Melinda YaoTrade talks between the United States and China take place, a beloved children’s author has a new book, and a Russian weapon picks up a 007 codename. Test your knowledge of this week’s news, and take last week’s quiz here. Jeremy MikulaJeremy Mikula is the weekend director of platforms for NBC News.Melinda YaoI am an intern for NBC News’ Data / Graphics team.Lara Horwitz and Amina Kilpatrick contributed.
NEXT
Nov. 1, 2025, 5:00 AM EDTBy Alexandra MarquezAs the federal government shutdown passes the one-month mark, a new round of impacts is set to hit millions of Americans on Saturday.A chief concern for lawmakers on both sides of the aisle in recent weeks was the impending lapse in funding for SNAP benefits, colloquially known as food stamps, for which millions of people were set to lose benefits on Saturday.Over 40 million Americans rely on SNAP benefits to purchase food, leading to concerns from elected officials that millions could go hungry. Governors and other state leaders from dozens of states across the country have said that they will free up emergency funds in their states to temporarily assist families that usually rely on their SNAP benefits to purchase food.A coalition of municipalities, nonprofit groups and business and union organizations sued earlier this week, requesting that a federal judge in Rhode Island force the Trump administration to use contingency funds in the U.S. Department of Agriculture to pay out SNAP benefits.On Friday, U.S District Judge John McConnell did just that, ordering the USDA to distribute money from a contingency fund “as soon as possible,” in time for Nov. 1 SNAP payments to be made.Despite the ruling, issued from the bench just hours before the Nov. 1. deadline, SNAP benefits are likely to be delayed. McConnell asked the Trump administration for an update on Monday on its efforts to pay out SNAP benefits. President Donald Donald Trump said later Friday that he directed lawyers for the administration to seek clarity but that “even if we get immediate guidance, it will unfortunately be delayed while States get the money out.”We’d like to hear from you about how you’re experiencing the government shutdown, whether you’re a federal employee who can’t work right now, a person who relies on federal benefits like SNAP, or someone who is feeling the effects of other shuttered services in your everyday life. Please contact us at tips@nbcuni.com or reach out to us here.Another program that will be forced to shutter in states across the country is Head Start, which provides free learning programs, health screenings and meals to young children from low-income families. Over 130 Head Start programs that serve almost 59,000 children around the nation did not receive their federal funding on Saturday and will close their doors if they cannot find alternative funding for the duration of the shutdown.Senate lawmakers left town earlier this week after failing again to negotiate a path out of the shutdown. While most Senate Republicans and some Democrats have repeatedly voted on a stopgap funding measure that would fund the government through Nov. 21 and has already passed in the House, the measure has failed so far to reach the 60-vote threshold for passage.Senate Democratic leaders say that they won’t vote alongside GOP lawmakers to reopen the government without some kind of deal to extend Affordable Care Act subsidies, which expire at the end of the year. On Saturday, open enrollment for health insurance plans under the ACA — which cover more than 24 million Americans — began, revealing to customers how much their premiums could spike next year without an extension of the subsidies.One analysis by the Kaiser Family Foundation found that insurers are raising premiums by an average of 17% or 30%, depending on whether the states they’re in are using the federal marketplace or individual state marketplaces. Those price hikes, combined with the expiration of enhanced subsidies, could lead to premiums jumping by 114% on average for Americans using the ACA and could lead to millions of people going uninsured over the next eight years.Americans traveling by air this weekend could experience delays in transit due to staffing shortages at airports after air traffic controllers and Transportation Security Administration workers received their first zero-dollar paycheck earlier this week.Pressure on lawmakers over airport staffing shortages helped end the 2019 government shutdown.If congressional lawmakers don’t find a way to reopen the government by Wednesday — the 36th day of the government’s closure — the ongoing shutdown will set a record for being the longest government shutdown in history. It would surpass the shutdown that began on Dec. 22, 2018, during Trump’s first term, and lasted 35 days.Alexandra MarquezAlexandra Marquez is a politics reporter for NBC News.Berkeley Lovelace Jr. , Megan Lebowitz, Sahil Kapur, Scott Wong, Rebecca Kaplan and Gary Grumbach contributed.
Related Post
October 8, 2025
Former FBI Director James Comey pleads not guilty
September 22, 2025
Videos supposedly show Teslas failing to stop at railroad crossings in self-driving mode
September 30, 2025
Plane makes emergency landing on California freeway
November 18, 2025
Nov. 18, 2025, 9:28 AM ESTBy Alexander SmithTo hear President Donald Trump tell it, this was “one of the biggest approvals in the history of the United Nations,” a “moment of true historic proportion” that would ” lead to further peace all over the world.” But the gravity of the U.N. Security Council’s endorsement of the U.S. Gaza plan raised renewed questions Tuesday over how it will actually work. Most pressingly, it is not clear whether those at the heart of this conflict — the Palestinians and the Israelis themselves — actually support its end goals.Hamas, which still controls around half of the strip, outright rejected the resolution and said it robs Palestinians of their own agency, effectively allowing Trump free reign over the Gaza Strip for the next two years. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu welcomed its passage, but previously said he rejects its talk of “Palestinian self-determination and statehood” — which his far-right allies disavow.On a practical level, the proposal says it will require the creation of several as-yet-non-existent bodies, including the “Board of Peace” headed by Trump, and the International Stabilization Force, or ISF, whose troops could be drawn from Turkey, the United Arab Emirates and as far away as Indonesia. Displaced Palestinians try to protect their belongings from damage after heavy rain in the Austrian Quarter of Khan Younis, Gaza on Sunday.Abed Rahim Khatib / Anadolu via Getty ImagesThat said, this was a rare moment of geopolitical unity.Trump’s team won the support of Arab states by inserting language hinting at a future Palestinian state, and Russia and China abstained from the vote rather than using their vetoes to torpedo the proposal outright.In the event, it passed 13-0.Summarizing the mood Tuesday, U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres welcomed the vote as an “an important step,” but cautioned that it was “essential now to translate the diplomatic momentum into concrete and urgently needed steps on the ground,” his office said in a statement.It’s a sentiment shared by many observers.Frank Lowenstein, former special envoy for Israeli-Palestinian negotiations under President Barack Obama, told NBC News that passing the resolution was “essential” for Trump’s proposal.”There was no way this Trump plan could possibly work without a U.N. Security Council resolution,” he said. Not only will it impart “the credibility and the legitimacy and the clear support of the international community,” but it “provides an opportunity to begin creating a new reality, to begin moving forward with the process in a way that will give people hope.”He cautioned however that the resolution’s passage was “nowhere near sufficient,” principally because the U.N. has no enforcement mechanism, and that the ISF was immediately rejected by Hamas.The rubble of destroyed buildings in northern Gaza’s Jabalia Camp, on Sunday.Saeed M. M. T. Jaras / Anadolu via Getty ImagesThe resolution claims that “the parties” to the conflict “have accepted it.” But it’s not clear that is the case.The main Palestinian governmental body, the Palestinian Authority, said in a statement Tuesday that it welcomed the resolution and expressed its “full readiness to cooperate” with the United States and its backers.But Hamas, the perpetrators of the Oct. 7, 2023, attack, said the agreement did not meet the “political and humanitarian demands and rights” of the Palestinian people.The Palestinian militant-political group, which is designated a terrorist organization by the U.S. and would be disarmed under the deal, said in a statement that the mandate it grants to the ISF to use force “strips it of its neutrality, and turns it into a party to the conflict in favor of the occupation.”NBC News has contacted the White House for a response to these criticisms.Netanyahu praised Trump and “his tireless and devoted team,” saying he believed the plan “will lead to peace and prosperity because it insists upon full demilitarization, disarmament and the deradicalization of Gaza.”But just a day earlier the Israeli prime minister had firmly rejected the resolution’s call for “a pathway towards Palestinian self-determination and eventual statehood,” under pressure from his far-right coalition partners.Even putting these differences to one side, there are big question marks about how the basics of this plan will work in practice.“There is a genuine sense of relief that we are moving forward to diplomacy,” said Nimrod Goren, the president of the Mitvim Institute, a progressive Israeli think tank.“On the other hand, it’s not really clear where all this is headed,” he added. “What is the commitment of the leaders, the motivations of those behind it? And can it actually lead us away from the status quo in which Hamas still controls part of Gaza and Israel controls other parts around it?”On his Truth Social platform, Trump said members of the Board of Peace would be named in the coming weeks — having previously said British Prime Minister Tony Blair would be involved — and to expect “many more exciting announcements.””There are all kinds of new terminology and mechanisms that do not yet exist,” said Goren. “So there are a lot of question marks on the basic premises: What is their mandate? How will they be set up?”Indonesia, one of the backers of the U.S. proposal, says it is readying 20,000 troops to deploy to the ISF. But they are unlikely to head into Gaza so long as Hamas opposes the deal, according to Lowenstein.”Nobody’s going to send troops to be a part of the stabilization force that’s going to be fighting Hamas,” he said.Alexander SmithAlexander Smith is a senior reporter for NBC News Digital based in London.
Comments are closed.
Scroll To Top
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Contact Us
  • Politics
© Copyright 2025 - Be That ! . All Rights Reserved